Is Signal App Owned by China And Is It
Safe To Use? Inside Pete Hegseth's Leaked
Group Chat
International Business Times UK,
by
Vinay Patel
Original Article
Posted By: MaximusP,
3/25/2025 7:54:30 AM
Signal, a messaging app known for its end-to-end encryption and focus on privacy, is facing renewed scrutiny in an era where digital security is a growing concern. Questions about its ownership and reliability have surfaced, particularly after a leaked group chat involving Fox News host Pete Hegseth came to light.
According to a report published by The Atlantic on Monday, members of former President Donald Trump's national security team, including his defence chief, used Signal to discuss classified military plans
Post Reply
Reminder: “WE ARE A SALON AND NOT A SALOON”
Your thoughts, comments, and ideas are always welcome here. But we ask you to please be mindful and respectful. Threatening or crude language doesn't persuade anybody and makes the conversation less enjoyable for fellow L.Dotters.
I won’t bother opening the article. It is obviously not reliable based on posted blurb. Pete Hegseth is SecDef, not FOX News host. President Donald Trump is current president, not former president.
22 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
downnout 3/25/2025 8:27:52 AM (No. 1920919)
SecDef needs to have an extremely tough investigation of the people working for him. Just imagine the chaos those individuals could cause. It wouldn’t surprise me a bit to find out there is a high-level mole.
16 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
skacmar 3/25/2025 8:31:35 AM (No. 1920921)
Everyone keeps reporting this as Hegseth's text leak. It was not Hegseth who screwed up and added a liberal reporter to a group chat. It was Mike Waltz, National Security Advisor. Unfortunately mess ups happen and in this case the liberal media ran with it.
13 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
red1066 3/25/2025 9:07:29 AM (No. 1920938)
Does anyone check these sites for ownership and security before using them? How about checking the personnel responsible for maintaining the operation of this site. Who put what info in and when, and if this site is owned by the Chinese, why are they using it to discuss secret information, and why is this info being discussed over the internet? Have these people never heard of holding a meeting with everyone in one place. Seems common sense is still in short supply in D.C.
6 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Red Ghost 3/25/2025 9:11:38 AM (No. 1920940)
Thanks post #1. Unfortunately, I thought it might be a legitimate article and opened it up. I too, stopped reading when the writer described Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth as a Fox News host. Another garbage hit piece.
10 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
bighambone 3/25/2025 9:54:11 AM (No. 1920959)
In the years ahead, who knows, we may find out that this fiasco was really a manipulated covert “false flag” style operation, using a far left media type, to let the Houthi’s in Yemen and and the Mullahs of Iran have a glimpse of the overwhelming military action that they could be facing if they persist in attacking ships, especially US Navy vessels, on the high seas. When it comes to so-called “war plans” when deemed necessary, they historically been changed to meet changing strategic and tactical objectives.
5 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
hershey 3/25/2025 9:57:07 AM (No. 1920963)
The only really 'secure' communication is person to person..anything else, you're just fooling yourself that it is secure..anything that man can encript, man can decrypt....
8 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Axeman 3/25/2025 10:11:05 AM (No. 1920974)
It's more secure than WhatsApp, owned by Meta Zuckerface.
And, could it be that it was intentional? Misdirection? Misleading intelligence?
Who's laughing?
3 people like this.
The article claims a conflict between what Pete Hegseth said about this and what the White House said about this. Pete Hegseth said (as quoted in the article) "Nobody was texting war plans, and that's all I have to say about that." The article then claimed that the White House confirmation that the text conversation was authenticate was a contradiction of what the SecDef said. But the SecDef never said that Goldberg was not in the text conversation, he said that war plans were not texted. No contradiction, not even a mild conflict, between those two statements.
2 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
DVC 3/25/2025 1:53:20 PM (No. 1921100)
NOTHING that is on your phone is EVER "secure". People who pay bills and do banking on their phones are just naive, and WILL eventually be ripped off and money stolen.
Any source that tells you that their phone app "is totally secure" is either intentionally lying to you, or woefully naive....and some of the latter are also "highly paid IT professionals"......who are hopelessly naive.
2 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Hermit_Crab 3/25/2025 3:07:48 PM (No. 1921128)
Why is the Federal Government using ANY public app / website, China owned, American corporate owned, Anyone in the private sector owned, or foreign government owned; to discuss sensitive stuff, much less war plans? Their 'online meetings' if they have to have them at all, should be over highly secure government owned networks and machines, ones that require their government credentials to be entered to access.
Maybe a couple of Elon's bright boys could take a week off from chasing faraudsters to design the system and write the code for it.
1 person likes this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "MaximusP"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)