U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson
Rules the Bureaucracy Controls the Executive
Branch, Not the President

Impeach her. She has shown she is too incompetent to perform her duties.

Corrupt judge that has no acquaintance with our Constitution.

Take away her robe. Take away her law degree. Encourage her to learn to code.

Our judicial branch of government looks like an evil clown show.

Excellent. This will force the SCOTUS to slap her down with the Constitution and clarify the law for the rest of the liberal judges. Once the SCOTUS has ruled, "resistance" comes with a much higher cost, including censorship and impeachment. The farce with these liberal judges is coming to an end.

Fine, he claims he can only be fired for poor job performance, then fire him for that. Otherwise, put him in a closet of an office with a desk and a chair, no staff, take his security clearance and take away all of his duties. Make him useless.

She needs to go back to the 7th grade and read about how we have three branches of government here i the USA.

I guess then we need to put these folks in an office building, no phone, wifi, computers, etc, require them to be there from 8 to 5 five days a week , and remain on the government payroll under all the responsibilities thereon. We got lots of empty buildings. The cost cuts will have to wait until DOGE 2.0.

It's always the U.S. District Court. Democrats own it, lock stock and barrel. What kind of authority does the President have if some jag off Judge can over rule his authority. If it were ruled that the president over stepped his authority when he fired this dork, then that over ruling should come from the supreme Court, not from some judge with a hard on for Trump.

Wrong again, will be overturned.

What to do about another lawfare judge proving their ignorance or incompetence? Even if Dellinger was dismissed in error (LMFAO) his legal recourse is not reinstatement but financial compensation. This all part of the "gum up the works" plan. Be that as it may, she's clearly proved herself biased and incompetent and should be removed. Unfortunately, impeachment requires two thirds majority in the Senate. The Supremes better quash this Judicial Insurrection and PDQ!

Thanks for your ILLEGAL Decision, Pound Broken Glass!

Why did I have to scroll into the PDF opinion to learn that she's a federal judge for DC? So much interesting subject matter gets spoiled by poor reportage.

John Roberts: "Here we go again, cleaning up the messes of the lower courts. This is getting old."

Give Hampton Dellinger, an office in the Men's Room.

Set her up for a cage match with Pam Bondi. Tickets go on sale here tomorrow.

So now WE know what the democrat game plan against President Trump is...tie him up in court...except these little glitches are not stopping him...it's full steam head....ya gotta feel sorry for the democrats...every time they get up to bat...they strike out...WE the people are celebrating ...winning...winning...winning...and they keep losing...losing...losing....tomorrow night President Trump will outline his agenda for US...and no nervous Nancy Pelousy sitting behind him and tearing up his speech notes...ya gotta love this!!

She meant to add, "Unless the President is a Democrat!" They want very badly to own Trump. Neva happen!

We need a fast-track, Judicial, "Impeach & Remove," proceeding for cases where SCOTUS reverses ANY Federal Judge's ruling involving an egregious error on "Constitution 101" matters. Lifetime appointments bring grave responsibilities requiring constant oversight.

District Courts were established by Congress and signed into law by sitting presidents, per the Constitution's, Article III, Section 1: "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish." Because Congress has the authority to decide whether the lower federal courts should exist, the legislature is also understood to enjoy broad power to structure the lower courts, make procedural rules for them, and regulate their jurisdiction. The Executive Branch, described and structured by Article II is headed by the president, who in Section 3 is commanded to "...take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed, and shall Commission all the Officers of the United States." In carrying out the Take Care clause, it has long been established that the president has the right of removal of any Officer of the United States, provided that such removal doesn't violate any other Constitutionally established public law. I'm sure Sundance knows this but it is not in keeping with his compelling narrative, given the law fare faced by Trump throughout the Biden Administration. The question that the Supreme Court may consider, if the Judge Jackon's ruling is appealed, is precisely what public law was allegedly violated by the president's exercise of his removal power. The provisions within the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978, may be in play here; however, there are at least a dozen laws dealing with Equal Opportunity Employment matters in federal employment alone, largely addressed by democrat controlled Congressional majorities, that may impact on the specific matter of the Jackson ruling.

That's been a complaint for some time but the government didn't want to change things, democrat and republican. There has never been any legal action taken by the various cabinet members that make regulations that were eventually to become law that was never sanctified by the congress.