BREAKING: AG Pam Bondi tells Jesse Watters,
“Some Epstein Information” Will Be
Released Tomorrow – Including Flight
Logs! (Video
Gateway Pundit,
by
Jim Hoft
Original Article
Posted By: Imright,
2/26/2025 11:28:50 PM
Attorney General Pam Bondi told Jesse Watters on FOX News on Wednesday night that “some Epstein information”
Pam Bondi told Watters there are over 200 Epstein victims and the number may be 250!
Jesse Watters: One of the things a lot of people are wondering, because you said last week that you have the Epstein files on your desk, is when can we see them and what’s taking so long to release them?
AG Pam Bondi: I do. Jesse, there are well over, this will make you sick, 200 victims, 200! Well over… over 250, actually.
Post Reply
Reminder: “WE ARE A SALON AND NOT A SALOON”
Your thoughts, comments, and ideas are always welcome here. But we ask you to please be mindful and respectful. Threatening or crude language doesn't persuade anybody and makes the conversation less enjoyable for fellow L.Dotters.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Californian 2/26/2025 11:55:38 PM (No. 1904553)
Flight logs are junk.
Where's the client list?
10 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Lawsy0 2/27/2025 12:08:11 AM (No. 1904558)
Flight Logs: Fifty couples named Mr. & Mrs. Smith.
14 people like this.
A little red meat to keep the base engaged while they try to figure out how to bury the worst.
14 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
singermom9 2/27/2025 1:31:26 AM (No. 1904572)
Can someone who knows how to get a message to Bondi as her to investigate this? Ought to shut up the dems if this LIST and $'s paid re HUSH MONEY comes out
Dems maybe you should ask Ashley Biden abt how her father Joey took NASTY showers with her growing up OR the women like Tara Reade who claimed, along w others, that Joey raped her or the other VILE things Joey does that the dems cover up. So dems don't want a rapist in thew WH. Well, they already have 1 and a child molester too. And check out the Office of Compliance Hush Money bill signed in 1995 with 268 settlements so far paid for by OUR tax dollars (17.2 MILLION).
Dems are upset abt Trump and Stormy? At least HE used his own money Conyers and the dems have used OUR tax dollars to help them get re-elected and look pure while being charged with vile deeds by others. Let's be TRANSPARENT and look at the 268 settlements. WHO are the elected leaders who were charged and WE PAID SETTLEMENTS for to keep them in office? I bet dems "settled" w all these people to get RE-ELECTED. Just like they are claiming abt Trump.
I did not know if you were aware of this law that was passed re paying TAX DOLLARS for misconduct of our elected officials. I guess Trump should have paid Stormy with THIS money. Just like Congress does. Here is my response to the article listed above. In 1995 a bill was passed by the Office of Compliance. It allows our elected officials who are charged with discrimination, including sexually, to get paid settlements with OUR TAX DOLLARS. (at least Trump used his own money). As of 2017 there were 268 settlements made and it cost the taxpayers $17.2 MILLION dollars. So if they put Trump in jail for Stormy then ALL of the reps that had charges brought against them should be in jail too. THAT is NOT going to happen.
THIS is no secret. Here is 1 story. https://www.axios.com/2017/12/15/congress-has-paid-17-million-in-sexual-misconduct-and-discrimination-settlements-1513307017 Congress has paid $17.2 million in sexual misconduct and discrimination settlements Amazing how dems are so SELECTIVE in attacking those they want to eliminate and yet they protect their own isn't it? I bet very few people know abt this. Justice for ALL no longer applies to repubs anymore. Dems hide what they they do while accusing repubs of misdeeds.
10 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
NotaBene 2/27/2025 2:36:48 AM (No. 1904579)
It wasn’t me.
2 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
watashiyo 2/27/2025 2:41:30 AM (No. 1904580)
Hmmmmm.... Not quite transparent and awkward innuendos. Just open up the spigots and let the taxpayers sort it out. "A wishful thinking."
10 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
SweetPea3 2/27/2025 4:16:53 AM (No. 1904594)
Quit yapping and release the list already!
For cryin out loud.
21 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
DCGIRL 2/27/2025 6:36:44 AM (No. 1904634)
My bet, she will release the remaining information but I'm thinking she is allowing everyone on Epstein's list know they were on it. Sort of preparing them for the smack in the face and to let their spouses know what will come out. Just a guess.
5 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
gwholmessr 2/27/2025 6:43:22 AM (No. 1904640)
Nothing is going to come out that we don't already know. Keep in mind, Bondi was the one that ruined George Zimmerman life.
3 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
5 handicap 2/27/2025 6:54:18 AM (No. 1904646)
Any Government Transparency or claim thereto is BULLSHIT! Releasing information takes less than 5 seconds..."Here it is" and hand it over! Anytime it requires review it is being REDACTED! SOOO, Ms Bondi please stop LYING to us and turn over the documents, Today!
9 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
anniebc 2/27/2025 6:55:50 AM (No. 1904649)
I don't like how Bondi shifted to focusing on the victims in the interview. We know there are victims; we don't want to know about the victims, we get it; we want her to give US the victimizers. Bring justice to the victims by prosecuting the victimizers. I feel like she's not being transparent. Now if she's working on the prosecutions, she should just say it's going to take some time to review everything she has; stop talking tough until you have some real action to take. She should know we won't be satisfied with vague flight logs; those logs better have some teeth.
10 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
chumley 2/27/2025 6:57:05 AM (No. 1904652)
No. No more teasers that amount to nothing. Either release the list or give a good reason why not. Keeping most of congress in office is not a good reason.
8 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
tootall 2/27/2025 7:03:00 AM (No. 1904658)
It seems to me there are some very big names on here she is afraid to release. So there has to be Republicans and Conservatives here too. It makes me wonder if the biggest names are there and it won't be long before that leaks out. Just do it!
6 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
downnout 2/27/2025 7:31:16 AM (No. 1904676)
I’ll believe it when I see it.
4 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
privateer 2/27/2025 7:58:52 AM (No. 1904689)
Choose your partner for the Potomac Two-step. Promise the moon; deliver a crumb of green cheese.
5 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
Strike3 2/27/2025 7:59:10 AM (No. 1904690)
The flight logs were published shortly after Epstein's arrest and disappeared just as quickly. Some very interesting names appeared on there and some were denied as being people with the same name, like John Roberts. Bill Clinton could not find an excuse. Anybody flying to Epstein Island would be staying at the compound because there's little else there except sand. This could be big or it could be heavily redacted. Don't forget about the video cameras both on the island and in the Manhattan lair. We will definitely not see those films. Ghislaine Maxwell could have made millions by publishing a book with her inside knowledge. Maybe that's why she is still socked away in prison. I hope she has a better suicide watch than Jeffrey did.
7 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
Strike3 2/27/2025 8:01:43 AM (No. 1904691)
Some of the "victims" were sold by their parents. Those also need to be sorted out.
2 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
jasonB 2/27/2025 8:13:42 AM (No. 1904699)
Lest we all forget. Bondi has a BOSS. He could get all of this released in about 5 minutes if he really WANTED to.
Client names (if we even see a relevant name) are okay.
WHO was running Epstein?
WHO gave him cover? You don't run an international blackmail ring without VERY powerful people/nations backing you up.
6 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
Venturer 2/27/2025 8:21:11 AM (No. 1904704)
It's obvious this has sat at the Justice Department for a long time.
Why was it never acted on before.?
When do the indictments begin.?
Now we are starting to see why the Democrats fought so hard to keep a real FBI from being reformed.
5 people like this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
coldoc 2/27/2025 10:22:36 AM (No. 1904785)
It appears this administration is no more interested in releasing this than the previous. Very disappointing. We want the client list, and stop screwing around!
2 people like this.
Reply 21 - Posted by:
justjoe1237 2/27/2025 12:07:38 PM (No. 1904854)
Oh shut up Pam!
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Imright"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)