Judge blocks Musk team access to Treasury
Department records
BBC [UK],
by
Mallory Moench
Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought,
2/8/2025 1:49:39 PM
A federal judge has blocked Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (Doge) from accessing the personal financial data of millions of Americans in Treasury Department records, according to court documents.
US District Judge Paul A. Engelmayer issued a preliminary injunction on Saturday to prohibit access, ordering Musk and his team to immediately destroy any copies of records.
The move comes after 19 state attorneys general sued the Trump administration after Doge, a cost-cutting initiative led by Musk, was given access to the records.
They argued access for Musk, a "special government employee", and Doge, which is not an official government department, violated federal law.
Post Reply
Reminder: “WE ARE A SALON AND NOT A SALOON”
Your thoughts, comments, and ideas are always welcome here. But we ask you to please be mindful and respectful. Threatening or crude language doesn't persuade anybody and makes the conversation less enjoyable for fellow L.Dotters.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
itsonlyme 2/8/2025 2:06:36 PM (No. 1892249)
Janet Yellen
Janet Louise Yellen
August 13, 1946 (age 78)
"Janet Louise Yellen (born August 13, 1946) is an American economist who served as the 78th United States secretary of the treasury from 2021 to 2025."
"On November 30, 2020, President-elect Joe Biden nominated Yellen to serve as secretary of the treasury; she was confirmed by the U.S. Senate on January 25, 2021, and was sworn in by Vice President Kamala Harris the following day"
10 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Mike22 2/8/2025 2:19:09 PM (No. 1892254)
If I am called for jury duty again, how can I say I will follow the judges interpretation of the law? Its clear that many of them don't follow the law, they just make up their own.
57 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
paral04 2/8/2025 2:23:57 PM (No. 1892261)
If the DOGE team is just looking at expenses and not taxpayer files, then I don't see why the numbers aren't public. I suppose they can counter sue under the Freedom of Information Act.
33 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
DVC 2/8/2025 3:11:36 PM (No. 1892294)
Indefensible. The Treasury is under the Executive Branch. Trump, the man, IS the Executive Branch, as has been recently clarified by SCOTUS. So there is no one MORE proper to look at those records than representatives of the President.
The judge is just aching to be slapped down for being a political hack. This won't stand long.
67 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Venturer 2/8/2025 3:12:33 PM (No. 1892295)
George Soros owned Attorneys General?????
30 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
anniebc 2/8/2025 3:32:28 PM (No. 1892316)
Kind of a nothingburger since they weren't accessing personal financial data of everyday Americans. That's not the concern anyway. The deep state is afraid of Elon tracing their grift back to them.
47 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Califedup 2/8/2025 3:34:41 PM (No. 1892317)
Keep in mind the current Judicial System, especially Judges, is another potent weapon in the corrupt, evil Deep State arsenal against our freedom. A judicial DOGE must be formed to purge these commie judges.
42 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Daisymay 2/8/2025 3:59:34 PM (No. 1892338)
So, it's okay for DOGE to work in one Building, but not another! I think someone, hire up, needs to decide. Either it's ok, or not! As for the worry that a worker, of DOGE, might get their hands on someone's personal information, are you saying that all the Thousands of Morons who work for Social Security, and Medicare, have been Vetted by Congress so that there is no risk of a person's Number gets sold? Ha! How do you think our personal information gets out into the world! I would be way more comfortable having DOGE handling my Personal Info than the Weenies who work is some of the D.C. Offices!
44 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
bpl40 2/8/2025 4:22:31 PM (No. 1892354)
What one Federal department is permitted to do in another is an issue totally internal to the Executive branch. What has the judiciary got to do with it? Ask the judge to go pound sand.
29 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
WI Cynic 2/8/2025 6:10:47 PM (No. 1892403)
This action raises the question:
What information at the Treasury Department do they want to hide from President Trump?
38 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
danu 2/8/2025 7:38:40 PM (No. 1892446)
when i was a teenybopper, i was told about treasury/ infernal rev by somebody who had worked for them:
seems the infernals are the biggest scofflaws on the planet; they never pay a dime of taxes themselves;
they give themselves massive pay hikes, monetary work rewards, unbelievable pensions, retirements...
bigger than any other agency , and also said to be tax free. it was mind boggling-and nobody checked them.
tbh: i always wondered, but never asked.
meanwhile back at the ranch:
congress ran to them to grab spending money from social security, disability,va, military increases
=as taxes= and now doge could tell us as slush funds, hush money payments, as well?
but this is long ago; who could verify these stories; and why would they tell a jobless teen?
9 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
MickTurn 2/8/2025 8:03:26 PM (No. 1892465)
SO Judge, this ruling would better serve Americans if it was applied to the entire IRS.
So why does it NOT?????????
13 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
JimBob 2/9/2025 3:32:39 AM (No. 1892585)
More than DOGE..... this evil, overreaching judge has issued an order blocking the new Secretary of the Treasury from accessing Treasury Department data!
link:
https://choiceclips.whatfinger.com/2025/02/08/treason-a-liberal-judge-in-new-york-just-banned-the-secretary-of-the-treasury-from-accessing-the-us-treasury/
10 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
judy 2/9/2025 4:00:46 AM (No. 1892587)
Soooo make Musk audit team federal employees...
11 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Philipsonh 2/9/2025 5:25:35 AM (No. 1892605)
The Treasury Department is part of the executive branch of the Govt. The top official is appointed by the President. President Trump has the ABSOLUTE right to send any emissary into the Dept. for purposes of discovery. Any so-called ' judge' who blocks the President should be disbarred.
22 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
5 handicap 2/9/2025 5:40:43 AM (No. 1892609)
Its ALWAYS the Criminal scum who scream the loudest when caught with their hands in th cookie jar. IN this case wwith help from a sleazy Poloitical Hack Paul Englemeyer.
19 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
ARKfamily 2/9/2025 6:09:37 AM (No. 1892616)
So we have three branches of government, executive, judiciary, and legislative. These three branches exist for a reason. Wouldn't you think that the judiciary branch would want to know about corruption? Maybe they have become part of the problem?
15 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
privateer 2/9/2025 6:33:44 AM (No. 1892618)
The Treasury controls money from Americans across the Nation. Who elected this black-robed saboteur? PDJT should personally go into the records center, with a DOGE specialist at his side. Say to the employee: give me access to all the records. 'I'm sorry, Mr. President, I can't do that. You're fired! Same to the next down the line. You're fired! And so on, finally to a low level record specialist. Looks like you're head of this department now. Give me access. Right away, Mr. President!
15 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
FunOne 2/9/2025 7:07:08 AM (No. 1892624)
The Honorable Judge Paul A. Engelmayer was appointed to his judgeship by Obama.
12 people like this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
Rinktum 2/9/2025 7:53:29 AM (No. 1892641)
These are not impartial judges, they are ideological tools embedded in the judiciary to achieve whatever outcome the left desires. With their out of control obsession to thwart anything the right does, it is a means to control what the American people have cast their vote to achieve. It is the most frustrating aspect of politics today and their involvement should not be a consideration. Regardless of the issue democrats will find one of their own and undermine the will of the people. The question to be answered is how do we stop this? There seems to be no accountability for the judicial branch and they smugly go about ruling like kings. This is the antithesis of a blind justice system. Right now it is drenched in political bias. Lawfare is the absolute worst political tool and democrats wield it very effectively. The least Republicans could do is aggressively point it out. What good is winning if these black robed narcissists can pull the rug out from under every decision the President makes? Please make this stop!
23 people like this.
Reply 21 - Posted by:
RussZilla 2/9/2025 8:31:53 AM (No. 1892655)
Time to audit the judiciary! Libs always criticized Clarence Thomas. And investigated his connections to the wealthy. Let us proceed to auditing everybody, eh?
18 people like this.
Reply 22 - Posted by:
Zigrid 2/9/2025 8:37:33 AM (No. 1892657)
Not a surprise...the left is in panic mode now that President Trump is in charge...and can direct his staff to access anything he wants...just a hiccup folks...Elon will get the records and find out just who is lining their pockets and with what lobby...it's just a small inconvenience for now...President Trump knew what he was doing by starting his term early....he knew there would be challenges.....
16 people like this.
Reply 23 - Posted by:
Rumblehog 2/9/2025 9:55:50 AM (No. 1892696)
To be thrown out in 3, 2, 1... The US Supreme Court might be the only Court in the nation who understands the U.S. Constitution, but then merely a few on that court.
Ironic this article being from the BBC, recipient of US taxpayer dollars through USAID for the last several years.
9 people like this.
Reply 24 - Posted by:
edgar 2/9/2025 10:08:19 AM (No. 1892707)
The Treasury Department is part of the Executive Branch. As such, the POTUS has full authority to conduct a an audit of the Treasury Department using elected, appointed, hired or any other type of employee, provided they have the appropriate security clearance. The judge did not, because he cannot cite any law and is grasping at straws with his "opinion".
7 people like this.
Reply 25 - Posted by:
bighambone 2/9/2025 10:23:46 AM (No. 1892714)
The Federal District Judges should just take a sniff and then back off, as it is common sense that the President must be able to run the Executive Agencies of the Federal Government in accordance with his Constitutional authorities, just as the leadership of Congress runs the Congress, and the Supreme Court running the Judicial Branch of the Federal Government.
3 people like this.
Reply 26 - Posted by:
franq 2/9/2025 10:26:43 AM (No. 1892719)
Too rich. Zhoa ignored court rulings about his student loan forgiveness boondoggle. Never did hear a final outcome on that. Did any loans ever really get forgiven? He made noise two or three times.
2 people like this.
Reply 27 - Posted by:
NotaBene 2/9/2025 11:25:56 AM (No. 1892754)
Our Marxist compatriots released President Trump’s Taxes and it was all good.
2 people like this.
Reply 28 - Posted by:
rikkitikki 2/9/2025 12:06:08 PM (No. 1892781)
In the vein of a "smoking gun," I suggest that Team Musk focus their efforts to the same records that the judge just identified for immediate destruction.
To horribly mix some metaphors, no wheel squeaks as loudly as a guilty wheel...
2 people like this.
Reply 29 - Posted by:
Gallo3 2/9/2025 12:10:35 PM (No. 1892787)
President Trump should declare a National Crisis and Extraordinary State of Emergency and Martial Law and then direct the Provost Marshal and Secret Service and US Marshals to arrest and incarcerate this activist judge without bail in order to continue the investigation of the criminally-operated US Treasury.
Roberts et al will take note.
Meanwhile these dirtbag fleecers at Treasury are having a shredding festival, knowing that for them and the trillions they have stolen, it is only a short time existing to destroy evidence.
1 person likes this.
Reply 30 - Posted by:
WWIIDaughter 2/9/2025 12:49:28 PM (No. 1892801)
PIN (Personal Identity Numbers) are legally protected. Number of dollars spent by the government are not. These are simply data points that clearly are Public Information. FOIA STAT!
1 person likes this.
Reply 31 - Posted by:
BarryNo 2/9/2025 1:10:02 PM (No. 1892813)
THIS is sedition.
Arrest this 'judge' for interfering with the executive branch. Through him in solitary and throw away the key.
There are, even in the Judicial Branch, certain procedures to protect all parties from inadvertent harm. This Judge followed NONE of them. Lock him up!!
0 people like this.
So a New York judge is trying to dictate what happens in D.C.
Does that mean that another judge from anywhere else in the country can rule the opposite?
I suspect Soros has all of his purchased judges and D.A.s in crisis mode.
0 people like this.
Reply 33 - Posted by:
WWIIDaughter 2/9/2025 1:29:17 PM (No. 1892819)
In 1834, Chief Justice John Marshall judged that the Cherokee Indians owned North Georgia. Pres. Andrew Jackson nevertheless took the land for the United States and told the Court that Marshall "has made his decision; now let him enforce it."[From Roger Kimball at American Greatness 2/9/25]. Precedent, indeed.
1 person likes this.
Reply 34 - Posted by:
Ida Lou Pino 2/9/2025 1:32:24 PM (No. 1892821)
Poster #4 has it exactly correct.
The President IS the executive branch. No two-bit leftist judge has any authority to deny the President access to anything whatsoever within the executive branch. President Trump IS the entire branch - - and he owns all of the information.
Dear God - - how I hate these commies.
3 people like this.
Reply 35 - Posted by:
Hermit_Crab 2/9/2025 1:55:41 PM (No. 1892829)
How many Divisions has the Judge?
3 people like this.
Reply 36 - Posted by:
Dodge Boy 2/9/2025 4:24:52 PM (No. 1892887)
We are off to Maui tomorrow for our annual relaxation trip until the end of the month. Stand tall and firm in the meantime, L.Dotters. Soros and his son's paid-for judges are on borrowed time. A note to those who voted these "judges" in. Please wake up, folks.
1 person likes this.
Reply 37 - Posted by:
Californian 2/9/2025 5:34:09 PM (No. 1892907)
No jurisdiction.
Next!
0 people like this.
Reply 38 - Posted by:
udanja99 2/9/2025 5:36:18 PM (No. 1892910)
Ignore the judge, President Trump. There is precedent - back in 2009 0bama ordered a ban on deep water drilling in the Gulf of America. A couple of months later a federal judge ended the ban, but 0bama kept it in place
0 people like this.
Reply 39 - Posted by:
danu 2/9/2025 6:15:34 PM (No. 1892924)
29's plan sounds lovely. perfect for valentines day.
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)