FDA bans Red No. 3, artificial coloring
used in beverages, candy and other foods
NBC News,
by
Berkeley Lovelace Jr.
&
Elizabeth Chuck
Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought,
1/15/2025 11:45:36 AM
The Food and Drug Administration said Wednesday it’s banning the use of Red No. 3, a synthetic dye that gives food and drinks their bright red cherry color but has been linked to cancer in animals.
The dye is still used in thousands of foods, including candy, cereals, cherries in fruit cocktails and strawberry-flavored milkshakes, according to the Center for Science in the Public Interest, a food safety advocacy group that petitioned the agency in 2022 to end its use. The FDA’s decision marks a victory for consumer advocacy groups and some U.S. lawmakers who have long urged the FDA to revoke the additive’s approval, citing ample evidence that its use
Post Reply
Reminder: “WE ARE A SALON AND NOT A SALOON”
Your thoughts, comments, and ideas are always welcome here. But we ask you to please be mindful and respectful. Threatening or crude language doesn't persuade anybody and makes the conversation less enjoyable for fellow L.Dotters.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Starboard_side 1/15/2025 12:11:00 PM (No. 1874041)
While this group requested it to be banned, it's funny how it took so long to come to this conclusion just a few days before the end of the Biden administration (so they can take credit and not give it to RJK jr and Trump).
I hope RFK reviews the process and timeline for this to see if it was pushed more recently.
19 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
earlybird 1/15/2025 12:12:34 PM (No. 1874044)
They admit they found no "causal" relationship between this dye and hyperactivity in children. No hard causal relationship for anything else in humans. How much pf the dye itself would one have to consume?
11 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
DVC 1/15/2025 12:17:18 PM (No. 1874048)
Seems like the dye isn't actually proven to harm anyone, just 'associated with'. Sorry, not impressed.
18 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Ida Lou Pino 1/15/2025 12:17:56 PM (No. 1874049)
A seven-ounce lab rat consumed 37 gallons of red dye - - and it made him fat!
Ban the damn stuff!
11 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
franq 1/15/2025 12:30:34 PM (No. 1874061)
Too bad they can't ban vaccines and Remdesevir.
14 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
DVC 1/15/2025 12:31:15 PM (No. 1874063)
Cyclomates are an artificial sweetener. In the 70s, IIRC, they fed them to rats, and rats got sick. IIRC, the rats were given an equivalent of 10,000 sodas per day in their diet to make them sick. So cyclomates were banned in the USA.
Cyclomates are not banned in Europe and their diet drinks taste better because of it.
14 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Luandir 1/15/2025 12:32:07 PM (No. 1874065)
Joe throws another spanner in the works on his way out the door.
5 people like this.
We've known the stuff was bad since I was in high school, and I'm 70 now.
7 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Bur Oak 1/15/2025 12:35:51 PM (No. 1874069)
What, no more red M&Ms! What would we do without the FDA?
8 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
DrOstrow 1/15/2025 12:39:25 PM (No. 1874070)
Anything, ANYTHING that they can dream up, cobble together, LIE about or sell to the desperate so called 'press' so that the press can LIE about it in too order to misinform, damage, hurt, embarrass Donald Trump and/or his administration in ANY way will be used !!
Strap in folks. I fear that we're are going to seeing this type of adolescent garbage A LOT in the next 4 years.
4 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Californian 1/15/2025 1:22:45 PM (No. 1874090)
Why do we need to put artificial colors in our food?
I'd prefer all artificial colors were banned so we can know what we're eating really looks like.
No nutritional value, adds cost, false appearance, no benefits, all down sides.
19 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
LadyHen 1/15/2025 1:24:27 PM (No. 1874092)
It's a start.
There are natural options out there if you really need your food and medicine to be neon red in order to taste good or be effective. Why do we consider synthetic petroleum biproducts safe for food? I am guessing because it saves the manufacturer an 1/8 of a penny per item and thus, more profits and cheap food. Because the fuel that runs our bodies should be manufactured as cheaply as possible, right?
6 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
joew9 1/15/2025 2:28:16 PM (No. 1874120)
Back in 1970's Johnny Carson in his monologue said "it had been found that if a rat were given ten thousand times the normal daily human intake of saccharine it would explode."
8 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
mc squared 1/15/2025 4:08:10 PM (No. 1874168)
Didn't we do this decades ago? As I recall no other country did.
1 person likes this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Twinkle93 1/15/2025 4:16:15 PM (No. 1874170)
The manufacturers will switch to red blood.
2 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
DVC 1/15/2025 6:22:22 PM (No. 1874231)
Re #11, you wouldn't eat a lot of foods if they were the fully natural color.
7 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
LC Chihuahua 1/15/2025 6:32:25 PM (No. 1874242)
Why do I think it's possible they are banning red dye because it is the color of Republicans.
5 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
chance_232 1/16/2025 6:15:21 AM (No. 1874463)
Wanna bet that they will still be using that dye on the baking shows?
1 person likes this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
Zigrid 1/16/2025 9:55:55 AM (No. 1874623)
Looks like Bobby is making some big corporate dudes move before he moves on them....I'm so thrilled with Bobby's MAHA...not even confirm yet and his words are out there...and millions are following him already...I listen to every interview he does on Newsmax and sometimes on Fox...Keep it going Bobby...WE're with ya....your Daddy must be proud of you as he looks down...you are an apple that didn't fall to far from the Kennedy tree....I loved your dad..
2 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)