How California eco-bureaucrats halted
a Pacific Palisades fire safety project
to save an endangered shrub
New York Post,
by
Alex Oliveira
Original Article
Posted By: Ida Lou Pino,
1/14/2025 11:10:06 AM
California’s eco-bureaucrats halted a wildfire prevention project near the Pacific Palisades to protect an endangered shrub. It’s just the latest clash between fire safety and conservation in California that is coming under scrutiny following the devastating outbreak of the Palisades Fire — the most devastating blaze in Los Angeles history, which has consumed the very same area. In 2019, the LA Department of Water and Power (LADWP) began replacing nearly 100-year-old power line poles cutting through Topanga State Park, when the project was halted within days by conservationists outraged that federally endangered Braunton’s milkvetch plants had been trampled during the process.
Post Reply
Reminder: “WE ARE A SALON AND NOT A SALOON”
Your thoughts, comments, and ideas are always welcome here. But we ask you to please be mindful and respectful. Threatening or crude language doesn't persuade anybody and makes the conversation less enjoyable for fellow L.Dotters.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
seamusm 1/14/2025 11:16:35 AM (No. 1873312)
Endangered BUSH? I wonder if it is now GONE in the this preventable Palisades' fire. Morons!
11 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
DVC 1/14/2025 11:22:44 AM (No. 1873320)
Another useless, pointless, worthless 'endangered' plant. Something like 10,000 species have gone extinct in the last 1,000 years. And yet, the planet is full of life of millions of different forms. Just stop this nonsense.
10 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Strike3 1/14/2025 11:31:16 AM (No. 1873333)
The joke's on them. All of their precious bushes are now burned to ashes.
16 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
DougTN 1/14/2025 11:46:13 AM (No. 1873344)
Being an environmentalist means being unencumbered by the thought process.
14 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
LC Chihuahua 1/14/2025 11:55:52 AM (No. 1873353)
Why didn't they transplant it at some point to keep it safe? Stop the stupidity.
I am beginning to think some people are deliberately giving bad advice just to see how many fall for it.
7 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Starboard_side 1/14/2025 11:56:44 AM (No. 1873355)
I suspect a few lawsuits will be filed against many of these environmental groups and those who fund them.
3 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
NorthernDog 1/14/2025 11:59:02 AM (No. 1873359)
I wonder if all the non-native Eucalyptus trees will be saved? They have peeling bark that is highly flammable and an oil-like sap that also burns quickly. But they were planted everywhere in CA. In nature the tree propagates itself when fire spreads its seeds.
5 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
BarryNo 1/14/2025 12:14:46 PM (No. 1873372)
Always remember: Back in the sixties, the environmental groups decided that lying about their concerns, hyping it up to extreme levels was beneficial. Saw this several times in National Wildlife Articles and National Geographic. The activists felt you had to, to get the needed hype to draw attention to the problem. Now they do it for government funding. I can recall many times eco-activists were caught dipping into funds for personal use, an one case, where a popular walking/biking trail was closed to 'protect the environment and sensitive species' when actually the local head activist (this was California as I recall) had built himself a mansion back beside a protected lake and simply wanted a private estate. It was only discovered when some people ignored the 'no trespassing' signs and discovered his completed house on site.
I was a big environmentalist, back then. That finished it. I realized these damned people only wanted nature preserved for them, and them alone. I'm still environmentally conscious, but I keep a close eye on what these people are actually proposing. There is a lot of foreign money coming in with the goal of causing chaos - not preservation. Spotted Owl was another one. Cut government funding from these groups and leav them reliant only on public donations, and you might see more honest work.
4 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
DVC 1/14/2025 12:33:15 PM (No. 1873386)
"Save" the shrub by burning all of them into ash.
4 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
hershey 1/14/2025 2:38:12 PM (No. 1873487)
The truth always comes out...first the Delta Smelt which they can no longer find any trace of, then the empty ponds, now, a plant...eco-weenies are truly deranged...wonder if any of their homes burned up???
2 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
rochow 1/14/2025 2:49:21 PM (No. 1873500)
A fish, now a bush..... California, keep voting for this demented filth that 'leads' you.
2 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
sw penn 1/14/2025 3:38:41 PM (No. 1873531)
No matter the issue
there are usually a million reasons to do something.
And a million reasons to not do that thing.
The course chosen depends upon the priorities.
Is it reassuring to know that your lives,
your children's' lives, and all your possessions
are worth less to your elites
than a shrub?
2 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
mifla 1/15/2025 5:29:46 AM (No. 1873765)
CA taxpayers, the next time an eco terrorists proclaims something as "endangered", go find it and kill it.
Once it is extinct, their concerns are useless.
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Ida Lou Pino"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Comments:
Oh, this is so great! I was deeply worried about the Braunton's milkvetch - - but until now I didn't know that it had been saved! Many, many restless nights - - but now I can sleep like a babe. The Braunton's milkvetch lives on!