Should California Go Full Steam Ahead
on Offshore Wind Farms? Latest Evidence
Says No
Issues & Insights,
by
Kerry Jackson
Original Article
Posted By: 4250Luis,
12/26/2024 6:34:24 AM
California has made a big bet on a technology to meet its self-imposed green energy target. It could work. Maybe. Might happen. If the real world matches the optimism. But there are challenging hurdles ahead.
One, the concept is untried on an industrial scale. Floating offshore wind turbines, which California believes will provide a full quarter of the state’s electric power by 2045, “is largely underdeveloped in the United States,” host Kevin Sliman says in an interview with two Penn State University Institute of Energy and the Environment professors.
“There’s a few kind of like one-off test turbines that are typically much smaller than what you would do on a fixed platform,”
Post Reply
Reminder: “WE ARE A SALON AND NOT A SALOON”
Your thoughts, comments, and ideas are always welcome here. But we ask you to please be mindful and respectful. Threatening or crude language doesn't persuade anybody and makes the conversation less enjoyable for fellow L.Dotters.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
bpl40 12/26/2024 6:51:50 AM (No. 1861237)
Don Quixote charging the windmills had a better grasp of reality. Windmills have moving metal parts. Placing them in salt water where they will rust even faster is insane!
22 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Strike3 12/26/2024 7:05:55 AM (No. 1861243)
No, but with a half-wit like Newsom in charge, let them go ahead and waste what few dollars they have not yet spent. The violent Pacific Ocean will tear the windmills apart and the project will be more expensive than generating electricity by rubbing woolen sweaters together. The only alluring feature that California has left is that beautiful coastline so go ahead and destroy it. Nuclear power is the only practical answer but they will have to wait until people like Jane Fonda are gone since they allow the idiots in hollywood to control their lives and politics.
27 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
smak90 12/26/2024 7:23:34 AM (No. 1861252)
They should do it. Ban all petroleum fuels and only allow wind and solar. No reason to wait 20 years either. They should mandate it immediately if they really are worried about the environment. Let's see how it works out for them.
20 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
philsner 12/26/2024 7:30:20 AM (No. 1861257)
Just the "latest evidence"? How about "all the evidence"?
13 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Jesuslover54 12/26/2024 7:55:01 AM (No. 1861278)
2045. Gimme a break.
5 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Hazymac 12/26/2024 8:00:43 AM (No. 1861283)
All "green" energy is a waste. I hate seeing windmills over the landscape, and don't like solar either. The greens are trying to run us out of energy. Their solutions are the problem.
20 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
felixcat 12/26/2024 8:47:32 AM (No. 1861306)
China says yes.
5 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
red1066 12/26/2024 9:13:39 AM (No. 1861317)
California of the east is going full steam ahead with windmills. Maryland approved the building of wind turbines being built offshore and will start to do so very soon.
3 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Twinkle93 12/26/2024 9:36:03 AM (No. 1861333)
The wind that they should harness it that which is coming from Sacramento.
8 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
preciosodrogas 12/26/2024 9:50:05 AM (No. 1861342)
We can't wait 20 years! We must do it now!/s
3 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Venturer 12/26/2024 9:57:09 AM (No. 1861350)
One small coal powered or nuclear electric plant will supply as much energy as all of these windmills and the environment is better off then the use and building environmental damage of building and maintaining these damned things.
California is a lunatic state.
10 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
hershey 12/26/2024 10:06:02 AM (No. 1861360)
It costs more to manufacture a wind turbine than it can ever save in energy...a 2 megawatt windmill contains 260 tons of steel, requiring 170 tons of coal and 300 tons of iron ore....all mined transported and produced by hydrocarbon processes and machines...it could spin until it falls apart and never create enough energy as it used to be built...green energy is a myth....
11 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
scottj 12/26/2024 10:08:36 AM (No. 1861363)
I wish there was a provision in the constitution where we could vote to expel a state from the union. California would be gone in a heartbeat.
6 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Starboard_side 12/26/2024 10:41:54 AM (No. 1861385)
First, never think the CA politicians will be deterred by any obstacle when they see a grand opportunity to go on many boondoggle trips to investigate the issue (they took multiple trips to see how high-speed rail worked for their train to nowhere project).
Second, it's not about climate change but their desire to remove pollution (just review their goals of reducing SOX and NOX as the justification for any expense).
Wonder how expensive the insurance will be for the project since it looks like it will have many issues to overcome. Especially if one breaks loose and kills people or whales.
4 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
minuteman 12/26/2024 10:45:05 AM (No. 1861388)
And they can use all of the energy to power their bullet train.
3 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
JHHolliday 12/26/2024 11:00:51 AM (No. 1861395)
California might as well go for it. They are already billions in the red. I would laugh, but they will be coming for the feds and the rest of us taxpayers to bail them out.
5 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
franq 12/26/2024 11:04:45 AM (No. 1861400)
Invest in candle futures.
7 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
snowoutlaw 12/26/2024 11:20:14 AM (No. 1861405)
They stopped most all off shore oil production because people didn't want to see the tiny little platforms, now they want huge fans? Waves or swells are a form of energy that is 24/7 here, There are many designs to harness the up and down motion of swells and are not much more than a buoy.
5 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
DVC 12/26/2024 1:04:04 PM (No. 1861461)
Windmills are expensive, ineffective eyesores. Get rid of ALL WINDMILLS.
8 people like this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
mc squared 12/26/2024 2:07:59 PM (No. 1861481)
Even if it worked, ever see what salt water does to steel and machinery?
3 people like this.
Reply 21 - Posted by:
DVC 12/26/2024 6:18:05 PM (No. 1861550)
No, but 'full steam' for normal coal fired steam power plants would be good. Or nuclear fired steam power plants.....full STEAM ahead.....no windmills, no solar.
1 person likes this.
Reply 22 - Posted by:
watashiyo 12/26/2024 9:59:34 PM (No. 1861628)
Just let'em and let the locals deal with the mess they've helped create.
0 people like this.
Reply 23 - Posted by:
MickTurn 12/27/2024 12:23:46 AM (No. 1861672)
I prefer Earthquakes...GO FOR IT!
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "4250Luis"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)