Remote work crackdown: How Trump’s DOGE
could push federal workers to quit
CNN,
by
Rene Marsh *
Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought,
11/21/2024 1:16:45 AM
President-elect Donald Trump’s new Department of Government Efficiency, a nongovernmental entity helmed by billionaire Elon Musk and biotech entrepreneur and former Republican presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy, is expected to make a push for an end to remote work across federal agencies as a way to help reduce the federal workforce through attrition.
Both Musk and Ramaswamy have recently publicly lamented the number of employees working remotely across the government.
A source familiar with early discussions about the focus of DOGE, as the initiative is known, told CNN that while nothing is final, early priorities include an effort to immediately end remote work across federal agencies,
Post Reply
Reminder: “WE ARE A SALON AND NOT A SALOON”
Your thoughts, comments, and ideas are always welcome here. But we ask you to please be mindful and respectful. Threatening or crude language doesn't persuade anybody and makes the conversation less enjoyable for fellow L.Dotters.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
caljeepgirl 11/21/2024 1:30:35 AM (No. 1839620)
I do know that Musk absolutely hates the remote working concept....
14 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
anniebc 11/21/2024 2:52:47 AM (No. 1839627)
It's a lot cheaper for certain employees to work from home. Companies save loads of cash because they don't have to rent space, communication costs are lower, and a host of other advantages, but there's an honor system. If your work is quality work, it's harder to paint the house and other tasks while "on the clock," and there's give and take at the same time. I'm okay with government workers working from home; there are jobs that shouldn't be, and there's just too darn many government agencies requiring too many workers, period. And, a lot of them are overpaid. Fauci, for example.
15 people like this.
I'm a contractor to the Federal Government, and since we've started working from home, our productivity has almost doubled. We don't have folks dropping into the office to gossip all day long...
12 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
3XALADY 11/21/2024 6:21:26 AM (No. 1839670)
I am retired and when I am out shopping during the day, it seems no one works in an office any more. Men and women of all ages, from 20's on up, are in the stores. Surely they all don't work the night shift.
10 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Aspen02 11/21/2024 6:53:23 AM (No. 1839677)
#2 Government buildings need to be maintained regardless of how many occupy them. Unless closed and sold, it is not cheaper for government workers to work from home.
13 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
chumley 11/21/2024 7:02:04 AM (No. 1839686)
I had a job that required me to be on site 12 hours a day. To leave without being relieved was a firing offense because of the hazardous nature of the job. One fine day I went to the head shed to check on some paperwork and nobody was there. I was told they were all "working from home". Everything immediately became harder to do. Simple questions had to be submitted via computer and you never saw or spoke to a real human.
I even had to retire over the computer. Nobody was there to answer my questions and it was just a shot in the dark all the way. People I enjoyed seeing every day had just vaporized and much of their workload was transferred to those of us who had to show up. We had one manager who showed up one day a month for a couple hours, but maintained the office he insisted on, which was pretty well hidden anyway. He earned well over 100k a year and all the bribes and kickbacks he could weasel.
Work from home is a scam.
15 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Northcross 11/21/2024 8:32:27 AM (No. 1839774)
They can't quit. They are unemployable in the real world.
7 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
privateer 11/21/2024 8:48:19 AM (No. 1839814)
Per 4, being paid while you shop takes some of the bite out of inflation.
5 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
anniebc 11/21/2024 8:52:48 AM (No. 1839822)
Then you repurpose the government buildings, poster #5. Dang. We're talking about getting rid of agencies and people working for government. That should include getting rid of unused buildings.
10 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Strike3 11/21/2024 9:58:12 AM (No. 1839895)
Reduction of the federal workforce would be like reducing the number of ants at a picnic.
Some people work better from home where it's quiet and you don't have phones ringing in cubicles and people constantly walking into offices with the purpose of discussing ball games and other useless reasons. Computer programming and writing are ideal professions for that. Others use time at home for other purposes like interacting with family and dogs to running errands and watching TV when they are supposed to be working. I would guess that the unproductive are more numerous than the productive. The majority of federal government workers are unproductive in either environment.
6 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
felixcat 11/21/2024 10:10:44 AM (No. 1839910)
At one point in the late 1990s/early 2000s, the federal government, well at least some agencies, were starting to talk about limited teleworking - climate warming then change you know. But it was greatly resisted by managers and supervisors. Then it started to slowly gain traction with one important reason was that if most/all of the paper pushing employees (not the safety inspectors at airports, etc) could do the same computer work at home then think of all the real estate the feds could off load. Lots of tax dollars savings right there, but most agencies resisted full-time telework. Then covid and full-time telework with the obvious exceptions of federal prison guards, aviation safety inspectors, etc. Things have not fallen apart in those years. Unfortunately, there is still a lot of real estate that is almost empty and it's either return everyone back to their cubicles or sell off those buildings as in some cases. There isn't even enough cubicle space for the feds. Let's hope DOGE uses some commonsense when they start cleaning house and they better go after the Intel agencies just as ruthlessly as the low hanging fruit of Transportation, HHS and Education.
2 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
felixcat 11/21/2024 10:19:51 AM (No. 1839921)
One more post. The ONLY reason there is all this emphasis on all federal workers returning to their offices in DC is because since covid, the loss of their money to support cafes, coffee houses and restaurants has been devastating to the DC economy. And yet, every few years the DC Mayor (whoever it is) and the DC Council and their lone Congressional Rep start pushing for a commuter tax on feds coming i not DC to work. They overuse our roads, add to the traffic, blah blah blah.
2 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
broken01 11/21/2024 10:58:52 AM (No. 1839939)
Same here #3. Some of our departments such as HR and Payroll work from home and the bosses love it. Departments such as mine (Logistics) can't mainly because of things like stock control but all in all everything is humming along nicely.
0 people like this.
Quitting would be the easy way. If they refuse to go and have unions pushing back, the contract cleaning contract can be ended and we can have highly paid toilet cleaners. (pride will kick in)
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Comments:
W/Kristen Holmes and Tami Luhby.