Newly Emerged 9/11 Video Shows Previously
Unseen Angle of Second Plane Hitting South
Tower – Uploader Claims to “Accidentally
Left It Private” on YouTube for Almost
2 Decades (Video)

i don’t quite understand what the issue is ? a new video ? is it faked or enlightening?

In the age of AI video-fakes and on the 911 anniversary, suddenly a "new" video appears supporting the official narrative.

Well I guess that proves it. Or disproves it. Oswald was the lone shooter. The moon landing was actually enacted on the grassy knoll. And we have proof. Or we don't.

It "suddenly showed up" feb 2022...this is the 1st I have seen of it...there are also dozens of other people seen filming at the same time, but I have never seen their videos either. Is it because MSM all bought the footage they chose to show via a few agents/outlets and only ran their own "Exclusive" content? It certainly is a dramatic angle, and I'm a bit gobsmaked that a former soldier who had served in Desert Storm didn't IMMEDIATELY declare "Terrorists!" instead of repeating "What were those pilots thinking? What is wrong with them???"

RIP, Michael Horrocks. Co-pilot of Plane #2. My neighbor, and a man for whom I had nothing but respect. Had I been in charge, 9/12 would have been way different. Progressives delenda est.

The background comments seem quite authentic -- Leftist New Yorkers shrieking, "What's going on!" They are perpetually clueless about reality.

A terrible video, so shaky and poorly done that I couldn't watch much. Doesn't seem to show anything significant or new.

#6, from the article posted here on the 9/11 anniversary by the lady who survived WTC2, there were people who simply did not process what was happening. She said she had to wait to use a phone while some guy casually made dinner plans with his wife instead of running for his life (apparently just before the buildings started to fall). Some people are simply unable to think during catastrophes.

Rush said that that about half-way through building of the Towers, the NYC City Council voted to stop requiring the builder from having to include fire walls, etc., from the rest of the upper floors. If that's true, the terrorists KNEW that and that's why they hit the top parts of the Towers.

Re#2 so….. the official narrative is that planes were flown into the World Trade Center? Is there a different narrative?

Remember our government led by George Bush allowed Saudis to flee the U.S. immediately after 9/11. They knew right away this was a Saudi inspired attack not one from Iraq. Also remember Papa Bush was also the head of the CIA before he became President. This country has been so deep into the chaos at the hands of the CIA, FBI, and NSA. Also, remember Papa Bush had to invade Panama and arrest President Noriega. When has the U.S. ever invaded and arrested another country’s leader. Just to keep him quiet would be my guess. Conspiracy you say…only if the dots can not be connected.

Re #9, close, but inaccurate. Half way through the building, the normal "fireproofing" spray on a cement-like coating with asbestos fibers, providing both structural connection due to the fibers, and fire proofing. As the cementacious material may crack with age, the fibers hold it in place. This coating provided some fire protection, not making the steel "proof" against an endless fire, but giving some hour or two (?) time for the fire to be extinguished or people evacuated before the coated steel beams became so hot that they would weaken to the point of collapse. So.....econazies banned the asbestos filled fire resistant coating on the steel floor beams which crossed the towers from one 'skin' to the other, providing floor support and critical stiffening effect for the stainless steel corrugated external steel skin. An alternative material was hastily used....the building was going up at a record pace and time was critical for financial reasons. So....eco-crap replacement fireproofing was used....and it was later found to crumble and fall off with time, providing no protection when gone. The fires overheated the steel cross beams which supported the floors. As these internal braces dropped out, one by one, the external skins had less and less stabilizing bracing, and eventually the tremendous, normal downward loads of millions of pounds of the building above the damaged section just caused the skins to buckle. The holes from the aircraft entry added more weak points to these external skins, the primary structure of these unique buildings. Once the skin buckled, and a 30 or so story section of the building dropped the distance of one floor....the energy of that falling "hammer" could not be stopped by the intact structure below it. The impact was unstoppable once it started moving. You saw it on TV, an intact upper portion just driving through and destroying the lower tower structure until it finally was stopped by the ground....and destroyed by it's own velocity. The substandard "green" coating used as a fire resistant material was, like all "green" replacements, pure crap and didn't work. With the old material - perhaps the buildings would have stood, but the fire "proofing" is only for a given period of time - so the fires can be extinguished or people evacuated. More lives could have probably been saved, but I question if the buildings were saveable.

I have seen halograms mentioned being used on these buildings and when you see that plane fly right into that building, I can't wrap my mind around it that is isn't a plane. Help.

Now I understand the question 'where did the plane go?'

I found the reactions of the crowd very normal and interesting from our 22-year vantage point. We tend to forget our own shock at the moment we witnessed that horrible morning live on TV. How long did it take our senses and brains to process what we had seen? The initial, "Oh, God!", "Oh, Lord!" responses were heartbreaking to hear, yet also inspiring. Those were cries of a faithful people and that gave me hope. I still believe the majority of our country are faithful people despite the damage done to our culture by the Marxist vultures. That is the lesson I want to take from the surfacing of this video at this time. God is still with our people.

Not surprised, if you ever posted anything on YouTube it very easy to mistakenly mark as private so only friends can see it, Plus if you read the article this video was actually taken 4 years before YouTube was launched. If you see a conspiracy about this, you need a tinfoil hat. By the way, the person that took the video was an Iraq combat veteran.