Exclusive-U.S. EPA to consider tougher
emissions rules for heavy trucks
Reuters,
by
David Shepardson
Original Article
Posted By: NorthernDog,
9/21/2022 1:23:28 PM
WASHINGTON - The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) will consider adopting more stringent greenhouse gas emissions rules for heavy trucks after Congress passed new incentives to speed the adoption of zero-emission vehicles, the agency told Reuters. (Snip) The Truck & Engine Manufacturers Association, which represent companies like Daimler Trucks (DTGGe.DE), Caterpillar (CAT.N) and Cummins (CMI.N), previously raised concerns the EPA proposal could boost costs and result in customers keeping "their higher emitting trucks longer." EPA will be issuing a supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking to consider more stringent GHG standards for model years 2027 through 2029 in December. EPA Office of
Reply 1 - Posted by:
SweetPea3 9/21/2022 1:47:55 PM (No. 1283936)
So, split that heavy load and put it on two trucks. Yeah, that'll save the planet!
6 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Bur Oak 9/21/2022 1:58:05 PM (No. 1283943)
This would not only affect trucks but all equipment that uses diesel engines such as farm and construction equipment. This is all about forcing uneconomical electric motors to replace diesel engines. It has absolutely nothing to do about smog or pollution.
13 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Quigley 9/21/2022 1:59:35 PM (No. 1283947)
I can’t help but think that conditions have become such that every action will have a reaction far more devastating than than helpful. As is often the case when artificial measures have been used to excess.
9 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
GoodDeal 9/21/2022 2:06:14 PM (No. 1283950)
The intentional destruction of the heavy industry continues.
13 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
sanspeur 9/21/2022 2:12:09 PM (No. 1283955)
well the cost of diesel wasn’t wnough to kill this very necessary biz .. what wlse can we do ?? ah , goobermint ! always knows how to throttle biz on America .. support it in zhou’s xicom stock market
3 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Ribicon 9/21/2022 2:14:25 PM (No. 1283960)
USA did just fine until Richard Nixon saddled with the EPA. We can fantasize all we want about how some candidate is going to disband the EPA (and President Jimmy's Department of Education), get us out of the UN (and the UN out of the USA), and so on, but the Republicans can't even manage to defund NPR. So who will do this for us? Our previous guy did none of it, and they're more toxic than ever.
14 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Geoman 9/21/2022 2:18:23 PM (No. 1283963)
This is how a once prosperous nation, the government of which has been hijacked by leftist fanatics, inflicts mass starvation on its subjects. No self-governed nation intentionally starves its own populace but totalitarian nations with a docile population always get around to killing their own citizen subjects.
12 people like this.
Yes, by all means, make inflation worse by making shipping less efficient and more expensive in order to fight a made-up crisis.
While you're at it, make firearms illegal to stop the poaching of elephants in New Mexico.
10 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Venturer 9/21/2022 2:55:37 PM (No. 1283996)
These dipsticks will not be happy until there is no shipping in America.
Put the truckers out of business and we all suffer.
11 people like this.
Over-regulation, excessive regulation by goobermint.
Defund not the police but EPA. Abolish EPA.
10 people like this.
They already caused the shipping crisis with their stupid regulations for heavy trucks, what more do they want? Yeah I know, dumb question.
7 people like this.
No groceries for you.
6 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
DVC 9/21/2022 3:00:35 PM (No. 1284009)
Further crushing the economy.
There will be a lawsuit against this, and it is likely to block this new regulation, as per West Virginia vs EPA ruling.
9 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
downnout 9/21/2022 3:23:24 PM (No. 1284039)
Great, it will take more trucks to move the same quantity of goods thus causing additional costs and additional emissions. Is there anyone in our government with a brain?
7 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
paral04 9/21/2022 3:27:19 PM (No. 1284043)
Isn't the cost of food expensive enough? Now, they want to make it more expensive to transport the stuff. Are they trying to kill us so their illegal friends can come here and vote for them? Is that the plan?
8 people like this.
The Kalifornia Air Resources Board now has on its agenda expanding the new-EV-only mandate in 2035 from cars to diesel rigs in 2038. At what point does this all come to a crashing halt?
5 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
Californian 9/21/2022 4:40:21 PM (No. 1284092)
Good. The nation's supply system was running too smoothly. We need to do something to gum it up.
2 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
whyyeseyec 9/21/2022 5:20:55 PM (No. 1284115)
Because food prices are not high enough.
4 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
curious1 9/21/2022 6:27:32 PM (No. 1284157)
Didn't the SCOTUS just determine that these agencies couldn't invent new rules because that was the responsibility of congress?
And when do the pubbies start asking how the epa is backed by the constitution without an amendment to that effect? Shut it down!
6 people like this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
mifla 9/22/2022 3:50:12 AM (No. 1284372)
Government employees sitting around all day worrying that if they do not crank out rules and regulations, they may lose their cushy jobs.
0 people like this.
Reply 21 - Posted by:
DVC 9/22/2022 9:35:05 AM (No. 1284680)
Re #19, see #13.
Yes, they will be sued, they will lose. This is the beginning or reining in these out of control agencies.
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "NorthernDog"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Comments:
The EPA is thanking the 'Inflation Reduction Act' for the more stringent regulations. Not surprisingly it will dramatically increase the cost of new trucks and encourage businesses to get by with older diesel powered vehicles.