Post New Article

Supreme Court Hands Down Biggest Second
Amendment Victory Since Heller

Original Article

Posted By: Imright, 6/23/2022 10:55:15 AM

The Supreme Court on Thursday handed down its opinion in a landmark Second Amendment rights case, the biggest win for gun rights since the court's Heller ruling holding that "New York’s proper-cause requirement violates the Fourteenth Amendment by preventing law-abiding citizens with ordinary self-defense needs from exercising their Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms in public for self-defense." (Tweets) The ruling came down 6-3, with Justice Clarence Thomas writing the majority opinion joined by Justices Roberts, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett — plus concurring opinions by Justice Alito and Justice Kavanaugh. Justices Breyer wrote the dissent joined by Sotomayor, and Kagan.

Post Reply

Reply 1 - Posted by: LadyVet 6/23/2022 11:15:41 AM (No. 1194421)
Jeff Tubin on the ruling: "I've got two guns. Now I can carry both in public." (Note: Vietnam vets will understand the reference.)
14 people like this.

Reply 2 - Posted by: JubilationTCornpone 6/23/2022 11:19:08 AM (No. 1194425)
That’s great, but it will be tempered in blue states by a deluge of red flag accusations by liberals against their conservative neighbors. Can’t keep and bear what the cops have kicked in your door and confiscated. Why anyone is still a registered GOP baffles me. The party hates you.
11 people like this.

Reply 3 - Posted by: Vaquero45 6/23/2022 11:21:37 AM (No. 1194427)
Hallelujah! After 111 years, the unconstitutional Sullivan Law is GONE.
18 people like this.

Reply 4 - Posted by: FL_Absentee_Voter 6/23/2022 11:30:09 AM (No. 1194441)
This outcome was expected and is very good news with national implications.
15 people like this.

Reply 5 - Posted by: DVC 6/23/2022 11:34:50 AM (No. 1194446)
Now all the remaining eight states with objective standards laws on concealed carry permits will be forced to change their laws. The anti gun folks will be frantic.
12 people like this.

Reply 6 - Posted by: Ida Lou Pino 6/23/2022 11:38:50 AM (No. 1194451)
Something has happened with Roberts? He is moving from jellyfish wishy-washy to full bore Constitutionalist. Whatever the leftists had on him before - - seems to be no longer operative.
9 people like this.

Reply 7 - Posted by: Gordon Freeman 6/23/2022 11:49:53 AM (No. 1194464)
#1... One of them would be a rifle?
3 people like this.

Reply 8 - Posted by: Mass Minority 6/23/2022 11:53:48 AM (No. 1194467)
This is a huge ruling. I hope the MA gun owners go after the state laws there with a vengeance now. For those who don't reside in the peoples paradise of Cambridge in Massachusetts in order to own any firearm at all, or the ammunition and accesories that go with them one must get a concealed carry permit. A FULL BLOWN CONCEALED CARRY PERMIT to simply posess a shotgun to hunt with. To be in possesion of a single bullet or empty shell casing without an active carry permit is a felony. And here is the real kicker, there are currently no standards for who is and is not eligable for said permit. That is left entirely up to the chief of police in the town in which you reside. You have to take a course and get a certificate before you can even apply for said permit and at most the first question asked is where do you live. If your answer is any of the towns on the red list the instructor kindly informs you that you are wasting your time and we will give you a full rebate. Those towns on the red list have a chief of police who will not authorize any permits in his town, essentially making it a gun free zone (remember you CANNOT own a firearm of any kind without a carry permit). You are required to have an in person interview with the chief of police, and in the town I lived in (Thank God, no more) you needed three letters of reference from "upstanding citizens not related to you" declaring you an upright and respectable citizen. Even then, if the Chief doesn't like your haircut, your demeanor, anyone in your family, you had an unpaid parking ticket or he simply is in a bad mood because Dunkin Donuts screwed up his bagel order (Anyone who has lived in MA will understand that struggle) you will be denied. You can spend tens of thousands on appealing the ruling and after many years you will probably win because the state AG does not ever want a case to actually get to a federal court, for obvious reasons. But remember the one you really PO'd doing that is the chief law enforcement official where you live. No more warnings for you.
7 people like this.

Reply 9 - Posted by: Jethro bo 6/23/2022 11:57:39 AM (No. 1194473)
I'm not a lawyer and don't claim to be. However, is this a shot across the bow on the constitutionality of 'Red Flag Laws'? Seems Thomas was clear that the 2nd amendment wasn't subject to goobernment permission.
19 people like this.

Reply 10 - Posted by: Georgia Peach 6/23/2022 12:28:39 PM (No. 1194504)
Now maybe we will get serious about protecting children in schools. Armed guards, one way in with a metal detector. .Works at court houses.
9 people like this.

Reply 11 - Posted by: broken01 6/23/2022 12:37:22 PM (No. 1194509)
To #6 Obama just mailed Roberts' "boys" back to him that's all. As for the ruling it is great news and we can expect the anti-2A guns just shoot themselves leftist knuckleheads to go bonkers over it.
4 people like this.

Reply 12 - Posted by: Krause 6/23/2022 12:55:47 PM (No. 1194522)
I'd like to have somebody tell me that I don't have a right to defend myself.
10 people like this.

Reply 13 - Posted by: formerNYer 6/23/2022 1:41:55 PM (No. 1194544)
I wish the article has at least a taste of what the 3 dissenting judges were thinking, it was probably a lot like the jughead president malarky about the 2nd amendment not being absolute. Good for the court. It's time to have constitutional carry in all 50 states.
6 people like this.

Reply 14 - Posted by: Omen55 6/23/2022 2:16:33 PM (No. 1194569)
I remember how many of dem told the atty Marc Elias to drop the case because they were afraid this would happen. So happy he ignored dem. LOL!!
5 people like this.

Reply 15 - Posted by: downnout 6/23/2022 2:18:43 PM (No. 1194572)
Many years ago I applied for a CCP in Pennsylvania. I had to be interviewed by the Police chief in Harrisburg. I could tell he didn’t want to approve my application but he had no legitimate grounds to deny me. I had gone through extensive training (including out scoring a number of his officers) and frequently had to carry substantial sums of cash.
5 people like this.

Reply 16 - Posted by: SkeezerMcGee 6/23/2022 2:40:11 PM (No. 1194592)
No government, including the federal government, can require that an adult must acquire a prerequisite permit to OPEN CARRY commonly carried handguns. I find two of Thomas' sentences to be amusing: 1. "But when is comes to interpreting the Constitution not all history is created equal." 2. "Notwithstanding the ink the parties spilt . . . " (regarding the 1328 Statutes of Northampton). This is a fun dig regarding the amount of lawyering the parties have expended discussing and arguing the alleged relevance of this 694 year old Statute, which the majority opinion explains has had no relevance in England for the last 400 years, and has zero relevance when interpreting the Framers' intent as expressed in the 2nd Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
4 people like this.

Reply 17 - Posted by: red1066 6/23/2022 2:41:58 PM (No. 1194595)
This could also affect Maryland's concealed carry permit rules, since the same issue is in effect when applying for a concealed carry permit in Maryland. One has to have a reason to get a permit to carry, and self-defense isn't a good enough reason.
5 people like this.

Reply 18 - Posted by: DVC 6/23/2022 3:25:52 PM (No. 1194642)
Re #8, your state will very quickly be involved in a lawsuit which is based on this ruling, I am sure, and the state requirements for "proving a special need", or however Mass phrases it, will be struck down, based on this ruling, and the state will be forced to create some sort of a concealed carry law. Most, when forced create an objective standards concealed carry law, commonly called "shall issue"....because if you meet the written standards they SHALL issue you a permit, not "may issue", which is what was just struck down. And any law which essentially prevents almost everyone from owning and carrying a gun will be struck down in a "dominoes" process, state by state, but relatively quickly, I think. "Keep AND bear".....own and carry. Both are requirements of the Constitution, and the states are now on notice that they cannot prevent you from keeping OR bearing your gun unless there is some objective proof that you are unable to be trusted. Moves the burden of proof back to them to prove you can't hae your Constitutional right, not you proving that you have a "need". Typically the requirements have been 1) age 21 or more 2) no history of violent crimes...typically no felonies and in many states 3) some training. Some states have made the training fairly painful, like 16 hours of class and range time required, others have 8 hours, and others have no training mandated. As an instructor, I am in favor of training....but it is a Constitutional RIGHT and you don't need training to exercise any other rights. And most folks are smart enough to get some training, anyway. I am currently running three women through a handgun training class, next session this PM. They sought me out because they want to learn and be safe. Most normal people go in this direction.
4 people like this.

Reply 19 - Posted by: EJKrausJr 6/23/2022 3:48:15 PM (No. 1194659)
SCOTUS got it right. The 2A is the law of the land. All federal gun legislation is mute without amending the 2A. "That shall not be infringed" means it. Arms is also not defined in the 2A. That means knives, swords, pitchforks, hoes. medieval pikes, cannon, howitzers, dinner forks, etc., are allowed arms, not just firearms. The government has no say as the 2A protects us from the government, not the other way around.
3 people like this.

Reply 20 - Posted by: LonestarM3 6/23/2022 4:22:45 PM (No. 1194676)
If any wonders about the importance of preserving the Supreme Court, this ruling should provide the answer. Chief Justice Roberts, to his credit, seems to have deferred to Justice Clarence Thomas to write the Majority Opinion, joining him in along with four others joining and two concurring. I thought it would be impossible to have more respect for Justice Thomas than I already had. Turns out I was wrong - it was easy. I can't wait to read the opinions. (Including the three dissenting justices who must think the Constitution does not REALLY mean what it says:-) Just in time to make the Fourth of July celebrations to really rock!
2 people like this.

Reply 21 - Posted by: GirlwithaCurl 6/23/2022 4:29:15 PM (No. 1194684)
One down, but one more BIG one to go! Pray for the end of legalized baby killing!
1 person likes this.

Reply 22 - Posted by: DVC 6/23/2022 9:55:31 PM (No. 1194909)
Darn it! IN #5, that should be "WITHOUT" not "with".
0 people like this.

Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Imright"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Most Recent Articles posted by Imright"
Thousands of protesters hit the streets
and begin to gather outside Justice Clarence
Thomas' home after he said SCOTUS should
'reconsider' gay marriage now Roe v. Wade
has been overturned: Pro-choice extremists
are planning 'Night of Rage'
13 replies
Posted by Imright 6/24/2022 11:50:31 PM Post Reply
Thousands of protesters took to the streets on Friday night to express their anger at the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade - the 50-year law that guaranteed access to abortion in every state. In New York City, a crowd thousands strong massed in Union Square and Washington Square Park, and then marched up Park Avenue. The crowd massed on Grand Central station, before walking past it and continuing through the Upper East Side. In Washington DC, Union Square was the site of demonstrations, while protesters from Boston to Philadelphia, Atlanta, Detroit and Los Angeles marched in fury.
What The Post wishes Joe Biden’s cue
card would say
6 replies
Posted by Imright 6/24/2022 11:44:01 PM Post Reply
On Thursday, Joe Biden flashed for the cameras a comical presidential “cheat sheet” that proved just how stage-managed the 79-year-old is by his staff. Besides instructing him to remember to say “hello” and “thank you,” it emphasized basic steps such as “YOU take YOUR seat.” Thanks to a White House mole, The Post was able to smuggle a new cheat sheet into Biden’s jacket pocket when he was taking a quick nap in the Oval Office. Here, what we think the presidential cue card should say: THE PRESIDENT Press conference sequence of events
Cops brace for unrest as irate protesters
gather across country after Roe v. Wade overturned
14 replies
Posted by Imright 6/24/2022 7:56:54 PM Post Reply
Hundreds of angry protesters gathered outside the US Supreme Court building Friday to denounce the historic overturning of Roe v. Wade — as police departments across the country girded for mass unrest after the bitterly contentious ruling. Additional cops — many in riot gear — were brought in to protect the barricaded federal building and keep any mayhem at bay, a scene that played out at burgeoning protests in all major US cities. A throng of protestors chanted “F–k Clarence Thomas!” outside the Supreme Court site Friday afternoon to voice their displeasure with the conservative jurist’s vocal support of Roe v. Wade’s dissolution.
'This is a horrifying decision': 'Heartbroken'
Michelle Obama leads furious criticism
of SCOTUS overturning of Roe v. Wade -
as Amy Schumer blasts justices for following
'intentions of slave-owning rapists who've
been dead for hundreds for years'
42 replies
Posted by Imright 6/24/2022 7:34:10 PM Post Reply
Michelle Obama and Amy Schumer are leading the furious public criticism of the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade today - with the former First Lady slamming the move as 'horrifying' while warning that it will have 'devastating consequences' for women across the US. Dozens of celebrities have spoken out to share their horror over the landmark decision, including Kim Kardashian, Taylor Swift, Busy Philipps, Bette Midler, Hailey Bieber, and Sophie Turner - with many of them choosing to share Obama's statement as well as their own thoughts on the issue. 58-year-old Obama was one of the first high-profile people to react
Protesters plan to target Justice Clarence
Thomas' home after he said SCOTUS should
now revisit gay marriage and contraception
after end to Roe as pro-choice extremists
plan 'Night of Rage'
17 replies
Posted by Imright 6/24/2022 7:26:42 PM Post Reply
Protesters are planning demonstrations outside the home of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas on Friday night, after he revealed he now has laws protecting gay marriage, gay sexual activity and contraception in his sights, after axing Roe v. Wade. Following Friday's landmark decision, Thomas called on his fellow jurists to overturn previous rulings that followed similar legal precedent. The prospective law changes, released in a concurring opinion of the decision penned by Thomas, would see limits put on gay marriage, same-sex sexual activity, and citizens' access to birth control.
With Roe dead, some fear rollback of LGBTQ
and other rights
18 replies
Posted by Imright 6/24/2022 7:19:04 PM Post Reply
The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision allowing states to ban abortion stirred alarm Friday among LGBTQ advocates, who feared that the ruling could someday allow a rollback of legal protections for gay relationships, including the right for same-sex couples to marry. In the court’s majority opinion overturning the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision, Justice Samuel Alito said the decision applied only to abortion. But critics of the court’s conservative majority gave the statement no credence. “I don’t buy that at all,” said Lawrence Gostin, a professor of medicine at Georgetown University and faculty director of its Institute for National and Global Health Law.
Murkowski vows to work on legislation
in response to abortion ruling
30 replies
Posted by Imright 6/24/2022 7:14:04 PM Post Reply
Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski (Alaska) announced Friday that she would prioritize legislation permitting abortion across the country following the Dobbs v. Jackson Supreme Court decision that overturned Roe v. Wade. “In the wake of this ruling, it is up to Congress to respond,” wrote Murkowski, vowing that she would continue “to work with a broader group to restore women’s freedom to control their own health decisions wherever they live.” She added: “Legislation to accomplish that must be a priority.”
Bill Clinton: Supreme Court’s Roe v.
Wade decision has ‘put our democracy
at risk’
44 replies
Posted by Imright 6/24/2022 7:10:14 PM Post Reply
Former President Clinton is slamming the Supreme Court’s ruling to overturn Roe v. Wade, saying it contributes to putting “democracy at risk” and calling the high court “radical” and “activist.” “This decision puts partisanship ahead of precedent, ideology ahead of evidence, and the power of a small minority ahead of the clear will of the people,” Clinton said in a statement on Friday. “This jarring removal of rights that had long been guaranteed, along with decisions gutting the Voting Rights Act and abolishing any judicial remedy for admittedly unconstitutional gerrymandering by state legislatures and abuses of power by federal authorities
Alabama Judge Grants Emergency Motion
on Abortion, as a Contrast of Two Americas Sharpens
6 replies
Posted by Imright 6/24/2022 7:05:27 PM Post Reply
Where abortion is concerned, Alabama just became a different state — not only compared to its former self, but to other areas of America. Following the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn 1973’s Roe v. Wade decision guaranteeing a federal right to abortion, Alabama has outlawed the practice — with one exception. The process began in 2019, when Gov. Kay Ivey signed the Alabama Human Life Protection Act. As noted by WBRC, “The law made performing an abortion at any stage of pregnancy a felony unless the mother’s health was in danger. It did not provide any exceptions for rape or incest.” However, a preliminary injunction was imposed against the ban.
New York Bishops ‘Give Thanks to God’
for Roe v. Wade Reversal
7 replies
Posted by Imright 6/24/2022 6:51:44 PM Post Reply
The Catholic Bishops of New York issued a statement Friday on the Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision, declaring that the historic ruling “will save countless innocent children simply waiting to be born.” “We give thanks to God for today’s decision of the United States Supreme Court in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization,” reads the statement, signed by Cardinal Timothy Dolan and seven of his brother bishops from New York state. In their statement, the bishops express their gratitude to “the millions of heroic Americans who have worked tirelessly toward this outcome for nearly a half-century” and who have been “a charitable and compelling voice for the voiceless.”
‘Into the Streets!’: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
Chants SCOTUS Dobbs Ruling Is ‘Illegitimate’
23 replies
Posted by Imright 6/24/2022 6:46:28 PM Post Reply
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) joined pro-abortion activists outside the Supreme Court Friday to protest the historic overturning of Roe v. Wade by the nation’s highest court. Ocasio-Cortez can be seen chanting the word “illegitimate” in reference to the decision alongside activists, according to video footage shared by TPUSA contributor Drew Hernandez. The New York Democrat was also seen shouting “into the streets,” in an apparent call for Americans to partake in public demonstrations against the ruling. (Tweet/Video)
Arizona Republican Party chair Kelli Ward
subpoenaed by DOJ in fake elector scheme
6 replies
Posted by Imright 6/24/2022 6:42:22 PM Post Reply
Kelli Ward, the head of the Arizona Republican Party, and her husband, Michael, received grand jury subpoenas from the Department of Justice regarding their involvement in a scheme to send fake electors to Congress on Jan. 6, 2021. The subpoena for the Wards first was reported by the website Politico, which cited an unnamed source it said was familiar with the matter. Alexander Kolodin, an attorney for the Wards, said to The Republic that “this is an investigation based on allegations that our clients engaged in core First Amendment-protected activity, namely petitioning Congress for a redress of grievances.”
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Exclusive: Pelosi Readies New Articles
of Impeachment Against Trump, Says ‘Third
Time’s The Charm’ *
47 replies
Posted by RockyTCB 6/24/2022 5:53:14 AM Post Reply
WASHINGTON, June 31, 2022 — House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Frisco, is readying new articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump, Issues & Insights has learned. “Sixteen months is too long to go between Trump impeachments,” she told her Democratic caucus in a secret meeting surreptitiously recorded by I&I investigators. She said that despite her previous claim that Trump had been “impeached forever,” she now believes that the effectiveness of a Trump impeachment is only about as long-lasting as a COVID vaccine. [snip] * Editor’s Note: This is a parody,
Bill Clinton: Supreme Court’s Roe v.
Wade decision has ‘put our democracy
at risk’
44 replies
Posted by Imright 6/24/2022 7:10:14 PM Post Reply
Former President Clinton is slamming the Supreme Court’s ruling to overturn Roe v. Wade, saying it contributes to putting “democracy at risk” and calling the high court “radical” and “activist.” “This decision puts partisanship ahead of precedent, ideology ahead of evidence, and the power of a small minority ahead of the clear will of the people,” Clinton said in a statement on Friday. “This jarring removal of rights that had long been guaranteed, along with decisions gutting the Voting Rights Act and abolishing any judicial remedy for admittedly unconstitutional gerrymandering by state legislatures and abuses of power by federal authorities
'This is a horrifying decision': 'Heartbroken'
Michelle Obama leads furious criticism
of SCOTUS overturning of Roe v. Wade -
as Amy Schumer blasts justices for following
'intentions of slave-owning rapists who've
been dead for hundreds for years'
42 replies
Posted by Imright 6/24/2022 7:34:10 PM Post Reply
Michelle Obama and Amy Schumer are leading the furious public criticism of the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade today - with the former First Lady slamming the move as 'horrifying' while warning that it will have 'devastating consequences' for women across the US. Dozens of celebrities have spoken out to share their horror over the landmark decision, including Kim Kardashian, Taylor Swift, Busy Philipps, Bette Midler, Hailey Bieber, and Sophie Turner - with many of them choosing to share Obama's statement as well as their own thoughts on the issue. 58-year-old Obama was one of the first high-profile people to react
Biden calls abortion decision a 'sad day,'
urges Americans to elect pro-abortion
rights officials
36 replies
Posted by Dreadnought 6/24/2022 1:32:21 PM Post Reply
Washington - President Joe Biden pledged to take every step his administration can to protect abortion rights after the Supreme Court overturned the landmark Roe v. Wade decision on Friday, and called on voters to elect state and federal officials who will vote to allow the procedure. Biden spoke from the White House on the ruling that eliminates a woman’s constitutional right to an abortion after nearly 50 years. The decision is expected to lead to nearly half of U.S. states outlawing or severely restricting the medical procedure and will affect tens of millions of people. “I believe Roe v. Wade was the correct decision as a matter of constitutional
Pelosi says Supreme Court is ‘eviscerating
American rights’ following Roe decision
35 replies
Posted by Imright 6/24/2022 11:26:06 AM Post Reply
Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) on Friday slammed the Supreme Court decision striking down Roe v. Wade, arguing that the justices are “eviscerating American rights.” Pelosi — in remarks at her weekly press conference, which took place minutes after the decision was released — said the ruling is an “insult” and “a slap in the face to women.” “This morning, the radical Supreme Court is eviscerating American rights and endangering their health and safety,” Pelosi said. “Today the Republican-controlled Supreme Court has achieved their dark, extreme goal of ripping away a women’s right to make their own reproductive health decisions,” she added.
Roberts charts own path in Supreme Court
abortion ruling
32 replies
Posted by Hermoine 6/24/2022 12:05:51 PM Post Reply
Chief Justice John Roberts issued a concurring judgment in the Supreme Court ruling Friday morning that revokes a woman's constitutional right to an abortion. Roberts explicitly sided with his conservative colleagues in their majority opinion to uphold Mississippi's ban on abortions following 15 weeks of pregnancy. However, in his concurring opinion, he expressed a difference in opinion with his colleagues on the matter of overturning the court's decades-old decision in Roe v. Wade, which gives women the constitutional right to abortion.
Murkowski vows to work on legislation
in response to abortion ruling
30 replies
Posted by Imright 6/24/2022 7:14:04 PM Post Reply
Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski (Alaska) announced Friday that she would prioritize legislation permitting abortion across the country following the Dobbs v. Jackson Supreme Court decision that overturned Roe v. Wade. “In the wake of this ruling, it is up to Congress to respond,” wrote Murkowski, vowing that she would continue “to work with a broader group to restore women’s freedom to control their own health decisions wherever they live.” She added: “Legislation to accomplish that must be a priority.”
Video: Maxine Waters Just Called For A
Nation-Wide Insurrection In-front Of The
Supreme Court
29 replies
Posted by Black Conservative Voice 6/24/2022 1:26:39 PM Post Reply
A shaken Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) issued a statement and spoke to reporters Friday on the Supreme Court decision returning abortion lawmaking to the states. Pelosi called the ruling “cruel”, “deadly serious” and blamed President Trump, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY), and Republicans.
6 Ways McConnell Betrays the Republican Base 26 replies
Posted by Magnante 6/24/2022 5:03:31 AM Post Reply
I do try to respect President Reagan's 11th Commandment: "Thou shalt not speak ill of thy fellow Republican." (snip) But…you knew it was coming…I sure wish we could move on from Mitch McConnell. Or rather, I wish we could find an effective way to compel Republican senators to move on from McConnell (and his lackeys) as their leader. I don't like him. I don't like the way he conducts business in the Senate. I don't like his imperious nature and his backroom double-dealings. I don't think he represents the vast majority of Republican voters
Maxine Waters reacts to Dobbs ruling:
'The hell with the Supreme Court. We will
defy them'
25 replies
Posted by Imright 6/24/2022 5:20:39 PM Post Reply
Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., pledged to defy and protest the Supreme Court following its decision Friday overturning Roe v. Wade. "You ain't seen nothing yet," Waters said from the steps of the court. "Women are going to control their bodies no matter how they try and stop us. The hell with the Supreme Court. We will defy them. Women will be in control of their bodies. And if they think Black women are intimidated or afraid, they got another thought coming." "Black women will be out in droves," she continued. "We will be out by the thousands, we will be out by the millions. CORRECTION*
United States Supreme Court Overturns
Roe V. Wade; Leaves Abortion Restrictions
To States
25 replies
Posted by Beardo 6/24/2022 10:23:12 AM Post Reply
WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court has overturned the monumental Roe v. Wade case that legalized abortion across the America. The 6-3 decision on Friday followed the early May leak of a draft opinion indicating which way the justices would rule. That leak prompted protesting across the nation, particularly in Washington, D.C. as well as dozens of attacks and vandalism of pro-life organizations, centers, and churches. Overturning of the landmark 1973 case came in the decision on Dobbs v.s. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, a challenge to a Mississippi law greatly restricting the federal right to abortion
Lightfoot: SCOTUS NY Gun Ruling Doesn't
Respect Federalism, Could Hurt Court Legitimacy
in Wake of Roe Opinion Giving States More Power
25 replies
Posted by Dreadnought 6/24/2022 3:03:03 AM Post Reply
During an interview on MSNBC on Thursday, Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot criticized the Supreme Court’s ruling on New York’s gun laws for failing to see “the importance of federalism.” And stated that she’s worried the ruling will “the legitimacy of the court, particularly given the leaked draft of the Roe decision.” Lightfoot stated, “We were part of an amicus effort on the behalf of a number of states in support of the New York law and really focusing on the importance of federalism. But unfortunately, given the composition of this court, we were not surprised that they struck down the New York law. But I think that they gave ample opportunity
Post New Article