Queen 'banned Harry and Meghan from having
a photographer capture the moment she
met her great-granddaughter Lilibet'
Daily Mail (UK),
by
Chris Matthews
Original Article
Posted By: Imright,
6/7/2022 12:31:22 AM
The Queen reportedly banned Harry and Meghan from having a photographer snap the Monarch meeting her great-granddaughter Lilibet for the first time.The 96-year-old is said to have met Harry and Meghan's daughter on Thursday.The Duke and Duchess of Sussex wanted a private photographer to capture the moment their daughter met her namesake, The Sun reported.However, they were allegedly told 'no chance' because it was a 'private family meeting'.Palace insiders may have worried any photos taken by Harry and Meghan would be shared with TV networks in the US.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Scout Finch 6/7/2022 1:06:30 AM (No. 1178307)
Ha ha. I bet Sparkle Markle was hoping to rake in loads of lucre from the photo sessions. Say what you will about England’s royal family, but Queen Elizabeth at least shows some restraint.
77 people like this.
Why give these two twits their selfish, narcissistic payoff with paparazzi-ing a private moment. Good for the Queen for putting the kibbosh on a Daily Mail photo-op
The D list actress and her Human Merkin are insufferable.
63 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
daisey 6/7/2022 3:41:21 AM (No. 1178361)
Markle would have gone after a huge payout from People magazine for pictures of the Queen and her “namesake”. I think Her Highness has Markle’s number.
70 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
mifla 6/7/2022 4:14:19 AM (No. 1178364)
That Liz is a class act. After she is gone, the Brits will ignore the Royal Family.
40 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Rinktum 6/7/2022 4:44:38 AM (No. 1178379)
And folks, that’s how it’s done. The Queen is no one’s fool and she clearly has these two nitwit’s number. Harry has thrown away his heritage for someone who is using him to promote herself. However, it is not going as she planned. In the UK, they were not welcomed with delight, in fact, they were booed and pretty much went home with their tails tucked between their legs. I doubt this nasty duo have learned anything and I expect Harry’s memoir which is due to be released before the end of the year will be packed full of more vitriol. It will be “his truth”. These two are money grubbing narcissists and everyone can see it. Nevertheless, the book will probably sell well, but I predict they even with that windfall, they won’t make it financially. Meghan really miscalculated their worth. She could have had everything she ever wanted but rejected it because she could not be the “queen bee”. Now she will get exactly what she deserves, nothing. The UK is done with their antics and the US couldn’t care less about their self-serving endeavors. They destroyed themselves. I predict she will leave him or push him to suicide whichever will benefit her most. Regardless, this will not end well.
74 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
WhamDBambam 6/7/2022 6:31:17 AM (No. 1178414)
They'd have had those pics on ebay before the sun went down.
31 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Strike3 6/7/2022 6:54:25 AM (No. 1178432)
The whole point was to have the pictures spread across as many TV screens and publications as possible. That's what Harry and Meghan are all about.
41 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
jinx 6/7/2022 7:19:59 AM (No. 1178447)
Lilibet has Harry's hair but she looks like Megan's sister.
17 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Jebediah 6/7/2022 7:28:42 AM (No. 1178460)
Fascinating to see the manly Harry wearing those pre distressed jeans, multi extra $ for the privilege......never understood why people fall for that attempt to look like you work your tush off and the knees give, when you are actually just sitting there showing off,. And I am SURE that the Sussex's wanted pictures of them with the Queen.,......they somehow have to re establish their brand, which is fading.
28 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
udanja99 6/7/2022 8:25:21 AM (No. 1178538)
They went back to London for a photo-op and the queen denied it to them. Long live the queen!
51 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
broken01 6/7/2022 8:43:27 AM (No. 1178557)
This is the Queen basically telling photo ho MEGS Meghan and her dopey grandson Hapless Harry this. Even though out of spite you gave your daughter a name that was private and I never liked I love her just the same. However, I will NEVER give you the opportunity to exploit me in regards to her for your own personal gain. Game set match.
29 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
bighambone 6/7/2022 9:02:29 AM (No. 1178575)
History will tell you that Queen Elizabeth was not about to be a “prop” for the likes of Netflix and the Hollywood crowd. That’s why Harry and Meghan serriptiously left the UK during the middle of the Queen’s jubilee celebration apparently without saying goodbye to the Royal Family. An act like that shows that while Meghan and Harry may think of themselves as the King and Queen of Hollywood, that in the UK and Commonwealth they rank behind the Paddington Bear!
22 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
jinx 6/7/2022 9:28:12 AM (No. 1178600)
I dare them to ever mention Climate Warming again after flying on a private jet for a four day visit and a birthday party for a one year old. They are the worst hypocrites!!!!
21 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
mizzmac 6/7/2022 10:03:41 AM (No. 1178661)
"Shared" with TV networks in the US? More like, SOLD, to the highest bidders!
15 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
padiva 6/7/2022 10:23:12 AM (No. 1178686)
The photographer for the 1 year should be fired!
The girl's hair was a mess. Do the English use combs/brushes?
The dress was all puffy. The girl looks like she is shaped like a beach ball.
Long live the Queen!
6 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
smokincol 6/7/2022 11:04:21 AM (No. 1178719)
the Queen has more smarts than the whole family put together and she has earned her place in history
13 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
thewarden 6/7/2022 12:08:29 PM (No. 1178786)
Bravo! Her Majesty deprived them of the one thing they really, really wanted and the only reason they went there—the prized pic of Lilibucks with the Queen! Well played, mam. Hilarious. They must be fuming. And yes, that pic of Lilibucks is trademarked to the Sharkles as are all pics of their spawn so that they can max merch it all. They are reprehensible.
10 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
Aubreyesque 6/7/2022 2:20:52 PM (No. 1178908)
Dont be fooled - security guards report there were NO children when the Harkles arrived in the UK, and NONE that left with them when they flew out before the Jubilee was over. In the time period that the Sussex Squad claims there was a birthday party, ALL Royals that were supposed to be in attendance were in other parts of the UK and not in London at the time. And after watching how Yacht Girl shhh'ed the children of the Tindall's for a photo op, and then saw how the Tindalls handled The Claw and Hazno after the service at St Pauls, do they really think people will believe they let their children near the Claw once again to be with a baby that NO ONE has seen until this past Saturday??? Beware the PR team of Sunshine Sachs and the "Barbie Ken Doll" Amid Scabies - especially the latter: he is as bad or worse than the Yacht Girl when it comes to vicious lies and stories.
2 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
JimBob 6/8/2022 1:23:34 PM (No. 1179828)
Just a minute here!
What's all this "Duke and Duchess of Sussex" garbage?
My understanding is that Hapless Harry and The Shrew 'resigned' from being 'Royals' because the 'Duties' were 'too tiresome',
and they were just 'Harry' and 'Shrew' from then on.
Is it now the Daily Mail's place to 'restore' them to the Royal family?
Grifters and Trash! That's what they are!
Put 'em in with The HornDog and the HildeBeast, or put 'em on The View with those other harridans.
That's where they belong!
1 person likes this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Imright"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)