Former Trump Aide Navarro Indicted for
Contempt of Congress over Refusal to Cooperate
with January 6 Investigation
National Review,
by
Brittany Bernstein
Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought,
6/3/2022 12:14:59 PM
A federal grand jury has indicted Peter Navarro, a former Trump White House adviser, on criminal contempt of Congress charges over his refusal to cooperate in the House investigation of the January 6th attack.
The indictment comes after the House voted in April to refer Navarro to the Justice Department for failing to comply with a February subpoena from the House Select Committee on the January 6 Capitol riot.
Navarro was charged with one contempt count for his refusal to appear for a deposition, and another for his refusal to produce documents requested by the committee, despite the subpoena from the January 6 committee.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Venturer 6/3/2022 12:22:31 PM (No. 1174865)
70% (my figure) of Americans have nothing but contempt for Congress.
Most of those have contempt for the President, and the SCOTUS is beginning to be contemptible also.
45 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
EQKimball 6/3/2022 12:23:17 PM (No. 1174867)
If he can drag it out through the year, a Republican House will withdraw the subpoena, thereby mooting the prosecution's case against him. Even if DOJ tries to continue the case, the courts will find it moot.
35 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Shmowry1 6/3/2022 12:32:49 PM (No. 1174880)
Personally, I don’t think it should be prosecuted because I think we have better time or resources to use or spend to other things that affect the nation as a whole than a possible lie to the FBI…I mean than refusal to comply with a highly partisan rogue committee. We could spend that time more wisely.
21 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
stablemoney 6/3/2022 1:07:05 PM (No. 1174899)
Navarro is not contemptuous of Congress, but contempt of the Democrat Jan. 6 Committee. Please amend the indictment accordingly, removing the inaccuracy.
31 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Daisymay 6/3/2022 1:11:50 PM (No. 1174902)
Yeah, that really looks good! The NASTY members on the Jan 6th Committee threatening to throw an OLD MAN in a Jail Cell because he won't squeal on his former Employer, The President! Hope everyone else does the same and refuses to have anything to do with those Clowns! Drag it out long enough for the Mid-Terms and none of the Committee will be in Congress. They will be thrown out with the rest of the Garbage in that Building!
15 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
john56 6/3/2022 1:16:42 PM (No. 1174906)
Another instance on how the deep state plans to bankrupt its opponents by having them spend lots of $$$ on deep state attorneys who will "defend" you against these charges.
Why more of these folks haven't gone to the civil suit route like Carter Page and now President Trump is beyond me. For example. I believe Gen. Flynn would have a great case against James Cardinal Comey and others for that frame job -- and what will be found is that Flynn HAD to be framed and framed quickly, because he would have quickly been able to determine what had been done (and was in the process of being done) by the Clinton machine, DNC, and the DOJ/FBI/Intelligence agencies.
11 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
volksford 6/3/2022 1:23:39 PM (No. 1174914)
Banana republics eat your hearts out .
15 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Highlander 6/3/2022 1:31:42 PM (No. 1174919)
This is not justice, just political persecution. Like the other poster said, Navarro should hang in there until the Dems get beaten in the mid-terms.
16 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
sailannapolis 6/3/2022 2:08:42 PM (No. 1174944)
I did not know that a mostly uneducated house of so called representatives have the power to indict a private citizen?
10 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
bighambone 6/3/2022 2:13:35 PM (No. 1174947)
If he doesn’t end up with a Clinton, Obama, or Biden appointed Judge who rules that evidence, pointing out that the January 6th Democrat run congressional committee was not properly appointed, cannot be presented during his trial, Navarro should be OK. But remember this will certainly be a another highly politically charged case held in DC with a Democrat supporting jury.
7 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Mofongo 6/3/2022 2:17:55 PM (No. 1174950)
Proud to be an American where at least I know I’m free.
5 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
hershey 6/3/2022 2:25:10 PM (No. 1174953)
How can you not be in contempt for a body for which you have nothing but contempt??? Congress is a bunch of baboons, picking fleas off each other while screwing over our country...they all need to be sent back to the jungle...NOVEMBER 2022...watch the RED wave inundate them even with their trickery at the polls...
8 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
rytwng 6/3/2022 2:26:34 PM (No. 1174955)
Just change his first name to Hillary and no problem.
6 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
davew 6/3/2022 2:48:14 PM (No. 1174970)
Here's what's at stake for the Office of the President and the "separation of powers" intent in the Constitution. Executive priviledge is a critical protection that all Presidential aides and consultants expect regardless of party or ideology. This allows them to be candid and honest with the Executive without fear of public retribution or legal actions against them from the Legislative branch.
The Jan 6 committee is attempting to prosecute former Trump aids like Bannon and Navarro for not disclosing to Congress decisions and communications that fall under the Executive priviledge protection. President Trump is just a person and once he leaves office he can no longer can claim the powers of the Executive. Normal successor Presidents of either party have recognized the need defend this protection just as both parties in the Senate recognize the importance of defending the fillabuster.
Because Joe Biden is a partisan hack with a vendetta against Trump and is willing to destroy the Presidency along with the rest of the country, he has refused Executive priviledge protection for his predecessor even when it clearly applies. This is what will be adjudicated over many years and at great expense in the Bannon and Navarro trials. The SCOTUS will have to resolve this impasse but the clear expectation of President Trump, and indirectly his aides, is that his term in office should receive equal treatment under the principle of Executive Priviledge as every prior President in history.
9 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
BarryNo 6/3/2022 3:09:35 PM (No. 1174978)
Being held in contempt by Democrats and RINOs is a badge of the highest honor.
5 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
smokincol 6/3/2022 3:56:03 PM (No. 1175002)
this demcommie pack of rats might just be sorry for doing this and I hope it bites them right where it should, right between their gluteus maximi
3 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
singermom9 6/3/2022 4:12:53 PM (No. 1175026)
I would go to the cmte and just repeat the Hillary responses. "I do not recall" and "At this point what difference does it make"?
3 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)