Who Leaked The Roe V. Wade Draft? Some
Big Clues Point To Obvious Culprits
The Blue State Conservative,
by
Hailey Sanibel
Original Article
Posted By: Rush Was Right,
5/3/2022 9:33:31 AM
Violating hundreds of years of norms and ethics, a leaked memo from within the Supreme Court purports to show a majority of the nine justices having indicated a willingness to overturn the half-century-old Roe V. Wade decision. If true, the leak itself is nothing short of blatant judicial intimidation and amounts to an insurrection in its own right, according to D.C. politicians and pundits.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
DVC 5/3/2022 9:37:46 AM (No. 1145188)
Look for the Wide Latina's band of extreme leftist crazies to be the most likely culprits.
38 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
samoasam 5/3/2022 10:13:09 AM (No. 1145229)
Really, who cares. Idiots are treating this like it’s nuclear war, which is on the horizon!!
13 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
smokincol 5/3/2022 10:22:18 AM (No. 1145232)
the communists have infiltrated every level of our government - this is very dangerous for every sincere American in the country, for as the Borg says: you will be "assimilated" and the condition is, whether you like it or not - the Borg are the demcommies and will do anything, and commit every illegal act, to accomplish their unlawful domination of our country - the repubs had better wake up and get the game on to fight this insurrection
9 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Trump'sCousin 5/3/2022 10:23:01 AM (No. 1145235)
So when do American Patriots get busy saving the Republic by rounding up Ftards and Kwirdoz and publically executing them?
They hate this country and everything it stands for. Believe me, America and the world will be much, much better off without them.
Prove me wrong.
14 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
millstream 5/3/2022 10:30:21 AM (No. 1145244)
Do drafts routinely circulate amongst all the justices or just the supporters. Hope the are able to idenditify the culprit or we will never again see decisions with any level of trust
10 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
WV.Hillbilly 5/3/2022 10:35:56 AM (No. 1145253)
The leaker should be given 24 hours to come forward and admit what he did. And then fired.
If he doesn't, fire all the clerks.
30 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
The Other Guy 5/3/2022 10:36:00 AM (No. 1145254)
I, for one, care and I suspect many others do also. It is possible to have concerns about more than one serious situation at the same time.
14 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
MindMadeUp 5/3/2022 10:39:05 AM (No. 1145263)
"...dare I say, an insurrection." Of course, the Marxist/Democrats and their pet MSM will call the waves of massive, violent riots "protected free speech" in this case, but attempting to overthrow SCOTUS and the Constitution literally *is* an insurrection.
12 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
SilkCity 5/3/2022 10:44:26 AM (No. 1145274)
The Chief's way of checking the weather.
Bet on it.
14 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
TLCary 5/3/2022 10:48:15 AM (No. 1145282)
So far I keep hearing that leaking the document wasn’t a crime. No crime, no criminal investigation. How about contempt of courts or obstruction of Justice? Miss-spellings, this wasn’t a final draft. Finding who had it at this iteration would be easy, but only if they want to. I don’t expect the FBidenI to be in a big hurry. Don’t get caught up in the Inside Baseball, celebrate the victory.
3 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Philipsonh 5/3/2022 10:52:47 AM (No. 1145292)
My opinion is that the Supreme court has NO integrity or credibility; when they refused to take ANY of the cases of voter fraud that took place during the 2020 election, that was the last straw. They did and do not care what happens in the USA. The voter fraud filings were the most important filings ever and the while Nation, and the World, has been affected. Just look at what has occurred over the last 15 months.
20 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Krause 5/3/2022 10:59:01 AM (No. 1145299)
I would suggest a panel to interview any person who had access to this information, and a polygraph test as well for each.
12 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Rama41 5/3/2022 11:15:11 AM (No. 1145323)
An unidentified person soon to be associated with the Supreme Court was quoted as saying she thought the leaker was a woman, but she wasn't sure.
3 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Daisymay 5/3/2022 11:39:57 AM (No. 1145361)
Ha Ha #1, Not sure if that was a typo or not! I WAS going to say the "Wise Latina", but I guess your version covers it as well!
5 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
ARKfamily 5/3/2022 11:42:06 AM (No. 1145366)
On another website, there is an article about how disturbed/disappointed Hillary is on this decision that might occur and, of course, a "former" campaign spokesperson is okay with the leak. Of course, they are. They think they are all gods of some sort.
I am reading Exodus right now in the Bible and there seems to be some parallels for me. Exodus 1:22 states this: "Then Pharoah gave this order to all his people: Every Hebrew boy that is born you must throw into the Nile, but let every girl live." I guess babies are meaningless in some people's eyes. There are moms who support abortion which is baffling. It doesn't say much for what they think of their children. Oh, I know their babies are not inconvenient. I am disgusted with the casual attitude for babies.
5 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
formerNYer 5/3/2022 11:43:17 AM (No. 1145367)
I'll bet it was either the jackass Latina or the newest groomer put on the court. Can you say impeachment?
3 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
chillijilli 5/3/2022 11:43:38 AM (No. 1145368)
Well, if we're postulating, who would be most motivated to sacrifice their entire future career for a chance to become a superstar for so-called women's rights, while bailing out Biden at the same time? In LibSpeak that means find me a zealot who'd do whatever it takes for the "greater good."
Since Breyer's clerks will presumably soon be without a job, might they be 1s in line as leak suspects? Or how about our newest Supreme? If she or her inexperienced clerks were provided access to the draft BEFORE she's seated as a Justice---could they claim they weren't informed of the seriousness of such a leak?
I know, I know. You'd have to be a moron to not understand the gravity of a leak like that---but remember we're dealing with a woman who claims not to know what a woman is---AND IS ABLE TO GET AWAY WITH IT!
4 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
czechlist 5/3/2022 11:46:38 AM (No. 1145380)
Doctor my eyes,...is this the prize...?
brown, jackson?
1 person likes this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
Highvoltage 5/3/2022 11:49:00 AM (No. 1145384)
If a clerk released this, the justices for whom they worked should be impeached!
3 people like this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
bighambone 5/3/2022 12:14:38 PM (No. 1145417)
No doubt the leftist, progressive, and socialist Democrats will now attempt to make this leaked draft Supreme Court decision a huge distraction from all the Biden politburo and Democrat incompetencies that have put Biden and the Democrats in a massive political hole according to almost all the polls during the run-up to the November election.
Common sense will tell you that the draft Supreme Court decision, dated back in February, has probably already been superseded by additional draft decisions working towards a final decision that the Supreme Court would release in June. Now that final decision should be put on the fast track as a demonstration that the Supreme Court Justices will not be intimidated by unlawful or political acts. There is no doubt that the draft decision was leaked by someone working at the court who disagreed with the draft decision relating to that highly politicized case, and that would certainly be a Democrat activist or operative. There should be a comprehensive administrative and criminal investigation to identity the leaker(s) and determine if the leaker(s) are subject to criminal prosecution for disrupting government operations and of course to remove the leaker(s) from their employment at the Supreme Court.
2 people like this.
Reply 21 - Posted by:
rytwng 5/3/2022 12:30:03 PM (No. 1145443)
A Democrat of course.
3 people like this.
Reply 22 - Posted by:
doctorfixit 5/3/2022 12:58:26 PM (No. 1145486)
Turnabout is fair play. CommuNazis accept no limits on their evildoing, therefore it is appropriate to destroy them by any means necessary.
3 people like this.
Reply 23 - Posted by:
DVC 5/3/2022 3:57:59 PM (No. 1145676)
Re #14, no typo.
With malice aforethought.
2 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Rush Was Right"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)