New York Times, FX Team Up for Elon Musk Exposé
PJ Media,
by
Stephen Green
Original Article
Posted By: Hazymac,
4/26/2022 7:52:38 AM
There’s an Elon Musk exposé on a possible coverup of Tesla deaths coming to FX next month as part of the network’s The New York Times Presents series.
According to Variety, “Elon Musk’s Crash Course” will take a critical look at Musk’s Tesla automaker and its efforts to create fully self-driving cars:
"The film will dive into how Tesla’s Autopilot program has resulted in several deaths that Musk and the company has yet to publicly acknowledge, and details Musk’s efforts to kill government investigations into the incidents. Several former Tesla employees will be featured in the documentary, speaking out against Musk for the first time."
According to TeslaDeaths.com
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Lazyman 4/26/2022 7:54:36 AM (No. 1138492)
From the people who just recently discovered Hunter's laptop.
38 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
KGK73 4/26/2022 8:02:16 AM (No. 1138499)
What about the expose on Hoe and Hunter Biden?
17 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
philsner 4/26/2022 8:06:27 AM (No. 1138501)
Lol. "The New York Times Presents". "Presents" = lies like a rug.
18 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Chiritwo 4/26/2022 8:15:30 AM (No. 1138507)
Another person the left is deathly afraid of. Why, because the left doesn't want free speech.
25 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Rumblehog 4/26/2022 8:18:58 AM (No. 1138512)
The Tesla is still safer than the Pinto and Corvair; now think about that, NYT.
15 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Newtsche 4/26/2022 8:21:02 AM (No. 1138514)
Another test program that has resulted in deaths comes to mind.
12 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
ROLFNader 4/26/2022 8:30:34 AM (No. 1138524)
Since its the NYTtwits, I'll put this one in the category of reasons to vote FOR someone.
5 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
cor-vet 4/26/2022 8:32:15 AM (No. 1138527)
Between frivolous lawsuits and lying exposes, they work overtime to smear anyone that strays from the company narrative. I'm surprised it took this long!
14 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
EJKrausJr 4/26/2022 8:34:48 AM (No. 1138532)
Smells of retaliation. Deep Staters must eliminate Elon. He is a threat to their control. Musk is the new 45. He must go.
18 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Hazymac 4/26/2022 8:35:29 AM (No. 1138534)
Alfred Hitchcock Presents.... Here are two highly credulous organizations trying to fake something they never had: credibility. The FX Network and the NYT, already wallowing in mud and filth up to their necks, want it to be over their heads. They want to wallow in it, head to foot. So let it be. If they don't have an undermud breathing apparatus, they might wind up in the same shape as the Bidiot, just wandering around aimlessly and hoping the songbirds don't carpet bomb his ice cream cone or his brow.
7 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Dodge Boy 4/26/2022 8:37:26 AM (No. 1138535)
Oh come on now, FX. Just because Elon took tweeter away from you is no reason for your little revenge game.
6 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
J-Dog 4/26/2022 8:48:39 AM (No. 1138553)
Audi 5000.
2 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
LadyVet 4/26/2022 8:51:18 AM (No. 1138556)
#10, thanks for the laugh. Good visual on the carpet bombing.
3 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Strike3 4/26/2022 8:53:42 AM (No. 1138559)
Now that Musk has made himself a target the smear campaign will soon follow. This will be a bit embarrassing for the government that subsidized Tesla with millions of dollars so they could build those little electric cars. People die every day in Chevys and Fords and the car isn't blamed, what's up with that? FNYT
8 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Strike3 4/26/2022 8:58:20 AM (No. 1138567)
New York Times staff probably sat at their desks all day long and enjoyed an endless stream of propaganda on Twitter that provided them with ideas to write stupid articles uncontaminated with conservative viewpoints. That's all gone now.
5 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
snowoutlaw 4/26/2022 9:04:20 AM (No. 1138571)
Did FX/NYTs plant incendiary devices like NBC ?
3 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
toddh 4/26/2022 9:37:15 AM (No. 1138619)
FX is Disney.
3 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
Clinger 4/26/2022 9:49:28 AM (No. 1138629)
Musk is a Nazi, there beat em to the punch.
1 person likes this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
DVC 4/26/2022 11:01:46 AM (No. 1138684)
NYT is a leftist propaganda operation, and has been since the 1930s. Everything they do is focused on helping Communists and other leftists, and facts and truth are never of the slightest interest to the slmeballs of the NYT.
3 people like this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
DVC 4/26/2022 11:31:50 AM (No. 1138717)
Actually, #5, neither the Pinto or the Corvair were anything close to the "unusual dangers" that the lying press claimed they were.
Years later one of the test drivers for lying Ralph Nader's "Unsafe at any Speed" said that they had to intentionally greatly lower the rear tire inflation pressures on the Corvairs to get them to spin out, and even then, it took the drivers intentionally 'whipping the wheel' to destabilize the cars in the middle of a corner.
I'm not as aware of the Pinto details, other than it was claimed that they burst into flames when hit in the rear, but all cars of that era had their fuel tanks at the extreme rear bottom of the car, very easily damaged in a rear end collision. I don't think that the Pinto was substantially more dangerous than other cars of that era.
Most cars today have the tank located farther forward, less likely to be damaged in a crash. And most cars then had the fuel filler neck literally a friction fit steel tube inside a large rubber grommet. The fill pipe was attached to the frame, not the tank. Easily displaced in a crash, fuel pouring everywhere. Dangerous? Yes. But most cars were much the same, the Pinto had no special patent on this danger.
4 people like this.
Reply 21 - Posted by:
Hazymac 4/26/2022 12:35:52 PM (No. 1138793)
#20's point about the 1971-1976 Ford Pinto aka The Exploding Car is correct. Popular Mechanics published an article about the controversy, which concluded that Ford's PR problems made the Pinto's design flaw which were obvious with the fuel positioned between the rear bumper and axle seem worse that it really was. From Popular Mechanics: "Reports range from 27 to 180 deaths as a result of rear-impact-related fuel tank fires in the Pinto, but given the volume of more than 2.2 million vehicles sold, the death rate was not substantially different from that of vehicles by Ford's competitors." In other words, the equally bad Chevy Vega was no less dangerous than the Pinto. But the Pinto's gas tank was just sitting there in the face of the next driver in line, and if he knew anything, he was snickering. Get me away from this exploding car! Cheap cheap cheap. Then Ford chairman Lee Iacocca should have been ashamed of himself for that misstep.
0 people like this.
Reply 22 - Posted by:
Hazymac 4/26/2022 12:46:45 PM (No. 1138810)
Correction: "...which was obvious with the fuel tank positioned between the rear bumper and the axle...." Although 2.2 million Pintos were sold during 1971-1976, you would have to look hard to find one still running, or, heaven forfend, in 99 point concours showroom condition. Why bother gilding the lily? Junk is junk. These cars should never have been on a showroom floor. Some of them exploded or burned up; the rest either rusted in 10,000 junk yards or got cubed in Auric Goldfinger's car crusher, and recycled.
Although I'm not in the market for an electric car, Tesla is probably the best of that lot. Elon Musk has got my respect.
0 people like this.
Reply 23 - Posted by:
rochow 4/26/2022 2:41:27 PM (No. 1138957)
But of course, the NYSlime needs to get their feet wet. Can't wait to hear that they report that President Trump and Elon are actually lovers, and both are planning a sex change!!!
1 person likes this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Hazymac"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)