SEC’s new rule would add climate change
risks, emissions to corporate disclosures
Washington Times,
by
Ramsey Touchberry
Original Article
Posted By: Ribicon,
3/21/2022 11:31:24 PM
The Securities and Exchange Commission unveiled a landmark proposal Monday that would require publicly traded companies to disclose emissions data and risks posed by climate change. The proposal, which must undergo a 60-day public comment period before the SEC makes it final, would be a first of its kind and mark yet another arena where the Biden administration hopes to combat a warming climate. It also underscores the administration’s concerns about climate change’s potential impacts on the economy. The idea faced immediate pushback from Republican lawmakers and industry groups. They said the regulators had overstepped their authority and would spread confusion through corporate offices and on Wall Street.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
stablemoney 3/21/2022 11:40:17 PM (No. 1106326)
Now the left is on to destroying the financial numbers. 2 plus 2 will be 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, or whatever they say the number is for the day. Financial statements, are already 95% of unnecessary information, and the important stuff nowhere to be seen. Expenses are grouped into one line, SG&A. Really, that says a lot.
4 people like this.
I’m more concerned on the effect on Santa and the Tooth Fairy.
4 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
caljeepgirl 3/22/2022 2:30:31 AM (No. 1106364)
Why do I feel like doors are closing all around me and they're throwing away the keys?!
13 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Scout Finch 3/22/2022 2:32:04 AM (No. 1106366)
Corporate America is happy to go along with all this BS. Kind of makes one wonder why.
5 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
voxpopuli 3/22/2022 5:08:45 AM (No. 1106386)
Re: #4
Bribery and Blackmail
On huge scale
8 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Jesuslover54 3/22/2022 5:26:32 AM (No. 1106387)
Assumes facts not in evidence -- and never will be.
8 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
F15 Gork 3/22/2022 6:33:26 AM (No. 1106412)
The primary impact of climate change on the economy is the damage being done to it by government clowns like those in the SEC mandating this or that based on zip, zero nada.
10 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Rich323 3/22/2022 6:34:40 AM (No. 1106415)
Zyick Zyick bam! Zyick Zyick bam! I’m practicing my sound effects. Never know when I might need them.
1 person likes this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
5 handicap 3/22/2022 6:44:23 AM (No. 1106427)
Has the SEC outlived its usefulness? Probably so! Why do the asshats in governmental positions always do stupid things to only justify their existence?
3 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
skacmar 3/22/2022 6:47:17 AM (No. 1106428)
Useless and unnecessary actions that will be expensive to comply with and will do absolutely nothing to reduce the imagined climate change. What about companies offering a service (Google) vs a manufacturing company (Steel companies)? How do you evaluate the climate impact of a computer program or video game? This is just another rule to make it look like they are doing something because "they care".
6 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Calvinesq 3/22/2022 7:24:00 AM (No. 1106440)
Sample disclosure by a company with losses in each of the last three fiscal years:
"It's hot. We're not."
2 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
SkeezerMcGee 3/22/2022 8:16:33 AM (No. 1106470)
"The SEC has a three-part mission: to protect investors; maintain fair, orderly, and efficient markets; and facilitate capital formation."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._Securities_and_Exchange_Commission
Congress has delegated to the SEC no jurisdiction regarding climate change. The SEC has no expertise regarding climate change. The Biden administration intends that the SEC be authorized to impose obligations upon publicly traded companies based upon the respective corporation's disclosure of its emissions data and its risks regarding climate change.
What could go wrong? Most corporations produce no emissions such as from the hearing and cooling appliances in structures each occupy. Will such corporation be required to produce "emissions data" regarding emissions from those structures? Piece of cake! No problems and no undue expenses, especially regarding structures wherein the corporation is a tenant.
6 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
lakerman1 3/22/2022 8:57:41 AM (No. 1106489)
Geez, #2, you left out the most important question - what about unicorns? Make those ugly companies assess the differences in rates of horn grown in black unicorns and white unicorns, in integrated versus segregated schools, in high CO.2 jurisdictions.
0 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
curious1 3/22/2022 9:10:26 AM (No. 1106496)
Yet more unnecessary regulatory actions. Dome-commies need a dirt nap before they completely destroy the Republic.
1 person likes this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Pearson365 3/22/2022 9:41:09 AM (No. 1106534)
Reasons for Biden’s misuse of SEC are obvious:
A. Allows SEC to hire hundreds of leftist activists to analyze the mandated corporate responses on climate. Estimated average salary $180,000 per plus benefits. These activists will contribute heavily to Democrats.
B. Forces corporations to hire climate consultants, with these consultants working in firms that are owned by Democrat contributors and politicians. Nancy Pelosi’s husband will be a major investor in the new consulting companies.
C. Forces manufacturers to produce expensive and unwanted “green” products to placate SEC’s climate zealots.
D. Finally, it allows the leftist executives who manage many of our largest corporations to show their concerns for the earth. And to have these leftist CEOs contribute more to the Democrats than they do to shareholders and customers.
3 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
skacmar 3/22/2022 10:47:06 AM (No. 1106602)
All of the hot air coming out of politicians mouths regarding climate change has more effect on the weather than all of the evil publicly traded corporations who will be required to report their climate impact. The SEC has no reason to worry about climate change. It is not their job. The SEC worries about Securities and Exchanges. They are not the woke socially and globally responsible corporate monitoring agency.
1 person likes this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
Heil Liberals 3/22/2022 10:49:28 AM (No. 1106606)
New rule. See, we are ruled. There is no legislation from our worthless legislators in Congress to authorize this. They ceded that power in the original laws which gave these pukes autocratic power to destroy.
We are ROME.
2 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
MickTurn 3/22/2022 11:01:37 AM (No. 1106635)
Yes the climate changes...the Sun comes up, it gets warmer, the sun goes down it gets cooler So Effin What!
0 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
Scribelus 3/22/2022 11:36:54 AM (No. 1106694)
If climate change twaddle is required, can astrology and necromancy be far behind?
0 people like this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
learner 3/22/2022 11:53:00 AM (No. 1106713)
They can offset it with fairy dust and unicorn flatulence which are just as real as manmade climate change.
1 person likes this.
Reply 21 - Posted by:
DVC 3/22/2022 12:39:24 PM (No. 1106777)
Adding fiction , irrelevant fiction, to the SEC reports.
1 person likes this.
Reply 22 - Posted by:
Hermit_Crab 3/22/2022 1:39:56 PM (No. 1106816)
Kill American Business In Every Way Possible Is (one of) The Goal Of This Evil Cabal
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Ribicon"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Comments:
If you wanted to hamstring US companies versus international competitors, you'd force them to perform costly work that produces nothing of value whatsoever. Which evidently is the goal here. A secondary effect would be to encourage publicly traded companies to go private, thus avoiding this folly altogether.