Former DNI Ratcliffe told Durham intelligence
supports ‘multiple’ indictments in
probe: sources
Fox News,
by
Brooke Singman
Original Article
Posted By: Imright,
2/14/2022 10:36:46 AM
Exclusive: Former Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe met with Special Counsel John Durham on more than one occasion and told him there was evidence in intelligence to support the indictments of "multiple people" in his investigation into the origins of the Trump-Russia probe, sources told Fox News.Fox News first reported on Durham's latest filing, which alleged that lawyers from Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign in 2016 had paid to "infiltrate" servers belonging to Trump Tower and later the White House, in order to establish an "inference" and "narrative" to bring to federal government agencies linking Donald Trump to Russia.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
spacer 2/14/2022 10:57:17 AM (No. 1071693)
How is this not high treason?
26 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
DVC 2/14/2022 11:01:21 AM (No. 1071697)
Wake me when Comey, Strzok, Rosenstein, McCabe, Brennan or Clapper are indicted.
This is not going to get to 'the big fish', and punishments will be thirty lashes with a wet noodle.
29 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Gordon Mills 2/14/2022 11:10:08 AM (No. 1071705)
Yeah, sure. How long have we been hearing this crap? And how many of the crooks do you see in prison?
23 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Readaholic 2/14/2022 11:34:01 AM (No. 1071727)
WELL, I'm sure James Comey's daughter can make this all go away.
17 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Daisymay 2/14/2022 11:56:30 AM (No. 1071754)
If they couldn't get Hillary for deleting 33,000 e-mails, they won't get her for anything. Yes, maybe some of her Henchmen will have to fall on the Sword for her, but she will never see the inside of a Jail. Take that to the Bank!
14 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
formerNYer 2/14/2022 12:04:06 PM (No. 1071766)
Oh, this is going to big!
4 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
john56 2/14/2022 12:11:19 PM (No. 1071778)
Again, I continue to adopt the "Apostle Thomas" theory of the Durham investigation. When I see it, I'll believe it. So far, it seems like janitors and underlings to underlings are most at risk. And hey, they aren't even getting an FBI 6 am raid and a couple nights in the local lockup when arrested.
And Durham can get all the indictments he wants. But it's DOJ lawyers trying the case. Something tells me that the Rittenhouse prosecutor would be much better than the prosecution case these deep state DOJ lawyers will ever produce.
I'd love to be proven wrong.
13 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
moebellini3 2/14/2022 12:42:27 PM (No. 1071804)
The scum in office and the media like to talk about Jan. 6th and insurrection. Fact is, they are the insurrection, they are the supporters of treason and they are the American haters who stole the election. These low life hypocrites should all go to jail. They all hate Trump because he IS NOT PART OF THE D.C. SWAMP. Trump exposed all of them, both democrats and republican Rinos. They are the shadow government running this country through a mentally incapacitated puppet called Joe aka, "lunch bucket" Biden. Wake up...
21 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
JunkYardDog 2/14/2022 1:37:58 PM (No. 1071838)
#8
Couldn't have said it any better myself. Treason worthy of hanging and firing squad did happen during the 2020 election campaign.
9 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Rich323 2/14/2022 2:34:04 PM (No. 1071873)
Indictments for the mailman, the paper boy, the ice cream man, the lawn service, but NONE for the high and mighty Pig in a Pant Suit (PIAPS)!
5 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
RuckusTom 2/14/2022 4:20:34 PM (No. 1071950)
Hmmm. Let's check out what the Constitution says about "treason" - "Article III, Section 3, Clause 1: Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court."
I've read elsewhere that our betters only have a 5 year statute of limitations. Most of this stuff happened in 2016 (or before). So, 2016 (to 2021) is out.
They've run out the clock unless something pops up in 2017 or after.
0 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
learner 2/14/2022 5:39:46 PM (No. 1072006)
Top layers of State, Justice and DHS need to be blasted with the subpoena canon.
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Imright"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)