How Biden’s Vow to Name a Black Woman
to the Supreme Court Backfired
Slate,
by
Christina Cauterucci
Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought,
2/1/2022 9:10:39 PM
Americans seem to be turned off by Joe Biden’s Supreme Court nomination strategy.
In a new ABC News/Ipsos poll of U.S. adults, more than three-quarters of respondents said Biden should “consider all possible nominees” to replace retiring Justice Stephen Breyer, rather than “consider only nominees who are Black women, as he has pledged to do.” Even 54 percent of Democrats said they’d prefer Biden take the wide-net approach.
This may come as an unwelcome surprise to the White House, but it makes perfect sense to those of us who’ve been following Biden’s blundering attempts to discuss race and gender in politics over the past two years.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
SALady 2/1/2022 9:23:50 PM (No. 1058409)
Not-my-president Senile Joe biden is so senile that he doesn't have a clue what he is saying. He didn't decide to appoint a black female -- his handlers made that decision.
And that is the bigger problem. His handlers are unelected Communists who are so far removed from reality that they honestly believe all of the far-left garbage they want to force on this country is what the strong majority of people in this country actually want. Nothing -- and I do mean nothing -- could be further from the truth. They are of that mindset that, because nobody they know would ever vote for a Republican, therefore nobody in this country would vote for a Republican.
Yet these handlers are holding the strings of our puppet president. If that doesn't scare you, I don't know what will!!!!!
13 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Jesuslover54 2/1/2022 9:56:15 PM (No. 1058429)
Not just a black woman but a fat, diabetic, hypertensive black woman. Who has B.O. Why shirk?
7 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Paglia guy 2/1/2022 10:05:30 PM (No. 1058441)
And who reeks of hair treatment, eh, #2?
5 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Rich323 2/1/2022 10:53:54 PM (No. 1058482)
I support BRM Black Robes Matter. Do it right or don’t do it at all. Just think, we are on the verge of having a lifetime appointment made by an illegitimate President. What a mockery of our whole system of government.
16 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
janjan 2/1/2022 11:09:08 PM (No. 1058492)
The SC does not exist to serve social justice based on someone’s race, gender or life experience. They are there to rule on the constitutionality of the law. Since liberals don’t consider the Constitution a legitimate document they do not understand the Court’s purpose nor are they concerned about following it. That’s why an affirmative action hire makes perfect sense to them.
12 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
bighambone 2/1/2022 11:32:52 PM (No. 1058513)
If Biden can say that he will only select a Black woman for a position on the Supreme Court, why could Biden not set out the same exclusive racial and gender qualifications for all other federal positions that he intends to fill through his future nominations?
5 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
ussjimmycarter 2/2/2022 12:05:52 AM (No. 1058526)
Let’s make sure she is also as smart as a bag of hammers!
3 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Italiano 2/2/2022 12:10:37 AM (No. 1058528)
It's not like black liberal Democrat women, lawyer or not, have distinguished themselves over recent years.
Nor have white liberal Democrat women, come to think of it.
Sorry, flame away, but there it is.
9 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
danu 2/2/2022 3:28:10 AM (No. 1058589)
His backfires are a constant gas attack, even with the adult nappies; it's a common symptom of gaslighting, we're told.
3 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Strike3 2/2/2022 3:34:08 AM (No. 1058591)
Right on point, #8. Everything Biden has done since the theft of the 2020 election has backfired because his entire administration consists of not-too-smart leftist losers. His upcoming state of the union could be reduced to one word on the teleprompter, FUBAR.
4 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Roscoelewis 2/2/2022 6:03:44 AM (No. 1058643)
I nominate Whoopi.
3 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Rabidrabbit1 2/2/2022 9:01:45 AM (No. 1058810)
If Biden’s only criteria is it be a black female, then he should accept any Trump suggests, to make it fair.
0 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
bigfatslob 2/2/2022 9:45:49 AM (No. 1058869)
Biden didn't make this decision he only announces it for the real masters. Watching this Kakistocracy is frightening. A fraud president choosing a SC judge has brought this nation to new lows. FJB
2 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
jeffkinnh 2/2/2022 10:29:33 AM (No. 1058913)
This is beyond Biden. The Slate article makes it clear that it is fine to make a choice for SCOTUS based on race and sex. In itself, that is true. Race or sex should not DISQUALIFY a SCOTUS candidate. However, the rest of the process, as described by Slate, is that "Diverse political institutions make more inclusive policies". That may be true for a legislature that MAKES laws. Is is absolutely NOT true for a court that INTERPRETS legislative intent when there is confusion about the meaning of a law.
Therefore, what is REQUIRED of a SCOTUS justice is that they understand their place in the government and their place in the law. Their "diversity" of race or sexuality is largely irrelevant. They may see injustice in laws as written. They may speak to that injustice in their opinions. But they SHOULD NOT (one might say MUST NOT) create law to address that injustice. That is the job of the legislature, where diversity of experience IS significant so that laws may be fair to all.
Of course liberal views, such as Slate's, REQUIRE a skewed SCOTUS that creates laws to achieve liberal goals. Why? Because liberal legislators are cowards. They KNOW if they act to push their true views, views that a majority of the public STILL do not support, they will lose elections. THIS is what is about to happen in the midterm elections. The arrogant Left is about to pay for their behavior in office. It is MUCH better to have SCOTUS justices, in office for life, to create law and be immune to popular heat for their decisions. It is the only way that some of the liberal agenda can be passed.
The gift that President Trump gave us is a solidly Conservative SCOTUS, one that tries to interpret the law as intended, not make it as they would wish it to be. Breyer's replacement with a judicially weak liberal justice, like Sotomayor (who rants absurdly), won't make much difference in outcomes but it WILL remind the people WHY it is important that Conservative justices be appointed. That can be reflected in the midterm and 2024 votes as all of Biden's and the dems chickens come home to roost.
1 person likes this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Kafka2 2/2/2022 2:03:10 PM (No. 1059204)
Biden's criteria for picking a Supreme Court Justice is undeniably raciest. The person would have dark skin and female body parts. Only after the small fire, the next day he added the third criteria that the person would be qualified. Looking at the three being considered, qualified means being a fervent Progressive politically. I have yet to hear having in depth knowledge of the U.S. Constitution.
1 person likes this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)