‘Alarmingly incoherent’: NYT’s columnist
cites age, ‘uneven’ cognitive state,
begs Biden not to run in ’24
BizPac Review,
by
Terresa Monroe-Hamilton
Original Article
Posted By: Imright,
12/16/2021 3:06:38 AM
New York Times columnist Bret Stephens wrote in a column on Tuesday that President Joe Biden should not seek reelection in 2024. In a piece entitled, “Biden Should Not Run Again — and He Should Say He Won’t,” Stephens also called the president “alarmingly incoherent.” For an author at The New York Times to beg Biden to step aside so other Democrats can prepare for the next presidential contest, is, to say the least, unprecedented. It must also be unnerving for Democrats.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
SALady 12/16/2021 3:19:03 AM (No. 1008595)
I still believe the plan was to get a doddering old senile fool like biden elected by any means necessary. Then, after a few months, he would step down (probably for "health reasons"), and a hard core socialist like Matressback Harris would take over. The socialist revolution takeover of our republic would have been complete without having to fire a shot.
However, Harris has turned out to be so unpopular and so incompetent, they the Demon-Rat powers-that-be had to scrap that idea. They now have to keep Lyin' Joe biden breathing as their puppet president until they can find a way to get Harris to step down and replace her with someone that they can then complete their original plan with.
As a nation, we are totally reamed. And I truly blame the Republi-Can'ts as much as the Demon-Rats for standing by and letting this happen in the last election!!!
19 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
mifla 12/16/2021 3:53:08 AM (No. 1008602)
Wow, NYT. Let me check on something. Yep, I can see icicles in Hell.
9 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Petronius 12/16/2021 4:57:09 AM (No. 1008623)
How can that be? Jill just said old potato head is as sharp as a tack.
9 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
mobyclik 12/16/2021 5:14:19 AM (No. 1008627)
Ever wonder why the Beast has been popping up so much lately? That sodden ol' pig still has visions of parking her over-sized butt behind the Resolution Desk in the Oval Office.
12 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
lakerman1 12/16/2021 6:28:54 AM (No. 1008667)
Black leaders are strangely quiet about Kamala Sutra. They are not rallying in support of the Canadian Cackler.
5 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
SweetSweetback 12/16/2021 6:57:40 AM (No. 1008680)
Run, baby, run!!!
2 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
wilarrbie 12/16/2021 7:21:35 AM (No. 1008698)
He hasn't completed year 1 yet, and it's obvious to any sentient being he is incapable of completing his term. This fool begging him not to run AGAIN is diversionary. What are they doing behind the curtain?
9 people like this.
Did Stephens confuse 'successor' with 'predecessor' in reference to George HW Bush?
Is he saying that Bush did more in 4 years than Clinton in 8? Or was he trying to make the usual lazy slight of Reagan and used the wrong term?
2 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
smokincol 12/16/2021 7:58:09 AM (No. 1008729)
diapers was put in office to be the bait dog a the dog fighting club in DC. and to prove to our people that the demcommies worst candidate could defeat our, incumbent, President, Donald J. Trump. the level to which the demcommies will go hasn't, yet, been reached. they have the media and they have the federal government in their back pockets so, they have nothing to worry about in the future and as far as the repubs clobbering the demcommies in 2022 - I'll believer it when I see it, the day after the elections.
2 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
broken01 12/16/2021 8:31:34 AM (No. 1008766)
But Brett Stephens and the NYT Rag were all behind the Creepy, Sleepy Sloppy Wun when he told a reporter that he should have to take a cognitive test because everything was all good. I wonder what changed. That's a rhetorical question BTW.
2 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
MickTurn 12/16/2021 8:44:55 AM (No. 1008785)
HE's what you Commies wanted, a dottering fool to take orders...
3 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Laotzu 12/16/2021 9:21:02 AM (No. 1008845)
I bet the Russians are envious that we took their preservation of Lenin's corpse one step farther.
5 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
FunOne 12/16/2021 9:23:50 AM (No. 1008850)
Biden and Harris need to be clearly and frequently identified as the "brand" of the democrat party. Comments of a negative tone toward either of these need to include the word "democrat" to reinforce the fact that change for the better will not be expected with the next democrat presidential candidate.
2 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
NorthernDog 12/16/2021 9:38:19 AM (No. 1008880)
Doktor Jill isn't going to give-up power so easily.
4 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Old Army Vet 12/16/2021 1:05:19 PM (No. 1009184)
This was known before he ran for office. He is senile, demented, and incapable of doing the job. The election was stolen and everybody knows it. Trump 2024.
3 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
bigfatslob 12/16/2021 1:14:17 PM (No. 1009199)
If the old standing cadaver is still above ground in 2024 I'm all for Mr. McGoo running. It would be hilarious but remember whatever was in the 2020 plan with Harris as the fraud VP Dr. Jill nixed it. Dr. Jill has a long memory of the debate night that Harris called her racist demented husband a 'racist'. People running the show thought it was a great idea to choose Harris to cleanse Biden's racist soul but the good doctor Jill is not forgiving.
MAGA
2 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
DVC 12/16/2021 1:23:29 PM (No. 1009212)
He shouldn't have been able to run in 2020. Only the massive media coverup of this senile old dingbat leftist hiding in his basement and misreading the teleprompter helped him to cheat his way to the top office.
4 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Imright"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)