Images: Suspect A Rogue Juror, #54, Foreperson,
Is Holding Back Acquittal Here Are Her
Leaked Notes From The Trial
Defiant America,
by
Kellyanne Richardson
Original Article
Posted By: Black Conservative Voice,
11/19/2021 9:53:25 AM
The judge in the trial of Kyle Rittenhouse has banned MSNBC from the court over allegations a producer tried to follow jurors.
Judge Bruce Schroeder said Thursday he received a report from the Kenosha Police Department that police pulled over a person identifying themselves as an MSNBC producer for running a red light the night before, and the producer claimed “he had been instructed” to “follow the jury bus.” The matter is still under investigation, but Schroeder said he was banning anyone from MSNBC from the building for the rest of the trial.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Rokkitt 11/19/2021 10:05:20 AM (No. 982345)
This whole political persecution has been a farce. A mistrial should have been declared w/ prejudice a while ago. The jury should have been sequestered. This judge is a clown simply trying to cover his arse.
26 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Hazymac 11/19/2021 10:11:57 AM (No. 982350)
The lack of a verdict after three days is indicative of one juror who will not be moved. She wants to put Rittenhouse away, and she's dug herself in. Mistrial! Idiots should not serve on juries.
34 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Blue-Z-Anna 11/19/2021 10:14:31 AM (No. 982357)
In our new and improved post factual world the evidence doesn't matter, the truth doesn't matter, only the transformation of society matters, only the agenda matters.
Everything must be seen through the lens of the marxist dialect and if the people in flyover country need to be crushed then so be it. it would probably be better that way anyway.
23 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Blue-Z-Anna 11/19/2021 10:15:57 AM (No. 982358)
Dialectic
10 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
TruthFetish 11/19/2021 10:21:40 AM (No. 982366)
How did defense let Karen onto the jury?
14 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Jerseyden 11/19/2021 10:23:04 AM (No. 982369)
Wonder if she’s contacted anyone regarding a book deal. In today’s world I don’t trust anyone to be completely impartial especially those on the liberal side.
34 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
3XALADY 11/19/2021 10:25:00 AM (No. 982375)
#6 BINGO! My first thought.
25 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Kate318 11/19/2021 10:25:59 AM (No. 982376)
Exactly, #6. I’d keep an eye on her bank account.
24 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
ussjimmycarter 11/19/2021 10:31:59 AM (No. 982386)
How did some dame get this position? Two minutes in the room with me and she would have started sobbing “you trigger me so bad”! This actually happened to me on a new project that I took over! It had been failing for 5 years. This woman ran everything and she was just a team member. I stripped her of power, gave it to myself and our business customer and we were done in 10 months! We HATED each other!
17 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
lakerman1 11/19/2021 10:44:33 AM (No. 982424)
She can be removed from the jury if the other jurors say she is not cooperating/deliberating.
And the judge just made another mistake - allowing exhibits/testimony/transcripts tp be taken home is just asking for trouble.
What was he thinking?
26 people like this.
People like that alleged juror holding out, Karma bites really hard. If you were that scared of doing the right thing for innocent people, you should have withdrawn from the jury and let an alternate take over.
10 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Fosterdad 11/19/2021 11:05:41 AM (No. 982482)
Prediction. Hung jury with 11 voting to acquit. Judge dismisses all charges with prejudice.
22 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
SkeezerMcGee 11/19/2021 11:10:25 AM (No. 982496)
It's concerning how Judge Schroeder has been much too folksy when he tells the jury "Please don't discuss the case, .... " The normal warning is much more direct and stern: "You are again INSTRUCTED not to discuss the case ...."
Defense counsel should have objected to allowing the jury instructions to be removed from the courthouse. Removal invites juror misbehavior in many possible ways, including research or calling a "lawyer friend."
The judge MUST question the jury regarding possible juror misbehavior based on the mere possibility of misbehavior. The issue has been raised and can't be ignored.
Any juror who conducted legal research must be removed from the jury.
11 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Vesicant 11/19/2021 11:54:44 AM (No. 982554)
The fact that the jury selected this Karen as the foreperson tells you something about the jury, and it's not good for Rittenhouse. I think they'll convict him on the recklessly endangering safety charge just to "send a message" that the white boy should have stayed home and not tried to interfere with the saints and heroes of blm and antifa.
4 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
DVC 11/19/2021 12:02:35 PM (No. 982566)
Re #12, That would be a good outcome, but I have no idea if the judge can do such a thing, or if it would be quickly overturned on appeal. A hung jury would give the persecutors (no typo) a chance to either just walk away or tilt at this windmill again. One would hope that they would gather up all their idiots and 'wounded' and leave, never to try this case again.
Not a lawyer, no idea what the legal possibilities are at this point.
4 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
mc squared 11/19/2021 12:40:59 PM (No. 982612)
1 - usually of leftist political persuasion,
2 - bossy, entitled, and status-sensitive,
3 - her social group would necessarily know she had done so, given the unanimous nature of an acquittal.
4 - likely to seize the leadership position
5 - suit their bossy and entitled nature.
6 - outspoken and forward in circumstances where other people would defer to apparently higher authority.
Lemme guess.
5 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
bigfatslob 11/19/2021 12:58:22 PM (No. 982629)
This better end soon those pallets of bricks aren't going to throw themselves. The 'spearchuckers' are getting restless Kenosha needs a cleansing by fire, you know what I mean?
4 people like this.
I do not know what the law in the state of Wisconsin is. But in some states the person who gets designated as juror #1 is automatically the foreperson.
As some one described up topic, I, too, have dealt with bossy, overbearing women who were steady making a hash of things. It is never pretty to move them aside so that things can actually get done and everyone else be at ease in their work. That type of woman will hate you forever, unless the LORD somehow intervenes in her life. My wife and I have been praying for true justice to be served in Kyle's case.
That Grosskreutz character should be thanking God that the pistol he pointed at Kyle was the focus of his attention. Had Kyle been looking at the center of Grosskreutz's chest or into his eyes, Grosskreutz would be dead. Instead he is making the rounds of talk shows lying his head off. A real scum bug!
3 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
pensom2 11/19/2021 1:24:36 PM (No. 982659)
I'm not a trial lawyer, let alone a criminal trial lawyer. Still, I cannot imagine why the judge did not at least sequester the jury by putting them all up in a hotel every night. Nor should he have permitted them to go home with the jury instructions. ALL their deliberations and study should be taking place in the jury room, not at home.
To my knowledge, the judge can declare a mistrial--with or without prejudice--at any time after the mistrial justification has taken place. Personally, I think the judge would like to see the jury make the acquittal, rather than have to create the outcome himself--by declaring a mistrial at any time during the pendency of the trial. If the jury becomes hung--by one or more holdouts refusing to agree with the majority, the judge will either have to declare a mistrial with prejudice, with no re-trial, or he'll have to declare a mistrial without prejudice, meaning that the case has to start over with a new jury. No one wants to go through this a second time.
If the jury tells the judge that they're having difficulty reaching a unanimous verdict, expect the judge to very sternly send them back to deliberations and try and find a way to reach unanimity.
The judge is as afraid of having his home torched by mobs as the jury members are.
1 person likes this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Black Conservative Voice"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Comments:
The tone of that note suggests to me that the person who wrote it is accustomed to giving orders to underlings—personal assistants, staff, household help—and here the note is being addressed in this tone to the trial judge as if the judge were a staffer to the jury foreperson. Yesterday we had the very unusual request to be permitted to take the jury instructions home, made by a single juror—a female juror. I suspect that all of this conduct is that of juror #54, the female foreperson of this jury—who I suspect is precisely the kind of “mask Karen,” left-leaning, bossy, entitled, and status-sensitive juror that would be most likely to hold out against acquittal.