Native American Lawsuit Challenges Colorado
Ban On Native American “Mascots” As Discriminatory
Legal Insurrection,
by
William A. Jacobson
Original Article
Posted By: Judy W.,
11/8/2021 2:00:19 PM
The banning of Native American (American Indian) depictions for sports teams gets a lot of press, most famously the Washington Redskins renaming themselves the Washington Football Team.
There’s a side to this issue that I had not thought of, but is argued in a lawsuit just filed in Colorado. That when the government is involved in such name bans, it is discrimination against American Indians because it deprives them of the ability to have things named after them. It is, according to the argument, the worst form of cultural appropriation, more like cultural depravation.
In Colorado in 2021, legislation was passed banning the use of American Indian mascots, broadly defined.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
downnout 11/8/2021 2:10:18 PM (No. 971513)
Since teams are named after persons, animals or ethics they admire, the natives have every right to be offended. No one ever named a team after something they hate.
21 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Skinnydip 11/8/2021 2:10:32 PM (No. 971514)
Love it!
15 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
JayD 11/8/2021 2:14:21 PM (No. 971520)
This is one of the best stories I've seen in a while. Perfect example of fighting back against leftists who assume they know what's best for everyone.
27 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
DVC 11/8/2021 2:26:33 PM (No. 971529)
OOPS....the offended ones forget to ask an actual Indian about being offended.
LOL! I only know of one pure blooded Indian, and he is a smart, capable engineering design technician at a big engineering firm where a family member used to work. He wears a long braid, ....and is otherwise an entirely normal, sane, average, nice guy, leans towards westernish clothes, looks like a white guy to me, but I really don't pay much attention to that stuff, frankly. He doesn't hide or accentuate his heritage. Sometimes it comes up, mostly not.
Grow up you idiot leftists!
15 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Krause 11/8/2021 2:28:42 PM (No. 971533)
Washington Football Team. I like it! A good response to a stupid issue.
9 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
FLCracker 11/8/2021 3:22:47 PM (No. 971591)
To do the ladies in the article one better, don't call a Seminole an Indian. They will tell you they are NOT "Indians"; they are Seminole.
(I knew a man from the former Soviet Union who used to get irritated when I called him a "Russian" and said, "will you stop doing that?" I said, "sure, as soon as you stop calling me a 'Yank'; I come from 12 generations of people born below the what would become the Mason-Dixon Line." I had to explain that to him.)
11 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
udanja99 11/8/2021 3:51:51 PM (No. 971611)
#6, not to mention that the Seminole tribe fully supports the use of their name for the Florida State football team and owns part of the concession which sells tee shirts, sweat shirts, ball caps, beach towels and just about anything else that a fan could want.
12 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
chumley 11/8/2021 4:00:27 PM (No. 971620)
But what would people with skin darker than a cue ball do without white liberals to defend them? They should appreciate the help from people who think they are smarter and more virtuous than everyone else. So what if every reference to Indians is eradicated from our culture? Just finishing what Andrew Jackson started.
3 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Timber Queen 11/8/2021 4:16:57 PM (No. 971637)
FTA: "The Native American Guardians Association supports the respectful use of Native American names and imagery in certain instances, and it fears that erasing all such imagery and iconography could also erase Native American history from school grounds."
They're catching on to the real purpose. Tell me again why the Land O Lakes Indian maiden, created by an American Indian, was offensive?
14 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
AltaD 11/8/2021 4:46:34 PM (No. 971652)
FTA: they oppose the use of American Indian mascot performers and caricatures that mock Native American heritage
A valid point, however I think some mascots were unfairly banned. I don't think the students who portrayed Chief Illiniwek were mocking Native American heritage, nor did I think the logo was an insulting caricature. Of course, it's not my heritage so maybe I'm not seeing what others saw but to me, that ban never made sense.
3 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Ida Lou Pino 11/8/2021 5:36:38 PM (No. 971674)
"Indian" is a misnomer - - because the people have nothing to do with India.
"Native American" is also a misnomer - - because there are no humans who are native to this continent - - and the name "America" wasn't coined until the 16th-century.
So - - I suggest a new name - - inspired by the wisdom of Al Sharpton - - I suggest calling them Siberian Interlopers. Yes - - I think everyone should start using that descriptor - - Siberian Interlopers.
7 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
skacmar 11/8/2021 5:46:07 PM (No. 971680)
Only liberal woke white people presume to assume that any use of any ethnic minority or race as a "mascot" is an insult to that race or culture. In fact, many consider it an honor and something to be proud of. Only in the woke liberal white mind is the honoring of a cultures strength considered an insult.
4 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
chillijilli 11/8/2021 6:40:15 PM (No. 971720)
Round and round we go. As a child of the 60s, I was taught that we finally figured things out and we were supposed to be...colorblind. OK, I could easily do that. But then, a couple years later, someone pointed out that Oprah said, "If you don't see color...you don't see ME." OK, so we all want to please Oprah...but if I do that I'm no longer color blind as my college professors instructed. So now we have a similar issue with the Native Americans. I personally was in favor of keeping the name Redskins and changing the logo to a red potato. But that didn't gain a whole lotta steam (ho ho), either, so I've decided that I'll do or say nothing about racial, gender, or social identity of any kind UNTIL Nancy and The Squad hold extensive meetings on this and tell me who can be what. Like...can a menstruating person of no color identify as a gay male transie? Just tell me. What is the problem?
4 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
snowoutlaw 11/8/2021 6:57:16 PM (No. 971734)
There's also this thing where it says in its1st Amendment: "Congress shall make no law ... abridging the freedom of speech".
3 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Omen55 11/8/2021 7:13:28 PM (No. 971747)
Teams should be named after historical groups.
That's why the former Redskins should have picked Romans & march unto the field with a Roman Standard to conquer the other team.
1 person likes this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
Enoch Powell 11/9/2021 5:31:27 AM (No. 971975)
I believe a survey showed most Indiana were absolutely indifferent to Indian sports mascots and names.
1 person likes this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
FLCracker 11/9/2021 11:30:00 AM (No. 972286)
#16, your type brings up an interesting point.
What ABOUT "Indiana"?
2 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
Faithfully 11/9/2021 3:05:37 PM (No. 972517)
In the 60's my HS sports mascot was an Indian Brave. We were proud.
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Judy W."
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Comments:
It never occurred to the woke folks who banned Indian mascots that there are Indian-related mascots that are derogatory, ones that are neutral, and ones that honor Indians. Leftists just throw everyone they can into victim groups and think they can speak for them without looking at the facts and what the people in the group actually think. THAT's what's demeaning.