California ports, key to U.S. supply chain,
among world's least efficient
Reuters,
by
Lisa Baertlein
Original Article
Posted By: NorthernDog,
10/20/2021 2:10:26 PM
LOS ANGELES - Southern California's Los Angeles and Long Beach ports handle the most ocean cargo of any ports in the United States, but are some of the least efficient in the world, according to a ranking by the World Bank and IHS Markit. In a review of 351 container ports around the globe, Los Angeles was ranked 328, behind Tanzania's Dar es Salaam and Alaska's Dutch Harbor. The adjacent port of Long Beach came in even lower, at 333, behind Turkey's Nemrut Bay and Kenya's Mombasa, the groups said in their inaugural Container Port Performance Index published in May. The
Reply 1 - Posted by:
daisey 10/20/2021 2:23:20 PM (No. 952129)
And who calls the shots and makes the rules? Every single thing Democrats touch fails and harms citizens.
22 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
woodenleg 10/20/2021 2:33:17 PM (No. 952140)
The fact that Sec. of Transportation was out for 2 months.....might have something to do with it.
7 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
sleona 10/20/2021 2:33:53 PM (No. 952142)
Once again, Japan and China are at the head of the pack.
6 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
john56 10/20/2021 2:39:39 PM (No. 952148)
Well, I guess we need to start hauling stuff up to Dutch Harbor!
5 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
coldoc 10/20/2021 2:49:00 PM (No. 952158)
Thus the punta colnett harbor plan which would bypass california and the corrupt longshoreman union completely.
2 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Blue-Z-Anna 10/20/2021 2:53:27 PM (No. 952166)
1st of all there is Democrat led Union foolishness and then there's Democrat lead environmental foolishness.
When you stifle competition you stifle capitalism, you stifle everything, you destroy everything. The democrats are toxic in every possible way.
20 people like this.
This stinks like the Union label.
7 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
bad-hair 10/20/2021 3:03:33 PM (No. 952180)
Actually California ports are the key to Wal-Mart's supply chain from China.
In Texas the Port of Houston keeps us pretty well supplied.
6 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
formerNYer 10/20/2021 3:18:22 PM (No. 952195)
I'm from the government and I'm here to help.
4 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
VietVet68 10/20/2021 3:25:10 PM (No. 952197)
"The ports in Communist Kalifornia are the least efficient"....somehow I'm not surprised.
10 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
earlybird 10/20/2021 3:36:57 PM (No. 952207)
This ranking is based upon turnaround time - in, unload, out. No allowance for volume handled by the respective ports. The United States is the biggest importer of goods in the world, and 20% is handled through the Port of Los Angeles.
4 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Mushroom 10/20/2021 3:59:54 PM (No. 952219)
I have to side with #11. I can see Dutch Harbor inefficiencies in that they can't cover the capital costs for some equipment to speed up the processes. What is LB and LA's excuse?
2 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Jiobaobubai 10/20/2021 4:42:44 PM (No. 952230)
It's just like LAX, an embarrassing poop hole.
This is what democrats so, destroy all that is good.
2 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
DVC 10/20/2021 4:48:53 PM (No. 952237)
Unions combined with leftist rules. Why would you expect anything else?
2 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Muguy 10/20/2021 5:11:48 PM (No. 952245)
Someone tell me why OTHER PORTS cannot be used.
Tell me why critical items such as computer chips needed for automobiles cannot be transported by air freight with companies like Fedex to get them to their destinations. Cheap crap on the shelves of Wal-Mart and "dollar stores" WILL be affected.
Too much reliance on cheap Chinese labor is now a NATIONAL SECURITY issue.
Open borders and flying illegals with diseases all over the country is a NATIONAL SECURITY issue.
WE have allowed very little resistance against this, and when it hits us in the pocketbook and with shortages of what we would like to have, maybe we will wake up.
As Peter Finch said in the movie "Network" first we have to get "mad as h*ll that we aren't going to take it anymore"
5 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
MickTurn 10/20/2021 5:41:43 PM (No. 952267)
Of course, they are run by Unions and regulated by Democraps...what could possibly go WORNG!
1 person likes this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
Starboard_side 10/20/2021 6:32:48 PM (No. 952322)
Was just down at the ports earlier today.
Stacks of empty containers which limit the terminal efficiencies.
Idle chassis in multiple areas, likely needing repairs, which is handled by the union staff.
Trucking companies all have huge signs looking for drivers.
Lack of space at the terminals to return empty (unloaded) import containers
Lack of skilled labor to form longshoreman gangs that work the terminals.
Everyone working day and night to keep up with all of the issues, and delays, which results in more work for the same shipment.
ILWU contract up for negotiation next year (July 2022)
It's not one thing alone, or even a few things, but a multitude of issues, and one being the environmental issues that restrict truck capacity and trucker hours of service restrictions.
3 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
jfodoch 10/20/2021 6:36:10 PM (No. 952324)
Why are our ports clogged ? Has it ever been better ? Is this a sudden change ? Is this intentional ?
1 person likes this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
DVC 10/20/2021 7:08:47 PM (No. 952356)
I wonder how much housing costs are factoring into this 'can't find drivers' at the ports?
I remember reading that all service jobs in LA area were getting harder to fill because of the huge cost of housing meant to afford a home you had to live very far away and had a very long commute. How many folks have just given up on this and walked or moved away?
How many of this class of people are among the large numbers moving out of California?
4 people like this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
Tusker 10/20/2021 7:27:29 PM (No. 952372)
Nothings going to move as long as mandated three-year-old only trucks presumably to satisfy idiotic environmental emissions reduction mandates are not being defied. And nobody’s talking about this REAL reason for product not moving, and nobody’s defying the truck age/emissions mandates.
Just blah, blah, blah from the absolutely worst government, state and federal, in the history of the U.S.
6 people like this.
Reply 21 - Posted by:
LC Chihuahua 10/20/2021 8:05:27 PM (No. 952405)
Are there any other ports in California? San Diego? San Francisco? Are they having the same problems as Los Angeles and Long Beach?
2 people like this.
Reply 22 - Posted by:
DVC 10/20/2021 10:37:30 PM (No. 952481)
Less "made in China " junk is a good thing.
1 person likes this.
Reply 23 - Posted by:
Roark 10/20/2021 11:56:35 PM (No. 952510)
There's a lot of lying going on in this article. The inefficiencies of Long Beach and Los Angeles have been known for decades. It's by design. While the Asian ports have modernized with automation, those improvements have been kept out of LB and LA by the longshoreman's union and their Democrat friends in the state assembly. It is also why San Diego has meager facilities (why put up with competition?). Unions and Democrats in control gets you ranked No. 328 and 333. They should be proud.
1 person likes this.
Reply 24 - Posted by:
RedWhite&Blue2 10/21/2021 12:44:36 AM (No. 952533)
Kalifornia unions (D)
Kalifornia ridiculous trucker regulations (D)
Kalifornia Government (D)
Kalifornia voters (D)
39 million people
Governed by morons
Elected by morons
0 people like this.
Reply 25 - Posted by:
smokincol 10/21/2021 2:14:34 AM (No. 952564)
is it that they are "California Dreamin""? out there or have they adopted the old Soviet style system of labor dispersal, which was 1 day of work and 3 days of no-work?
it only took 72(+/-) years for the Soviet Union to collapse because of their economic 5 and 10 year plans, which caught up to them really, really quickly.
0 people like this.
Reply 26 - Posted by:
Trigger2 10/21/2021 2:38:02 AM (No. 952575)
Of course CA ports are least efficient. Demonrats run the state and the unions by giving them everything they want.
0 people like this.
Reply 27 - Posted by:
mifla 10/21/2021 4:17:59 AM (No. 952590)
Look for the union label.
0 people like this.
Reply 28 - Posted by:
F15 Gork 10/21/2021 6:43:20 AM (No. 952651)
When you are woke, you don’t need no stinkin’ efficiency......
0 people like this.
Reply 29 - Posted by:
Paperpuncher 10/21/2021 7:28:36 AM (No. 952675)
I am shocked, just shocked that California has the worst ports in the world.
0 people like this.
Reply 30 - Posted by:
virbots 10/21/2021 10:40:51 AM (No. 952883)
It is not a port efficiency problem but an insufficient trucking problem. If the ports were more "efficient", the containers would pile up even faster at the ports. Railways are slowing/suspending trains to Chicago because of container build up at the train depots there are full. Again, because of insufficient trucking in Chicago area to haul away the containers.
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "NorthernDog"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Comments:
Tanzania has better port operations than L.A. Don't expect the backlog to disappear anytime soon.