Justice Breyer: Trump’s 2020 Election
Case Did Not Meet ‘Normal Criteria’
For Supreme Court
Breitbart,
by
Pam Key
Original Article
Posted By: Black Conservative Voice,
9/13/2021 4:27:11 AM
Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer said on this week’s broadcast of “Fox News Sunday” that they did not hear President Donald Trump’s 2020 election case because it did not meet “normal criteria.”
Anchor Chris Wallace said, “One of your arguments against seeing the court’s political is the fact that it refused to even hear the appeals from the Trump campaign about the 2020 election. Didn’t even hear it them.”
In a video, former President Donald Trump said, “No judge has had the courage, including the Supreme Court — I am so disappointed in them...
Reply 1 - Posted by:
PChristopher 9/13/2021 5:10:10 AM (No. 912726)
Let Tucker interview him, that's the only way you'll get some semblance of the truth out of him.
70 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Flyball Dogs 9/13/2021 5:11:30 AM (No. 912727)
If the case had been filed by a “D” party, would it have been “normal”?
89 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
5 handicap 9/13/2021 5:35:04 AM (No. 912735)
Breyer, in my estimation, has always been a great disappointment to Patriotic America and to God!
50 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
lakerman1 9/13/2021 5:52:57 AM (No. 912742)
Did Wallace ask Breyer what 'normal criteria' means? If not, why not?
106 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
ronbet 9/13/2021 6:00:06 AM (No. 912745)
There was no chance of getting any real information or getting to Breyer's thinking about anything the Supreme Court does or why he decides as he does because the talk was with the total Democrat Chris Wallace. Wallace comes at every issue and every interview from the Democrat perspective.
Come to think of it, that's true with each Sunday talk/interview program. Chuck Todd, George Stephanopoulos, Jake Tapper and Wallace; all are products of Democrat party political backgrounds. They are employed by organizations that lean Democrat in their top leadership, so we actually have no chance of learning anything from these partisan buffoons.
78 people like this.
In what universe were the events surrounding the 2020 election 'normal'? This is meaningless, but totally expected from a hack like Chrissy Wallace.
69 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Rinktum 9/13/2021 6:09:22 AM (No. 912748)
During the day in a quiet time of reflection, do you think any of these justices ever regret refusing to hear this case? Surely, they see the devastation the Biden administration has wrought on this country by their stubborn adherence to their philosophy of political power over the good of the country, political power over the Constitution and rule of law, and political power to bully and intimidate. Even the hilljacks out here in flyover country can recognize the complete collapse of our borders, economy, foreign policy, and military under this regime, not to mention the division that this cabal loves to stir up. Do they believe themselves to dwell in a place so high above the rest of us that they actually are unable to connect their cowardice in taking up election cases to the havoc this administration has created because democrats stole what they could not win. Can they even make that connection or do they just ignore it.
The American people, thankfully, are unlike these giants of intellect. They see clearly what has happened and understand that this court did not have the courage to do its duty and uphold its oath to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. They chose to take a pass in the face of an unprecedented attack on the Republic. What respect could Americans have for a court so self-absorbed and cowardly that they failed in the hour they were most needed. I know my personal respect for this court is zero.
114 people like this.
The "normal criteria" being that a case must advance a leftwing cause or objective.
66 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
nina584 9/13/2021 6:10:58 AM (No. 912751)
Sorry i don’t watch Chrissy Walace I consider him a low life,
66 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Strike3 9/13/2021 6:30:42 AM (No. 912763)
Treason and a coup by the entire democrat party, the intel agencies with ample help from the media does not meet normal criteria.
65 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Sully 9/13/2021 6:45:41 AM (No. 912778)
All he said was, "The case was rejected it bc we decided to reject it."
Yeah! We Know That. The question is WHY you rejected the case.
He did not describe the criteria for rejection. He simply restated the result. Duh. And so he has no Answer.
And so he never has to defend the LIE that nobody has standing to challenge a stolen election for POTUS in the SCOTUS.
62 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
mifla 9/13/2021 6:51:23 AM (No. 912787)
They never give their reasonings for not taking cases. Likely, don't want anyone second guessing them.
20 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
homefry 9/13/2021 7:05:11 AM (No. 912805)
The supremes did not take the case because they dont want to be the guys who PROVE that America has become a banana republic.
42 people like this.
Chris Wallace? Was Obama himself not available to perform the interview? Or perhaps Hillary? Anyone less a partisan biased hack than Chris Wallace
26 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
LaVallette 9/13/2021 7:17:45 AM (No. 912814)
"The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers". (Shakespeare; "King Henry VI") Rueful and mocking, it often expresses the ordinary person's frustration with the arcana and complexity of law!. FIRSTLY: Courts (and lawyers) are never about justice. They are about the law BUT always confined within and by the delicate and complex procedural issues, rules, obscure and often out of date "binding" precedents and interpretations, created by the lawyers, Judges, and Courts themselves to establish and maintain the dignity and erudition of those who happen to be on the particular bench at the particular time and then handed down for those who would follow them. The Rule of Law is nothing but the "Law" written BY lawyers, made for lawyers, using the most convoluted language, grammatical structures and mostly totally lacking in internal cross referencing totally mesmerizing for the ordinary citizen, leaving it up to the lawyers to interpret and make sense of and for them to arbitrate.
27 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
Falconer 9/13/2021 7:42:19 AM (No. 912839)
John Roberts did not hear the case because he did not want to be responsible for the burning of American cities by blm and antifa.
44 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
Heil Liberals 9/13/2021 7:55:01 AM (No. 912852)
The purpose of the SCOTUS is not to determine what is normal. It’s to determine matters of Constitutional law, period.
54 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
RedWhite&Blue2 9/13/2021 8:05:47 AM (No. 912868)
So you’re all chicken schiff judges?
Er um ugh duh well ....”yes we are”...
23 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
bpl40 9/13/2021 8:19:59 AM (No. 912890)
Two of the senior most justices, among the ablest jurists in the land, Thomas and Alito desperately argued that the SCOTUS was created PRECISELY to give a hearing to this type of appeal. Denying it negates the raison d'etre of the Court. But the Liberals and the three turncoats had their marching orders. Disgraceful!
40 people like this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
Jebediah 9/13/2021 8:20:15 AM (No. 912891)
"I guess"? How can you make a case re: criteria when you don't LOOK for criteria?
17 people like this.
Reply 21 - Posted by:
Jebediah 9/13/2021 8:23:51 AM (No. 912895)
Which is why I watch Maria Bartolromo on Sundays at 10 EST on Fox....she asks, she listens, she THINKS. (Wallace's new book could be solid gold and I wouldn't buy it because I detest the man....I recall him asking, in TWO different debates, questions re: Charlotte that he knew the answers to and went with truncated versions of what Trump said and his replies on purpose.)
23 people like this.
Reply 22 - Posted by:
Jebediah 9/13/2021 8:25:55 AM (No. 912896)
#16 nails it!!!!!!!
12 people like this.
Reply 23 - Posted by:
Otis Gill 9/13/2021 8:34:48 AM (No. 912906)
And if #16 is correct, and there was such a report, it means our Supreme Court is being controlled by scrawny Marxists mobs, BLM and ANTIFA.
21 people like this.
Reply 24 - Posted by:
NeverForget 9/13/2021 8:36:26 AM (No. 912909)
BEFORE and during the fraud(s) of the 2020 election, the cases were not yet "ripe" as no injury had yet been inflicted. No standing.
AFTER the frauds were completed, there wasn't enough time to remedy the situation. No standing.
Isn't that convenient?
24 people like this.
So now it is clear that the SCOTUS has just become another political body ensuring the continuing rule by the political class
23 people like this.
Reply 26 - Posted by:
Boatingforfun 9/13/2021 8:46:30 AM (No. 912924)
All Bryer has done is confirmed that packing the court will make no difference. If these 9 "Judges" couldn't see what was going to happen to America with a massively stolen election then what good are they? They are letting the country be destroyed so what difference does a "Supreme Court" make? Does China have a Supreme Court? NO!!! Look at your future justices - you have let this happen to America because you FAILED to do your jobs, protect our constitution, our constitutional right to ONE PERSON ONE VOTE, and the states rights to be heard by YOU - the sacred 9!!! So if the dems want to pack your precious court I say have at it because you didn't matter when it really counted and now the entire country is paying a massive price of death and destruction. The only one who shares the massive blame for this mess Is the traitor former Vice President Pence!!!
17 people like this.
Reply 27 - Posted by:
Rumblehog 9/13/2021 9:00:42 AM (No. 912934)
I'm sure that most on the Supreme Court have been spied on by the NSA under Obama's watch and they have the "goods" on them all, most notably, John Roberts. They are all puppets to the Demonrats. This coup has been under construction for quite some time and it involves every agency of the Federal Fascist State, including its minions in the Corporate world, specifically, the "big socials," who censored for the Demonrats any talk of election stealing, etc. We just witnessed a classic CIA coup, the kind we used to accomplish in banana republics to our south.
20 people like this.
Reply 28 - Posted by:
Miceal 9/13/2021 9:31:39 AM (No. 912973)
BeeEss...
7 people like this.
Reply 29 - Posted by:
starboard 9/13/2021 9:33:20 AM (No. 912978)
Have Maria interview him.
8 people like this.
Reply 30 - Posted by:
Zigrid 9/13/2021 9:39:14 AM (No. 912992)
The supremes folded like a cheap suit...instead of taking the matter under advisement and delaying the installing of biden/obama...both of them illegal representatives....if they had waited for all the information to cross their desks...President Trump would have won...as he did...and WE all know it...and more and more information is surfacing to validate that...Breyer has no credibility...he's a stooge...but...he's holding on...why?
12 people like this.
Reply 31 - Posted by:
MickTurn 9/13/2021 10:02:12 AM (No. 913030)
Right...you Clowns in Robes didn't give him a chance to PROVE his case...it was lights out, nothing to see here, AS USUAL!
13 people like this.
Reply 32 - Posted by:
MDConservative 9/13/2021 10:14:52 AM (No. 913058)
Let's recount the bidding. The US Constitution places responsibility for elections on the states, expressly the state legislatures. The state legislatures oversee the vote process and the selection of electors. The legislatures certify the electors to Congress. There, a House Member and Senator may challenge the electors. There is a vote, and thus "due process". A President is elected.
SCOTUS is not mentioned. They are outside the process. Take your issues to the SIX REPUBLICAN LEGISLATURES that failed to do any meaningful investigation of the alleged voting "anomalies" prior to certifying a slate for Biden. A Federal Judge in Wisconsin (Trump appointee) explicitly TOLD the Trump legal team exactly that. They failed to listen and follow-up. Now, ask yourself WHY. And, WHY were these SIX REPUBLICAN LEGISLATURES that failed in THEIR duty unchallenged?
11 people like this.
Reply 33 - Posted by:
bighambone 9/13/2021 10:32:19 AM (No. 913097)
The 2020 election obviously did not meet the criteria of a normal election. That’s why so many Americans believe that the 2020 election results were bogus and fraudulent.
9 people like this.
Reply 34 - Posted by:
ARKfamily 9/13/2021 10:37:11 AM (No. 913104)
My answer is kind of similar to #33. The 2020 election doesn't meet the criteria for the Supreme Court? A serious matter like the 2020 election is not enough for them? What then would be serious enough for them? Obviously, wisdom has left everyone of these Supreme Court justices. . .
10 people like this.
Reply 35 - Posted by:
DVC 9/13/2021 11:23:23 AM (No. 913172)
Breyer the Liar.
8 people like this.
Reply 36 - Posted by:
PrayerWarrior 9/13/2021 11:39:52 AM (No. 913200)
How many more States had to come to the Supremes to meet "normal criteria" .... believe it was 16 States (Texas in front) that appealed to the Supremes as they were disenfranchised by voter fraud by other States.
Biggest disappointment, Judge Amy Barrett. What was promised to her or threatened, for her to decline to hear the States' voter fraud case? Of course, Judge Roberts, a Bush appointee, is a turncoat, who can't be trusted. It's a sad day in our country that even our highest court can't be counted on to abide by the Constitution. God bless Alito and Thomas, our real heroes of the Supremes, who stood tall in the midst of the biggest election steal of our nation's history!
10 people like this.
Reply 37 - Posted by:
NotaBene 9/13/2021 11:39:56 AM (No. 913201)
Stephen Breyer never voted with the Americans in the Court. 100% against US.
7 people like this.
Reply 38 - Posted by:
TrueBlueWfan 9/13/2021 11:56:06 AM (No. 913226)
#36, Don't forget Kavanaugh! We conservatives, along with Pres. Trump stuck our necks for this ungrateful swamp rat. We should have let the loons have him.
10 people like this.
Reply 39 - Posted by:
local500 9/13/2021 12:04:09 PM (No. 913237)
"Breyer said, “Why was it? Because they didn’t bring a case, I guess, that met the normal criteria for being heard. When we decide to take a case, there has to be four votes to take it, so I can’t go beyond that. What we do know is that there were not for votes to take it because it wasn’t taken. There are criteria, and if we don’t take a case, you know, the reason in all likelihood is that the criteria weren’t met.”"
So basically they just decided not to take the case(s), and there was not even a minimal review.
That is certainly political.
Cowards.
7 people like this.
Reply 40 - Posted by:
little guy 9/13/2021 12:18:08 PM (No. 913254)
The true reason they didn't "take the case" is because CJ Roberts was afraid of riots, pure and simple. And, of course, the blackmail material they have on him.
If there was ever a reason for term limits on ALL government officials --- elected and appointed --- this is it!
9 people like this.
Reply 41 - Posted by:
antitox 9/13/2021 12:55:52 PM (No. 913301)
The problem here is, WE KNOW WHAT THEY DID. To not see that they cheated openly you would have to be in denial. There was no much evidence it begs some attention.
10 people like this.
Reply 42 - Posted by:
danu 9/13/2021 2:24:38 PM (No. 913387)
Normal= Marxicrats always lie cheat and steal elections w/ impunity in the name of their common goal:
Communism.
SCAMUS connives with this goal, b/c they wouldn't be elected or chosen by WTP for janitorial staff, due to their normal levels of
arrogance , self-obsession, and unscrupulousness.
Normal= Marxicrats don't labour, achieve, merit, earn, anything.
They lie cheat and steal from others b/c they feel entitled.
They are normally parasitical, lazy, and greedy.
No amount of Commandments will tell them to be otherwise.
The Golden Rule is soooooooo middle class and distasteful.
Normal= Americans and their chosen candidates have no right to complain and shall not be heard.
They are not elite; they were not the chosen ones of the Goebbellist kleptocracy.
They will never attain our hallowed VICES.
Normal= if cryptomarxists didn't get their choices embedded in SCAMUS, Breyer wouldn't have a job.
The drugs the money the children the violence they crave.... would not FLOW.
4 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Black Conservative Voice"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Comments:
The Supreme Court has failed the American people terribly, they’re going along with the Democratic Party in helping to destroy America. DISGRACEFUL.