Abortion Is a 'Tool of Modern-Day Eugenics,' Blacks
and Hispanics Tell The Supreme Court
PJ Media,
by
Tyler O´Neil
Original Article
Posted By: ladydawgfan,
7/28/2021 4:56:39 PM
In a powerful new legal filing, black and Hispanic pro-lifers ask the Supreme Court to blot out the “dark stain” of its precedent on eugenics by striking down Roe v. Wade (1973) and the “right” to race-based abortion, which they describe as a “tool of modern-day eugenics.”
The pro-lifers write that the case Thomas Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health “is an ideal vehicle for the Court to finally overrule Roe v. Wade and its progeny, which have constitutionalized eugenic abortions as a fundamental right.”
In the brief, the National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference (NHCLC) —
Then why do you still vote overwhelmingly for its biggest proponents?
12 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
TJ54 7/28/2021 5:05:46 PM (No. 860469)
The fake Catholics on the Court do not care about morality
13 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Catherine 7/28/2021 5:16:54 PM (No. 860487)
Abortion has been around since women first got pregnant. It will be around as long as women get pregnant.
6 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Rumblehog 7/28/2021 5:28:35 PM (No. 860502)
Wait now, a woman has a right to choose... but not about vaccines?
s/o
14 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
marbles 7/28/2021 5:30:07 PM (No. 860504)
If you ever read Margaret Sanger"s writings, you would know that this was her intent.
15 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
JGalt 7/28/2021 5:43:48 PM (No. 860523)
Interesting how we never hear complaints from liberals about how abortion affects blacks disproportionately
8 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
DVC 7/28/2021 5:43:57 PM (No. 860524)
Read what Margaret Sanger wrote about it. She was a hateful white supremecist, for certain, and yet, she is much revered by the leftists who call all normal people "white supremecists" today if they want "white" things iike law and order, patriotic education, no burning and rioting, violent criminals in prisons.
9 people like this.
That was Margaret's goal when she started PP, and based on where they place their abortion mills, black babies remain in their target sights.
5 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
FormerDem 7/28/2021 6:32:31 PM (No. 860568)
May they win. And #1 nobody really knows who black and Latino voters are voting for, let alone who they actually want to vote for. Have you seen the film from Fulton County? if the left were sure of the black vote they wouldn't be doing that.
3 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Timber Queen 7/28/2021 6:57:45 PM (No. 860588)
#2 - Thank you for always giving the opportunity to defend life.
Yes, women aborting unwanted/inconvenient babies has been around forever. Greek and Roman women were known to give birth to unwanted children and then abandon their infants exposed on garbage heaps on the outskirts of town. Human life had little value in the ancient world, until Christ taught mankind about God the Father, the Holy Spirit and Eternal Life. First century Christian women began to go out to the garbage piles to rescue the innocent lives so carelessly disregarded. They took them into their homes to raise as their own.
It was Christianity that introduced to mankind the notion that life was sacred, and had a deeper meaning than just filling the belly and surviving another day. No human being, "even" a fetus or an infant, should be killed for merely existing. If life is in danger when it occupies the womb of its own mother, how can life have a value that must be guarded from birth to death?
At one time Western Civilization protected the babe in the womb and offered women in distressed circumstances support, and the option of adoption. Life had value. After Roe v. Wade life lost its value. Abortion was elevated to the position of a sacrament. Dissent from the mantra was ridiculed. Pro-life pregnancy support clinics must rely on donations, but Planned Parenthood gets tax-payer funding. Pro-life clinics were mandated to post information on the closest abortuary, but no such equal mandate was given to PP to post information on the option of keeping the baby. Beginning in grade school our young girls are given birth control and abortions to correct an "oopsie"...without their parents even knowing. When a society only condones one option for women with a crisis pregnancy, then only one option is chosen. I don't call that civilization.
Pro Life is Pro Woman.
11 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Timber Queen 7/28/2021 7:06:21 PM (No. 860595)
Excuse me, my comment is in reply to #3.
1 person likes this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
SkeezerMcGee 7/28/2021 8:38:10 PM (No. 860663)
The argument made to the Supreme Court includes:
"Minority groups have long complained about Planned Parenthood’s focus on the black community, which persists to this day.
"Planned Parenthood intentionally located 86 percent of its abortion facilities in or near minority neighborhoods in the 25 U.S. counties with the most abortions,” the brief notes. “These 25 counties contain 19 percent of the U.S. population, including 28 percent of the Black population and 37 percent of the Hispanic/Latino population. In 12 of these counties, Blacks and Hispanics/Latinos are more than 50 percent of the population. In contrast, Blacks are only 12.6 percent of the U.S. population, and Hispanics and Latinos are 16.3 percent.”
“Planned Parenthood’s largest abortion facility in America is situated in the middle of a Black and Hispanic neighborhood within walking distance of a nearby school. Given that Planned Parenthood has strategically located abortion clinics near minority neighborhoods, the abortion industry’s attempt to deny its eugenic aims cannot withstand objective scrutiny,” the brief argues."
Comment: The above argument does not come close to proving that Planned Parenthood ("PP") has selected these places because PP favors abortions of minorities. PP may have made these decisions because those geographic areas are where a high percentage of women who want abortions reside. PP may have selected those places as an accommodation to those woman.
Note: I despise PP because I believe it sells fetuses and parts of fetuses.
The article includes:
“Although the Mississippi statute at issue in this case does not require this Court to consider the validity of an anti-eugenics law, this Court’s current abortion jurisprudence presently ‘constitutionalize[s] the views of the 20th-century eugenics movement,’ by ‘[e]nshrining a constitutional right to an abortion based solely on the race, sex, or disability of an unborn child,'” the brief claims, citing Thomas."
Comment: Each woman's decision is based on what she believes. Each decision is no doubt based on numerous factors, which may or may not include the race, sex and/or disability of the fetus. The fact that a woman's decision to have an abortion may include some or all of these factors does mean that the respective woman has any intent whatsoever to "promote eugenics."
Comment: This case before the SC has nothing whatsoever to do with forced sterilization. In 1981Oregon performed the last LEGAL forced sterilization in the United States.
The infamous case styled "Buck v. Bell" (1927) is taught in law schools are one of the worst cases in its entire history. It's limited to its unique facts and has probably not been cited in a favorable light for more than at least 60 years.
Comment (prediction): The Supreme Court is not going to overrule Roe v. Wade. It well probably affirm Roe.
2 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Catherine 7/28/2021 8:40:44 PM (No. 860664)
# 10 - we are focused on different ends of the issue. Having an inconvenient pregnancy isn't the reason for most abortions. Some women have bad lives through no fault of their own. Some are not well educated and live in abusive situation. Some women end up alone raising the children they have and have no way to afford another child. I was raised Catholic, went to Catholic schools. But early on I realized abortion should be a personal decision for the woman. I wish every conceived child were wanted and loved. We both know that isn't the situation. I do think that after the third month, abortion should only be when it's medically necessary. And you have no idea how many times I want to comment on this topic but don't. Most of the time I ignore it and move on.
0 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
downnout 7/28/2021 9:01:43 PM (No. 860691)
This won’t go over well at DNC headquarters.
3 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
MickTurn 7/28/2021 9:56:49 PM (No. 860744)
We now get to see which judges on SCOTUS are murdering scum and which judges are Human!
2 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
GustoGrabber 7/28/2021 11:35:39 PM (No. 860837)
Every conceived child is loved and wanted. Not always by the birth mother.
And as always, game ball TQ.
7 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
Pinkpanther 7/29/2021 10:27:43 AM (No. 861154)
#13 replace abortion with any other evil and see if those excuses stand. Killing a child doesn’t fix any of those problems, it creates new ones. Post abortive women kill themselves at a rate of 6x higher after an abortion according to several studies. Also, over 60% of women report having been forced to abort so I fail to see how abortion is good for a woman in any way, shape or form. Does killing a child get a woman out of an abusive situation? Does it get her out of poverty? All it’s done is add the death of her child on top of these circumstances. It’s time to stop victim blaming (the unborn child) and killing them for it so it’s time to overturn this abomination of grave human rights violation.
4 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
KatieJo 7/29/2021 2:39:05 PM (No. 861367)
At first I was very encouraged, then I realized they might just decide it's okay to kill white babies only. Seriously, would you be that surprised?
1 person likes this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
Timber Queen 7/30/2021 2:30:10 AM (No. 861850)
#13 - For fifteen years, from 18 until 33, I also advanced the same arguments. I had to - in order to keep the guilt at bay. I met my first boyfriend the March of my senior year in high school. He was 20 and had his own apartment. To say I was naive, innocent and inexperienced would be a great understatement. I was pregnant by July. Although a graduate of my own Catholic school, my boyfriend never mentioned marriage. 1972 was before Roe, but abortion was legal in California and the news was dominated by the upcoming Supreme Court decision. I only heard arguments in favor of abortion and for a scared 18 year-old looking forward to college, a quick and quiet abortion with no one else knowing would put things back to the way they were before. It didn't.
My boyfriend broke up with me within a month. Like many post-abortion women and men, I fell into substance abuse and promiscuity. Two other abortions followed before my 21st birthday. You can bet I was an avid pro-abortion feminist. I ridiculed marriage and feigned a dislike for babies and children. I even refused to hold the new born babes of my friends. I was an angry young woman and blamed it all on the patriarchy.
A few weeks before my 33rd birthday, I found myself one night on the ocean cliffs at Del Mar, CA. My total life's assets were a 5-year-old car, a stereo and a pair of red racing skis. I began to draw closer to the cliff and could see the pounding waves 40 feet below. I closed my eyes and began to inch forward, "Its not suicide if its an accident." Suddenly a strong hand grabbed my right shoulder and yanked me backwards. When I opened my eyes I was alone. I hit my knees and soon my face was in the dirt and I made the most desperate prayer of my life, "Oh, God! I can't do this alone anymore! If there's a man out there looking for me, I'm ready to be found!" I even added, "And, if he could be someone I already dated we wouldn't have to go through that awkward first year." Two weeks later I received a letter from TK, an old beau I hadn't seen in eight years.
That led us back to the Catholic Church to receive the Sacrament of Marriage. I made my first full confession in fifteen years and was absolved of my sins. Ten years later in a weekend retreat I had a mystical experience and met my three babies. I have named them Veronica, Simon and Bridget. You wrote, "I do think that after the third month, abortion should only be when it's medically necessary." My babies were as fully human and possessing an eternal soul at conception, at six weeks when they were aborted, as they would have been at three months gestation.
May you prayerfully consider all the ramifications of the positions you support; God bless you abundantly, as He has done for me.
1 person likes this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
ussjimmycarter 7/30/2021 3:13:30 AM (No. 861854)
Abortion is murder of an unborn human! Faith in God is given to infants in the womb per the Bible! When Mary announced her coming birth, John The Baptist jumped with joy in his mother’s womb! Enough of this monstrous practice!
1 person likes this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "ladydawgfan"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Comments:
WOW!!! Go git 'em!!