Judge Charges 3 U.S. Marshals After
Deputy Marshal Refused To Say If
She Was Vaccinated
The Police Tribune,
by
Sandy Malone
Original Article
Posted By: Grateful,
6/20/2021 4:20:12 PM
A federal judge in South Dakota brought criminal charges of contempt of court and conspiracy to obstruct justice against three U.S. Marshals Service (USMS) officials on Monday in connection with a deputy marshal’s refusal to reveal her vaccination status to his court. In March, U.S. District Judge Charles Kornmann tried to require all courthouse employees to be vaccinated, the Associated Press reported. But U.S. Marshal Daniel Mosteller, who heads up the agency in South Dakota, told Kornmann that wouldn’t work because USMS was not requiring its marshals to be vaccinated.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
chance_232 6/20/2021 4:24:04 PM (No. 821614)
So much for that HIPPA law. Its nobody's business what your medical records have to say except every insurance company, Google, Amazon, your employer, the courts,, school districts. local, state and federal governments.
40 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
LanceLink1 6/20/2021 4:48:12 PM (No. 821628)
Papers pleeze! You do not half your papers? We half a cattle car waiting for you and your family. America uber allas.
31 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
zephyrgirl 6/20/2021 5:01:33 PM (No. 821635)
If a man can identify as a woman and a woman can identify as a man, then I can identify as vaccinated.
66 people like this.
Voting will no longer fix this.
37 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Nimby 6/20/2021 5:16:32 PM (No. 821646)
Obviously the DORK Judge doesn’t know or care about HIPPA
20 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
EQKimball 6/20/2021 5:20:47 PM (No. 821649)
An interesting issue. By federal statute (28 USC 566(a)) the U,S. Marshal Service is required to obey all lawful orders of the court. Is this a lawful order? Maybe not. The subject matter is administrative rather than a case or controversy. Regardless, my guess is that the presiding judge of the district has jurisdiction in this matter, and not every division. That said, this judge is acting like a jerk.
18 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
stablemoney 6/20/2021 5:35:08 PM (No. 821661)
The U.S. Marshall's office should refuse to comply. Other law enforcement should refuse any orders from this Judge. His rulings are his opinion, not law.
18 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
anniebc 6/20/2021 5:37:06 PM (No. 821664)
Bet they won't ask them if they have AIDs.
34 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
justavoter 6/20/2021 5:50:31 PM (No. 821673)
You should have a liability agreement at hand to ask anyone to sign that request for you to be vaccinated.
The Liability request should include a guarantee that any harm done to you by the vaccine for the rest of your life will be the responsibility of the requestor. The requestor of vaccination should be required to carry a 10 million dollar per incident liability insurance policy in the event that anyone that person has required to be vaccinated in their presence has a claim.
22 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
seamusm 6/20/2021 5:57:00 PM (No. 821675)
Another example of judicial overreach. Our judges have become poisoned by the illusion that they have authority on everything and everywhere. Local judges who issue opinions expected to be authoritative across the country. 'Who do they think they are?' We can see. They think they are appointed to the Supreme Court - or even higher - as God. The problem is that our real SC never slaps them down and so far neither has our Almighty Father. I have some hope and faith that He will.
12 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Ashley Brenton 6/20/2021 5:58:20 PM (No. 821677)
Notice how the Left's treatment of Covid is vastly different from how it approached HIV/AIDS?
23 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Jethro bo 6/20/2021 8:28:57 PM (No. 821723)
Yes the judge is a member of the fascist party and yes the judge is a Clinton judge. And yes, this is what our two tiered Just-Us system has come to.
15 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
DVC 6/20/2021 10:18:38 PM (No. 821777)
None of your business.
6 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Lawsy0 6/21/2021 1:20:51 AM (No. 821846)
Isn't it against the great and mighty HIPAA law to even ask someone? If it isn't, is should be. This is one crappy religion, all this COVID VAX bilge.
3 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
mathman 6/21/2021 11:13:58 AM (No. 822162)
Given the provisions of HIPPA, the three U S Marshals would have NO right to know the vaccination status of another Marshal. Oh, well.
The Judge lacks the standing to order the vaccination of anyone.
Unless he is also President, which I would not doubt.
1 person likes this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Grateful"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Comments:
U.S. District Judge Charles Kornmann is a Clinton appointee.