3 Major Scientific Discoveries In The
Past Century That Point To God
The Federalist,
by
Stephen Meyer
Original Article
Posted By: Judy W.,
4/3/2021 7:35:20 PM
This week, traditional Jews and Christians celebrate special acts of God in human history. Yet, polling data now show that an increasing number of young people, including those from religious homes, doubt even the existence of God.
Moreover, polls probing such young “religiously unaffiliated agnostics and atheists” have found that science — or at least the claims of putative spokesmen for science — have played an outsized sole in cementing disaffection with religious belief. In one, more than two-thirds of self-described atheists, and one-third of agnostics, affirm “the findings of science make the existence of God less probable.”
Reply 1 - Posted by:
IowaDad 4/3/2021 8:03:44 PM (No. 744002)
The more we learn about the universe the more amazing the act of creation is! But it degrades the quality of most religious teaching. Someone had to come up with a system of particles that was present at the Big Bang and which created all of us (even Democrats). That someone was pretty clever.
12 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
NYbob 4/3/2021 8:12:29 PM (No. 744007)
Nice, short, article. It is easy step to this side of the argument when you learn a few things about the history of the formation of our solar system, earth, life and you. This side vs the goofball actor Bill Nye or the smug twit Hitchens is no contest, once you really dig down on the science.
16 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
HerbVA 4/3/2021 8:27:30 PM (No. 744020)
I have said for years I am not credulous enough to be an atheist.
11 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
bpl40 4/3/2021 8:32:16 PM (No. 744024)
If scientific discoveries make you think probability of God is lower, then you haven't understood God or science. Gandhi put it best when he said true faith starts where the intellect ends.
13 people like this.
And now we have vaccinations that alter that complex DNA/RNA. No thanks.
10 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Plex 4/3/2021 8:47:54 PM (No. 744043)
Let me give a contrarian view. I am not saying that Meyer is wrong... Of course we are the product of the particular circumstances in the "universe" we see and any changes would mean we would not exist in the form we recognize. That does not mean that other circumstances in this or another "universe" would not produce sentient life that we would not recognize. The "universe" that we see may not be the only such "universe" in existence, the void is large. The "universe" we see may very well contract eventually and re-explode (I read Hoyle as a yute). The DNA argument is the most interesting one. I spent time use adaptive software to develop diagnostics and was surprised by the results of random changes in a "DNA" that described a diagnostic mix. Given many, many generations of random changes, interesting results emerged that would not have been predicted by conventional analysis. Billions or trillions of years of random changes might, I repeat might, produce the complexity of the inner ear.
My best argument relating to intelligent design is that it is possible that the language of DNA was created by an intelligent "being" but that the results were the product of cosmic rays tweaking the DNA over billions (or more) years.
I remember well, as a NASA employee, watching the first lander exploration and noting that all of the experiments to discover life were based on exactly what we recognized as life on this planet. No thought was given to the possibility of a completely different basis for life. I guess I read too much old style science fictions, Asimov, Heinlein, Clarke, Bradbury, Adams, Herbert, Anderson.
Just poking!
7 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
kono 4/3/2021 9:50:49 PM (No. 744091)
God had mercy on this long-time atheist by granting me the grace to believe. Now I bear personal witness to God as our Creator and Redeemer.
I liked this article in general. One specific point that seems a little sloppy to me, though:
"We know from experience that software comes from programmers. We know generally that information — whether inscribed in hieroglyphics, written in a book, or encoded in radio signals — always arises from an intelligent source."
Have we discovered any such 'information' other than ours? Not that I've ever heard about. One out of one is hardly enough to declare "always".
God, the source of all being and giver of all life, be praised and thanked for ever. Happy Easter to all.
18 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
DVC 4/3/2021 10:28:27 PM (No. 744108)
This scientist and engineer is convinced.
Entropy requires a LOSS of organization with time. Tghe only way to locally reverse entropy is with intelligence.
The universe and life cannot be an accident.
17 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
LC Chihuahua 4/3/2021 10:34:34 PM (No. 744109)
Take a moment and consider the universe, and the life that resides in it. Neither is a product of random change. Both are too sophisticated for that. They have a design. If there is design, that means there is a designer. A creator. That designer and creator is by definition, God. People and religions will have different ideas on what God is like and what God wants, but they all agree on one thing, there is a God.
16 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
A.I. 4/3/2021 10:43:46 PM (No. 744112)
The advancements in science only point to the existence of the Creator.
10 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
columba 4/3/2021 10:52:15 PM (No. 744116)
There were more than 500 witnesses to the risen Jesus Christ.
How many more do you need?
13 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
hershey 4/4/2021 4:03:02 AM (No. 744212)
Ya know, it is better to believe in God and die to find out you were wrong, than not believe in God and die to find out you were wrong....
8 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
GO3 4/4/2021 6:55:14 AM (No. 744249)
Gerald Schroeder, a PhD from MIT, has addressed similar issues in his book, The Science of God, which was published in the late 90s. He particularly covers the trillions upon millions of random events and the stochastic (probabilistic) outcomes for the current structure of the universe and the generation of of life. It is, for all intents and purposes, nil. This is a good article and I also recommend Schroeder's books.
6 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
udanja99 4/4/2021 8:22:22 AM (No. 744304)
All I have to do to believe in God is to look at nature. Learn about Phi, the golden ratio, and you will see it everywhere in nature. I refuse to believe that it is the result of an explosion billions of years ago. Perhaps the expanding universe is less like a balloon and more like a spiral.
3 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
stablemoney 4/4/2021 1:15:47 PM (No. 744597)
The findings of science make the existence of God more probable. The universe is made up of intelligent design, which means there is some very big body of intelligence somewhere. It's all way above my small mind.
1 person likes this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Judy W."
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Comments:
I'm reading his book now. It is slow going because it is filled with ideas I have to digest, even though I've read his previous books, and it is a stunning experience.