Supreme Court to Consider 2020 Election
Challenge Lawsuits in February Conference
Epoch Times,
by
Tom Ozimek
Original Article
Posted By: earlybird,
2/7/2021 10:15:22 AM
The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday scheduled several high-profile contest-of-election lawsuits, including ones brought by attorneys Sidney Powell and Lin Wood, and the Trump campaign, for consideration at its Feb. 19 conference.
(Snip) the lawsuits include Sidney Powell’s Michigan case (20-815), the Trump campaign’s Pennsylvania lawsuit (20-845) and Wisconsin lawsuit (20-882), the Pennsylvania lawsuit brought by Rep. Mike Kelly (R-Pa.) (20-810), and Lin Wood’s Georgia case (20-799).
All cases allege some form of unlawful election-related conduct affecting the result of the election, including expansion of mail-in balloting by elections officials changing rules in contravention of state election laws, lack of adequate security
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Avikingman 2/7/2021 10:21:11 AM (No. 687778)
Who's next? Capone or Dillinger?
16 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
anniebc 2/7/2021 10:29:51 AM (No. 687796)
They all need to insert the Times article into the record for each case. PDT should do that in the senate circus trial too. They have scheduled five cases. Why? Why now? After hearing the cases, what will the SC do, especially if the plaintiffs "win"? Will they revoke xiden's presidency? Why again are they hearing the cases? Is it to fix election processes for next time without making a statement on the one in question? Will anyone be prosecuted for the fraud?
39 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Califedup 2/7/2021 10:42:56 AM (No. 687815)
So what. You think these frauds in black robes are going to declare these cases "have standing" and declare the elections in key states fraudulent? Chief Fraud Roberts is in control and the rest of these charlatans of justice - Kavanaugh (we fought for him and our thanks is betrayal, Gorsuch (gutless), and that stealth liberal Barrett who won't even stand up for freedom of religion and who if anyone was listening at her confirmation hearing revealed herself to be part and parcel of the Judiciary Deep State when she breathlessly told of gathering her children around to weep about poor George the addict Lloyd who died of an overdose, who fathered and did not support several children, and who stuck a gun in a pregnant woman's belly while doing a home invasion of her house, and his chosen career was being a lifetime criminal before any investigation had taken place. What kind of a Judge would pass judgement on the police without any evidence.
A classic China Mitch pick. We got played again as suckers.
And we all thought that hey now the court majority is now in the hands of justices who are strict constitutionalists? Boned again. Only two on the court are Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito.
Expect no justice from the Not Supreme Court. They are part of the communist oligarchy ruling over us now. It is entirely up to us to win this fight on our own and we can and will.
Free America.
44 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Buzzman 2/7/2021 10:49:21 AM (No. 687820)
If we actually had a real Supreme Court they would take these up in a heartbeat. Unfortunately, we have have John "Chicken Suit" Roberts in charge. According to him, no one anywhere has standing on anything.
29 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
zek 2/7/2021 11:11:27 AM (No. 687843)
The Supreme Court has no standing —in the court of public opinion.
36 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
WhamDBambam 2/7/2021 11:31:53 AM (No. 687861)
Such a sorry lot, now pretending to act when it's too late.
34 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
spacer 2/7/2021 11:54:47 AM (No. 687887)
By democrat "standards" Roberts and his fellow jurist are directly responsible for Ashli Babbitts murder.
20 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
bpl40 2/7/2021 12:06:59 PM (No. 687898)
Day late. Dollar short. Nothing of value will come of it. Safest bet in town.
17 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Rob_NC 2/7/2021 1:00:30 PM (No. 687956)
You know I watched a clip of Paul Harvey speaking of the signers of Declaration of Independence and pondering what would the founders think.....
12 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Luandir 2/7/2021 1:15:43 PM (No. 687990)
Roberts is preparing some new way to string us along and then disappoint us.
9 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Rinktum 2/7/2021 2:59:52 PM (No. 688101)
Not at all surprised the SCOTUS decided to hear this now. Think about it. They hear the case and make a decision against the Plaintffs and poof the narrative has been set. The SCOTUS found no evidence of fraud or cheating. Case closed. Shut up and sit down you wretched Trump supporters. The Supremes have spoken. Of course this is how this was going to work. They had to have a court decision that went against Trump in order to shut down any argument to the contrary. Now they are going to get what they need. The unbelievable corruption and criminality of the political class is stunning in its hubris and determination to destroy President Trump.
8 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
smokincol 2/7/2021 4:08:23 PM (No. 688156)
oh, I see what they're doing. bundling all of them together so there will only have to be one ruling to knock out the whole bunch of them. pretty crafty idea, johnny boy, you george bush bum kisser.
4 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
moebellini3 2/7/2021 4:23:13 PM (No. 688172)
These freakin idiots should wait until 2030. Useless, meaningless. The damage is already done. We're a banana republic, a 3rd world country because these dummies refused to act. We have a mentally incapacitated washed up politician sitting in the white house who like his master, Barack Hussein Obama, has turned the presidency into a part time job. Appalling...
4 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
XCenturion 2/7/2021 8:41:51 PM (No. 688361)
Remember the Justices on the Supreme Court, and most judges for that matter, are merely corrupt lawyers who think they are gods that are driven by political ideologies! After this last election I have lost all respect for the judiciary, the DOJ, and especially the FBI!
1 person likes this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
bighambone 2/7/2021 9:10:22 PM (No. 688391)
If one adverse decision to the Democrats on election fraud comes out of the Supreme Court, watch as the angry Democrats start impeachment proceedings first targeting Trump’s three Supreme Court Justice nominees, and then the other three supposed conservative Justices. At the moment the Democrats are playing for keeps.
0 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
ldb51 2/8/2021 12:37:22 AM (No. 688509)
I believe Dementia Joe and his handlers are trying to create an environment conducive to, no, BEGGING for, active insurrection, so they can clamp down once and for all. More to the point, his handlers are guiding us into a civil war footing by knowingly creating abuses of his authority. Uncle Joe himself is clueless as to the implications of his statements and actions. His addled state of mind allows him to be highly emotional, angry and spiteful, and maybe even to occasionally sound coherent, but incapable of drawing a line from his behavior to its consequences. If they don't get the result they want soon, watch out for the extreme sacrifices the Left is likely willing to make, to light the spark...
1 person likes this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "earlybird"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)