Unlocked For Public: Loud Arguments in US
Supreme Court Chambers over Texas Lawsuit -
Court Intimidated
Hal Turner Radio Show,
by
Hal Turner
Original Article
Posted By: Foont,
12/13/2020 11:35:11 AM
From a source deep inside the US Supreme Court as they discussed the pending Texas lawsuit against Pennsylvania et. al. . . . "Hal, as you know I am a clerk for one of the Justices on SCOTUS. Today was like nothing we have ever seen. The justices are arguing loudly behind closed doors. The Justices met in a closed and sealed room, as is standard. Usually it is very calm, however today we could hear screaming all the way down the hall. They met in person, because they didn't trust telephonic meeting as secure. Chief Justice Roberts was screaming"Are you going to be responsible for the rioting if we hear this case?" Correction*
*Posters must post intro to full word limit or post may be deleted.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Captleemo 12/13/2020 11:41:39 AM (No. 630608)
John Roberts is the one who should be impeached.
100 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
BarryNo 12/13/2020 11:42:00 AM (No. 630609)
Well... They can be killed by Antifa and BLM, now, and oversee the end of the Great Experiment.
Then they can be killed by the Patriots who respond to Antifa and BLM and begin the Second Great Experiment.
49 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Moritz55 12/13/2020 11:45:30 AM (No. 630610)
Sorry, but I don’t buy it. Sounds more like satire than news.
29 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Californian 12/13/2020 11:52:33 AM (No. 630618)
More anonymous sources and no recorded audio. Where's the recording?
29 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
preciosodrogas 12/13/2020 11:52:44 AM (No. 630620)
Can this be confirmed? If so, as for me and many others, our rules send us into battle for our freedoms, and put our lives on the line, and these b-ds cannot not even stand up for Truth and Freedom, with no real threat to their lives, property, or well being. They would rather see our country die then face scorn from godless people they don't even know and never will. Why do they think that that situation would arise? Why do they feel our system cannot handle some punks rioting?
God save us all.
46 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
ronald trump 12/13/2020 11:59:28 AM (No. 630628)
JV Roberts has 2 choices; become a Man or remain a JV. I'm 79 years old, have seen a lot of garbage coming out of the courts. If they continue on this JV route, expect globalization, loss of your 1st and 2nd amendments and federal policing. The World Order is one step closer. IMHO!
44 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Avanti1 12/13/2020 12:05:44 PM (No. 630632)
If true, America is doomed. RIP Constitution.
33 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
TNVolunteer 12/13/2020 12:07:07 PM (No. 630635)
Take this with a full shake salter of salt.
17 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Anti_democRAT 12/13/2020 12:09:09 PM (No. 630638)
I am skeptical. I think they will have a better chance in the near future when the standing issue is crystal clear. Then we will know if we have a court that will do their job to uphold the constitution, the only law of the land.
14 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Dodge Boy 12/13/2020 12:25:53 PM (No. 630650)
My goodness. God help us. This accounts appears to be credible having come from a SCOTUS clerk who heard the yelling and screaming from Friday's closed-door session. I would suggest Congress get sealed sworn statements from other clerks who overheard this and if their statements are consistent consider how to deal with JC Roberts.
26 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
anniebc 12/13/2020 1:01:44 PM (No. 630683)
I'm not buying this.
8 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
gramma b 12/13/2020 1:09:11 PM (No. 630697)
If true, this is huge.
12 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Strike3 12/13/2020 1:17:05 PM (No. 630705)
There ya have it. Chickenschiff Roberts is the usual n-word in the woodpile. This lilly-livered skunk should resign and the resignation should become effective back to the day he saddled us with the illegal garbage known as Obamacare.
The rioting is going to happen anyway, John, and YOU will be held responsible.
25 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
montwoodcliff 12/13/2020 1:32:15 PM (No. 630721)
If this is true, Roberts should be removed for being a coward. The riots are not his problem--the Constitution and law is! The riots fall under the jurisdiction of the elected officials to handle them as they please.
28 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Madinmaryland 12/13/2020 1:45:54 PM (No. 630727)
This could easily be fake. Corroboration would make it more believable. At this point I don’t know what to believe anymore.
18 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
MDConservative 12/13/2020 2:15:56 PM (No. 630757)
Okay...
And send Hal Turner a few bucks. See, "TABOOLA severed its 6 year relationship with [him] because they didn't like the content of this site. Those ads were the revenue [he] used to feed [his] family. [He is] in serious need of public support."
What better way to churn a few extra clicks...maybe?
9 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
TLCary 12/13/2020 2:32:19 PM (No. 630761)
Roberts is afraid of the professional rioting crowds doing their thing? He should be afraid of what millions of Americans who already swore our lives to defend the Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic will do if we are convinced a coup has taken place. A bunch of fire-starting metrosexual thugs in black stocking caps are a joke compared to the havoc and destruction we can lay down.
17 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
Aubreyesque 12/13/2020 2:37:44 PM (No. 630766)
Hal, apparently has also been claiming that 50,000 Chinese troops were "destroyed" on US Soil (MeWe). I dont know who this guy is but Im beginning to think he's not credible.
3 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
3XALADY 12/13/2020 2:47:07 PM (No. 630773)
In your heart of hearts, you know they (SC) are not going to do anything because of the threat of the other side burning the country down. They (SC) already know they will burn for no reason. There it is, folks.
9 people like this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
Bluefindad 12/13/2020 2:57:07 PM (No. 630779)
Sorry, I don't understand. Does the Chief Justice have the power to coerce the votes of other justices? What punishment can he mete?
13 people like this.
Reply 21 - Posted by:
Geoman 12/13/2020 3:06:19 PM (No. 630785)
It seems to me that Hal Turner is trying to pull a Howard Stern-like stunt for reasons having nothing to do with preserving our Republic. It may be true, or even likely, that Roberts, who appears more and more to be an ideological leftist rather than someone susceptible to blackmail, and his proto-commie fellow travelers on the high court acted in fear of being blamed for more widespread rioting and killing from the left. If so, then they have taken the measure of the Normal Americans and see no real threat from the tens of millions of Normals for SCOTUS' siding with the election thieves to normalize, if not permanitize, our very real disenfranchisement. If SCOTUS has changed the rules of political engagement, then do we play by them to win or do we sit back and go gently into that dark night?
7 people like this.
Reply 22 - Posted by:
Shmowry1 12/13/2020 3:08:30 PM (No. 630787)
So, what do we do when SCOTUS doesn’t follow the law? When they clearly bend to the will of the “mob”? What do we do?!
12 people like this.
Reply 23 - Posted by:
DVC 12/13/2020 4:16:46 PM (No. 630821)
OK, then perhaps the solution is to take on antifa with small arms, not with words, signs or anything else.
We are just about to that point. Antifa thugs, they deserve to be stopped by force. The police won't do it. The courts won't do it.
Perhaps Kyle had the right idea, but just needed more guys on his side.
13 people like this.
Reply 24 - Posted by:
4Diogenes 12/13/2020 5:10:41 PM (No. 630852)
Someone should ask Roberts if either statement is accurate. If either is, he should resign immediately.
7 people like this.
Reply 25 - Posted by:
BeatleJeff 12/13/2020 6:05:37 PM (No. 630891)
As if we needed any further evidence of John Robert's moral cowardice.
2 people like this.
Reply 26 - Posted by:
jimincalif 12/13/2020 7:39:03 PM (No. 630958)
Yes, we need confirmation, but the fact that this is plausible is a huge problem. They know conservatives don’t riot, kill and burn down their cities. So, to quote Benjamin Franklin, "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." Emphasis on temporary, but mob violence prevails. Again, IF this is true. But here again we conservatives are at a disadvantage, wanting confirmation. If an anonymous source came out with anything like this on Trump, it would be on every MSM outlet for days, THEY don’t care about confirmation, as long as it advances their narrative.
4 people like this.
Reply 27 - Posted by:
Omen55 12/13/2020 7:42:35 PM (No. 630962)
I hope they live long enough to pay the ultimate price at the hands of those they feared.
3 people like this.
Reply 28 - Posted by:
KanCreeper 12/13/2020 9:34:02 PM (No. 631027)
FOLKS! I am doing a C&P from the linked story....I do not care if it is REAL or a B.S. to stir up Conservatives!
I find it not only sickening, but more than troublesome, at best.
FTA:"...The Justices met in a closed and sealed room, as is standard.
Usually it is very calm, however today we could hear screaming all the way down the hall.
They met in person, because they didn't trust telephonic meeting as secure.
Chief Justice Roberts was screaming
"Are you going to be responsible for the rioting if we hear this case?"
"Don't tell me about Bush v. Gore, we weren't dealing with riots then"
"You are forgetting what your role here is Neil, and I don't want to hear from the two junior justices anymore. I will tell you how you will vote."
Justice Clarence Thomas says "This is the end of Democracy, John."
When they left the room, Roberts, the Libs and Kavanugh had big smiles. Alito and Thomas were visibly upset. ACB and Gorsuch didn't seem fazed at all."
Clearly Chief Justice Roberts is intimidated by the ATNIFA/Left-wing rioting. Well, one has to wonder if maybe he can intimidated more by some actions of the right wing?..."
Since we have no "MEDIA" at present...I wish there were someone who could question the Justices...It seems impossible, to ask the SCOTUS to return any kind of communications??? THEY have surrendered any STANDING That they might have had in this case! Apolitical? SCOTUS, is not!
I'm not going to bother doing that or anything else, and neither should any of you, but I'm just wondering, is all.
1 person likes this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Foont"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Comments:
Political violence and intimidation work.