Pennsylvania Court Rejects Trump Appeal,
Campaign Lawyers Say It’s ‘On to SCOTUS’
Epoch Times,
by
Jack Phillips
Original Article
Posted By: earlybird,
11/27/2020 4:25:23 PM
The U.S. Third Circuit of Appeals in Pennsylvania on Friday rejected President Donald Trump’s campaign appeal in their challenge of the state’s election results, a move that Trump’s lawyers said will allow them to expedite their lawsuits to the U.S. Supreme Court.
“The activist judicial machinery in Pennsylvania continues to cover up the allegations of massive fraud. We are very thankful to have had the opportunity to present proof and the facts to the [Pennsylvania] state legislature,” Trump lawyers Jenna Ellis and former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani wrote in response.
“On to SCOTUS!” they wrote, referring to the Supreme Court.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
sparky joe 11/27/2020 4:33:59 PM (No. 618014)
Let’s Assume that this is a Positive, if not indeed Deliberate step that allows the Case to be brought
to SCOTUS for EXPEDITED CONSIDERATION
KEEP THE FAITH
DON’T GO WOBBLY
32 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
OhioNick 11/27/2020 4:36:05 PM (No. 618015)
I'm going to make a prediction.
If Joe Biden is allowed to steal the election, look for multiple federal indictments in early January. Hunter Biden will be charged with the rape of a minor, and Joe will be charged for failing to contact the authorities when he learned about the sexual abuse.
9 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Illinois Mom 11/27/2020 4:40:45 PM (No. 618021)
Getting to SCOTUS was always the goal wasn't it? I know that they have a good case just on the face of it. We are supposed to believe that Joe Biden, joke of the senate for 47 years, Vice President for 8 miserable years, got more votes than any other presidential candidate in history? That is laughable, but, in an era when "experts" state, with a straight face, that men" can have babies, the country was founded in 1619, and that Obama was a "great statesman" (barf) we have to suspend disbelief just to get through the day. In 2020 we are required to, not just tolerate, but actively participate in the fantasies of others.
While it shouldn't be an issue in this case because the evidence is overwhelming, I hope that Justice Thomas remembers who lead his high-tech lynching, and that Justice's Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Barrett remember the guy who stood up to the mob on their behalf, defended them against every vile accusation, and didn't cave to the pressure of the MSM and spineless Republicans.
36 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
LC Chihuahua 11/27/2020 4:46:44 PM (No. 618025)
This has always been destined for the Supreme Court. What Pennsylvania has done is legalized voter fraud. The biggest concern from this ruling is the Court's ruling that they weren't presented any evidence. There was a claim that there was a dump of ballot data where Trump received less than 1% of the vote for nearly 600k ballots. I would hope Trump's lawyers have actual proof of this.
14 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
planetgeo 11/27/2020 5:00:54 PM (No. 618033)
Well, well, well... Just happens to be Justice Alito's Circuit Court of Appeals. What am interesting coincidence. Stand by to board...
18 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
volksford 11/27/2020 5:03:33 PM (No. 618035)
Getting the feeling that Rudy ain't a "closer"
1 person likes this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
nina584 11/27/2020 5:17:20 PM (No. 618043)
#6 ask John Gotti
17 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Californian 11/27/2020 5:31:52 PM (No. 618047)
Although obviously disappointing, you want the other side to be the ones filing the appeals, no matter what, it was going to the USSC so might as well get there ASAP.
I didn't read the briefs so I don't know what the exhibits were or what evidence was presented in court as opposed to Twitter but we all know the fraud is clear. Hopefully, they actually did present and it was just ignored and brushed aside.
Frankly, what judge wants their name on this case anyway? Wouldn't be the first time a judge saw a case they -knew- was going to be appealed and took a hard pass to get it off their socket ASAP.
Also, this is hardly the only case going on. Others have cases going on all over so even should this one ultimately be rejected it doesn't mean everything is over and election fraud is now legal.
Hold on to your hats. Not even close to over.
15 people like this.
I don't think there is a court in the land that has the nerve to overturn anything to do with this election.
12 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
The Remnants 11/27/2020 6:35:39 PM (No. 618084)
Seventy-three million voted for President Trump - that's a lot of people. I cannot believe that that many people will accept the U.S.A. ending up a banana republic. So many of our men and women have fought to protect others' freedoms; It is time now to protect our own freedoms.
17 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Rumblehog 11/27/2020 6:47:45 PM (No. 618088)
Rudy provided PLENTY of proof. It's just that the PA Supreme Court changed the rules of the voting, per COVID, and now the Appeals Court is covering their corrupt black-robed backsides. I've got a feeling this won't work out well for those crooked Judges once it arrives at the U.S. Supreme Court.
9 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Anti_democRAT 11/27/2020 7:14:33 PM (No. 618103)
This ruling seems to say if a state counts it anything goes.
4 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Quigley 11/27/2020 7:15:33 PM (No. 618104)
I don't think there's any doubt that this is a positive. Time is of the essence. There is no time for the circuit court to review, write and opinion, motion for rehearing, then to the US Sup Ct. This is the only thing that makes sense- on to the US Sup Ct.
7 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
RedWhite&Blue2 11/27/2020 7:41:57 PM (No. 618118)
Getting the feeling it’s all going to come down to AMY...
Pray for her
And for our President
And for our Republic
10 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
bighambone 11/27/2020 8:12:04 PM (No. 618132)
If the three blind Republican Judges who made that Circuit Court ruling get their way, you will never see another Republican President elected again in your lifetime. What they are saying is that all the Democrat States could perpetrate mass election fraud by manipulating the ballots and as long as those States don’t do anything to fix that election fraud that the Federal Government must simply accept whoever those States says won the election in those States? Common sense will tell you that such election fraud always would favor the Democrat candidate, so the Democrats running those States are not about to do anything to fix election fraud. You better believe that the Democrats are experts at election fraud as they have been at it now for over a hundred years in their big cities with the establishment Republicans being to naive and wimpy to do anything about that.
5 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
ROLFNader 11/28/2020 7:47:18 AM (No. 618339)
I suggest that Rudy skip the dose of Grecian Formula , this time.
Just sayin....
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "earlybird"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)