Democrat lawmaker: ‘Small genitals is not
sufficient reason to own a gun’
BizPac Review,
by
Vivek Saxena
Original Article
Posted By: ladydawgfan,
8/31/2020 12:55:47 AM
Freshman Democrat Rep. Sean Casten, the same guy who’d previously smeared decorated Navy SEAL Rep. Dan Crenshaw as a “racist” and compared President Donald Trump to deceased terrorist Obama bin Laden, is back in the spotlight again.
In a dehumanizing, possibly sexist remark made during a webinar last weekend, he suggested to a college student that the only reason Second Amendment supporters want so desperately to own firearms is to make for up for their allegedly “small genitals.”
“If you are a constitutional originalist, unless you’re a member of a well-regulated militia, tell me why you need to own a gun?
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Newtsche 8/31/2020 1:04:13 AM (No. 526477)
4Chan hackers reveal Mrs. Casten's browser history -- gun dealers.
Her response, "It didn't work". Then she cried.
6 people like this.
Did he join the squad ? I resent paying these idiots, who care noting about the taxpayers, $174k a year.
All of them came into our districts asking for votes and donations. We the People elect them to represent US in Congress and look what they do.
I don't condone violence, but some of them need to be smacked. Have they passed any legislation this year or spent the entire time hating the President and US?
7 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
DVC 8/31/2020 2:21:40 AM (No. 526498)
Speak for yourself, sir.
5 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
DVC 8/31/2020 2:38:04 AM (No. 526504)
Just for the education of the lame brain Mr. Casten... USCode 10 para 311 [federal law for idiots like him] defines the militia in the USA as being made up of two components a) the organized militia, Nat Guard and b) the unorganized militia, which the law defines as all males from 17 to 45. And former military men remain members of the unorganized militia until age 64.
Yes, we ARE members of the militia, you ignorant punk.
12 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
DVC 8/31/2020 2:39:08 AM (No. 526505)
Answering his question: To protect ourselves from dangerous tyrants like YOU, Sean.
9 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
web 8/31/2020 3:50:12 AM (No. 526516)
The only reason we need a gun, apparently, is because demoncrats constantly give encouragement and support to criminals, rioters, looters and illegal aliens to attack us and our property. We are forced to defend our lives and property ourselves because they will not allow the police and government to do their jobs, paid for with our hard won tax dollars. Government sure wants our tax money, but don't wish to use it for its intended purpose, which is only to provide us with safety and security in our lives.
6 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
chance_232 8/31/2020 5:18:29 AM (No. 526530)
Who knew that packing a large endowment would scare off looters, rioters, rapists and murderers when they come knocking on your door?
People have figured out that they cant count on democrats to protect their lives and property. Not when said party is encouraging and funding said behavior.
11 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Highlander 8/31/2020 5:31:57 AM (No. 526533)
Small brains is sufficient reason to be a Democrat congressman.
10 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
jeffkinnh 8/31/2020 5:57:41 AM (No. 526545)
Beyond the offensiveness and stupidity of his remark, Casten's remark is legally incorrect. The SCOTUS has ruled that the "militia" notation in the constitution does NOT contradict the INDIVIDUAL right to bear arms. Of course, the law has never been an obstacle to dems.
6 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
franq 8/31/2020 6:01:18 AM (No. 526547)
#4, does that mean anyone over the age of 45 who was not in the military cannot own a gun?
0 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
WhamDBambam 8/31/2020 9:30:29 AM (No. 526738)
I've always found it a bit odd that Democrats' first reference point seems to be their crotch.
9 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
udanja99 8/31/2020 9:38:18 AM (No. 526748)
Sounds like he has personal experience with that on top of being afraid of guns.
4 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
StrikingViking 8/31/2020 11:00:46 AM (No. 526868)
Ask the McClosky's, who had an angry mob break into their property and threaten them while 911 calls to the police went unanswered.
As for the snark about small junk, Democrats just can't help themselves from projecting.
1 person likes this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
paral04 8/31/2020 11:10:59 AM (No. 526896)
And how does this brilliant observation about male gun owners relate to women who own guns?
1 person likes this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
DVC 8/31/2020 11:42:17 AM (No. 526934)
#10, no, not at all.
The Supreme Court in The District of Columbia vs Heller (2008) ruled that the Second Amendment is an individual right and is not connected to militia membership. That is definitely settled law.
But even if the leftist crazies want to try to push the (no longer important) militia connection, they are mostly completely unaware that all males 17 to 45 are members of the unorganized militia, by federal law. Beyond that age, the ownership is a personal right, not associated with militia membership or lack thereof, and validated by the Heller decision.
1 person likes this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
curious1 8/31/2020 11:47:11 AM (No. 526942)
#10, No.
The 2nd's prohibition on the government doesn't set an age restriction. So whether you're eligible for the organized or unorganized militia (or not), the government is still strictly prohibited from interfering in any way with a citizen's right to keep and bear arms. Note the second amendment doesn't have any qualifiers or caveats about if the feddie, state or local government doesn't like you, or whether it's concealed or open, no limitations at all. In fact, the citizens of that time owned cannons, state-of-the-art firearms, ships rigged for combat, and if airplanes had already been invented or tanks been in use, they would have owned those as well. The citizens were to be more powerful than the government because they controlled the government, not the other way around like the communists want.
0 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
NYbob 8/31/2020 1:13:52 PM (No. 527041)
Ever notice how so many rats are absolutely obsessed with the size of genitalia? It seems to be a filter for their every waking moment. If you ever meet this idiot, don't bother trying to talk to him, protect your groin area and find an exit.
0 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
Eagle4ever 8/31/2020 1:45:07 PM (No. 527063)
HE SHOULD KNOW !!
1 person likes this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
franq 8/31/2020 4:48:10 PM (No. 527217)
Thanks for clarification, 15 and 16. I only ask because some libs try to say guns are only for militia members, and in their minds militias are archaic and non-existent today.
0 people like this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
JoElla Bee 8/31/2020 6:21:18 PM (No. 527296)
Headline: Democrat lawmaker: ‘Small genitals is not sufficient reason to own a gun’
Or - - -
Democrat lawmaker explains why he doesn’t own a gun.
2 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "ladydawgfan"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Comments:
Charming!! Leftists just ooze class, don't they??!!