Post New Article

Appeals court denies Michael Flynn and
Justice Department's effort to end his case

Original Article

Posted By: Ladyhawke, 8/31/2020 12:54:00 PM

A federal appeals court ruled Monday against Michael Flynn and the Justice Department in their request to quickly shut down his criminal case. The 8-2 decision restores power to a judge to question the Justice Department's moves in the politically divisive case, when Attorney General William Barr dropped charges against President Donald Trump's former national security adviser earlier this year despite twice pleading guilty to lying under oath to lying to the FBI. Flynn had fought District Judge Emmet Sullivan's decision to ask a third-party lawyer to argue against the Justice Department's dismissal in the case, and his plans to hold a hearing, which has not yet happened.

Post Reply

Reply 1 - Posted by: Ladyhawke 8/31/2020 12:57:07 PM (No. 527019)
This is just disgusting, especially since it has been revealed that Judge Sullivan is long-time friends with Obummer.
62 people like this.

Reply 2 - Posted by: Rotten in Denmark 8/31/2020 12:57:33 PM (No. 527020)
No surprise here folks, SSDD. Black robed overseers minus a horse.
43 people like this.

Reply 3 - Posted by: MDConservative 8/31/2020 12:58:36 PM (No. 527023)
And now the real game begins...Judge Sulllivan is likely not messing around. Two years of this circus in the courts - crooked FBI, roll-over guilty pleas, and table pounding lawyers. Let's get to the bottom of this debacle once and for all.
40 people like this.

Reply 4 - Posted by: Jethro bo 8/31/2020 1:08:17 PM (No. 527033)
Totally expected. This liberal court couldn't wait for a chance to say screw the constitution, the courts now can prosecute, and execute whomever they desire. This court basically said the judge can do whatever he desires in the pursuit of a political objective. The courts have been out of control for too long. Its time for Congress to exercise oversight and reign these black robed demigods in. Just another example of Justice for Flynn and Just-Us for democrats.
50 people like this.

Reply 5 - Posted by: jimincalif 8/31/2020 1:13:20 PM (No. 527040)
Clinton, Comey, Brennan, Strzok, Clapper, etc. all go free. Instead of the rule of law, we have #twotieredjustice.
48 people like this.

Reply 6 - Posted by: ladydawgfan 8/31/2020 1:15:31 PM (No. 527044)
RE #4: Nasty Piglousi's Congress??? PUH-LEEZ!! Jesus will come again before that ever happens, especially if it means that the Congressional leftists can "get" President Trump just one more time!!
22 people like this.

Reply 7 - Posted by: Avanti1 8/31/2020 1:17:51 PM (No. 527047)
This article, and perhaps the Appeals Court ruling itself, fails to address the significant Constitutional issues raised by Flynn; on what authority does the Judiciary usurp the sole power of the Executive Branch to prosecute? What dispute is Sullivan to preside over since both the prosecution and defense have reached an agreement to drop the charges? What established Sullivan's standing to appeal the ruling of the three judge panel, since Sullivan is not a party to the original dispute? These are SIGNIFICANT issues of law. What was the position of the Appeal Court on them?
50 people like this.

Reply 8 - Posted by: Starboard_side 8/31/2020 1:25:07 PM (No. 527050)
Well, the good news, I would think now the Flynn team has evidence of previous legal counsel not acting on his behalf, and that there was no real reason to indict Gen. Flynn. Seems to me the longer they allowed this case to be delayed, the more information about how it all began came to light. I suspect more is coming soon, and it will be linked with the current Durham investigations.
25 people like this.

Reply 9 - Posted by: earlybird 8/31/2020 1:27:24 PM (No. 527053)
The Ruling itself is here in pdf. Read it for answers to questions about what the judges were thinking. The only ones dissenting were Henderson and Rao, who were for Flynn in the 3-judge hearing...
15 people like this.

Reply 10 - Posted by: Safari Man 8/31/2020 1:30:20 PM (No. 527054)
Maybe the DOJ should proceed and simply present a case (in a single afternoon) of how Flynn is innocent and the real culprits are the Obama admin. Throw in a presentation of how corrupt the courts are as well. Then let Trump pardon.
22 people like this.

Reply 11 - Posted by: john56 8/31/2020 1:38:21 PM (No. 527059)
Can Gen Flynn's counsel and DOJ appeal this to SCOTUS now?
24 people like this.

Reply 12 - Posted by: Ida Lou Pino 8/31/2020 1:40:04 PM (No. 527060)
Leftists never hesitate to shove it into our faces. And they do so without the slightest reference to law, ethics, or morality. They do it for only one reason - - spite. "Screw you, man" is their blatant and rapid response. And yet - - how long have we been waiting to get justice - - when there is overwhelming evidence that a massive number of crimes have been committed? If only we had some "screw you" voices on our side. Leftists = In your face Pubbies = Into the deep weeds
13 people like this.

Reply 13 - Posted by: JimBob 8/31/2020 1:44:14 PM (No. 527062)
The Process is the Punishment. The Deep State 'Rats KNOW that Flynn KNOWS where the Bodies are Buried. They are desperate to keep him tied up and unable to speak until after the election. The 'Just-Up' system is on full display.
25 people like this.

Reply 14 - Posted by: JunkYardDog 8/31/2020 1:46:03 PM (No. 527064)
There is no patience left for these rogue Judges who insert themselves into the case for political reasons. This is what happens in a leftist banana-republic where the courts are controlled by the political party in power. In those cases, this arrangement goes away when the NEW gvt. comes into power, (and usually drags these judges away in the middle of the night never to be heard from again). This behavior is making a mockery of the justice system-but hasn't it been like this for a long, long time? We need a PURGE of the whole government: the Legislative, the Judicial, and the Administrative Branches all need weeding out of those who are quick to criticize the US Constitution and the rule of law.
15 people like this.

Reply 15 - Posted by: BeatleJeff 8/31/2020 1:47:13 PM (No. 527066)
Given the demonstrable corruption in the judiciary, Trump now just needs to bring this schiff to a grinding halt by issuing Flynn a full pardon.
9 people like this.

Reply 16 - Posted by: Proud Texan 8/31/2020 1:57:13 PM (No. 527073)
Wonder how much Antifa would charge to give judge sullivan a visit.
6 people like this.

Reply 17 - Posted by: bighambone 8/31/2020 1:59:02 PM (No. 527075)
Clearly the Democrat plan now is to keep the Flynn case bouncing back and forth between the Democrat dominated Appeals Court and Democrat Judge Sullivan’s Court until after the November election. It will be interesting to see how long it takes Sullivan to finally rule on the case. After that if Sullivan comes down against Flynn there is a 100% chance that Sullivan’s decision will be appealed back up to the Appeals Court who can then slow walk initial decision with three judges, and end up with another en banc decision sometime later with the entire court again rehearing the case. Everyone above moron status who has been paying attention knows that the Flynn case is one of the most highly political cases to hit the federal courts since President Trump was elected. The Democrats absolutely do not want Flynn out there with the criminal charge against him dropped telling his story before the November election, that’s what the court created delays are all about. As the Democrats know that Flynn knows where all the old Obama-Biden Administration “bones” are buried.
13 people like this.

Reply 18 - Posted by: leonardo 8/31/2020 2:13:13 PM (No. 527081)
One of the most corrupt (Obama) administrations in American History is using Sullivan to keep Flynn gagged. Democrats, like their brethren in Communist China, are allergic to truth except as it suits their agenda. Give them the FINGER in a big way in November.
19 people like this.

Reply 19 - Posted by: DVC 8/31/2020 2:20:26 PM (No. 527091)
At some point, when the judges and courts don't provide anything but corrupt political actions you have to start considering alternatives.
13 people like this.

Reply 20 - Posted by: rytwng 8/31/2020 2:26:54 PM (No. 527098)
Just pardon him and save time and money. Tell these commiecrats up yours.
6 people like this.

Reply 21 - Posted by: Right Time 8/31/2020 3:16:39 PM (No. 527137)
A lifetime appointment as a federal judge could get very short, Ya' know whut Im'a sayin'?
5 people like this.

Reply 22 - Posted by: Scribelus 8/31/2020 3:33:57 PM (No. 527153)
Black Robes Matter!
2 people like this.

Reply 23 - Posted by: bighambone 8/31/2020 4:00:13 PM (No. 527173)
It is really hilarious that today, the same date that the DC Circuit Court denied Flynn”s Writ of Mandamus, that a Barack Obama nominated Circuit Court Judge in the same Circuit Court wrote an opinion granting Hillary Clinton’s Writ of Mandamus in a case brought by Judicial Watch regarding actions that Clinton took and matters that took place when Clinton was Obama’s Secretary of State.
5 people like this.

Reply 24 - Posted by: Pearson365 8/31/2020 4:10:23 PM (No. 527184)
A. Since this Obama directed judge did not have the legal authority to hold a hearing to determine if Mueller’s gestapo could bring these charges against Flynn in 2017, why is Sullivan entitled to determine if the dropping of charges is appropriate? B. When will Judge Sullivan hold his hearing to determine if the DOJ can decide to drop charges against Gen Flynn? October, November or whenever he feels like it? How long will this hearing last? 3 hours? 3 days? 3 months? If Sullivan decides to reject the DoJ’s decision, does he hold a trial in which he acts as prosecutor and judge? If Sullivan finds Flynn guilty of perjury, can Sullivan imprison Flynn in his court’s basement? C. If the DoJ and/or Flynn’s defense team appeal this egregious decision to the Supreme Court, will Chief Injustice Roberts side with the 4 leftists to deny Flynn a hearing?
2 people like this.

Reply 25 - Posted by: judy 8/31/2020 4:31:37 PM (No. 527200)
DC corrupt judges, they should be concerned with the.corruption in the Obama WH & Obama JD ...not Flynn ...Beyond sickening
4 people like this.

Reply 26 - Posted by: LWGII 8/31/2020 4:36:11 PM (No. 527206)
Okay, horrible decision. But it makes it clear how important this election is. We need to get rid of these insane judges and restore the rule of law.
7 people like this.

Reply 27 - Posted by: LadyChurchillUSA 8/31/2020 4:37:41 PM (No. 527208)
I thought you needed a prosecutor to conduct a trial when did that rule of law change? Now any judge can just throw a case together and say you a guilty of something without a verified charge? Where is the Supreme Court? These people should all be removed from the bench immediately.
5 people like this.

Reply 28 - Posted by: judy 8/31/2020 4:45:28 PM (No. 527215)
The blindfold needs to be removed from from one eye ....Justice is Not blind...DC has a one sided corruption justice system...
3 people like this.

Reply 29 - Posted by: msjena 8/31/2020 5:13:52 PM (No. 527234)
Will Flynn appeal? There is an important separation of powers argument in this case. I think the SCOTUS would take decide to take it.
2 people like this.

Reply 30 - Posted by: bighambone 8/31/2020 5:19:57 PM (No. 527241)
#29. While the US Supreme Court might take the Flynn case, remember that there are five anti-Trump liberals on the US Supreme Court, so it would be a crap shoot. It’s better now to allow Judge Sullivan to do his thing, and if necessary then start appealing.
3 people like this.

Reply 31 - Posted by: doctorfixit 8/31/2020 5:20:36 PM (No. 527242)
The federal judiciary is the enemy of the people. Get rid of it.
2 people like this.

Reply 32 - Posted by: LaValette 8/31/2020 5:41:46 PM (No. 527264)
Flynn must be really really important in the effort to uncover the criminal wrongdoing of the Obama people against the Trump campaign for them to fight this hard.
4 people like this.

Reply 33 - Posted by: DVC 8/31/2020 7:04:33 PM (No. 527347)
#26, the election won't remove them. They are appointed for LIFE. One thinks thoughts that one shouldn't think, and puts them aside. For now.
2 people like this.

Reply 34 - Posted by: udanja99 8/31/2020 7:27:10 PM (No. 527361)
I pray that, at some point in the very near future, Flynn gets to sue Sullivan into oblivion.
5 people like this.

Reply 35 - Posted by: preciosodrogas 8/31/2020 7:30:41 PM (No. 527363)
I called this when it first became a topic on this board. The law was clear. The judge was correct. You can't make a judge sign off on something when it calls for the judge to make a finding and then rule on it. Hot shot lawyers cannot bully a judge. That only makes sense. I spent enough time in courtrooms watching judges take such lawyers to the woodshed for these kinds of shenanigans. There is nothing evil that. There were problems surrounding this mess. I expect Judge Sullivan will make the right call now. And I still think Gen, Flynn will be expected to answer to the judge for his statements under oath to the judge, especially after all of this. Either Gen. Flynn's statement was true in which case the Judge will decide whether he believes it should be dismissed or it was a lie and then there is question of fibbing in court to a judge that gave him every opportunity to in the world to not do it. That's one gift horse you don't ignore. I imagine that J. Sullivan would have dismissed it if the lawyers had not tried to bully the judge. That's bad medicine, bellying through the bush is not the way to go. Those judges can get cantankerous. The judge will deal with the DOJ later. There is nothing political to this. or if there is it's on the bar not the bench. Now, he has then naked and swing in the breeze. Not good. The law states the judge is to make the finding and rule on the motion.
2 people like this.

Reply 36 - Posted by: cav16 8/31/2020 8:38:32 PM (No. 527406)
Reference post 35, good call Comrade!
5 people like this.

Reply 37 - Posted by: judy 8/31/2020 11:51:10 PM (No. 527539)
Judge Sullivan was 1000000000% bias against Flynn. Why did he continue to delay his sentencing??? My guess he will stall until the election is over, if Trump wins he will drop the case. Why the hatred toward Flynn? Because he wants his first 6 million $$$$ attorneys investigated for withholding evidence??? Sidney Powell is a hero. Anyone who says this is not political is out of touch.
2 people like this.

Reply 38 - Posted by: MickTurn 9/1/2020 8:31:20 AM (No. 527740)
SCOTUS, it's YOUR TURN, don't Blow it!
0 people like this.

Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Ladyhawke"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Most Recent Articles posted by Ladyhawke"
11 More GOP Senators to Object to
Electoral College Votes
15 replies
Posted by Ladyhawke 1/2/2021 1:08:41 PM Post Reply
A group of 11 senators on Saturday announced they’re going to challenge electoral votes during the Jan. 6 joint session of Congress. “America is a Republic whose leaders are chosen in democratic elections. Those elections, in turn, must comply with the Constitution and with federal and state law,” the group wrote in a joint statement.
Sen. Josh Hawley will object to Electoral
College results on Jan. 6
16 replies
Posted by Ladyhawke 12/30/2020 11:20:22 AM Post Reply
Republican Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri said Wednesday he will object on Jan. 6 to certification of the Electoral College’s selection of President-elect Joe Biden. His objection guarantees a last stand by President Trump, who unsuccessfully argued in lawsuits that fraud handed narrow wins to Biden in swing states.
Ted Cruz Could Be Arguing the
Pennsylvania Election Case at the
Supreme Court Soon
15 replies
Posted by Ladyhawke 12/7/2020 4:45:02 PM Post Reply
Constitutional scholar and Texas Senator Ted Cruz announced Monday afternoon if the Supreme Court takes up the election case pending in Pennsylvania, he will make the oral argument. "Because of the importance of the legal issues presented, I've publicly urged #SCOTUS to hear the case brought by Congressman Mike Kelly, congressional candidate Sean Parnell & state rep. candidate Wanda Logan challenging the constitutionality of the POTUS election results in PA. Petitioners’ legal team has asked me whether I would be willing to argue the case before #SCOTUS, if the Court grants certiorari.
Emails reveal how Hunter Biden
tried to cash in big with Chinese firm
15 replies
Posted by Ladyhawke 10/15/2020 6:18:56 AM Post Reply
Hunter Biden pursued lucrative deals involving China’s largest private energy company — including one that he said would be “interesting for me and my family,” emails obtained by The Post show. One email sent to Biden on May 13, 2017, with the subject line “Expectations,” included details of “remuneration packages” for six people involved in an unspecified business venture.
Smoking-gun email reveals how
Hunter Biden introduced Ukrainian
businessman to VP dad
12 replies
Posted by Ladyhawke 10/14/2020 7:37:09 AM Post Reply
Hunter Biden introduced his father, then-Vice President Joe Biden, to a top executive at a Ukrainian energy firm less than a year before the elder Biden pressured government officials in Ukraine into firing a prosecutor who was investigating the company, according to e-mails obtained by The Post. The never-before-revealed meeting is mentioned in a message of appreciation that Vadym Pozharskyi, an adviser to the board of Burisma, allegedly sent Hunter Biden on April 17, 2015, about a year after Hunter joined the Burisma board at a reported salary of up to $50,000 a month.
Hunter Biden emails show leveraging
connections with his father to
boost Burisma pay
5 replies
Posted by Ladyhawke 10/14/2020 7:29:50 AM Post Reply
Hunter Biden discussed leveraging his connection to his father in a bid to boost his pay from a Ukrainian natural-gas company, according to an e-mail he sent around the time he joined the firm’s corporate board. In a lengthy memo to his then-business partner, Devon Archer, who already sat on the Burisma board, Biden repeatedly mentioned “my guy” while apparently referring to then-Vice President Joe Biden.
Fox News Hosts Get Real Awkward When
Newt Gingrich Tries to Do a Soros Dog-Whistle
35 replies
Posted by Ladyhawke 9/16/2020 2:26:13 PM Post Reply
Things got extremely awkward on Fox News panel show Outnumbered on Wednesday after former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich tied billionaire financier George Soros—often the focus of anti-Semitic tropes—to violence in cities, prompting the show’s co-hosts to directly confront him on why he was invoking the liberal philanthropist. Towards the end of a discussion on the property damage that’s been caused by violent protests over police brutality, Gingrich—who is now a Fox News contributor—insisted that the real issue was with local elected leaders.
Durham aide resigns from Russia
probe amid concerns over pressure
from Barr: report
14 replies
Posted by Ladyhawke 9/11/2020 5:15:43 PM Post Reply
A top aide to U.S. Attorney John Durham has reportedly resigned from the Justice Department’s probe into the origins of the Russia investigation amid worries over political pressure from Attorney General William Barr. Federal prosecutor Nora Dannehy, who has worked with Durham for decades, resigned Thursday evening, sources told the Hartford Courant in a story published Friday. Her resignation email did not include mention of political pressure.
Appeals court denies Michael Flynn and
Justice Department's effort to end his case
38 replies
Posted by Ladyhawke 8/31/2020 12:54:00 PM Post Reply
A federal appeals court ruled Monday against Michael Flynn and the Justice Department in their request to quickly shut down his criminal case. The 8-2 decision restores power to a judge to question the Justice Department's moves in the politically divisive case, when Attorney General William Barr dropped charges against President Donald Trump's former national security adviser earlier this year despite twice pleading guilty to lying under oath to lying to the FBI. Flynn had fought District Judge Emmet Sullivan's decision to ask a third-party lawyer to argue against the Justice Department's dismissal in the case, and his plans to hold a hearing, which has not yet happened.
Kellyanne Conway says she will leave
the White House next month to focus on
family a day after daughter Claudia said she was
'pushing for emancipation'
17 replies
Posted by Ladyhawke 8/23/2020 11:16:23 PM Post Reply
Kellyanne Conway has announced that she is to leave the White House at the end of this month, the day after her 15-year-old daughter Claudia said she was 'officially pushing for emancipation' from her parents in a series of tweets. The 53-year-old counselor to the president said she was leaving for the sake of her family, to be 'less drama, more mama'. Her husband George, an attorney, is one of President Donald Trump's most vocal and pointed critics.
Graham on Harris: 'No issue'
as to whether 'she is an American citizen'
29 replies
Posted by Ladyhawke 8/14/2020 12:44:58 PM Post Reply
Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) broke with President Trump on Friday by saying there is no debate over whether Sen. Kamala Harris is a U.S. citizen, remarks that came after the president encouraged a conspiracy theory that the California Democrat may not be eligible to serve as vice president because her parents are immigrants. In a pair of tweets, Graham, a frequent defender of Trump, said he disagreed with Harris on “plenty of issues,” calling her “one of the most liberal members of the U.S. Senate.” But he said there should be no debate over her citizenship status.
Donald Trump REFUSES to shoot down birther
claim that Kamala Harris cannot run as VP because
her parents are immigrants - calling
Republican lawyer who pushed claim 'highly respected'
26 replies
Posted by Ladyhawke 8/13/2020 9:20:03 PM Post Reply
President Donald Trump fanned the flames of yet another 'birther' conspiracy theory by telling White House reporters Thursday that he had 'no idea' if Kamala Harris was eligible to be vice president. The president added that the Republican lawyer who wrote a Newsweek op-ed pushing that claim 'is a very highly qualified, very talented lawyer.' Right-wing law professor John C. Eastman wrote an editorial Wednesday that argued that because Harris' parents weren't citizens when she was born in 1964 in Oakland, California then she might not fit the definition of eligibility under the U.S. Constitution.
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Biden's Incoherence Just Hit Critical Mass,
This Is Scary Awful
48 replies
Posted by Dreadnought 3/8/2021 11:45:49 PM Post Reply
As we reported two days ago, Joe Biden completely made no sense when he was trying to explain the Wuhan coronavirus relief bill. It was really bad and it explains why they’re afraid to have him deliver an address to Congress or do any kind of a real solo press conference, because at this point they have to be afraid this is all going to fall apart if he does anything live and this all becomes too obvious to the American people. But there’s only so long that they can hold this off. And it’s getting worse, as video today revealed. Biden was holding an event to announce the nomination
‘Huge Development’: Democrat Sen. Joe
Manchin Starts To Crack On Filibuster,
Signals Openness To Change
41 replies
Posted by Imright 3/8/2021 12:32:41 AM Post Reply
Democrat Senator Joe Manchin (WV) appears to have started to shift his views on the filibuster with remarks that he made on two news shows on Sunday morning.The shift from Manchin comes after he has repeatedly stated that he would not vote to end the filibuster, despite pressure from the far-Left. During the interviews on Sunday, Manchin repeatedly claimed that he was not open to ending the filibuster because he did not want to strip the minority party of their power in the Senate, but signaled that he was open to changing it.Fox News host Chris Wallace asked Manchin if he would consider “reforming the filibuster” if “Republicans
Evangelicals For Biden ‘Feel Used And Betrayed’
By Biden Fulfilling His Radical Abortion Promises
37 replies
Posted by Calvinesq 3/8/2021 10:37:51 AM Post Reply
In an open letter released Sunday, Pro-Life Evangelicals for Biden urged him to “honor his commitment” and include the Hyde Amendment in Democrats’ $1.9 trillion COVID-19 spending package, writing “we feel used and betrayed.” The letter states: We are very disappointed about the COVID-19 relief package’s exclusion of the Hyde Amendment, a longstanding bipartisan policy that prevents taxpayer funding for abortion. [snip] As pro-life leaders in the evangelical community, we publicly supported President Biden’s candidacy with the understanding that there would be engagement [with] us on the issue of abortion and particularly the Hyde Amendment
Meghan Markle reveals her true
self in Oprah interview
32 replies
Posted by Imright 3/8/2021 9:11:10 AM Post Reply
If you had any doubts that Meghan Markle is a manipulative piece of work, her bombshell Oprah interview Sunday night dumping on the British monarchy would set you straight. Prince Harry’s American wife accused his family of hateful racism against her baby, claimed they refused to protect her and drove her to the point of suicide.She made the incendiary and implausible charge that when she was pregnant with Archie, the royal family decreed that her unborn son would be denied the title of “prince” because her mixed race meant he might have dark skin.
Biden’s German Shepherds Shipped Back
to Delaware After ‘Biting Incident’
Involving White House Security
31 replies
Posted by Imright 3/8/2021 11:38:50 PM Post Reply
Joe and Jill Biden’s German Shepherds were shipped back to Delaware after a “biting incident” involving White House security, CNN reported.Major was adopted by Joe Biden and his handler wife Jill in 2018 from an animal shelter.Major and Champ moved into the White House in January and they’re already gone. The condition of the victim was not disclosed but it was serious enough to remove both dogs from the White House.CNN reported: The two German Shepherds belonging to President Joe Biden and first lady Jill Biden were returned to the Biden family home in Delaware last week
Pelosi’s HR1 bill a blatant power grab for Democrats 30 replies
Posted by FlyRight 3/8/2021 5:28:52 AM Post Reply
Nancy Pelosi’s top priority is to turn America into a one-party nation ruled by Democrats. Her bill HR 1 trashes the U.S. Constitution in an attempt to rig the system and make it virtually impossible to elect a Republican president or Congress again. It’s a power grab. The bill eviscerates state voting laws and forces all the states to conform to a set of rules that includes automatic voter registration. Anyone who goes to a DMV or applies for food stamps, Medicaid or other social services, or attends a public college will be automatically enrolled to vote. Noncitizens are obligated to identify themselves and opt out,
Biden seems to forget defense
secretary’s name, calls him
'the guy who runs that outfit'
29 replies
Posted by Ribicon 3/8/2021 8:37:17 PM Post Reply
President Biden on Monday seemed to forget Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin’s name at a White House event—calling the Pentagon chief “the guy who runs that outfit over there.” Biden was announcing the nomination of two female generals to lead US military combatant commands. “And I want to thank the sec—the, the, ah former general. I keep calling him general, but my, my—the guy who runs that outfit over there,” Biden said.(Snip) Earlier at the event, Biden mentioned the Defense Department leader by his name, “Secretary Austin,” while appearing to read from a teleprompter.
Oprah interview bombshells: Meghan claims
she was suicidal when she was five months
pregnant, Kate made HER cry and Royals
refused to make Archie a prince because
they were worried how 'dark' he would be
27 replies
Posted by Imright 3/8/2021 8:21:02 AM Post Reply
The Royal Family was left reeling this morning after Meghan Markle tearfully revealed that the stress of royal life made her suicidal when she was five months pregnant, claimed Archie was denied the title of prince because he is mixed-race and said Kate Middleton made her cry before she married Harry in a bombshell interview with Oprah Winfrey.The couple also chose to reveal that they are having a baby girl to the tens of millions of people watching the CBS show broadcast in the US before accusing the Royal Family of racism and revealing the deep rift 'Megxit' has caused with Prince Charles and Prince William.
Meghan Markle openly
accuses the Royals
of racism
26 replies
Posted by Magnante 3/8/2021 5:26:07 AM Post Reply
I’m probably second to none in my dislike for Meghan Markle. There’s something unattractive about a mature woman marrying into the British Royal family with one of the world’s most expensive weddings, hanging out with the Queen, living in insane luxury…and then whining non-stop about the horror of her life. There’s something even less appealing when that woman accuses the Royal family of race hatred. And the problem is that, when it comes to that left-wing diva, Meghan Markle, it’s hard to believe most of what she says. After weeks of hype, CBS finally televised Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s interview with Oprah.
Watch: John Solomon Gives Stunning Update
in Durham’s ‘Russiagate’ Investigation
24 replies
Posted by Imright 3/8/2021 4:56:55 PM Post Reply
Without question, the vast majority of Americans who support former President Donald Trump were angry and frustrated throughout 2020 passed with barely a mention of then-U.S. Attorney John Durham’s criminal investigation into the FBI’s fraudulent “Russiagate” counterterrorism operation directed at his 2016 campaign.In the weeks before the November election, word got out that then-Attorney General William Barr wasn’t going to announce any indictments or even a report on Durham’s investigation because he did not want to influence the outcome.So far, in fact, the only indictment to come out of the Durham probe is that of former FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith, who essentially got a slap on the wrist
Democrats renew calls to remove
J. Edgar Hoover's name from FBI building
24 replies
Posted by Ribicon 3/8/2021 2:56:29 PM Post Reply
Rep. Steve Cohen vowed to renew the push to remove former FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover’s name from the bureau’s downtown Washington headquarters, according to an interview released Monday. Appearing on Yahoo! News’ Skullduggery podcast, the Tennessee Democrat said the effort is getting a fresh look after the release of a new movie highlighting the FBI’s secret program to discredit civil rights activists. The Washington Times in 2019 first reported Democrats’ bid to strip the longtime FBI director’s name from the bureau’s headquarters. Mr. Cohen said the impetus to revive the bid is the new movie, “Judas and the Black Messiah.” The movie details
Jill Biden, the Meghan Markle
in the WH, is egregiously
guilty of elder abuse
23 replies
Posted by Magnante 3/9/2021 4:40:38 AM Post Reply
“There must have been a moment, at the beginning, when we could have said –-no. But somehow we missed it.” Tom Stoppard The millions of Americans who were paying attention throughout the 2020 election campaign all became painfully aware of the fact that Joe Biden’s cognitive abilities were slipping and slipping fast. His wife, as the person closest to him, should have been the one to call the campaign quits in order to reduce stress on the man. Instead, apparently so anxious to become the First Lady by any means necessary, Mrs. Biden continued to push her failing husband’s campaign forward as if he were mentally qualified.
Post New Article