Hillary Clinton asks appeals court
to help her dodge Judicial Watch
deposition on emails and Benghazi
Washington Examiner,
by
Jerry Dunleavy
Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly,
6/6/2020 4:58:45 AM
A three-judge appeals court panel heard arguments this week from Hillary Clinton’s lawyer and Judicial Watch as the former secretary of state seeks to avoid a deposition about her private email server and the Benghazi attack talking points.
Judicial Watch, a conservative watchdog group, argued Tuesday that the depositions of Clinton and Clinton's former chief of staff, Cheryl Mills, ordered by a D.C. district court judge was necessary to understand whether Clinton attempted to avoid the Freedom of Information Act when she improperly used a private server to conduct her State Department business and whether the agency adequately searched for all her emails.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
DCGIRL 6/6/2020 5:30:04 AM (No. 434251)
Hopefully, this will part of Durham's investigation. I remember Hillary and Mills being treated special during the entire investigation about the destruction of her cell phones and e-mails that were destroyed. I knew then, the fix was in.
83 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
coldoc 6/6/2020 5:48:34 AM (No. 434263)
Again, JW doing the job graham and barr should have done. Good for JW, shame on the repiublicans in the senate and all of DoJ.
106 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Ida Lou Pino 6/6/2020 6:27:45 AM (No. 434290)
Hey, Fey Wray - - please pay attention to Tom Fitton and Judicial Watch.
That's what you're supposed to be doing. Yes - - really - - that's YOUR job.
Got it?
72 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Strike3 6/6/2020 6:39:37 AM (No. 434304)
"What difference at this point...? The old bat is a little bit worried about having her stellar reputation tarnished now that competent people are asking the questions.
55 people like this.
Judicial Watch!
Make her pay for her lies!
Take her lies down!
Lock her lies up!
Shut her mouth of lies forever!
56 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
snapper451 6/6/2020 8:06:38 AM (No. 434397)
So she and Cheryl are going to the stacked with Democrat judges Federal Appeals court essentially to avoid testifying because she was allowed to get away with not living up to the Freedom of Information Act, by hiding her server. If any judge has any common sense - that sentence alone would make him or her throw the book at them and find them in contempt but also contemptible and despicable.
45 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Venturer 6/6/2020 8:13:30 AM (No. 434409)
Anybody want to bet that Hillary will win this case.?
It's in the bag, There are certain people who cannot afford to have Hillary face the music.
56 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
czechlist 6/6/2020 8:16:28 AM (No. 434415)
Her answers in any deposition are predictable.
"I don't know, I don't recall and what difference at this point does it make?"
But she can write detailed memoirs
66 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
gone2pot 6/6/2020 8:36:30 AM (No. 434439)
7, I'll put twenty on Mrs.The Big Impeached He winning. Two of the three judges were appointed by the Holy Hawaiian and the third by W. It's a slam dunk she gets the win.
29 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
padiva 6/6/2020 8:39:04 AM (No. 434444)
Will there be more Arkanicides to protect her holy name?
28 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
bigfatslob 6/6/2020 8:51:32 AM (No. 434461)
"What difference does it make now"? That was sufficient enough back then and it still stands today. She'll win and JW will have to pound sand.
13 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
stablemoney 6/6/2020 9:20:22 AM (No. 434526)
Who takes a government job, and puts all their work on a private server? Hillary Clinton. I think most people would think that inappropriate, maybe not normal, outside the rules and regulations, indefensible. But the Democrats will support her, say it was ok.
26 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
hershey 6/6/2020 10:01:29 AM (No. 434591)
Unfortunately, I don't think we, the common people, the deplorables, the conservatives, the Republicans, are ever going to see this witch take the fall for what she has done....she is too far up the liberal food chain to ever be brought to justice, at least in this life...
20 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Arby 6/6/2020 10:09:45 AM (No. 434603)
Here I would have thought that the PIAPS would have wanted to punish her accusers by forcing them to read through endless emails about Chelsea's wedding plans and the PIAPS's yoga class appointments. Could it be possible that there's something else there that she just might be trying to hide?
17 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
DVC 6/6/2020 10:30:38 AM (No. 434652)
Make here squirm! And I wonder if lying on a deposition is a crime.
17 people like this.
Liberal privilege.
15 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
Mauigirl 6/6/2020 7:12:07 PM (No. 435229)
A donation to Judicial Watch is in order if you like their work.
I sure do and that's why I donate.
3 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "MissMolly"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)