Huge! Second French Study by Dr. Raoult
finds Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin
Helped Every Patient in Study Group
of 80 Minus One (Video)
Gateway Pundit,
by
Jim Hoft
Original Article
Posted By: Imright,
3/28/2020 2:25:24 AM
On Friday night Laura Ingraham reported on the latest study by the French research team led by the renowned epidemiologist Dr. Didier Raoult was able to repeat his findings from a previous study.This time Dr. Raoult administered hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin to 80 patients and observed improvement in Every Case except for a very sick 86-year-old with an advanced form of coronavirus infection.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
JL80863 3/28/2020 2:39:37 AM (No. 360497)
I believe most of us understand "First, do no harm". In our extant situation, I believe most of us also would support "First, do some good".
19 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
PCMM 3/28/2020 2:47:03 AM (No. 360499)
Didier looks like he administers some drugs to himself. Fer pete’s sake, people, isn’t this kind if a no-brainer at this point? Way too much drama surrounding everything coro. It’s works in most people, cheap, established, familiar and lifesaving.
26 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
jalo1951 3/28/2020 2:47:52 AM (No. 360500)
Since we have some dem governors banning the use of this drug I certainly hope someone lets them know that maybe they shouldn't be practicing medicine without a license.
33 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
PCMM 3/28/2020 2:51:13 AM (No. 360501)
Apologies for “kind if” instead of “kind of” ... ditto for “It’s works” instead of “It works.” Darned phone does what it wants.
6 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
ZeldaFitzg 3/28/2020 3:28:46 AM (No. 360505)
And it also says the good doctor is a climate change skeptic.
18 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
planetgeo 3/28/2020 4:53:01 AM (No. 360516)
Great news... Except for those who live in Nevada.
13 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Trigger2 3/28/2020 5:50:22 AM (No. 360527)
I wonder what voters in NV think about their stupid and ignorant governor, or is it a Mormon thing to worship a fellow demonrat Mormon and follow his every edict even if it leads to death?
9 people like this.
This is the key to normal life. If we can feel confident that most people will be sick at home, as is the case with normal flu; and those that need a hospital will have this cure available....then we can move forward.
So why are these democrat governors and some in the media so insistent that this cure not be allowed?! Because the wide spread panic was a necessary part of their plan.
20 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
chiller 3/28/2020 7:13:22 AM (No. 360559)
Gov Cuomo is doing some HDXC testing, but it puts him in a pickle. Positive results save the patients, and his city, but stop the panic-- ruining Ds agenda--- and exalting DjT.
CUOMO SAVES DJT !
LOL
8 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
DCGIRL 3/28/2020 7:38:48 AM (No. 360574)
#6, don't forget Michigan.
10 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
tootall 3/28/2020 9:03:55 AM (No. 360642)
There has to be a shortage of these drugs and that is the major reason for not promoting them more. Once the easy testing for antibodies that you might have already had this virus in a milder form becomes available on a widespread basis, then you'll hear how this is an effective cure.
I've heard multiple Drs on the front lines say they are using this treatment. I know people who have taken it in NYC and Chicago. In Ohio, DeWine signed an EO that defined who gets these drugs several days ago. It seeems 'preferred' types were were disproportionally getting this cure.
6 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
franq 3/28/2020 9:35:57 AM (No. 360695)
The libs and media will try to quash any ray of hope. The red Drudge headline shows 100,000 infected now. Still have a ways to go to hit the 60 million that caught H1N1. But we are told 1 person can infect 59,000. So it shouldn't take long.
3 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
DVC 3/28/2020 10:10:37 AM (No. 360745)
Very encouraging news.
But still, no proper double blind scientificly definitive test results.
But all the anecdotal evidence is good.
I'd certainlywant it used on me if I had this disease.
4 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Wendybird 3/28/2020 10:28:42 AM (No. 360774)
Better be careful, Laura. Fox doesn’t seem to like people who point out the obvious facts. Where did your fellow New Hampshireite who did the same thing disappear to? A darned shame, seems to me.
0 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
jeffkinnh 3/28/2020 10:35:21 AM (No. 360780)
Manufacturers have promised millions of doses will be made available. It's not clear there will be a shortage. We have confirmed 100,000+ cases but less than 20% are severe creating a possible need for using these drugs.
There is concern that some other users may be shorted but some of the things they take it for are not life threatening. Surely a balance could be reached where critical Chinese virus patients could be assured access and severe needs for other illnesses would also be covered while production ramps up.
2 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
Mass Minority 3/28/2020 11:22:38 AM (No. 360831)
#11 if there isnt one now there will definitely be a shortage in the near future. The active ingredients for both Chloroquine and Hydroxychloroquine are mostly produced in China. I truly hope that we as a nation wake up to the insanity of outsourcing the production of our military, communications and health products including Masks, gloves, gowns, respirators and pharmaceuticals (and almost everything else) to a hostile and belligerent communist dictatorship.
1 person likes this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
Skeptical1 3/28/2020 11:25:43 AM (No. 360834)
People seem to be taking a position on Chloroquine based on their feelings about Donald Trump. Trump haters claim that he "touted" the drug before its efficacy had been proven, and in fact, he did say that he had a really good feeling about it. But he also made clear that he could be wrong, and the main point he was trying to make was that in an emergency, clinical decisions sometimes have to based based on imperfect knowledge, and the FDA should not stand in the way of clinicians exercising their best judgement. That wouldn't be controversial except for Trump saying it.
My guess is that Chloroquine will disappoint, because promising drugs usually do disappoint, and the anecdotal evidence supporting the drug is kind of thin compared to the number of patients receiving it. Didier's second small trial is encouraging, but it's the same investigator as the first. The only other trial I've read about was the little Chinese trial (more of an observation, I think) that showed no effect. But with formal trials under way, and its inclusion in standard-of-care in Belgium and India, we should know pretty soon.
0 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
Strike3 3/28/2020 1:09:05 PM (No. 360952)
There are drugs with much less favorable odds being pushed nightly in TV commercials. We now have a good picture of the FDA and found that it's just another inept government agency that lives by the almighty dollar. Use the drug and send that imbecile who runs Michigan on a one way trip into the middle of the lake.
2 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Imright"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)