President Trump Calls on Sotomayor and
Ginsburg to Recuse Themselves From His
Supreme Court Cases
Gateway Pundit,
by
Kristinn Taylor
Original Article
Posted By: Imright,
2/25/2020 1:24:25 AM
President Trump responded from India via Twitter on Tuesday local time to a scathing dissent by Justice Sonia Sotomayor released Friday that accused the conservative majority justices on the Supreme Court of being biased in favor of the Trump administration. Trump called on Sotomayor and her fellow Trump-hating Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg to recuse themselves from cases involving or relating to him. (Photo) Trump said, ““Sotomayor accuses GOP appointed Justices of being biased in favor of Trump.” @IngrahamAngle
@FoxNews This is a terrible thing to say. Trying to “shame” some into voting her way? She never criticized Justice Ginsberg when she called me a “faker”. Both should recuse themselves……on all Trump,
Reply 1 - Posted by:
DVC 2/25/2020 2:13:29 AM (No. 328884)
Hell will freeze over well before they will do this.
44 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
JL80863 2/25/2020 2:19:04 AM (No. 328887)
I doubt that PDJT expects them too. That wasn't the point.
97 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
jhpeters2 2/25/2020 2:22:26 AM (No. 328889)
Hmmm. RBG would not need to recuse if she left the mortal coil. As a good twitter poster, perhaps out VSG PDJT is foreshadowing an inevitability that has become quite sooner than later?
20 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
jhpeters2 2/25/2020 2:23:27 AM (No. 328891)
out = our. Apologies
4 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
NotaBene 2/25/2020 2:51:38 AM (No. 328903)
Right on Mr. President! Sotomayor and Ginsburg are cows that think their farts do not smell of methane. Meanwhile, we wait for the immortal RBG to give up the ghost and let President Donald Trump right the court for the next generation. The D.C. courts we now only incarcerate Republicans such as poor Paul Manafort, George Papadopulous, General Flynn, and Roger Sone. If you are Special Agent1 Joseph Pientka III, Agent Cleinsmith, Agent Archey, Eric CIAramella, Peter Strozk, his lover Lisa, Bruce Ohr, Nellie Ohr, Michael Sussmann of Perkins Boie, Victoria Nuland, Ambassador Downer, Azra Honeypot Turk, John François Kerry, Samantha Powers, Susan Rice, Joseph Mifsud, Stefan Halper, Lieutenant Colonels Vindmans, James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Sally Yates, John Brennan, or Baraque Hussein Obama you get out free because you are one with the Federal Courts of D.C.that are anti-Trump. If you are for America you go to jail, if you are anti-American you walk free. We all know what is going on and will crush the Commies on November 3rd voting for the entire Republican roster.
122 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
NotaBene 2/25/2020 3:00:11 AM (No. 328905)
Sorry, forgot to add FBI Agent Stephen M. Somma to the list of infamous anti-American conspirators.
56 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
pensom2 2/25/2020 3:17:02 AM (No. 328907)
Of course his wish that they recuse themselves won't come true, but he may very well have shown them up front and personal that they are the biased jurors, not those who may have sided with President Trump.
We've long complained that our Republicans in Washington have no cajones. There's clearly one who has 'em!
94 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
watashiyo 2/25/2020 4:16:37 AM (No. 328910)
Like Crazy Mazie Hirono, Crazy Sotomayor probably doesn't know what ILLEGAL means.
62 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Trigger2 2/25/2020 4:27:54 AM (No. 328915)
A better idea is to impeach those 2 commies.
49 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
judy 2/25/2020 5:03:37 AM (No. 328928)
But Justice Roberts said there are no Obama or Trump justices???
72 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
seamusm 2/25/2020 6:10:34 AM (No. 328952)
While I am saddened that there are fixed and diametrically opposed legal philosophies which exist between the liberal and more conservative court members, it is more disappointing that Sotomayor seems clueless that these repetitive cases surface because Roberts has lost control over the lower courts. These jurisdictional cases all arise because regional court judges act as if they have Supreme Court authority over the whole of America. This is Roberts fault. He could end the problem tomorrow.
88 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
WhamDBambam 2/25/2020 6:13:47 AM (No. 328954)
Assuming he wants to, #11.
49 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
The Remnants 2/25/2020 6:15:36 AM (No. 328955)
Well said, Mr. President!
He does call 'em as he sees 'em.
48 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Ditto1958 2/25/2020 6:30:23 AM (No. 328962)
More liberal projection. Accusing others on the Supreme Court of exactly what they are guilty of- bias.
45 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
doctorfixit 2/25/2020 6:34:56 AM (No. 328967)
Get rid of the federal judiciary entirely. Un-elected, un-accountable, un-democratic, un-American.
Otherwise every Obama judge should recuse on any case involving this administration. They're all corrupt America-haters.
25 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
Rinktum 2/25/2020 6:48:14 AM (No. 328977)
Chief Justice Roberts, control you’re Court. You are so convinced that there are no Obama Judges or Trump Judges. Seems like you missed one right under your own nose. She has just set a very dangerous precedent that if not addressed will do great harm to the Court. Show us what you are made of. Can you lead or just whine?
75 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
Rinktum 2/25/2020 6:53:38 AM (No. 328984)
Oops, should be “your” not “you’re”. Must confess don’t know it was a auto correct error or a half awake brain error. Please forgive. I must learn to proofread before I hit the submit button.
21 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
janjan 2/25/2020 7:21:12 AM (No. 329008)
It is not the Supreme Court’s job to look after the poor and downtrodden, or as in this case, illegal immigrants. It is their job to rule on the constitutionality of the law.
70 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
Dodge Boy 2/25/2020 8:00:55 AM (No. 329040)
Chief Justice Roberts, it's long overdue for you to start doing your job and supervise your Justices and Judges better. We all saw how you chose to weaponize the SCOTUS during the impeachment circus when you elected not to read Sen. Rand Paul's question to the Senate. Passive aggressive behavior like this is unacceptable. Now you are sitting back again while letting Sotomayor lecture your SCOTUS Justices. If you can do your job, do it. If not, resign so that the President can nominate someone else. Justice Gorsuch, Justice Thomas, Justice Alito, or Justice Kavanaugh could handle the job a lot better than you currently are.
Ruthie, as for you step aside, please, and retire while you are still at 98.6 degrees.
42 people like this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
Venturer 2/25/2020 8:15:15 AM (No. 329055)
I am not a devout watcher of the Supreme Court, but I don't ever remember a member of the court making accusations against other members.
45 people like this.
Reply 21 - Posted by:
Namma 2/25/2020 8:21:46 AM (No. 329064)
Roberts comes out and claims there are no Bush judges, Clinton judges or obama judges. Ha. That’s a laugh. Roberts appointed by Bush is most certainly an obama judge. Look how he ruled on obama care. Twisted the rule of law to accommodate his pal obama. The “wise Latino”gave her self away by opening her big mouth. Just proved to the world she is not a constitutional lawyer. And was appointed by obama because she is not.
37 people like this.
Reply 22 - Posted by:
little guy 2/25/2020 8:26:01 AM (No. 329075)
The good lady Justice, a "wise Latina", is clearly in way over her head. Her main qualifications were being born a woman in the Bronx to Puerto Rican parents. Also being a big Lib helped ... not so much her decisions as a lower court judge ( many of which were muddy).
Read between the lines of her full decision and you'll see she is all in favor of "bending over backwards" and having "a bias to one side" just as long as all that benefits HER side!
It's perfectly okay to govern from the bench and just make up legislation and laws that don't really exist ... just make sure those actions benefit the Left and are to the detriment of the Right.
Trump arrived like galloping cavalry ... not a moment too soon!
40 people like this.
Reply 23 - Posted by:
fayebeck 2/25/2020 8:30:07 AM (No. 329081)
Waiting for Gorsuch and Kavanaugh to come to the "lady's" defense.
4 people like this.
Reply 24 - Posted by:
lakerman1 2/25/2020 8:32:19 AM (No. 329085)
the wise latina, she who operates in the shadows of LBGTQ, committed an impeachable offense, in my opini0on, with those words. Those words strike at the very heart of our federal judiciary, contaminating it.
Shame on her, she of type 1 diabetes, which could take her down even as I type this, given her morbid obesity.
33 people like this.
Reply 25 - Posted by:
Strike3 2/25/2020 9:01:05 AM (No. 329115)
La Latina Loca does not seem to realize that when Conservative justices are appointed they will tend to have Conservative opinions. Liberals are just stupid, I don't care about their nationality, sexual preferences or how their little minds think.Sotomayor was just one of many Obama mistakes.
24 people like this.
Reply 26 - Posted by:
PlayItAgain 2/25/2020 9:15:48 AM (No. 329134)
I remember when Obama rebuked the Supreme Court in his SOTU address. Alito mouthed the words "not true!"
21 people like this.
Reply 27 - Posted by:
planetgeo 2/25/2020 9:41:57 AM (No. 329153)
Actually, Sotomayor (AKA the "wide Latina" in our home) is guilty of the very thing she accuses the other (legitimate) justices of doing. Namely, political bias. Classic projection, as always by leftist activists.
The Supreme Court has become hopelessly politicized. EVERY single ruling seems to be split along ideological lines. And the reason, I believe, lies in the manner in which they are selected. The Senate (a hopelessly politicized body) does the questioning of the candidates using blatant litmus tests (abortion being only the most obvious one) to grill them and pretty much assure that the chosen candidate will be a reliable vote. This needs to change. Otherwise, why even have the Supreme Court if they become in fact a "Super Committee of the Senate"?
17 people like this.
Reply 28 - Posted by:
jeffkinnh 2/25/2020 9:44:26 AM (No. 329154)
Sotomayor: "Perhaps most troublingly, the Court’s recent behavior on stay applications has benefited one litigant over all others."
This is the crux of the problem of liberal judges. She decries that the wrong person is winning. The problem is, SCOTUS justices should NOT be concerned about winners and losers. They should only be concerned about the LAW!
If Sotomayor is distressed that certain people are unfairly treated by the law, she should petition the Legislature to write new laws. It is NOT her job too do so.
I would have no problem if a justice that ruled fairly based on the law later wrote that they considered the law unfair but followed it anyway.
18 people like this.
Reply 29 - Posted by:
4freedom 2/25/2020 9:47:45 AM (No. 329158)
They got a country to ruin, why would they listen to Trump.
15 people like this.
Reply 30 - Posted by:
Bassman1911 2/25/2020 9:51:02 AM (No. 329162)
Seems like the lefties on the court are starting to have trouble hiding their hatred. I thought the Supreme Court was supposed to be the epitome of unbiased fairness.
22 people like this.
Reply 31 - Posted by:
udanja99 2/25/2020 10:46:57 AM (No. 329218)
Perhaps Sonia should have a little chat with the other lesbian justice, Elena, who should have recused herself from ruling on 0bamacare because she was involved in its creation.
19 people like this.
Reply 32 - Posted by:
Ida Lou Pino 2/25/2020 11:06:13 AM (No. 329229)
Roberts got one thing right - -
- - there are no Trump judges.
13 people like this.
Reply 33 - Posted by:
DennisM 2/25/2020 11:33:53 AM (No. 329259)
She complains about how many times President Trump has gone to the SC to remedy a lawsuit filed by her cohorts. Tell them to stop filing the lawsuit's and he won't need to go to the Supreme Court. They continually loose when they go to court and now they attack him for using the system as it was designed.
Yes she and RBG should recuse themselves as they are biased and they've shown us that since he announced his run for President.
16 people like this.
Reply 34 - Posted by:
rochow 2/25/2020 12:47:45 PM (No. 329324)
Unfortunately the wide Latina never displayed anything wise, ever!
13 people like this.
Reply 35 - Posted by:
RedWhite&Blue2 2/25/2020 1:10:18 PM (No. 329352)
She acts as “wise” as AOC...meaning not very.
Obama’s appointees are as corrupt as him.
Supreme?
LMAO
10 people like this.
Reply 36 - Posted by:
curious1 2/25/2020 2:19:20 PM (No. 329430)
#19, the scotus wasn't given the authority to decide on constitutionality. They just took it. See Marbury vs Madison.
5 people like this.
Reply 37 - Posted by:
mythman 2/25/2020 4:00:25 PM (No. 329505)
The Wide Latina, rich in saturated fats.
4 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Imright"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)