Nadler: ‘Incredibly Arrogant’ for Justice
Department to ‘Instruct’ Robert Mueller
in His Testimony
Breitbart Clips,
by
Trent Baker
Original Article
Posted By: earlybird,
7/23/2019 3:28:28 PM
On Tuesday, House Judiciary chairman Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY) reacted to the Justice Department advising former FBI special counsel to stay in the “boundaries” of his report in his upcoming testimony.
(Snip)
“I think it’s incredibly arrogant of the Department to instruct him to do that,” (Snip)
“He doesn’t have to comply with that letter. He doesn’t work for them. And that letter asks things that are beyond the power of the agency to ask even if he still there,”
Reply 1 - Posted by:
CharlyG 7/23/2019 3:30:53 PM (No. 131818)
Fake news, Mueller requested it.
26 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Nimby 7/23/2019 3:40:12 PM (No. 131828)
As I mentioned in an earlier post, it didn’t take long for faux outrage. Now watch the lunatics of LSM go bat guano crazy this evening
5 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Jethro bo 7/23/2019 3:55:16 PM (No. 131842)
Mueller is part of the Executive branch and thus is subject to seperate but equal protection in the Executive branch. Nadless was hoping beyond hope that Mueller would give Dems some juicy innuendo to say Trump was guilty of something. The DOJ reminded Mueller if he reveals privileged information, he could be in deep hot water.
8 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
JunkYardDog 7/23/2019 3:57:54 PM (No. 131844)
If a prosecutor doesn't indict a suspect then he isn't supposed to say jack-diddly-squat about it. PERIOD. But oh no, the Dems are in deep tropuble and they know it, they have to figure out ways to make Trump look bad, to invent innuendo. Oh how I can't wait for the 2020 elections.
10 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
GoodDeal 7/23/2019 4:03:34 PM (No. 131848)
Just another example of how Trump is obstructing justice and covering up Russian collusion and those highly illicit hush-money payments made to Stormy Stormy Stormy. You will not be able to intimidate the witness and draw him out into some premade verbal trap to get him to say something you want. There will be no gotcha moment.
4 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
jeffkinnh 7/23/2019 4:18:26 PM (No. 131856)
I have no doubt that if Mueller decides to color too far outside the lines that Barr will eviscerate him and Mueller knows it. Barr has been pretty respectful of Mueller's position but he is not going to accept lies and rumor. Everything of importance should have been in the report. If it wasn't then Mueller is going to be called out. If he tries to push opinion, Barr will take him to severe task, as he should.
Nadless can whine all he wants. He has nothing to work with and he is going nowhere.
6 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
F15 Gork 7/23/2019 4:24:30 PM (No. 131859)
Robert, my man, only a fool would trust a democrat - I’d take the 5th if I were you.
4 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
anniebc 7/23/2019 4:38:45 PM (No. 131863)
Does Nadler look like a frog sitting upright in incredible arrogance, or what?
3 people like this.
Just goes to show you can't trust Nadler, as he most likely knew this request came from Mueller.
It's so Mueller can't be forced to answer questions not in his report.
But, that does not mean the Republicans can't ask questions like these:
Did you investigate the Democrat candidate's campaign regarding Russian involvement?
(he'll say it's not part of his report, so can't comment, but it will leave a huge question as to why, and maybe allow the DOJ to open a separate investigation).
There are reports that your office knew on Day One, or within 1 week of taking the position, that there was no collusion, can you state the date, or within 1 month?
(this should be a YES, but if not, then the follow-up would be when did you know)
If the Russians were influencing the election in 2016, was the Special Council provided any information from the Obama Administration that the administration knew, to help the Special Council?
(the answer will be NO, and will highlight the Obama admin wasn't concerned with Russian influence until after Hillary lost the election)
4 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
DVC 7/23/2019 5:18:51 PM (No. 131902)
You mean, merely because he was their employee, working under their direction and rules?
Gee, sounds pretty darned normal to me, and everyone else.
Drop dead Nadler, and that is no figure of speech.
3 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
The Remnants 7/23/2019 5:43:52 PM (No. 131918)
Everyone knows that it was Muller who requested the letter from the Department of Justice.
Would Rep. Nadler DELIBERATELY lie to the people?
I kindof hope so, because otherwise it would show that he is not on top of the situation.
Well, I guess either is bad.
2 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
lil dotty 7/23/2019 6:40:23 PM (No. 131955)
It is thought that Nadler would know the full weight of arrogance.
He and his crew carry that weight and have done so for many moons.
The little squirt is arrogance personified; puffed out and poofed up. The rooster lost his feathers.
1 person likes this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
udanja99 7/23/2019 7:24:10 PM (No. 131984)
Herr Mueller, Jerry Nadless just called you arrogant. I hope that influences what you say tomorrow.
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "earlybird"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Comments:
Whining to dopey Alysin Camerata. I wonder if Mueller agrees with the little guy?