Trump: I’m ‘Not’ Prepared to Lose 2020;
There Was Voter Fraud in 2016
Breitbart Politics,
by
Pam Key
Original Article
Posted By: M2,
6/24/2019 10:09:30 AM
Sunday on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” President Donald Trump said he was not prepared to lose the 2020 presidential election.
When Chuck Todd asked the president if he was prepared to lose the election, Trump said, “Probably not. Probably not. It would be much better. It would be much better if I said, ‘Yeah.’ It would be much easier for me to say, ‘Oh, yes.’ No, I’m probably not too prepared to lose. I don’t like losing. I haven’t lost very much in my life.”
Todd asked, “You didn’t like the fact you lost the popular vote. That bothered you, didn’t you?”
Trump said, “I’ll say something that, again, is controversial.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Highlander 6/24/2019 10:35:08 AM (No. 105450)
That so-called popular vote that Hillary supposedly won in California was based on nothing but fraud. Thank God for the electoral college!
20 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Scrubber 6/24/2019 10:40:16 AM (No. 105457)
In the first two sentences, “was” is used incorrectly twice. That’s abysmal. Is not grammar taught anymore, or am I the only one who cares?
4 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
stablemoney 6/24/2019 10:44:55 AM (No. 105463)
There were many illegal votes. The Democrat Party frauds have been practiced for decades. Dirty voting rolls, dirty legislative districts, polls held open for extra hours, votes cast after the election deadlines, votes not counted at first, then found. There is no existing list of procedures that must be followed to ensure an accurate voter count. They don't hire Price Waterhouses's to count the votes, and we know why.
14 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Highlander 6/24/2019 10:47:59 AM (No. 105468)
Yes, “was” should have been “is.” That being corrected, I is not prepared to allow another democrat in the White House.
9 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
MDConservative 6/24/2019 10:48:29 AM (No. 105470)
So California actually voted FOR PDT, #1, if not for the fraud? Hmmmm....
2 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Jethro bo 6/24/2019 10:57:16 AM (No. 105478)
Love it. Winners are never preopaed to lose. That is one reason they win, cause losing is shameful and hateful to a winner.
3 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Blue-Z-Anna 6/24/2019 12:31:54 PM (No. 105574)
Time is a funny thing.
The concordance and agreement of past/present syntax depends on the observational position of the writer. IE---The "Question" was asked in the past and therefore adopts (arguably) a past tense.
-----Sister Mary Syntax
3 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
felixcat 6/24/2019 12:36:08 PM (No. 105580)
I'm not sure what is gained by PDJT by appearing on these "news" shows. The hosts either argue with him, talk over him (or try to) or are just plain rude. First ABC News with Georgie and now NBC with Chuck. Who in the WH Comm team is booking these appearances?
3 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
DVC 6/24/2019 12:42:13 PM (No. 105590)
The popular vote is entirely, totally, legally and constitutionally IRRELEVANT. It is not even actually tallied in any official way because it has NO official meaning.
Only the state votes count, and that will stay as long as the Electoral College stays in our wonderful Constitution. I can't imagine small states voting for the required constitutional amendment to change it.
And yes, there was massive voter fraud, esp in California where I am certain that many, many illegals voted, as the Dems have enabled, planned for, assisted and intended to happen.
4 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
h24015 6/24/2019 1:39:27 PM (No. 105651)
It's stunning that Chuck Todd is unaware of the JW lawsuit that the county of Los Angeles lost. The remedy of the lawsuit supposedly began last week where the county is purging the list where 141% of voting age population is registered to vote.
3 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Mike22 6/24/2019 11:30:13 PM (No. 106000)
I believe that he may have won the legal popular vote. If you go to the polls late in the day to precincts in California and Florida you may see it. Carloads of people who do not appear to be from the precinct, enter two at a time (as observed by lifelong residents in small precincts) show up, vote (provisionally or as a person who rarely votes) and exit. And of course the districts where over 100% of the adults vote, one precinct (Las Vegas) was reported to have twice as many registered voters as adult residents with the vast majority voting democrat. Friends who are poll watchers and have observed the suspicious voting pattern noted above have registered official complaints with no action taken whatsoever.
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "M2"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Comments:
Shot across the bow? He's woke. Dems beware.