A Message From Lucianne  

S-CR-TEO

NM05

G-SKY-01





   
 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Advertisement-Free Options | Register
Rules & FAQs | Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


B-CR-TEO
Trump tweets he wants to deport illegal
immigrants ´with no Judges or Court Cases´ —
a move that would violate due process

Business Insider, by Ellen Cranley

Original Article

Posted By:LittleHoodedMonk, 6/24/2018 1:03:17 PM

President Donald Trump tweeted Sunday morning that the US should deport immigrants who enter the US illegally with no legal process. Trump said once "somebody comes in" the country, they should be removed with "no Judges or Court Cases" — a move that would violate the long-established legal precedent for immigrants´ rights to due process. (Snip) The US Constitution´s Fifth Amendment guarantees the right to "due process of law" in criminal proceedings. In 1953, the Supreme Court clarified this right extended to non-US citizens. The Kwong Hai Chew v. Colding case concluded that the Attorney General "did not have the

Comments:
This should definitely set the dRATS hair on fire. The SCOTUS case cited seems to imply that deportation was in reference to a "lawful permanent resident". Illegals stepping over the border from Mexico to here aren´t or am I incorrect? Bueller? This seems to be at odds with the fact that they are a criminal by doing so. The problem with activist judges rears its ugly head to someday destroy our culture.

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Attila DiMedici, 6/24/2018 1:07:11 PM     (No. 11674362)

It is important to note that there is a difference between what someone wants to do and what they actually do.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    19 persons like this.


Reply 2 - Posted by: GW_Rider, 6/24/2018 1:08:50 PM     (No. 11674364)

hussein also wanted to rule without any checks from that pesky Constitution.

So?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    18 persons like this.


   

 


.New_S.
  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: judy, 6/24/2018 1:10:56 PM     (No. 11674367)

60% are against Illegal immigration.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    34 persons like this.


Reply 4 - Posted by: judy, 6/24/2018 1:11:41 PM     (No. 11674368)

Immigrants who enter the country illegally are illegals.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    44 persons like this.


Reply 5 - Posted by: MMC, 6/24/2018 1:16:07 PM     (No. 11674372)

If they are here illegally, do they have due process?

#askingforafriend

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    50 persons like this.


Reply 6 - Posted by: valinva, 6/24/2018 1:17:18 PM     (No. 11674377)

Did the write even read what they wrote? "The Kwong Hai Chew v. Colding case concluded that the Attorney General "did not have the authority to order the permanent exclusion and deportation of a lawful permanent resident of the United States without providing notice of the charges against him and the opportunity to be heard." LAWFUL PERMANENT RESIDENT are the operative words. No where in the president setting court ruling does it speak of UNLAWFUL BORDER CROSSERS. These illegal immigrants do not have due process rights. They should be put back across the border immediately upon capture. They certainly are not entitled to representation by an attorney. Representation by an attorney is something they should have done while on the other side of the border.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    100 persons like this.


Reply 7 - Posted by: Toledo, 6/24/2018 1:17:39 PM     (No. 11674378)

Isn´t due process for those here legally or born here not invaders?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    57 persons like this.


   

 

R-TA-Wide_2
  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: montwoodcliff, 6/24/2018 1:19:30 PM     (No. 11674381)

I don´t see the problem here. How do they get rights as immigrant? they are here illegally and thus criminals. We have every right to send them back without due process. It´s another story if they are here legally. Didn´t Obama deport people like this, or did they get a hearing? Somebody refresh my memory.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    42 persons like this.


Reply 9 - Posted by: Mackrand, 6/24/2018 1:20:07 PM     (No. 11674382)

The Government seems to forget these people coming in over the southern border are not immigrants.

They are wholly Illegal Aliens!!

There is a difference and PDJT is entirely correct to get them out of the country immediately. These Illegal Aliens have no rights in the United States of America!!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    68 persons like this.


Reply 10 - Posted by: earlybird, 6/24/2018 1:24:18 PM     (No. 11674387)

I’m sure this will be worked out satisfactorily without Ellen’s hysteria.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    22 persons like this.


Reply 11 - Posted by: dvc, 6/24/2018 1:24:23 PM     (No. 11674388)

Why do foreigners jump over our border illegally and suddenly they get all these damned rights to due process?

To heck with that. Pick them up, dump them over the border, same day. Only time to do DNA and fingerprints so you can prosecute them as felons the next time they come back.

Of course the problem with prosecuting them as felons is they may like the inside of our prisons better than running free in their stinkhole countries.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    60 persons like this.


Reply 12 - Posted by: sw penn, 6/24/2018 1:29:59 PM     (No. 11674392)

So...

10,000 year old marriage law can be changed,
but 65 year old inapplicable immigration law can´t?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    54 persons like this.


   

 


.LockDme.


 
Reply 13 - Posted by: earlybird, 6/24/2018 1:30:43 PM     (No. 11674394)

(hit submit too soon)

Ellen is no lawyer, writes for a so-so publication, and doesn’t understand what she has purportedly written:

First she says:

President Donald Trump tweeted Sunday morning that the US should deport immigrants who enter the US illegally with no legal process.

As soon as they step inside our country they are illegal migrants, not immigrants.

And then she goes on to cite as her authority SCOTUS´s case interpretation, which she also does not understand:

The Kwong Hai Chew v. Colding case concluded that the Attorney General "did not have the authority to order the permanent exclusion and deportation of a lawful permanent resident of the United States without providing notice of the charges against him and the opportunity to be heard.”

A “lawful permanent resident of the United States” is a Green Card holder.

Ellen should find something else to do with herself.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    56 persons like this.


Reply 14 - Posted by: Nevadadad46, 6/24/2018 1:35:20 PM     (No. 11674399)

Yes, illegals can be deported sans Due Process:
From Politifact-

“The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Zadvydas vs. Davis (2001) that "once an alien enters the country, the legal circumstance changes, for the due process clause applies to all persons within the United States."

In a Texas case, Plyler vs. Doe, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 1982 that non-citizen children must get a free K-12 education.

But undocumented immigrants don’t share all of the rights held by citizens -- for example, they can’t vote in state and national elections.

And Fordham law professor Jennifer Gordon said that some undocumented immigrants get almost no due process in removal proceedings.

In 1996, {Bill Clinton’s Presidency}, Congress created expedited removal for undocumented immigrants without a hearing. Initially it only applied at the U.S. border. Then it was expanded to within 100 miles of a border for undocumented immigrants who had been in the country less than 14 days.”


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    34 persons like this.


Reply 15 - Posted by: earlybird, 6/24/2018 1:35:29 PM     (No. 11674400)

Oh, for Pete’s sake! Ellen Cranley is the BI’s “Weekend News Intern”…

http://static1.thisisinsider.com/image/5ada18cf42e1cc6d7d23b5b2/ellen-cranley.jpg

She knows from nothing.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    27 persons like this.


Reply 16 - Posted by: harleynyc, 6/24/2018 1:39:52 PM     (No. 11674403)

They are not simply illegals but they are invaders, and are coming here to conquer us, whether they know that or are just pawns. This is a matter of national security. A matter of OUR survival. Left unchecked we become a one party dictatorship being that all the invaders will vote democrat and eventually elect only latinos.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    44 persons like this.


Reply 17 - Posted by: MDConservative, 6/24/2018 1:40:11 PM     (No. 11674404)

Due Process may consist of nothing more than a five minute hearing. This isn´t a criminal trial with a "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard of proof.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    28 persons like this.


   

 


.R-LJ.
  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: Bighambone, 6/24/2018 1:43:47 PM     (No. 11674409)

In keeping with the US Constitution, the US Congress has the sole authority to say what the immigration laws will be and how those immigration laws will be administered and enforced.

So Congress through specific legislation could severely limit the immigration court hearing and appeal process for illegal aliens caught unlawfully crossing the borderline into the USA which is the instant question at hand. Right now because of the esoteric complications placed in the process through the liberalization of the current laws by the liberal Democrats, activist federal judges, and some cheap labor loving Republicans, the immigration court deportation hearing and appeal process for one illegal alien caught unlawfully crossing the borderline could easily take five years or more, when the only issues that have to be determined for the issuance of an order of deportation is that the respondent in a deportation hearing is an alien who entered the USA across the borderline without being inspected and admitted to the country in accordance with the immigration laws.

The reason for that is that the about 330 administrative immigration judge immigration courts now have a backlog of over a million pending cases, including cases relating to hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens set free in the USA in accordance with Obama Administration so-called “catch and release” policies, who have absconded in percentages of up to 90% evidenced by them not showing up for previously scheduled deportation hearings..


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    17 persons like this.


Reply 19 - Posted by: earlybird, 6/24/2018 1:48:42 PM     (No. 11674413)

The writer is an intern who doesn’t understand her own writing.

She is wrong.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    33 persons like this.


Reply 20 - Posted by: bpl40, 6/24/2018 1:51:06 PM     (No. 11674414)

The very idea that the rest of the world is entitled, fully, to all the protections and rights guaranteed by the US Constitution to CITIZENS, should be revisited and thoroughly reexamined. We now live in a shrunken dynamic world where the US needs to protect itself with defenses not thought necessary a century ago.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    20 persons like this.


Reply 21 - Posted by: Emmajustin, 6/24/2018 1:51:19 PM     (No. 11674416)

It would be nice if Pres Trump could say that illegals are committing an act of war and then we could go to battle stations.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    37 persons like this.


Reply 22 - Posted by: sunhan65, 6/24/2018 1:57:52 PM     (No. 11674418)

Looks like this goofy article has been duly dealt with.

I have a related problem: I´m running several resource-intensive tasks on my computer right now, and clicking "like" on all of earlybird´s replies today is slowing down my processor.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    28 persons like this.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: doctorfixit, 6/24/2018 2:14:31 PM     (No. 11674421)

Invaders have no rights. They are not entitled to any process other than removal. If the federal courts disagree, they need to be removed. Federal tyrants can´t force us to commit national suicide. Get rid of the judges. Get rid of the illegals.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    238 persons like this.


Reply 24 - Posted by: dvc, 6/24/2018 2:28:20 PM     (No. 11674438)

OK, then I agree with #14 and #17. 3 minute limit, any sort of a lawyer can be assigned as an administrative judge for this kind of BS case. Get 20% of all the military lawyers in the Air Force, Navy, and Army assigned to this.

Get 300 courts set up, in trailers or defunct motels or whatever. Insist they process 15 per hour. 8 hour day moves 120 per court, 300 courts is 36,000 per day processed. At 5 days per week, and 4 weeks per month, that is 720,000 illegals processed. This is perfectly doable, if we get somebody in there with some real authority who wants to do it, not trying to obstruct everything, gum up the works.

If you can put 360 on a B747, fly them on chartered to somewhere in southern Mexico and turn them loose. That will take 10 flights per day. Charter five aircraft, two flights each day moves 36,000 out per day. That means you can have five different hubs for them to depart from, less ground transport. We are spending far more housing them here. These numbers are very tractable, nothing at all impossible about this. You just need some funding, and an organized group who actually wants this to happen.

Turn this into an assembly line. Accept no excuses why "It can´t be done." Just Do It!

When they pay $3000 to get here, takes weeks of travel, and spend 36 hours in the country, end up broke, back in Mexico, they won´t want to repeat, won´t be able to come up with the money quickly. Guaranteed failure is how we make them stop coming here.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    27 persons like this.


Reply 25 - Posted by: Amereagle-redux, 6/24/2018 2:39:10 PM     (No. 11674447)

How exactly does the Constitution that our ancestors wrote and fought and bled and died for apply to foreign nationals who enter our country illegally?? I must’ve missed that class.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    26 persons like this.


Reply 26 - Posted by: Rumblehog, 6/24/2018 2:43:38 PM     (No. 11674450)

Due Process, B.S. All we hear are the cries of lawyers wanting their cut of Government Cheese. If we catch these invaders, send ´em back, it´s a lot better than putting them in camps waiting for trial. Libertard lawyers want these Latrinos to get free stays in 5-Star hotels and appeal after appeal until the lawyers have their kids´ college tuition paid for.

If you can´t speak English, you need to leave this country. It´s just that simple.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    21 persons like this.


Reply 27 - Posted by: tnorling, 6/24/2018 3:11:09 PM     (No. 11674480)

Illegals have rights... in their own country, not ours.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    38 persons like this.


Reply 28 - Posted by: toodles3956, 6/24/2018 3:42:35 PM     (No. 11674505)

Do it, do it, do it!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    13 persons like this.


Reply 29 - Posted by: SALady, 6/24/2018 3:52:29 PM     (No. 11674521)

What we are doing now clearly isn´t working!!!

So I say lets try it President Trump´s way, and let the Supreme Court decide if it violates due process or not...

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    13 persons like this.


Reply 30 - Posted by: volksford, 6/24/2018 4:02:06 PM     (No. 11674535)

I guess it´s a damn good thing the Japanese didn´t invade the west coast during the war.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    13 persons like this.


Reply 31 - Posted by: Bighambone, 6/24/2018 4:10:54 PM     (No. 11674543)

The US Constitution gives the US Congress the authority to say what the US immigration and nationality laws will be. So when Congress passes an immigration law, how can politicized immigration lawyers and activist federal judges thereafter claim and adjudge that provisions of an immigration law passed by Congress are unconstitutional?

Clearly in the immigration court process today, justice delayed is justice denied, both to illegal aliens who are being detained for long periods of time awaiting final orders of deportation, and to US citizens who are becoming the crime victims of dangerous criminal illegal aliens who are being allowed to walk the streets all over the USA, and especially in Democrat invented so-called Sanctuary Cities that were designed to defend and protect illegal aliens, solely for political purposes, until the Congress passes another big general amnesty, with the vast majority of the would be legalized aliens then being put of a path to be molded into socialist oriented Democrat voters by the millions.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    12 persons like this.


Reply 32 - Posted by: BarryNo, 6/24/2018 4:13:32 PM     (No. 11674546)

I don´t recall soldiers giving VC or Norks, in those undeclared wars, Due Process when they shot them in ´Police Actions´.

Since these are invaders, perhaps similar rules can apply?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    16 persons like this.


Reply 33 - Posted by: Lazyman, 6/24/2018 4:13:34 PM     (No. 11674547)

Due process is mentioned after, "We the people of the US, not " We the people of the earth.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    12 persons like this.


Reply 34 - Posted by: davew, 6/24/2018 4:22:33 PM     (No. 11674566)

Due process occurs when someone enters the country with a valid passport with photo-id. This is the administrative process that is used universally around the world and is recognized by international treaties. Without a passport or diplomatic equivalent a person can be legally and immediately denied access to cross a sovereign border.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    14 persons like this.


Reply 35 - Posted by: earlybird, 6/24/2018 5:29:56 PM     (No. 11674645)

Illegals who have crossed and then requested asylum have been given hearings at the border. That is what PDJT is talking about. A huge judicial and logistical clog, very expensive, very controversial (fodder for the media), no law to support it.

Asylum is to be requested at any American embassy or consulate in their home country or at the lawful U. S. points of entry from the other side. They are not to cross into the U.S. first.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    16 persons like this.


Reply 36 - Posted by: Ribald1, 6/24/2018 5:42:18 PM     (No. 11674658)

These are not immigrants.
They are criminal trespassers, and yes, they should be escorted off the property without delay.
If they want to contest the situation they can visit the US embassy in Mexico. that is what it is there for.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    16 persons like this.


Reply 37 - Posted by: Robinhood, 6/24/2018 5:48:19 PM     (No. 11674664)

the ruling also stated "the attorney general" does not have the right.... the president has the right!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    19 persons like this.


Reply 38 - Posted by: Bighambone, 6/24/2018 6:08:47 PM     (No. 11674678)

Why don’t they establish USA asylum centers at the US Consulates throughout Mexico. Then aliens from wherever can go to those offices and file for asylum without unlawfully jumping the borderline. In any case that action would take away the excuse that aliens have to jump the borderline to file for asylum. Since well over 80% of the asylum claims received from illegal aliens who jumped the border are bogus or do not establish the legal requirements to receive asylum in the USA, such asylum centers would serve to keep a lot of illegal aliens out of the country who are coming to the USA unlawfully for economic reasons, like to get a job and send money home to relatives in a home country. No doubt a lot of aliens whose asylum applications had been denied at the asylum centers would still try to get into the USA by jumping the borderline, but their cases would not be complicated by unadjudicated asylum claims and they could quickly be deported. The only problem is that the leftist Democrats whose political agenda is to get as many poor and uneducated illegal aliens into the USA, who most likely would eventually become dependent on taxpayer provided social welfare services, and would in very high percentages, once legalized, become socialist oriented Democrat voters would no longer get a head start into the USA.. Clearly the leftist Democrats would not like that.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    14 persons like this.


Reply 39 - Posted by: hershey, 6/24/2018 6:15:05 PM     (No. 11674686)

Why do illegal fence jumpers have Constitutional Rights???? Something smells about that...

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    15 persons like this.


Reply 40 - Posted by: arcady, 6/24/2018 9:10:26 PM     (No. 11674797)

And this is why No to DACA or any other backdoor path to amnesty or green card, or anything. As soon as that´s granted and the chain migration kicks in, that will in essence grant them some standing and hence due process rights. Illegals are illegals. There should be no special privileges for any illegal group. Because we all know the Dems and GOP-e if given an inch, will try to steal a mile or more.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    12 persons like this.


Reply 41 - Posted by: Udanja99, 6/24/2018 9:27:31 PM     (No. 11674810)

Since when do illegal invaders get Constitutional guarantees of ANYTHING????? Those guarantees are reserved for AMERICAN CITIZENS.

(Please forgive the shouting, but I’ve had enough of this idiocy.)

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    13 persons like this.


Reply 42 - Posted by: dvc, 6/25/2018 12:26:46 AM     (No. 11674930)

Correction to my calcs above, need 100 flights per day, significant increase in aircraft required, but still doable. Need 50 aircraft leased, not 5.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    13 persons like this.



Post Reply   Close thread 946313




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "LittleHoodedMonk"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "LittleHoodedMonk"



Without Evidence, Trump Claims Vindication
From Release of Carter Page Documents
New York Times, by Katie Rogers, Emily Cochrane    Original Article
Posted By: LittleHoodedMonk- 7/22/2018 10:21:57     Post Reply
Berkeley Heights, NJ - President Trump claimed without evidence on Sunday that his administration’s release of top-secret documents related to the surveillance of a former campaign aide had confirmed that the Justice Department and the F.B.I. had “misled the courts” in the early stages of the Russia investigation. “Looking more & more like the Trump Campaign for President was illegally being spied upon (surveillance) for the political gain of Crooked Hillary Clinton and the DNC,” Mr. Trump wrote on Twitter. In a series of early-morning tweets, Mr. Trump left unmentioned how the documents laid out in stark detail why

Miami Dolphins´ anthem discipline
a policy only dictator would love
USA Today, by Nancy Armour    Original Article
Posted By: LittleHoodedMonk- 7/19/2018 8:47:19     Post Reply
Beating your wife is worse than protesting during the national anthem. So, too, is sexually assaulting a woman. While that might seem obvious, it needs to be clarified given The Associated Press´ report Thursday that the Miami Dolphins are now including protesting during the anthem on their list of "conduct detrimental to the club." Under NFL rules, that´s an offense punishable by a suspension of up to four games. The Dolphins later told the AP that "all options are still open." But to give you an idea of how heinous at least one NFL team sees trying to draw attention to racial and economic inequality, a four-game suspension is

House Republicans defeat attempt
to subpoena Trump interpreter
Politico Magazine, by Martin Matishak    Original Article
Posted By: LittleHoodedMonk- 7/19/2018 8:36:17     Post Reply
Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee on Thursday defeated an attempt by panel Democrats to subpoena the interpreter who worked for President Donald Trump during his summit Monday with Russian President Vladimir Putin. “This is an extraordinary remedy, I realize, but then it’s extraordinary for the president of the United States to ask all of his senior staff essentials to leave the room and have a conversation with an adversary,” said Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), who called for the vote to compel the interpreter to testify behind closed doors. “And then in a public conversation disavow his own intelligence

Here’s What Happens If The
Supreme Court Overturns Roe V. Wade
BuzzFeed News, by Ema O´Connor    Original Article
Posted By: LittleHoodedMonk- 7/19/2018 8:28:28     Post Reply
Washington, DC - President Donald Trump repeatedly promised during his campaign to nominate Supreme Court justices who would overturn Roe v. Wade. Now with another nominee to the Supreme Court in his hands, abortion rights advocates worry that conservative dream will come true. But what needs to happen in order for Roe, the 1973 court decision that legalized abortion nationwide, to be overturned is more complex than it might seem. And if it happens, what comes next isn’t black and white either. Trump nominated Judge Brett Kavanaugh, a George W. Bush–era nominee with an extensive record

Israel passes contentious
Jewish nation-state law
Associated Press, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: LittleHoodedMonk- 7/19/2018 8:14:52     Post Reply
Jerusalem - Israel’s parliament approved a controversial piece of legislation on Thursday that defines the country as the nation-state of the Jewish people but which critics warn sidelines minorities. The government says the bill, passed in the early morning hours, will merely enshrine into law Israel’s existing character. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called its passage a “historic moment in the history of Zionism and the history of the state of Israel.” “Israel is the nation-state of the Jewish people, which honors the individual rights of all its citizens,” he said. “I repeat this is our state. The Jewish state.”

US proposes roll back of
endangered species protections
Agence France-Presse, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: LittleHoodedMonk- 7/19/2018 8:04:38     Post Reply
The US administration of President Donald Trump on Thursday proposed sweeping changes to the 45-year-old Endangered Species Act which would roll back protections for threatened animals, sparking alarm by environmentalists. The 1973 federal law is considered the gold standard for global environmental protection, and is credited with saving dozens of key species from extinction, including bald eagles, manatees, humpback whales and American alligators. One proposed change, announced by the Interior and Commerce Departments, would remove a sentence that aims to separate economic impacts from decisions about animal protection. Other provisions would vary protections for animals on a case-by-case

House Democrats vote ´present´
on resolution supporting ICE
Washington Examiner [DC], by Susan Ferrechio    Original Article
Posted By: LittleHoodedMonk- 7/18/2018 5:15:29     Post Reply
Most House Democrats voted “present” Tuesday on a resolution aimed at forcing them to clarify whether they support U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, after some Democrats have criticized the agency´s role in enforcing U.S. immigration laws. The House passed a nonbinding resolution saying lawmakers support the "officers and personnel who carry out the important mission of the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement." A two-thirds majority was needed to pass it, and because Democrats voted "present" instead of "no," it passed easily in a 244-35 vote. The final vote saw just 18 Democrats vote for the

Mueller All but Ignores the Other
Russian Hack Target: the GOP
Real Clear Investigations, by Paul Sperry    Original Article
Posted By: LittleHoodedMonk- 7/17/2018 4:59:15     Post Reply
Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election wasn’t as one-sided as Special Counsel Robert Mueller charges in his latest indictment. The Russian military spy agency that Mueller says hacked the Democratic National Committee also penetrated the computer systems of the Republican National Committee using fake emails in a phishing scheme, U.S. officials say. This evidence challenges the narrative, now reinforced by Mueller’s indictments, that Russia’s scheme was solely aimed at damaging Hillary Clinton. “RNC emails were stolen through the same spearphishing scams used against Democrats,” a senior U.S. intelligence official familiar with the investigation told RealClearInvestigations.

Woman Who Sought ‘Back
Channel’ Meeting for Trump and
Putin is Charged as Russian Agent
New York Times, by Matt Apuzzo, Katie Benner*    Original Article
Posted By: LittleHoodedMonk- 7/16/2018 4:59:28     Post Reply
Washington - A Russian woman who tried to broker a pair of secret meetings between candidate Donald J. Trump and the Russian president, Vladimir V. Putin, during the 2016 presidential campaign, was charged Monday and accused of working with Americans to carry out a secret Russian effort to influence American politics. Working at the behest of a Russian government official and with help from an unidentified American political operative, the woman, Mariia Butina, worked to infiltrate American organizations as a way to secretly advance Russian interests, prosecutors said. As part of that effort, she tried to establish

U.S. senators want ban on
China´s ZTE, despite Trump action
Reuters, by Patricia Zengerle    Original Article
Posted By: LittleHoodedMonk- 7/12/2018 8:01:54     Post Reply
Washington - Republican and Democratic U.S. senators said on Thursday they want the government to reinstate penalties on ZTE Corp, despite a Trump administration agreement paving the way for an end of a ban on the Chinese telecommunications company. (Snip) Many U.S. lawmakers, including some of Trump’s fellow Republicans as well as Democrats, view ZTE as a national security threat, worrying that the use of its technology in the United States could make it easier for China to steal secrets. Commerce on Wednesday said it signed an agreement with ZTE, China’s No. 2 telecommunications maker, paving the way for it to

UN official says N. Korea
needs food, medicine, clean water
Associated Press, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: LittleHoodedMonk- 7/12/2018 12:06:34     Post Reply
Tokyo - About 20 percent of North Korean children are stunted because of malnutrition, and half the children in rural areas are drinking unsafe water, a senior U.N. official visiting the country said. Much progress has been made compared to 20 years ago but "significant humanitarian challenges" remain, Mark Lowcock, the undersecretary general for humanitarian affairs, said Wednesday at a news conference in Pyongyang, the capital of North Korea. The U.N. issued a transcript of his remarks. The United Nations is trying to raise $111 million to meet health, water and sanitation and food security needs for about 6 million people

The job market is apparently so hot
people are ghosting potential employers
CBS News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: LittleHoodedMonk- 7/12/2018 11:32:12     Post Reply
The much-maligned habit of ghosting has apparently made its way into the workplace. According to a recent LinkedIn article, "People are ´ghosting´ at work and it´s driving companies crazy." Ghosting is when a person abruptly goes silent or disappears without explanation. The article goes on to explain that candidates who have agreed to job interviews fail to show up without any notice or further communication and, in some cases, accept jobs only to not appear for their first day of work. "This job market is so hot right now. Unemployment is at a 18-year low. You´ve got more job openings than candidates,



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



What is She Wearing? Hillary Clinton Looks
Like Hell at OzyFest in New York (Video)

47 replie(s)
Gateway Pundit, by Christina Laila    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 7/22/2018 5:12:32 AM     Post Reply
New York –Twice-failed presidential hopeful, Hillary Clinton spoke at Ozyfest, a two-day festival in Central Park, on Saturday and she looked terrible. Hillary donned a mumu-style top that nearly touched the floor and white pants. Her hair was disheveled and she had very prominent bags under her eyes. To think this woman almost became the 45th president of the US….Hillary Clinton complained about Russia and Vladimir Putin for almost 45 minutes straight during a Q&A session with Laurene Powell Jobs, founder of Emerson Collection. Old Crooked claimed the Russians are still trying to hack into our computer systems – she

Elon Musk is a total fraud
46 replie(s)
New York Post, by Maureen Callahan    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 7/21/2018 4:18:28 PM     Post Reply
One disastrous tweet has finally revealed Elon Musk for what he is: a fraud. Enraged that a British cave diver called his idea to rescue the Thai soccer team for what it was — “a p.r. stunt [with] absolutely no chance of working” — Musk took to Twitter and called him a “pedo.” Just like that, Tesla’s market value plummeted by $2 billion. Musk has been in business since 2002. His stated goal is nothing short of transforming humanity through his products: his electric cars, space travel, and an underground high-speed Hyperloop system. He has yet to succeed at anything but somehow spins every

Is that a catheter bag under
Hillary Clinton´s loose clothing?

37 replie(s)
American Thinker, by Monica Showalter    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 7/22/2018 10:22:49 AM     Post Reply
Hot summer day, and Hillary Clinton was spotted again at a public speaking event, wearing voluminous clothes - with curious lumps under them. Jim Hoft´s GatewayPundit had the picture sequence, along with a collection of reactions from assorted characters on Twitter, few of them being nice about it. But some were more thoughtful than others, with speculation on what really might be happening.

Zinke Is Shipping The Headquarters
Of The Largest Land-Owning Agency
Out Of DC

35 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Tim Pearce    Original Article
Posted By: earlybird- 7/20/2018 8:26:38 PM     Post Reply
Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke is making plans to move the headquarters of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) out of Washington, D.C., to a city in the West. The federal government owns 640 million acres in the U.S., or roughly 28 percent of the nation’s entire landmass. The BLM manages 248.3 million acres of public land, more than any other agency, according to a March 2017 report by the Congressional Research Service. Today, @Interior confirmed that they are planning to move the BLM HQ west. This is great news since 99% of the land that the BLM manages is located

Remember these? Retro scents including Old
Spice, Joop and Brut are back in fashion-
after vintage obsessed millennials snap them up

34 replie(s)
Daily Mail (UK), by Latoya Gayle & Jessica Rach    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 7/22/2018 1:06:38 PM     Post Reply
A wave of nostalgia appears to have swept the nation, with the swinging sixties creeping back into fashion. Hawaiian shirts, traditional barbershops and vintage buys are all making a comeback, and with it, retro scents. The Perfume Shop has reported a 35 per cent yearly increase in the sales of traditional fragrances made famous in the 1960s. Surprisingly, the fragrance specialists say millennials are driving the craze, along with the trend of adopting a sixties lifestyle. An expert for the brand explained the sixties could be defined by the prominence in scents with lavender, tobacco and sandalwood notes, moving away from

No arrest in fatal shooting
during argument over
handicap parking space

30 replie(s)
Tampa Bay Times [FL], by Kathryn Varn    Original Article
Posted By: Hazymac- 7/21/2018 9:15:14 AM     Post Reply
CLEARWATER — Pinellas County Sheriff Bob Gualtieri announced Friday that his agency will not arrest a man deputies say shot and killed another man during an argument over a handicap parking space. The incident falls under Florida’s self-defense law known as "stand your ground," the sheriff said during a news conference. The law gives immunity to those in fear of their lives who use force to defend themselves. The shooting "is within the bookends of ‘stand your ground’ and within the bookends of force being justified," the sheriff said, later adding, "I’m not saying I agree with it, but I don’t make

The entire Republican Party
is becoming a Russian asset

29 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Paul Waldman    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 7/21/2018 5:14:54 AM     Post Reply
In the past few days, President Trump has given at least some Republicans reason to express displeasure over his relationship with Russia. First he performed a pathetic ritual of subservience before Vladimir Putin, standing beside the Russian leader — after a private meeting between the two, which no aides were permitted to attend — and dismissing the copious evidence of a Russian attack on the 2016 election in deference to Putin’s word. Then we learned that Putin had suggested that we make Americans available to the Kremlin for questioning, including Michael McFaul, the former U.S. ambassador to Russia, in exchange

Study supports Trump: 5.7 million noncitizens
may have cast illegal votes

28 replie(s)
Washington Times, by Rowan Scarborough    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 7/20/2018 5:18:24 PM     Post Reply
A research group in New Jersey has taken a fresh look at postelection polling data and concluded that the number of noncitizens voting illegally in U.S. elections is likely far greater than previous estimates. As many as 5.7 million noncitizens may have voted in the 2008 election, which put Barack Obama in the White House. The research organization Just Facts, a widely cited, independent think tank led by self-described conservatives and libertarians, revealed its number-crunching in a report on national immigration. Just Facts President James D. Agresti and his team looked at data from an extensive Harvard/YouGov study that every

Democratic socialism surging
in the age of Trump

28 replie(s)
Associated Press, by Steve Peoples    Original Article
Posted By: M2- 7/21/2018 9:03:20 AM     Post Reply
Last Friday, Maine Democrat Zak Ringelstein wasn’t ready to consider himself a formal member of the Democratic Socialists of America, even if he appreciated the organization’s values and endorsement in his bid to become a United States senator. Three days later, he told The Associated Press that was ready to become the only major-party Senate candidate in the nation to be a dues-paying democratic socialist. The swift evolution is latest evidence of a nationwide surge in the strength and popularity of an organization that, until recently, operated on the fringes of the liberal movement’s farthest left flank. But as Donald

Obama’s Former Director of National Intelligence
Says Obama Behind Entire Russia Witch Hunt!

27 replie(s)
Gateway Pundit, by Joe Hoft    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 7/22/2018 11:35:12 AM     Post Reply
President Obama’s former Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper, came clean on CNN and stated that former President Obama was behind spying on President Trump! James Clapper was on CNN yesterday and he stated that Obama was behind spying on President Trump and all the corrupt and criminal actions involving the government, including the Mueller investigation – According to Obama’s former spy chief, James Clapper, who appeared on CNN to say it was Obama who set the entire Russia witch-hunt into motion by tasking the intelligence community assessment.Clapper said – If it weren’t for President Obama we might not have

Trump says NFL players who kneel during
the anthem twice should be banned for the
season and urges ´$40,000,000 commissioner´
Roger Goodell to ´take a stand´

26 replie(s)
Daily Mail [UK], Associated Press, by Daniel Roth    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 7/20/2018 9:00:01 PM     Post Reply
President Donald Trump demanded on Friday that the ´$40,000,000 commissioner´ of the NFL suspend players for a whole season if they kneel during national anthem more than once. In a rehash of last year´s controversy, the President took to Twitter to blast NFL commissioner Roger Godell for not doing enough to stem the tide of players protesting racial inequality in America. ´The NFL National Anthem Debate is alive and well again - can´t believe it!,´ Trump wrote in the tweet. ´Isn´t it in contract that players must stand at attention, hand on heart? The $40,000,000 Commissioner must now make a stand.

What if You Owned a Beach but
Weren’t Allowed to Get to It?

26 replie(s)
New York Times, by Kathleen Sharp    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 7/21/2018 5:40:08 AM     Post Reply
SANTA BARBARA, Calif — From Malibu to Santa Cruz, wealthy people are blocking access to California’s publicly owned beaches. And no group has fought the public longer than the gated community of Hollister Ranch, about 130 miles north of Los Angeles. For more than 36 years, residents there have spent millions of dollars on lawyers and lobbyists to bar the hoi polloi from an 8.5-mile-long beach adorned with several coves. In May, after more than four years of litigation over public access to the beach, a settlement was announced between the ranch cooperative, on one side, and the California Coastal Commission


Post Reply   Close thread 946313





Recommended Trending videos


Sek-Float


Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Advertisement-Free Options | Register
Rules & FAQs | Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google



© 2018 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

FS