A Message From Lucianne  







S-G1




























ST-GC


   
 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


Senate Republicans Develop The Most Credible
Plan Yet To ´Repeal And Replace´ Obamacare

Forbes, by Avik Roy

Original Article

Posted By:StormCnter, 1/28/2014 4:45:07 AM

“Repealing and replacing” Obamacare with market-oriented reforms has been the Republican mantra for years now. If you’re a long-time follower of this space, you know that we’re skeptical that Obamacare will ever be repealed, GOP slogans to the contrary. Today, however, a trio of experienced Senate Republicans—Tom Coburn (Okla.), Richard Burr (N.C.), and Orrin Hatch (Utah)—have put forth the most thoughtful and constructive plan yet developed to repeal and replace Obamacare. The plan seeks to ensure that as many Americans have health coverage as Obamacare does. It’s a proposal grounded in the real-world tradeoffs that all serious reformers must make.

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: planetgeo, 1/28/2014 6:25:07 AM     (No. 9708465)

What´s wrong with simply "repeal"? Get government out of healthcare and the market will reorganize on its own to come up with options to "replace." The one and only good thing I can think of that government could do to lower health care costs would be tort reform. Talk to any doctor about what percentage of his fees are driven by legal costs and malpractice insurance and you´ll quickly see where much of the real problem lies.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    89 persons like this.


Reply 2 - Posted by: StormCnter, 1/28/2014 6:38:43 AM     (No. 9708477)

#1, there will have to be something to fill the gap between repeal and the market recovery you mentioned. What about those who have lost their insurance and for whom the insurance industry no longer has a plan to offer? Yes, the industry can replace those plans, but not quickly enough to help those in the midst of some kind of expensive treatment or hospitalization.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    56 persons like this.


   

 

R-G1
  
R-VAR_AD


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: Arby, 1/28/2014 7:29:50 AM     (No. 9708512)

Sounds a lot better than Fauxbamacare. I´d prefer to just tweak our original system--tort reform; buy insurance across state lines, etc.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    35 persons like this.


Reply 4 - Posted by: Dodge Boy, 1/28/2014 7:30:41 AM     (No. 9708513)

We have just two problems with this repeal schtick. Reid in the Senate and Obie in the WH.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    61 persons like this.


Reply 5 - Posted by: Periwinkel, 1/28/2014 7:31:00 AM     (No. 9708515)

Very often we hear of wonderful plans from the Senate and the House, but after the announcement everyone just melts into the woodwork. I know the media won´t help, but how did Newt Gingrich get people to understand the Contract with America?

Contract with America was the last time, Republicans gave full-throated explanation to their plans. We certainly need more of that. It is part of the campaign for the election this year and AGAIN in the run-up to 2016.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    44 persons like this.


Reply 6 - Posted by: Kerryman, 1/28/2014 7:31:02 AM     (No. 9708516)

More government centric garbage from the elites. I´m sorry Tom Coburn put his name on it. Where are the Health Savings Accounts(HSA´s)? Mine certainly influenced my consumer choices on Healthcare as it would affect others. It´s a control issue not a Healthcare issue and why it´s being framed this way.

Semper Fi

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    34 persons like this.


Reply 7 - Posted by: raspberry, 1/28/2014 7:37:30 AM     (No. 9708523)

Surely American Free Enterprise can again come up with a workable system like what most of us had and liked. For many of us the premiums were manageable and the plans were good. Oh, I know. Like with the British Insurance Companies Ovomit "stuffed their mouths with gold."

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    73 persons like this.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: reformationmama, 1/28/2014 7:42:29 AM     (No. 9708533)

Burr is a second-term senator in my state. His votes have been seductively trending more and more progressive. Get the government out of health care altogether. Lower or do away with federal income/inheritance taxes. Torte reform. Portability. But not "I´ve got another one just like the other one."

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    30 persons like this.


Reply 9 - Posted by: sorosisbehindit, 1/28/2014 8:07:02 AM     (No. 9708565)

Translation:

"a trio of experienced Senate Republicans"
means
not that damnable upstart Cruz from Texas, who embarrassed us by pointing out how worthless we are when we don´t control all three branches of government in any given year

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    36 persons like this.


Reply 10 - Posted by: suedotsue, 1/28/2014 8:22:23 AM     (No. 9708593)

There doesn´t ´have to´ be anything about anything. Every day there´s a new group who´s in a ´gap.´ No one has the faintest idea who´s in or out of a gap anymore. On the other hand, the massive bureaucracy created for this fraud is sitting pretty. The GOP had every chance to stop this and chose not to by failing to hold a standalone up or down vote to defund O´Care or even approve it as a tax. Before O´Care even came out it was admitted 30 million wouldn´t be covered. This author Avik Roy has a hugely inflated view of himself. He doesn´t get to lecture me on how to be serious. I know what´s serious.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    19 persons like this.


Reply 11 - Posted by: bugboy, 1/28/2014 8:31:55 AM     (No. 9708618)

Repeal it! Nothing needs to fill the gap!

Before everyone fell for the great lie that we needed government funded health care every thing was moving along smoothly. Now the lie has been sold and people believe it.

I quoted Saul Alinsky in another discussion here it is again from Saul Alinsky´s 12 rules.

Rule #10: “If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive.”

In other words tell a lie long enough you change the conversation so that the lie now becomes the truth.

People, Obama uses Saul Alinsky´s Rules for Radicals all the time. If you read them and familiarize yourself with them you will begin to see how Obama and the liberal left works. With that understanding you can see right through their entire sham and look back and see how we have been dooped.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    107 persons like this.


Reply 12 - Posted by: Felixcat, 1/28/2014 8:49:39 AM     (No. 9708648)

I may have posed this question during the Obamacare debate a couple of years ago, but what did Americans do before there was "health insurance." Did everyone who got sick just die because they couldn´t pay for health care?

As for gaps, well, life is a series of gaps. What´s next - the income gap? The automobile gap? The housing gap (well, we saw how well that turned out). Government cannot make life perfect or 100% safe.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    57 persons like this.


   

 

B-G1


 
Reply 13 - Posted by: stablemoney, 1/28/2014 9:02:49 AM     (No. 9708671)

Why are insurance premiums increasing so much every year? Not for the reason most given: That healthcare costs are rising. My thought is a lot of it is the government and the insurance companies have recognized that when they work together the government can have more and the insurance companies can have more, and the people are too weak to do anything about it. So let´s deconstruct the government/insurance company cartel.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    18 persons like this.


Reply 14 - Posted by: Clinger, 1/28/2014 9:21:34 AM     (No. 9708700)

Replacing a socialist takeover with a better socialist takeover doesn´t cut it. Let the free market work, identify where the government impeded the free market and that will lead you to the needed reform. Such as allowing competition across state lines. Then take a step back and look at the anticipated consequences. If the little piggy who built the straw house and partied his tush off while others toiled building the brick house falls on hard times and we decide to assist him, it´s welfare not insurance. The free market isn´t the mechanism for welfare.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    26 persons like this.


Reply 15 - Posted by: dvc, 1/28/2014 10:58:34 AM     (No. 9708885)

You are entitled to exactly as much health care as YOU can pay for. This idea the "health care for the poor" is a government responsibility is SOCIALISM. The poor should be handled by charities. If the feds would take their siphon out of my purse, much more of my money would go to charities - especially those that distinguish between the lazy druggie and the family with a temporary problem and real need.

I understand the need for a transition period, but whatever is put in place needs to taper off of the government controls and government money over a period of years. Health Savings Account could be as big a success as IRAs, money you invest in your self and you keep whatever isn´t necessary.

A tax exempt HSA for ordinary medical expenses combined with a catastrophic coverage option, which by itself is typically very cheap, is all you really need.

The Blue Cross Zerocare cost for two early 60s adults is $16,800 per year, with a $4,750 deductible PER PERSON. So, a couple will pay $26,000 per year for health care before getting anything covered. The same money invested in an HSA would probably build more than $50,000 excess in 3 years. Backed with a catastrophic plan that ONLY covers costs above $20,000-$30,000 per year (for a very low premium) this would be far better than this hideous Zerocare.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    21 persons like this.


Reply 16 - Posted by: Bpl40, 1/28/2014 11:17:07 AM     (No. 9708922)

Let´s face it. Social engineering and coerced income transfer are the true central goals of 0bamacare. If it does not do that Reid and Zippy will dig their heels in. So other than election year grandstanding this is unlikely to go anywhere.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    19 persons like this.


Reply 17 - Posted by: pickle1, 1/28/2014 11:18:59 AM     (No. 9708928)

Repeal it. Whatever it takes to drive a stake through it to get rid of it. No compromise. It´s not about healthcare or health insurance. It´s about corruption.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    20 persons like this.


   

 

R_DBL_B
  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: Skeptical1, 1/28/2014 11:33:24 AM     (No. 9708964)

This plan seems too wonky to work.

One of the things I don´t like is the proposal to cap the employer´s tax exclusion at 65% of the cost of today´s plans, and use the (imagined) revenue increase to subsidize other people´s plans. It´s just another hidden tax, built on the already illogical tax treatment of employer sponsored vs. individually purchased plans.



  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    20 persons like this.


Reply 19 - Posted by: OdinsAcolyte, 1/28/2014 11:53:47 AM     (No. 9709009)

Say out of private enterprise. FOOLS

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    22 persons like this.


Reply 20 - Posted by: GreatPlains, 1/28/2014 12:52:39 PM     (No. 9709133)

Repealing Obamacare is not going to happen, because it can´t.
Democrats control the Senate by 10 seats 45-55.
Obama will never , ever , ever sign anything repealing Obamacare.
So..in order to override his veto-it would require a 2/3 vote of the Senate-66 votes.
21 Senate Democrats would have to join Republicans to override Obama´s veto.
Repealing it sounds so simple, but, the reality is that repeal will cause as much chaos and be as big of a logistical mess as Obamacare.
Trying to make our health are system whole again will take years, assuming we ever get the numbers to repeal.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    24 persons like this.


Reply 21 - Posted by: Penney, 1/28/2014 1:17:16 PM     (No. 9709179)

If the GOP votes to grant amnesty to the ILLEGAL aliens, they might as well forget any other policy ideas. mmm mmm mmm

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    25 persons like this.


Reply 22 - Posted by: jglas, 1/28/2014 1:48:32 PM     (No. 9709235)

To accept that the Republicans have to come up with a comprehensive (read universal) federal healthcare plan to replace the Democrat´s comprehensive federal healthcare plan is to accept that the federal government is responsible for securing/providing healthcare for each and every person within the United States. But the federal government is not responsible for people´s healthcare anymore than it´s responsible for providing them food, housing, education or a job. This can be confirmed with a cursory reading of the constitution. In fact it is denied the federal government to provide such goods and services since the constitution does not empower them to provide such things and the tenth amendment to the constitution forbids the federal government to do the things they have not been specifically empowered to do by the constitution. Nowhere does it empower them to provided, food, education, housing, healthcare or any other necessity of life (saving defense) that you can name. The tenth amendment further empowers the states and the people to do for themselves the things not specified by the constitution for the federal government to do. This is the embodiment of the principle that people should be free to pursue their own happiness not the happiness that the government decides they should have. That is the source of our liberty. Any effort by the federal government to do those things for us that we can do for ourselves, however nice they might seem to some, represents a diminution of our freedom.

In effect the Republicans effort to provide their own comprehensive healthcare plan indicates they accept Obama´s assertion that we need to fundamentally change our form of government to something less freedom oriented and more socialistic only it should have their stamp of approval on it.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    48 persons like this.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: jdf, 1/28/2014 2:22:18 PM     (No. 9709276)

The system has not worked well. Reform is necessary; just not the reform the President proposed. This proposal sounds a lot better.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    24 persons like this.


Reply 24 - Posted by: Kerryman, 1/28/2014 2:24:58 PM     (No. 9709279)

I always ask this question when dealing with the other side. “Why do you have to touch the Healthcare of 285 Million Americans to solve the problems of 45,000,000 Americans?”. They have no answer because there is no answer. It’s a device to hide the taxes.

Dump Obamacare. Have a good program for pre-existing conditions. Implement universal HSA’s, cross-state and Tort Reform.

You have Medicaid for the poor. If you want to have a tax credit in lieu of the EITC (you can’t get both) fine. This is all nuts and only about power and control.

Semper Fi


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    31 persons like this.


Reply 25 - Posted by: HisHandmaiden, 1/28/2014 2:40:37 PM     (No. 9709310)

Ditto #26. And concentrate on getting 66+ senators!

There, that´s solved.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    19 persons like this.


Reply 26 - Posted by: gone2pot, 1/28/2014 5:03:17 PM     (No. 9709505)

Once upon a time we had two years worth of GOP House, Senate and Oval Office. We got campaign finance reform. Figure the odds that even with 66 GOP Depends Wearers in the Senate AND a GOP in the Oval Office with GOP House in 2016, this plan is anything other than a training manual for treading water for those stuck in the Titanic at the bottom of the Atlantic. (For those in Rio Linda, it´s too late and useless now). Again, give me your address and I´ll send you my pom-poms.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    20 persons like this.


Reply 27 - Posted by: freffy16, 1/28/2014 5:16:55 PM     (No. 9709524)

But he doesn´t want to repeal and replace - and he "owns" the guvmint.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    35 persons like this.


Reply 28 - Posted by: lc hoghead, 1/28/2014 5:49:52 PM     (No. 9709553)

Believe it when you see it.. The RINOs are COWARDS

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    29 persons like this.


Reply 29 - Posted by: O.G.´s Mom, 1/28/2014 10:32:35 PM     (No. 9709782)

Just repeal. The government, I don´t care who is running it DemoRATS or Republicans, has no place in anyone´s health care. Government tampering and involvement has brought this mess of a system to where it is now. Just get out and let the free market run this just like life insurance and car insurance. Period.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    22 persons like this.


Reply 30 - Posted by: nevernaught, 1/29/2014 11:07:03 AM     (No. 9710213)

Is this sort of like their other new plan to replace American citizens with illegal criminals at the voting booth. Sounds the same.



  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    21 persons like this.


Reply 31 - Posted by: pickle1, 1/29/2014 3:06:18 PM     (No. 9710571)

How abut government getting out of our lives. There is nothing remotely near healthcare or health insurance when government and sometimes greedy big business get involved.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    17 persons like this.


Reply 32 - Posted by: Ida Lil, 1/29/2014 10:33:26 PM     (No. 9710992)

One major insurance problem #14 is our companies that have been sold to foreign identities who have taken all the working cash out of the USA.
This follows the electrical power companies as well.A second problem is/was AARP who sold us out on the promise that their co. United Health would be the single source. Notice now that company is puling out of many locations and causing dropped plans . Perhaps former Senator Santoromn could explain just how much pork was thrown their way via his efforts.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    18 persons like this.



Post Reply   Close thread 769981




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"



Over 100 years of presidential (and
vice-presidential) daughters’ weddings
New York Post, by Kyle Smith    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/23/2014 6:03:35 PM     Post Reply
For a vice president’s daughter, Sarah Gore had a low-key wedding on Sunday in Carpinteria, Calif. But second weddings tend to be more modest affairs, and Sarah, 35, like her parents and her big sisters Kristin and Karenna, is a veteran of a failed marriage. She married Santa Barbara real-estate agent Patrick Maiani this weekend under a pine near a coffee shop, having previously wed tech investor Bill Lee, in 2007. Here are some other daughters of presidents and vice presidents who had splashy weddings.

Paul on vote fraud: ‘I think Republicans
may have overemphasized this’
Daily Caller, by Caroline May    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/23/2014 5:56:27 PM     Post Reply
Kentucky Republican Sen. Rand Paul said voter fraud should stop, but suggested that Republicans have overemphasized the problem in an interview with David Axelrod Tuesday. “Dead people do still vote in some elections. There still is some fraud. And so we should stop that, and one way of doing it is (driver’s licenses).” Paul said, according to a Washington Post transcript. “Although the incidence of fraud is relatively small,” Axelrod responded. “It probably is, and I think Republicans may have overemphasized this. I don’t know,” Paul responded. According to the Post, Paul noted that he does support voter ID but unlike some Republicans, who

Illinois woman sues condo where
husband died from swan attack
New York Daily News, by Lee Moran    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/23/2014 5:51:26 PM     Post Reply
The wife of an Illinois man who drowned after a brutal swan attack is suing the condo complex where he tended the birds. Amy Hensley claims the vicious April 2012 assault in Des Plaines "caused or contributed to" the death of her husband Anthony. And she blames the Bay Colony Drive complex, where it occurred, Hillcrest Property Management and his bosses at Knox Swan and Dog for not realizing the danger he was in. In a lawsuit filed against the trio last week, she said: "The presence of the mute swans on the premises rendered it unreasonably dangerous." And she claimed “(The defendants) knew

It’s Time to Eliminate ‘Hate Crimes’
From the American Legal System
PJ Media, by Jazz Shaw    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/23/2014 5:48:19 PM     Post Reply
It is unfortunate that events generally require the commission of a crime of unspeakable magnitude in some unsuspecting community before the media is prodded to, yet again, take up the long overdue reexamination of the various “hate crime” laws peppering the legal code of the federal government and most of the states. Such was the unfortunate case yet again in April of 2014 when Fraizer Glenn Miller, a former grand wizard of the Klan, opened fire at a Jewish community center and an adult care facility in Kansas. Whether Miller “succeeded” in his desire to kill Jews or not (he didn’t,

Are You a Modern Day Gentleman?
Country Life Magazine [UK], by Rupert Uloth & Emma Hughes    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/23/2014 9:49:13 AM     Post Reply
Gentlemanliness is, without a doubt, Britain´s most enduring export. For Evelyn Waugh, writing breathlessly to Nancy Mitford in 1956, it provided no less than an explanation for ‘all our national greatness´. But, although he spent his entire life in thrall to the concept, he never explained what he actually meant by it. He, like most of us, assumed that you simply knew a gentleman when you saw one. Other writers have only managed to come up with partial definitions. For George Bernard Shaw, a gentleman always ‘puts more into the world than he takes out´. Oscar Wilde thought that a gentleman

President Obama’s ‘Selfie Doctrine’
Washington Times, by Charles Hurt    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/23/2014 6:06:43 AM     Post Reply
In these selfie times when freedom, joy and posterity are just a head-tilt, grin and finger-click away, it is only fitting that the United States of America would have as commander-in-chief the undisputed King of Selfies. The Selfie Presidency for the Selfie Generation in a Selfie World. President Obama is that rightful king. There he is with the greatest baseball players of our day. The president mugging for a selfie outside the White House. Later he feigned outrage when it became public that the picture of him with Boston Red Sox slugger David Ortiz and a “44” jersey was just part of

Obama and the Most [REDACTED]
Administration in History
Reason Magazine, by Gene Healy    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/23/2014 6:00:37 AM     Post Reply
Good news: thanks to a ruling by the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Monday, the "most transparent administration in history" is going to have to tell American citizens when it believes it´s legally entitled to kill them. The lawsuit arose out of Freedom of Information Act requests by two New York Times reporters for Office of Legal Counsel memoranda exploring the circumstances under which it would be legal for U.S. personnel to target American citizens. The administration stonewalled, asserting that "the very fact of the existence or nonexistence of such documents is itself classified," and a federal district judge

How Lindsey Graham
outmaneuvered the tea party
Politico, by Manu Raju    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/23/2014 5:57:13 AM     Post Reply
SUMMERVILLE, S.C. — Sen. Lindsey Graham recognized the threat years before it had a chance to form — and knew immediately what he had to do. After the tea party wave in the 2010 election, right-wing groups were itching to get one of South Carolina’s newly elected conservative congressmen to challenge Graham, the blunt-spoken, deal-making congressional veteran of two decades. Rep. Mick Mulvaney, a favorite of the grass roots, was high on their list. So when Graham got wind in 2012 that Mulvaney wanted a seat on the House Financial Services Committee, he quietly lobbied his longtime friend, Speaker John Boehner, to

The Problem With Student-Loan Forgiveness
National Journal, by Sophie Quinton    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/23/2014 5:51:46 AM     Post Reply
If you have student loans, chances are you wish there was a way to make them disappear. And in a way, there is: The federal government now offers three repayment plans that lower monthly payments and will—eventually—forgive remaining debt. A separate plan forgives loans for people who take certain public-service jobs. Some of these options, however, are so new that nobody knows how well they´ll serve borrowers. Even when it comes to well-established repayment plans, many students don´t truly understand their options. And some analysts say that policy adjustments are needed to ensure that students don´t get too comfortable taking on

BOOM: The Left’s Favorite Talking
Point Disproved by Science
Washington Free Beacon, by Andrew Stiles    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/23/2014 5:35:05 AM     Post Reply
The Democratic Party’s obsession with income inequality and “the one percent” is factually misguided, science has found. Over the weekend, leading academic professor Mark R. Rank discussed the findings of a recent scientific study on income inequality in the New York Times. It turns out that, according to scientific data, the Left’s horror stories about a rigid class structure in the United States fueled by nefarious, wealth-hoarding one-percenters is false. “The picture drawn of the 1 percent has been that of a static population, just as the 99 percent is often portrayed as unchanging,” Rank writes. “There is a line drawn between

Raced-Based Preferences Forever
National Review Online, by John Fund    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/23/2014 5:32:21 AM     Post Reply
You can often tell when advocates of one side in an argument fear they will ultimately lose. They change their branding. A few years ago, warnings about “global warming” were replaced with scare stories about “climate change.” One reason? The Earth had stopped appreciably warming in the late 1990s, making the change a PR necessity. Supporters of affirmative action are now signaling similar weakness. What was called “racial quotas” in the 1970s and has been referred to as “affirmative action” since the 1990s is giving way to a new term: “race-sensitive admission policies.” The language shift is telling — race-based preferences

Mozilla, Duck Dynasty, Chick-fil-A,
and the politicization of everything
Daily Caller, by Casey Given    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/23/2014 5:24:53 AM     Post Reply
Would you boycott a family dinner because your grandfather holds some politically incorrect views about welfare recipients? Or, would you uninvite a neighboring family from attending a block party after learning that they attend an evangelical church that upholds a traditional definition of marriage? Most reasonable people would say “no,” adhering to the old adage that it’s rude to talk politics in polite company. Unfortunately, this rule of etiquette that has governed civil society for ages seems to be quickly evaporating in the world of commerce, as highlighted by the now notorious case of Mozilla CEO Brendan Eich. This impolite seed



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Benghazi attack could have been prevented if
US hadn´t ´switched sides in the War on Terror´
and allowed $500 MILLION of weapons to reach
al-Qaeda militants, reveals damning report

66 replie(s)
Daily Mail [UK], by David Martosko    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/22/2014 7:02:40 PM     Post Reply
The Citizens Commission on Benghazi, a self-selected group of former top military officers, CIA insiders and think-tankers, declared Tuesday in Washington that a seven-month review of the deadly 2012 terrorist attack has determined that it could have been prevented – if the U.S. hadn´t been helping to arm al-Qaeda militias throughout Libya a year earlier. ´The United States switched sides in the war on terror with what we did in Libya, knowingly facilitating the provision of weapons to known al-Qaeda militias and figures,´ Clare Lopez, a member of the commission and a former CIA officer, told MailOnline. She blamed the Obama administration

Why Does Nation Tolerate A
Habitual Liar As President?

64 replie(s)
Investors Business Daily, by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/22/2014 2:10:54 PM     Post Reply
Public Trust: Sixty-one percent polled say President Obama lies "some of the time" or "most of the time" on matters of national importance. Americans have to ask: Why do we let him get away with it? It´s no surprise that a Fox News poll of 1,012 registered voters last week found immense distrust of a president whose main domestic initiative was based on a lie. The shock is that the same poll found his disapproval level down to its lowest since last fall. Asked, "How often do you think Barack Obama lies to the country on important matters?" 37% replied "most of

Obama to free hundreds of drug
felons under clemency rules
designed to un-do mandatory
sentences from ´War on Drugs´ era

54 replie(s)
Daily Mail [UK], by David Martosko    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 4/21/2014 11:37:51 PM     Post Reply
The Obama administration is poised to entertain a flood of new clemency applications from thousands of federal prisoners who were given harsh sentences under mandatory-minimum laws following drug convictions, Attorney General Eric Holder said Monday. Holder said in a short videotaped statement that he wants to shrink the federal prison population by a modest amount while ensuring ´that those who have paid their debts have a chance to become productive citizens.´ At the center of the move is a set of old sentencing rules that punished crack-cocaine offenders with more time behind bars than users or traffickers of powder cocaine.

Dole: Cruz, Paul & Rubio
lack experience for 2016

44 replie(s)
The Hill [Washington, DC], by Mario Trujillo    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/22/2014 11:18:06 AM     Post Reply
Former Sen. Bob Dole (R-Kan.) said a number of junior GOP senators considering a presidential run in 2016 do not yet have the experience — specifically naming Rand Paul (Ky.), Marco Rubio (Fla.) and Ted Cruz (Texas). The former 1996 GOP presidential candidate sounded particularly skeptical of Cruz in an interview this week with The Wichita Eagle. "A number of the younger members, first-termers like Rand Paul, Rubio and that extreme-right-wing guy, Ted Cruz — all running for president now. I don´t think they´ve got enough experience yet," Dole said. The 90-year-old former senator said, however, his main concern about 2016 is living

Jeb Bush is your only chance
against Hillary, Republicans

42 replie(s)
Hot Air, by Bob Schrum    Original Article
Posted By: quantumman- 4/22/2014 6:32:54 AM     Post Reply
If Jeb reaches for the nomination, there will be a titanic battle between the party establishment and the Tea Party. Steve Schmidt, McCain’s strategist in 2008, insists that in the end Republicans usually settle on the most electable candidate. To get by, this Bush may be forced to trim his positions, although the cautionary tale of Romney suggests that he would have to tack artfully and carefully for the sake of the general election. Certainly he will have the resources to outlast, discredit, and disqualify his rivals.

Fraud runs rampant in Census Bureau
37 replie(s)
New York Post, by John Crudele    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/22/2014 5:03:20 AM     Post Reply
There’s a pattern of falsifying statistics throughout the entire Census Bureau. And anyone who attempts to blow the whistle on the fraud is either retaliated against or ignored, according to two new sources who have experienced the process firsthand. As I’ve been writing for more than six months, the Census Bureau office in Philadelphia uncovered a case of fraud in 2010, did nothing about it and allowed the practice to continue. In that instance, a data collector named Julius Buckmon was faking reports that went into the nation’s all-important jobless tally and consumer-inflation survey. Because the Census Bureau’s surveys are scientific — meaning

Professor: ‘Colleges Will Start Closing Up’ if
‘Racist, Misogynist, Money-Grubbing’ GOP Wins

36 replie(s)
National Review Online, by Andrew Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/22/2014 4:42:50 PM     Post Reply
New audio reveals an Eastern Connecticut State University professor warning that Republicans will “want things to go back — not to to 1955, but to 1855? if they win control of Congress in November. Republican victories could also put him out of a job, he cautioned. “We will live in a very, very, very different kind of country if that happens,” Professor Brent Terry told students in his Introduction to Creative Writing course, according to audio obtained by Campus Reform. “I mean, colleges will start closing up if these people have their way.” Over the course of his rant, Terry characterized conservatives

Jeb Bush: ‘I’m thinking about
running for president’

36 replie(s)
Fox News, by Christina Corbin    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/23/2014 3:01:45 PM     Post Reply
Jeb Bush said Wednesday he´s "thinking about running for president," in his most direct statement yet about a possible 2016 run. The former Florida governor spoke at a Catholic school benefit in New York Wednesday morning. He previously has said he´ll make a decision on whether to run for president before the end of this year, making clear that he was considering the possibility. But his comments on Wednesday appeared to be more direct. Asked what his "immediate plans" were, he said, according to an attendee: "I´m thinking about running for president." The answer was met with applause and a standing ovation, after

Reid: ´We Are a Nation of Laws,
Not of Men and Women´

33 replie(s)
Cybercast News Service, by Susan Jones    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/22/2014 10:53:27 AM     Post Reply
It may not be tomorrow, but Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) says "something will happen" to force a Nevada rancher to obey a court order to stop grazing his cattle on federal land and pay his grazing fees. "It´s obvious that you can´t just walk away from this," Reid said in an April 18 interview with a Nevada´s KSNV-TV News 3 program “What’s Your Point?” "You can´t have a law that is -- we´re a nation of laws, not of men and women," he said. (Video) Reid noted that most cattlemen pay their taxes, pay their fees, and follow

38 Republican lawmakers put aside differences
for lawsuit challenging legality of Obamacare

30 replie(s)
Washington Times, by Dave Boyer    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/22/2014 5:20:31 AM     Post Reply
Thirty-eight Republican lawmakers, including such unlikely bedfellows as John McCain of Arizona and Ted Cruz of Texas, have joined to support a lawsuit challenging the legality of the Affordable Care Act and accusing the president of repeatedly ignoring the law he signed for political reasons. The lawmakers have signed onto a legal brief in support of a lawsuit filed by Sen. Ron Johnson, the Wisconsin Republican who is asking a federal court to overturn Obamacare’s special treatment for members of Congress and their staffs. “The unlawful executive action at issue in this case is not an isolated incident,” the brief

The Five’s Beckel Rips Bolling
for Laughing at Climate Science:
‘You Are a Total, Complete Jerk!’

30 replie(s)
Mediaite, by Matt Wilstein    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 4/23/2014 8:29:47 AM     Post Reply
Today is Earth Day. Fox News’ The Five opened its show with a nearly 15 minute segment titled “Earth Day Hysteria.” The goal appeared to be to prove that scientists’ warnings about climate change are overblown and should be ignored if not outright mocked and co-host Eric Bolling was the ringleader of the effort. But he found an adversary in Bob Beckel, who challenged the status quo by presenting actual data on the rise of CO2 levels from NASA, of all places. But before Beckel got to his chart, Bolling took some time to “praise” President Barack Obama for what

Justice Sotomayor: Affirmative
Action ‘Opened Doors in My Life’

29 replie(s)
WPRO Radio [E. Providence, RI], by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: NorthernDog- 4/23/2014 12:30:26 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON -- In a dissent to Tuesday’s Supreme Court ruling upholding Michigan’s voter-approved ban on affirmative action programs in its public colleges, Justice Sonia Sotomayor speaks from experience about the complex impact of such programs on her own life. Sotomayor’s 58-page dissent, joined by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, has one theme: Race matters. (Snip) She takes a dig at Chief Justice John Roberts who wrote once, “The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discrimination on the basis of race.” Sotomayor says: “It is a sentiment out of touch with reality.” Sotomayor says, “Race matters.


Post Reply   Close thread 769981





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google



© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

NQ