A Message From Lucianne  







S-G1




























ST-GC


   
 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


It was wrong to bomb
Hiroshima and Nagasaki

Washington Examiner [DC], by Timothy P. Carney

Original Article

Posted By:StormCnter, 8/8/2013 4:32:33 AM

Ending a war is a good thing. Killing civilians a bad thing. Deliberately targeting civilians is murder, and is never morally licit, even in pursuit of a good thing such as ending a war. The tens of thousands of Japanese non-combatants we killed 68 years ago this week with two nuclear bombs were not “collateral damage” of military strikes. They were the intended targets. We hoped that mass murder would bring the Japanese emperor to surrender. It worked, and American and Japanese soldiers’ lives were probably saved by it —

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Elvira, 8/8/2013 4:46:53 AM     (No. 9463764)

I prefer the counter argument by Michael Bar one, thank you.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    41 persons like this.


Reply 2 - Posted by: ZurichMike, 8/8/2013 5:02:47 AM     (No. 9463769)

I don´t think anyone involved in the Manhattan project knew exactly what the fallout (literally) would be from using nuclear bombs.

War is nasty business -- people die, thinks break. The sooner it´s over, the better. The more we as a nation wring our hands over "those poor dears" the more our enemies will live among the innocent and use them as a literal and figurative shield to our moral angst. The faster that innocent people realize that they are being used by their own people as pawns and shields, the faster they may *do something* about it before the bomb drops.

Hate to be cold and calculating -- but the loss of another American´s life in WWII was not worth protecting the sensibilities of milquetoast westerns apologizing for a country that went on suicide missions and who hurled themselves and their children off cliffs at the behest of their emperor (instead of being captured), and who started the damn war with the US to begin with.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    45 persons like this.


   

 

R-G1
  
R-VAR_AD


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: bkt23, 8/8/2013 5:17:04 AM     (No. 9463774)

No, it wasn´t wrong. If the Japanese had the bomb, they would have used it against us. Same with the Germans.

The objective was to end the war with our side as the victors. One doesn´t fight a war with the primary concern being avoiding civilian casualties.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    51 persons like this.


Reply 4 - Posted by: Blue hen1, 8/8/2013 5:23:52 AM     (No. 9463779)

Bad Monday morning quarterbacking. It saved thousands of American lives

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    49 persons like this.


Reply 5 - Posted by: 49 Ford, 8/8/2013 5:33:52 AM     (No. 9463781)

I don´t post comments on articles I haven´t read, but I am going to make an exception this time:

PURE REVISIONIST BUNKO!

There, I feel better now.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    50 persons like this.


Reply 6 - Posted by: StormCnter, 8/8/2013 6:00:22 AM     (No. 9463792)

No one really knows, of course, how the war would have gone if the bombs hadn´t been dropped. But, I had at least one relative who was poised to be part of the first wave of a Japanese homeland invasion. He and who knows how many others were spared. That´s a very good thing.

However, I have never been completely convinced that the second bomb was necessary, Nagasaki. Opinions vary.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    53 persons like this.


Reply 7 - Posted by: FunOne, 8/8/2013 6:27:28 AM     (No. 9463808)

Yes, in 1945 the USA was committed to winning a war and demanding unconditional surrender by those who initiated hostilities on us.

If we had engaged in a "war" back then like we undertake it today, we would currently be fighting Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan.

Harry Truman would not recognize the Democrat party of today.



  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    56 persons like this.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: dman, 8/8/2013 6:34:55 AM     (No. 9463811)

In my view, a life is a life is a life. A soldier´s life is no less (and arguably more) valuable than a civilian´s life. Our culture has protected civilians as the soldiers, not they, "fight" the war. In the modern era, that is no longer the case - especially in democratic systems. Civilians give birth to, make weapons for, pay taxes to support, and otherwise facilitate the soldiers. They are, like it or not, part of the war machine. Our enemies know that and it is time for us to stop the denial. We´re all in it together.

Soldiers are not "drones" destined to die for the rest of us. They are our (and their) sons and daughters, brothers and sisters, who had the courage to step forward. War is a necessary evil that should be waged in a way to avoid unnecessary loss of life - civilian and military alike.

There are valid arguments on both sides of the decisions to bomb Hiroshima, Nagasaki, and even Dresden. We mourn the loss of all who died, were wounded, and suffered in the wars waged to preserve our civilization. We must redouble our efforts to avoid these wars as much as possible - and to settle them as quickly as possible when they cannot be avoided.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    55 persons like this.


Reply 9 - Posted by: Keekng, 8/8/2013 6:37:13 AM     (No. 9463812)

#7m Egggggzackly! My brother came home from that war thanks to the A-bomb and a president who had the guts to do his job.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    58 persons like this.


Reply 10 - Posted by: Sfacheem, 8/8/2013 6:38:52 AM     (No. 9463814)

Not only was it right to bomb Japan, we should drop one right now on Tehran.

That´s right, I said it.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    49 persons like this.


Reply 11 - Posted by: NuGoddess, 8/8/2013 6:39:43 AM     (No. 9463816)

It is difficult (if not impossible) to understand the mindset of wartime Japanese people. How do you explain the mass hysteria that produced kamikaze pilots?

Japanese physicists made an aerial inspection wrought by Little Boy and immediately knew we had exploded a nuclear device; they petitioned the military to surrender. Firebrand nationalists were convinced America was bluffing and began their campaign to immediately invade the U.S. The Japanese people were prepared to die to the last - we spared those lives with the detonation of Fat Man.

Millions of lives - both Japanese and American - and years of war were avoided because Truman had the guts to drop those bombs. One could argue the merits of such warfare but nothing written or said 70+ years later will alter those facts.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    49 persons like this.


Reply 12 - Posted by: lonestarm3, 8/8/2013 6:44:10 AM     (No. 9463822)

The use of the atomic bomb was not only the right thing to do, it would have been immoral not to use it.

US military planners had scheduled the invasion of the Japanese homeland to occur a few months later. The expected allied deaths were in the tens of thousands and injuries in the hundreds of thousands with several times as many Japanese in both categories

The utopian critics can argue till hell freezes over, but the notion of intentionally sacrificing 50 or 60 thousand of our soldiers to avoid killing a slightly larger number of the enemy is absurd.

Despicably absurd.

As to the "but they were mostly civilians" is also silly.
In total war - a war for the survival of civilization - there are no "civilians."


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    52 persons like this.


   

 

B-G1


 
Reply 13 - Posted by: uno, 8/8/2013 6:46:13 AM     (No. 9463824)

The best arguments for using the bomb was exactly what #3 mentions. the Germans and the Japanese would have used it it they had it and a way to deliver it. Don´t think there wasn´t a race on to develop atomic warfare either because there was. Just as certain as they would have used it 68 years ago, cave-men in the Middle East will certainly use them today when they finally acquire them. Of that there is no question, and when they do Liberals won´t cite the fact that for 68 years we have been responsible care-takers of nuclear technology. No, they will blame America for using it 68 years ago to end a bad war we didn´t start!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    59 persons like this.


Reply 14 - Posted by: ruready?, 8/8/2013 6:53:51 AM     (No. 9463835)

You go to war to win, not die in vain. Sheesh.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    50 persons like this.


Reply 15 - Posted by: KTWO, 8/8/2013 7:01:54 AM     (No. 9463847)

#8 is right. Truman was deciding who would die And he chose more Japanese and fewer Americans.

But it wasn´t that simple. It wasn´t heads or tails. Probably more Japanese civilians would have died if we had not bombed. Certainly their military would have.

Japan´s military was determined to fight to the end even though the war was already lost. And they still had millions of relatively able troops to defend the home islands.

In a sense the leaders of Japan, men who absolutely would not face facts, made the decision for Truman. They just didn´t know it.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    51 persons like this.


Reply 16 - Posted by: silencedogood, 8/8/2013 7:04:49 AM     (No. 9463850)

I am sure Timmy would be singing a different tune if he had been on a troop transport ship en route to Japan in preparation for invasion.



  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    52 persons like this.


Reply 17 - Posted by: Bevan, 8/8/2013 7:09:43 AM     (No. 9463854)

Timothy should study a little history. More civilians were killed by Curtis Lemay´s fire bombing of Tokyo than Hiroshima and Nagasaki combined. War is hell. More so for bedwetters that never served.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    58 persons like this.


   

 

R_DBL_B
  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: fleetusa, 8/8/2013 7:15:20 AM     (No. 9463860)

My Dad was trained to be an anesthesiologist in the medical M.A.S.H. units if we had to invade Japan. At the time they were worried about up to 500,000 casualties if the mainland was invaded based on Japanese fighting approaches in the islands.

One bomb would have been sufficient but the Japanese were so stubborn it took two.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    49 persons like this.


Reply 19 - Posted by: tanstaafl44, 8/8/2013 7:26:22 AM     (No. 9463875)

read this for the definitive response

http://vladtepesblog.com/2009/12/25/pajamas-tv-bill-whittle-speaks-on-hiroshima/

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    50 persons like this.


Reply 20 - Posted by: Peaches, 8/8/2013 7:30:19 AM     (No. 9463883)

Sneak attack at Pearl Harbor plus declaration of war against U.S. equals Japan getting its comeuppance. No Pearl Harbor and no war declaration gives you no bomb. It´s pretty obvious.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    46 persons like this.


Reply 21 - Posted by: Hermoine, 8/8/2013 7:56:21 AM     (No. 9463924)

#4 -- Not only did it save countless American lives, but it mostly likely saved many more Japanese lives. Estimates are that hundreds of thousands of Japanese would´ve died had we invaded the homeland (some even estimated that 1 million lives would´ve been lost).

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    58 persons like this.


Reply 22 - Posted by: provide, 8/8/2013 7:57:44 AM     (No. 9463930)

Boo hoo hoo. Ask the prisoners on the Bataan Death March what we should do.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    53 persons like this.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: terrywhite, 8/8/2013 8:23:06 AM     (No. 9463960)

Correction # 10, not Tehran, but Mecca! Rid the world forever of that Godless religion!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    52 persons like this.


Reply 24 - Posted by: MattMusson, 8/8/2013 8:36:15 AM     (No. 9463992)

When the Japanese invaded the Chinese coast 44 million people lived there. When they left 34 million people were still there.

We laugh now at the portrayal of Japanese in those old war movies. The reality is they were MUCH WORSE.

If you doubt me, try reading the book FLYBOYS by James Bradley and find out what the Japanese staff officers did to American POW´s at Chichi Jima.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    61 persons like this.


Reply 25 - Posted by: Old Army Vet, 8/8/2013 8:38:16 AM     (No. 9463996)

It was right.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    52 persons like this.


Reply 26 - Posted by: StormCnter, 8/8/2013 8:46:45 AM     (No. 9464014)

Forty years ago, I read David Westheimer´s "Lighter Than a Feather", an alternate history novel set during the Allied invasion of Japan´s homeland. It´s written from the Japanese perspective and I have never forgotten that book. If you can locate it, I highly recommend it.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    53 persons like this.


Reply 27 - Posted by: zephyrgirl, 8/8/2013 8:54:25 AM     (No. 9464033)

The Japanese were preparing for an invasion by the U.S. and their plan was to inflict as many casualties as they could so that the U.S.would lose heart. It took fire bombing of major cities, two atomic bombs and the threat of many more to convince them to surrender. Even at that, it took them five days after Nagasaki. Further, there was an attempted coup by junior officers of the Japanese military who wanted to fight to the death. This was not a society that was going to give up easily. Anyone who doubts this should review the battle of Okinawa (100,000 Japanese troops and 65,000 American died, and one quarter of the island population died).

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    48 persons like this.


Reply 28 - Posted by: grampus, 8/8/2013 9:07:47 AM     (No. 9464058)

At the time of the Battle of the Bulge, FDR asked about using the atomic bomb against the Germans....but learned that it was not yet ready. So much for those who inject a bit of race into Truman´s decision.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    46 persons like this.


Reply 29 - Posted by: Flashback, 8/8/2013 9:16:58 AM     (No. 9464075)

Annual revisionist crap. Tell it to the Marines.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    51 persons like this.


Reply 30 - Posted by: NorthernDog, 8/8/2013 9:49:08 AM     (No. 9464132)

Imagine the reaction from the American people if we had continued fighting Japan for another year, knowing we had 2 bombs that would quickly end the war. It was the right thing to do. It also gave Stalin pause in his attempt to grab Manchuria and northern Japan.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    55 persons like this.


Reply 31 - Posted by: toddh, 8/8/2013 10:08:49 AM     (No. 9464164)

Totalitarian regimes do not have civilians. Wanna talk aim points and factories? Thought not.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    59 persons like this.


Reply 32 - Posted by: Jennie C., 8/8/2013 10:11:46 AM     (No. 9464171)

Regarding the 2nd bomb: I have been told, by someone who was in the Philippines, poised for the invasion, that the initial Japanese thought was that we only had one bomb.

After Nagasaki, it was like, hmm, if they have two, maybe they have more. Hence, surrender.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    54 persons like this.


Reply 33 - Posted by: stablemoney, 8/8/2013 10:53:28 AM     (No. 9464251)

Send Timothy over to get Al Queda so we don´t have any collateral damage from the drones.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    57 persons like this.


Reply 34 - Posted by: BitterClinger, 8/8/2013 1:05:20 PM     (No. 9464491)

Here are two books that provide a great deal of information about that terrible time I believe too few are aware of.

Hell to Pay Operation DOWNFALL and the Invasion of Japan, 1945-1947
http://www.usni.org/store/books/ebook-editions/hell-pay

and

Downfall: The End of the Imperial Japanese Empire
http://www.publishersweekly.com/978-0-679-41424-7

Both books are available on Amazon and other booksellers.

If you read either or both you will understand what we would have faced had we invaded and also the "fog of war" our leaders had to contend with.

The books claim that the Japanese government was prepared to accept 20 million Japanese dead to achieve an armistice leaving the Japanese government at least partially intact. Our estimates, not fully shared with Truman, were a million American soldiers killed. Not casualties -- killed.

We used two bombs. There were seven more being assembled in the Philippines. MacArthur wanted to use them to destroy opposition at the beachheads.

If you read one or both of these books, you will not continue to repeat the shallow cliches about that time.

Both we and the Japanese people should be grateful Truman decided to use the bombs.




  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    57 persons like this.


Reply 35 - Posted by: harper, 8/8/2013 1:31:27 PM     (No. 9464541)

Among the many advantages of using both bombs was that it made it culturally possible for the Japanese to surrender. For every life lost on those 2 days, another 10 to 20 are alive because there was no kamikaze defense to an invasion.

No bomb, no surrender. Simple as that.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    55 persons like this.


Reply 36 - Posted by: saguni, 8/8/2013 4:22:44 PM     (No. 9464770)

One of the more vile and reprehensible actions of the modern "progressive" LIEberals is their habit of taking an event from history, stripping it of any context, then applying today´s morality to that event in order to "prove" how wrong "we" were in our history.

It fits this situation as well as the "Founding Fathers owned slaves" situation, or the "Founding Fathers thought blacks were only ´worth´ 3/5´s of a white man," two of the more common usages of this phenomenon.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    56 persons like this.


Reply 37 - Posted by: mathman, 8/8/2013 6:27:22 PM     (No. 9464962)

Had this author been consulted, I would have lost my father. He was 4-F during WW II. He got his 1-A notice in August 1945. He would have come home. Home in one of the 1,000,000 body bags which the Army had already ordered.
So don´t tell me the A-bomb was immoral.
The sole purpose of the military is to kill people and break things.
The A-bomb broke the will of the Japanese. They had no idea how many of the weapons we had (in fact we had only two at the time).
The military is called in when diplomacy fails. Japan indicated what they wanted when they destroyed Pearl Harbor. They wanted a fight to the death.
That is what we gave them.
And you can blame the partisans for the failure of the Germans to build their own A-bomb. Read about the destruction of the heavy water supply.
Bah. Humbug. Hogwash. This "person" should be sent to North Korea as a permanent resident.
Then we will see what he thinks.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    56 persons like this.


Reply 38 - Posted by: sw penn, 8/8/2013 9:43:28 PM     (No. 9465192)

To use the bomb or not...

Focus on Marpi Point.

Those who know what Marpi Point is,
don´t understand the question.

Those who don´t know what Marpi Point is,
don´t understand the answer.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    44 persons like this.



Post Reply   Close thread 747061




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"



The New Abolitionism
The Nation, by Christopher Hayes    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/22/2014 5:54:17 PM     Post Reply
Before the cannons fired at Fort Sumter, the Confederates announced their rebellion with lofty rhetoric about “violations of the Constitution of the United States” and “encroachments upon the reserved rights of the States.” But the brute, bloody fact beneath those words was money. So much goddamn money. The leaders of slave power were fighting a movement of dispossession. The abolitionists told them that the property they owned must be forfeited, that all the wealth stored in the limbs and wombs of their property would be taken from them. Zeroed out. Imagine a modern-day political movement that contended that mutual funds and

Elizabeth Warren Is Rewriting History
US News & World Report, by Brian Walsh    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/22/2014 10:31:06 AM     Post Reply
In a new book released today, Massachusetts Democratic senator and potential presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren attempts to rewrite history regarding the controversy surrounding her “Native American” ancestry that emerged in the 2012 Senate campaign. What’s remarkable is that, at least in the initial book reviews, the press largely allows her to get away with it. In fact, it’s virtually ignored that to this day Warren still refuses to release any law school records that may shed light on this controversy. To be fair, most reviews note that Warren has never substantiated her claims of Native American heritage, which is true.

Is Wendy Davis’ campaign
about to fall off a cliff?
Legal Insurrection, by William A. Jacobson    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/22/2014 5:31:55 AM     Post Reply
Wendy Davis’ campaign has had its problems. The revelation that her life story of personal struggle and triumph as a single mother was embellished was a game changer. Her campaign has had a communications problem as well, playing media favorites and putting Davis on stage with a shotgun in a Dukakis-in-tank moment. The video of Davis’ supporters mocking Greg Abbott’s disability was cringe-worthy. Her flip-flop then flop-flip on late term abortion alienated her base, as did her endorsement of open carry. All of this led the left-wing site Wonkette to issue a satirical appeal to readers, Let’s Help The Wendy

Fraud runs rampant in Census Bureau
New York Post, by John Crudele    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/22/2014 5:03:20 AM     Post Reply
There’s a pattern of falsifying statistics throughout the entire Census Bureau. And anyone who attempts to blow the whistle on the fraud is either retaliated against or ignored, according to two new sources who have experienced the process firsthand. As I’ve been writing for more than six months, the Census Bureau office in Philadelphia uncovered a case of fraud in 2010, did nothing about it and allowed the practice to continue. In that instance, a data collector named Julius Buckmon was faking reports that went into the nation’s all-important jobless tally and consumer-inflation survey. Because the Census Bureau’s surveys are scientific — meaning

Supreme Court to rule on use
of Jerusalem in U.S. passports
Washington Post, by Robert Barnes    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/22/2014 5:00:20 AM     Post Reply
After years of litigation, the Supreme Court on Monday said it would decide if Congress or the State Department has the final say in whether U.S. passports acknowledge Jerusalem as part of Israel. This touches on one of the most sensitive issues in decades of Middle East conflict, and the case also presents a major separation-of-power conflict between the legislative and executive branches. The controversy is over a 2002 law passed by Congress regarding passports. It says that a U.S. citizen born in Jerusalem may request his or her birthplace to be listed as Israel. This was an attempt to nullify

Unearthed footage shows Planned
Parenthood founder’s true mission
Daily Caller, by Eric Owens    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/22/2014 4:53:29 AM     Post Reply
In what can only be called a gracious historical act, a newsreel archive company called British Pathé has uploaded 85,000 historic films on YouTube—in high resolution, no less. The collection spans from 1896 to 1976 and there’s obviously a lot of great stuff to comb through that ranges from politics to art to culture to sports. One video that has caught The Daily Caller’s eye is the one below, in which American birth control activist Margaret Sanger (here called Margaret Slee, which was her second husband’s name) sternly demands that the women of the world have “no more babies.” The snippet was filmed

Stop the Baby Clinton Madness
Daily Beast, by Jeff Greenfield    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/22/2014 4:47:41 AM     Post Reply
Chelsea’s baby will remind voters of Hillary’s age—or it’ll make her more relatable. Or it’ll make her forget politics altogether. A look at the ludicrous search for political fallout. OK, I get it. The arrival of Baby Clinton-Mezvinsky will be a boon to Hillary Clinton’s presumed candidacy because it will humanize her, softening what remains of her Lady Macbeth image. It will prove so helpful, according to one radio flannel-mouth, that it was likely an act of strategic planning. No, wait. It will seriously, perhaps fatally, damage her prospects, because the “grandmother” label will remind people that she will be 69 in

The ‘We Do What We Want,
Bleep You’ Administration
PJ Media, by Tom Blumer    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/22/2014 4:36:44 AM     Post Reply
In the late-1970s, after a Rolling Stone review skewered his band’s latest album, Paul Kantner of the rock band Jefferson Starship fired off a nastygram the magazine printed which read (profanity removed): “We do what we want. Bleeeeeep you.” Although even then it was becoming obvious that a more generic version of Kantner’s attitude was systematically permeating the culture at an alarming rate, who could have guessed that 30 years later, his reaction would become the operating theme of a U.S. presidential administration? No one can argue that even before his 2008 electoral victory, Barack Obama and his cadre of collectivists were

Congressional Budget Office projections on
ObamaCare raise questions about future enrollment
Fox News, by Jim Angle    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/22/2014 4:24:29 AM     Post Reply
President Obama and other officials like to point to projections by the Congressional Budget Office to show that ObamaCare "is working," as the president put it. He said 8 million have enrolled in the federal exchanges, but the CBO said in a recent report only 6 million are newly insured and some say even fewer than that did not have prior insurance. "Twenty to 33 percent are actually newly insured and out of 8 million, that would be no more than 2 to 3 million people," said David Hogberg of National Center for Public Policy Research in Washington. That is

Brave Teen Repays the Woman His Father
Mugged With This Selfless Act of Kindness
Independent Journal Review, by Emily Hulsey    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/21/2014 3:55:15 PM     Post Reply
A 15-year-old boy displays compassion and bravery as he confronts a woman his father mugged, even offering to pay her back with his own money. Not only is this boy’s action incredibly admirable, but the woman’s response is just as great.

Rick Perry’s extreme makeover
Politico, by Katie Glueck    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/21/2014 3:33:46 PM     Post Reply
It’s impossible to exorcise the memories of 2012. But Rick Perry is going all out to present a new and improved version of himself — the swaggering big-state governor of old, with a dash of seasoned wise man thrown in. In the early months of 2014, his political team has booked him on one high-profile program after another: He’s joked with Jimmy Kimmel, charmed the “Morning Joe” crowd and wowed the Conservative Political Action Conference. The Texas Republican’s hip glasses are still earning approving media mentions long after he first donned them. And the possible 2016 candidate has spent time

Video: Best campaign ad of the cycle?
Hot Air, by Ed Morrissey    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/21/2014 3:22:03 PM     Post Reply
When incumbent Democrat Senator Mark Pryor (D-AR) attacked his midterm opponent Rep. Tom Cotton (R-AR) last month over his supposed sense of “entitlement” from his military service, it prompted widespread scorn and mockery — not least of which included pointed reminders that Pryor owes his own political career to his dad. The NRSC hammered Pryor and its DSCC counterparts for their “unacceptable” attacks on military service, but Cotton himself has opted for a lighter touch. He called his drill instructor to demonstrate just what military service taught Cotton, and “entitlement” doesn’t make the list:



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Obama to free hundreds of drug
felons under clemency rules
designed to un-do mandatory
sentences from ´War on Drugs´ era

54 replie(s)
Daily Mail [UK], by David Martosko    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 4/21/2014 11:37:51 PM     Post Reply
The Obama administration is poised to entertain a flood of new clemency applications from thousands of federal prisoners who were given harsh sentences under mandatory-minimum laws following drug convictions, Attorney General Eric Holder said Monday. Holder said in a short videotaped statement that he wants to shrink the federal prison population by a modest amount while ensuring ´that those who have paid their debts have a chance to become productive citizens.´ At the center of the move is a set of old sentencing rules that punished crack-cocaine offenders with more time behind bars than users or traffickers of powder cocaine.

Dole: Cruz, Paul & Rubio
lack experience for 2016

44 replie(s)
The Hill [Washington, DC], by Mario Trujillo    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/22/2014 11:18:06 AM     Post Reply
Former Sen. Bob Dole (R-Kan.) said a number of junior GOP senators considering a presidential run in 2016 do not yet have the experience — specifically naming Rand Paul (Ky.), Marco Rubio (Fla.) and Ted Cruz (Texas). The former 1996 GOP presidential candidate sounded particularly skeptical of Cruz in an interview this week with The Wichita Eagle. "A number of the younger members, first-termers like Rand Paul, Rubio and that extreme-right-wing guy, Ted Cruz — all running for president now. I don´t think they´ve got enough experience yet," Dole said. The 90-year-old former senator said, however, his main concern about 2016 is living

Jeb Bush is your only chance
against Hillary, Republicans

42 replie(s)
Hot Air, by Bob Schrum    Original Article
Posted By: quantumman- 4/22/2014 6:32:54 AM     Post Reply
If Jeb reaches for the nomination, there will be a titanic battle between the party establishment and the Tea Party. Steve Schmidt, McCain’s strategist in 2008, insists that in the end Republicans usually settle on the most electable candidate. To get by, this Bush may be forced to trim his positions, although the cautionary tale of Romney suggests that he would have to tack artfully and carefully for the sake of the general election. Certainly he will have the resources to outlast, discredit, and disqualify his rivals.

Michelle Obama:
´splurging is the key to life´

39 replie(s)
Associated Press, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/21/2014 9:31:25 PM     Post Reply
Washington - Michelle Obama said "splurging is the key to life" if you regularly eat right and stay active. Her biggest guilty pleasure: French fries. "How would you appreciate vegetables if you never had chocolate?" she asked. "You couldn´t live without a little chocolate, a little French fries." The first lady took questions from children reporters Monday after appearing at the White House Easter Egg Roll. She told the children that if they eat right the majority of the time, then a splurge or snack is not going to hurt them. "I still splurge when I can, but that's why I try to exercise almost every day," she said.

Fraud runs rampant in Census Bureau
37 replie(s)
New York Post, by John Crudele    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/22/2014 5:03:20 AM     Post Reply
There’s a pattern of falsifying statistics throughout the entire Census Bureau. And anyone who attempts to blow the whistle on the fraud is either retaliated against or ignored, according to two new sources who have experienced the process firsthand. As I’ve been writing for more than six months, the Census Bureau office in Philadelphia uncovered a case of fraud in 2010, did nothing about it and allowed the practice to continue. In that instance, a data collector named Julius Buckmon was faking reports that went into the nation’s all-important jobless tally and consumer-inflation survey. Because the Census Bureau’s surveys are scientific — meaning

Professor: ‘Colleges Will Start Closing Up’ if
‘Racist, Misogynist, Money-Grubbing’ GOP Wins

36 replie(s)
National Review Online, by Andrew Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/22/2014 4:42:50 PM     Post Reply
New audio reveals an Eastern Connecticut State University professor warning that Republicans will “want things to go back — not to to 1955, but to 1855? if they win control of Congress in November. Republican victories could also put him out of a job, he cautioned. “We will live in a very, very, very different kind of country if that happens,” Professor Brent Terry told students in his Introduction to Creative Writing course, according to audio obtained by Campus Reform. “I mean, colleges will start closing up if these people have their way.” Over the course of his rant, Terry characterized conservatives

But Seriously, Just How
Slow-Witted is John Boehner?

35 replie(s)
American Thinker, by C. Edmund Wright    Original Article
Posted By: quantumman- 4/21/2014 7:22:21 AM     Post Reply
As he moves from lobbyists to the golf course, from press conferences to the tanning bed, he remains oblivious to all that is around him. He has power, incredible power, and yet to this day he has no understanding of the election that made it so. Moreover, all around him are astonishing opportunities for him to be an historic figure -- one who could and should be the man who did more than any other single person in turning back the red tide of Obama. It’s all there for Speaker of the House, and yet John Boehner manages to miss

Would YOU be underwater if the
polar caps melted? Map reveals
what our planet would look like
if sea levels rose by 260ft

33 replie(s)
Daily Mail (UK), by Ellie Zolfagharifard    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/21/2014 5:20:21 PM     Post Reply
Global sea levels have risen by 8 inches (20cm) since 1880 and scientists predict they could rise up to 3ft (98cm) by 2100. But despite the UN’s recent threats of war, famine and extreme weather, such a dramatically different world caused by sea level rise can be hard to imagine. To help picture the future, Martin Vargic, an amateur graphic designer from Slovakia, has created a map depicting the planet with sea levels around 260ft (79m) higher than they are today. He imagines what Earth would look like if the ice sheets surrounding the North and South poles melted, releasing

Reid: ´We Are a Nation of Laws,
Not of Men and Women´

33 replie(s)
Cybercast News Service, by Susan Jones    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/22/2014 10:53:27 AM     Post Reply
It may not be tomorrow, but Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) says "something will happen" to force a Nevada rancher to obey a court order to stop grazing his cattle on federal land and pay his grazing fees. "It´s obvious that you can´t just walk away from this," Reid said in an April 18 interview with a Nevada´s KSNV-TV News 3 program “What’s Your Point?” "You can´t have a law that is -- we´re a nation of laws, not of men and women," he said. (Video) Reid noted that most cattlemen pay their taxes, pay their fees, and follow

You´re on the clock:
Doctors rush patients out the door

32 replie(s)
USA Today*, by Roni Caryn Rabin    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/21/2014 4:35:59 AM     Post Reply
Joan Eisenstodt didn´t have a stopwatch when she went to see an ear, nose and throat specialist recently, but she is certain the physician was not in the exam room with her for more than three or four minutes. "He looked up my nose, said it was inflamed, told me to see the nurse for a prescription and was gone," said the 66-year-old Washington, D.C., consultant, who was suffering from an acute sinus infection. When she started protesting the doctor´s choice of medication, "He just cut me off totally," she said. "I´ve never been in and out from a visit faster." These days,

The Increasing Desperation of Democrats
31 replie(s)
National Review Online, by John Fund    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/21/2014 5:19:02 AM     Post Reply
Harry Reid isn’t backing down from his claim that rancher Cliven Bundy’s supporters are “domestic terrorists.” It’s astonishing rhetoric given the White House’s characterization of the mass shooting by a genuine terrorist, Major Nidal Hasan, who killed 13 Americans at the Fort Hood Army base after yelling “Allahu Akbar!” (God is great.) Rather than labeling Hasan’s actions “domestic terrorism,” the Obama administration is prosecuting him for having committed “workplace violence.” Democratic rhetoric is become ever more desperate and overheated as we approach the November midterm elections. Last week, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi said that GOP positions on immigration were motivated by

Benghazi attack could have been prevented if
US hadn´t ´switched sides in the War on Terror´
and allowed $500 MILLION of weapons to reach
al-Qaeda militants, reveals damning report

31 replie(s)
Daily Mail [UK], by David Martosko    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/22/2014 7:02:40 PM     Post Reply
The Citizens Commission on Benghazi, a self-selected group of former top military officers, CIA insiders and think-tankers, declared Tuesday in Washington that a seven-month review of the deadly 2012 terrorist attack has determined that it could have been prevented – if the U.S. hadn´t been helping to arm al-Qaeda militias throughout Libya a year earlier. ´The United States switched sides in the war on terror with what we did in Libya, knowingly facilitating the provision of weapons to known al-Qaeda militias and figures,´ Clare Lopez, a member of the commission and a former CIA officer, told MailOnline. She blamed the Obama administration


Post Reply   Close thread 747061





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google



© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

FS