Former Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney jumped into the debate over the GOP’s future Tuesday night, warning congressional Republicans against forcing a government shutdown in their quest to stop President Barack Obama’s signature health care law. Romney addressed more than 200 donors on the shores of Lake Winnipesaukee at a fundraiser for the New Hampshire Republican Party, staged just four miles from the vacation home where he has spent much of the summer with his family. The event was closed to the media, but his office released his prepared remarks.
Comments: Given he got his clock-cleaned by Obama, he is reverting to RINO form. Don´t want political advice from losers.
Why do these RINOs say there will be a government shutdown? Everything will be funded EXCEPT Obamacare. All the disgusting departments that waste taxpayer money and do little else, will be funded. Only Monies for Obamacare will be omitted. If Obama can´t sign that bill he is the one that chooses to close the governments. These RINOs are working very hard to lose both houses of Congress next year.
It is really odd how our last nominee hasn´t said a word since he was defeated, but when he now does comes out to speak, it isn´t to provide any leadership to our side of the aisle on how to confront and win an issue; it´s how not to do something! I´m so disgusted with our leadership´s unwillingness to stand up to the president on anything!
According to Romney´s son, Romney had absolutely no interest in running for president, it was only the one son and his wife that wanted him to. This characterization hasn´t been denied. I believe the son has a private equity business and he did some solicitation at the GOP convention. Someone said of Romney that he´d fit in perfectly in Vichy. The people who paid to see Romney would probably like it fine in France.
So, the two men I campaigned for vigorously in 2012, Romney and Ryan, have now both come out against defunding Obamacare.
This loser even uses the Democrat talking points (and directs blame for the shutdown on the GOP) to make his cowardly case:
FTA: “... we need to exercise great care about any talk of shutting down government,” Romney said... “What would come next when soldiers aren’t paid, when seniors fear for their Medicare and Social Security, and when the FBI is off duty?”
Where are the folks who jumped on every Romney thread to accuse and hector anyone who questioned him or criticized him as a candidate? You can´t blame people for his loss when he failed miserably to articulate either the problems or the solutions.
Perhaps, #16, most people understand that the 2012 election is history and that now we must look ahead, all of us: Romney/Ryan voters (enthusiastic or not), stay-at-homes, pouters, write-in voters. I would suggest that Mitt Romney, Paul Ryan, Herman Cain, Rick Santorum et al are entitled to offer opinions and that no one, you included, is required to embrace those opinions. What´s the point in continuing to bait each other? Get over 2012.
#16 There´s really two separate issues that should not be conflated. - Romney and his campaign - Election Day
We can all agree to varying degrees that Romney was not the perfect candidate. For starters, he lacked a fire in the belly which gives credence to the rumor that it was really other family members who wanted him to run. Him, not so much. He was an improvement over McCain, but that´s not saying much.
Given all his shortcomings, there remained an election day decision for each of us. Tragically for this county, I believe those on the Right who stayed home in disgust or apathy or just unexcited, cost us the election. Realizing the alternative that in fact resulted, that decision is indefensible and deplorable and will remain so.
18 - blaming people for not voting for a candidate they had no confidence in, or voting for a third party is neither fair nor reasonable. If the candidate isn´t able to compel people to vote for him/her, then they are too blame.
A campaign that has to be based on "I´m the most electable" or "anyone but my opponent" is a losing proposition from the getgo.
Those few, the professional Romney enthusiasts, are too busy waiting for instructions and talking points. Rather than admit their errors, they spend time scouting antiPalin articles from various pennysavers and cryptomarxist alternative newspapers. Being disingenuous is extremely time consuming.
As to Romney, most of us knew he was never going to repeal his ugly child. The one issue that could have been used to shape the presidential campaign and remove the current White House inhabitants and the GOP sold the nomination to the only person on the planet unable and unwilling to articulate the need to repeal.
#18 That argument falls completely apart when the alternative is a lawless con man who can do great damage to this country, and do so with impunity. To stay at home on election day is to support the con man, plain and simple. People who try to justify staying home ignore the personage of Barack Obama, far and away, the worst president ever. Gimme Jimmie Carter because my disgust is only surpassed by Mark Levin, when he´s really rolling.
I think there´s a legitimate argument to be made for Romney´s viewpoint, but I´m on the other side-- that if you aren´t going to take a stand on Obamacare, then what are you going to take a stand on? I was a late supporter of Romney, and all of you who are so down on him, just imagine where this country would be now if we´d elected him instead of the Marxists now nesting in the White House. Not so bad, eh?
Calm down, this is just AP being AP which means doing the work of the Democrat party. Of course Romney has been talking since the election but he hasn´t said what AP wanted to report until now. Romney would have been infinitely better than Obama or most any Democrat, there was no good choice available.
I´ve never voted for my candidate; they´ve never make it through the runoff. But, at no time in our history was it ever more critical to vote against someone.
To those who failed to grasp this simple fact, and rejected two of the most competent and pragmatic people we ever fielded for office and condemned generations to follow, whose actions emanated from prejudice and distrust in the laws and constitutional procedures dating from birth of this country and which both candidates revered: SHUT THE HE!L up!
As to the question of the shut-down: well, it didn´t do much for Newt did it?
No, #4, Romney was nominated by Republican voters who had very little choice, given all the pygmies who were running against him.
If we want a conservative and not another McCain/Romney, then we have to find a way to convince the ego-candidates--the Bachmann types--who have no chance, to not siphon votes away from better choices...and perhaps to get the Ron Paul types not to waste their votes either.
We got the candidate we deserved based on how primary voters voted.
I am always left wondering what in the world is a "professional Romney enthusiast", or if even the ones who use the phrase so often have any idea either. Maybe there are also professional Romney denigraters? If so, both sets need to move beyond 2012.
#16 has a very good memory as to what was happening on this forum.
The Romneybots - - I was actually suspended for daring to use that term! - - were all over every thread - - trashing the Pubbie candidates AND their supporters (us) - - especially Little Ricky Santorum - - for daring to oppose the inevitable, all-powerful Mr. Mittens.
That was a low point for this forum - - from which it has happily and thankfully recovered. Let Lucianne be Lucianne!
First off Obama would be shutting down the government by vetoing the spending bill parts of which he doesn´t like. If the Republican strategy is to avoid that happening at any cost then they must do anything and exactly what Obama tells trhem to do. Not a very good strategy.
Have the guts to do what you believe to be right and let the chips fall where they may.
1n 1918, Germany, unable to neither understand nor accept defeat in the Great War, bought into the blarney that they were ´stabbed in the back by Radicals and Jews´. The rest is history. Now some insist that Romney lost because ´the Right stayed home election day´; utter malarkey and a gross slander from ignoramuses of the most loyal component of the GOP but a predictable canard from usual suspects who incessantly beat the drum for a prime facie loser like Romney. He and his water carriers deserve each other. BTW, has anyone noticed that many of these suspects have disappeared from this site? As for the Rodney King mantra, ´can´t we all just get along now because 2012 is history´; er..... no we can´t until the lesson of the marketplace is absorbed and understood. When given a choice between a D who will give them stuff and an R who will give then a little less stuff, voter choice is obvious. The GOP has trotted out many unprincipled incompetents over the past 100 years w/3 exceptions and the electorate has delivered its verdict; no further interest. Suggest the opening words at the next GOP convention (if there is one)resonate w/Santayana´s maxim; "Those who ignore the lesson of history are condemned to repeat it!"
What is it with these Republican losers. He lost. He quit in the last 3 weeks of the campaign and barely showed up for the last debate. He took my campaign contributions and refused to fight to the end. Same with John McCain. What good is their loser´s advice? Democrats all sing from the same hymnal and win with the most outrageous positions in politics, because they all believe and are in it together. (And don´t get me started on Chris Christy.)
Very well-said, #21. It´s sad to see that now Romney´s own words reveal him to be the embodiment of what many conservatives knew all along, his supporters tell the rest of us to move along, nothing to see here.
Mitt Romney destroyed his presidential chances by the way he campaigned: viciously in the GOP primaries, ineptly in the general against Obama. Romney´s favorable/unfavorable poll numbers were awful going into the GOP convention. There was no precedent for any candidate winning the presidency with numbers that bad. The Romney campaign was mirrored by many (not all) of his supporters on this site: Arrogant, divisive, and clueless. Some are still condescending to lecture us on how his defeat is our fault. Mitt Romney scorched the earth to secure our nomination and then blew it in the general against the worst president in U.S. history. Those who will not learn from Romney 2012 will condemn us all to repeat it.
In a new interview with ABC, President Obama concedes that the disastrous rollout of Obamacare has taken a toll on his approval ratings. But he believes the public´s opinion of his work will rise again. "I´ve gone up and down pretty much consistently throughout," Obama said. "But the good thing about when you´re down is that usually you got nowhere to go but up." That certainly sounds comforting for the president and his supporters. But is it true? Actually, there´s no reason Obama´s approval ratings might not continue to slide. In fact, for more than a year, Obama´s ratings have
Americans support the nuclear deal with Iran brokered in Geneva by a two to one margin, according to a new poll. The Reuter/Ipsos survey shows that 44 percent of Americans are in favor of the six-month interim agreement reached in Geneva on Saturday, while 22 percent are opposed to it. Under the temporary agreement, Iran will receive $7 billion in sanctions relief over six months in exchange for accepting restrictions on its nuclear development program. But although the agreement has been touted by the administration as a diplomatic breakthrough, critics have said it could pave the way for Iranian nuclear
On Tuesday, I mocked the Hurricane Katrina/Obamacare comparisons. Hurricane Katrina, after all, killed more than 1,800 people. Obamacare´s Web site isn´t working well yet. Ron Fournier, among others, defends the comparison, arguing that of course the crises themselves aren´t similar. The analogy is really about "the ways that Bush and Obama handled their crises, and [how] those actions changed the public´s view of their presidencies." But that´s precisely the point: The political fallout is driven by the nature of the crises. Or, to put it more starkly, reality drives politics — politics doesn´t drive reality. Start with the basic premise of
WASHINGTON — Despite the disastrous rollout of the federal government´s healthcare website, enrollment is surging in many states as tens of thousands of consumers sign up for insurance plans made available by President Obama´s health law. A number of states that use their own systems, including California, are on track to hit enrollment targets for 2014 because of a sharp increase in November, according to state officials. "What we are seeing is incredible momentum," said Peter Lee, director of Covered California, the nation´s largest state insurance marketplace, which accounted for a third of all enrollments nationally in October. California —
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Some 50 years after John F. Kennedy´s sole presidential term was cut short by an assassin´s bullets, nearly three-quarters of Americans believe Kennedy will go down in history as an outstanding or above-average president. This is the highest retrospective rating given to any of the 11 presidents who have held office since Dwight Eisenhower. Another fifth of the public sees the slain president as average, while just 3% rank him as below average or poor. Kennedy was killed on Nov. 22, 1963, and the 50-year anniversary of his assassination is being marked by a bevy of new
Who cares? That’s a common reaction — particularly in the Democratic wing of the Twitter-sphere — anytime, like this morning, we post a piece detailing President Obama’s sinking poll numbers. The thinking goes something like this: Obama isn’t ever going to have to run for reelection again, so focusing on his poll numbers — whether good or bad — is a meaningless exercise by political journalists. Except that it’s not. At all. Take a look back at the election results from the second midterm elections of presidents, which is what 2014 will be. From the end of World War II
A new poll finds former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie virtually tied in a potential 2016 matchup. Christie takes 43 percent in the Quinnipiac poll, compared with 42 percent for Clinton. Christie’s strength comes in part from his strong showing among independents: he leads among the group by 16 points, 48 percent to 32 percent. He also leads among men and white voters, and comes within 12 points of Clinton among Hispanic voters — far above 2012 GOP candidate Mitt Romney’s performance with that demographic. Clinton’s strength is with women (she leads 48-39 percent)
Senate Republicans are spoiling for a fight this primary season as they try to take back control of the party from conservative activists. The strategy: prop up the most electable candidates — even if they are more moderate than ones demanded by tea party activists — and punish those who get in their way. After witnessing the business community help save the candidacy of Bradley Byrne, an establishment-backed candidate in a GOP runoff Tuesday for a House seat in Alabama, Republican senators are calling for the same type of support from well-funded GOP groups in Senate primaries next year. “If
There is an apocryphal story about the origins of neoconservatism in the 1960s. Some liberal professors at Harvard were sympathetic to the New Left and such radical groups as Students for a Democratic Society. But one day one of these professors heard the radicals suggest burning down the Harvard library as an act of protest, and the professor suddenly realized that he had nothing in common with them at all. He organized some other professors into a vigil to protect the library at all cost. Today, the problem isn’t the New Left, but the radical right, which has dominated American
SPOTSYLVANIA, Va. — In politics, it is generally not a good omen when a candidate’s supporters argue that he still has a chance of victory — if the opponent’s supporters neglect to vote. But this was Virginia Republican Party Chairman Pat Mullins’s version of the power of positive thinking in an interview this weekend. The path for star-crossed GOP gubernatorial candidate Ken Cuccinelli, Mullins said, looks like this: “If turnout is in the 30s, the low 30s, we’re gonna win. If it gets higher up in Fairfax [in Democratic-leaning Northern Virginia], say like 40, it’s likely we won’t. I don’t
Democrat Terry McAuliffe has jumped to a 17-point lead over Republican Ken Cuccinelli in the Virginia gubernatorial race following the federal government shutdown that hit Northern Virginia hard and Hillary Clinton’s weekend visit to the state. The latest Rasmussen Reports telephone survey of Likely Virginia Voters finds McAuliffe with 50% support to Cuccinelli’s 33%. Libertarian candidate Robert Sarvis is a distant third with eight percent (8%) of the vote. Three percent (3%) like some other candidate, while five percent (5%) remain undecided. (To see survey question wording, click here.) The survey of 1,000 Likely Voters in Virginia was conducted on
PRINCETON, NJ -- Despite the highly publicized technical issues that have plagued the government´s health insurance exchange website that went live on Oct. 1, Americans´ views of the Affordable Care Act are slightly more positive now than they were in August. Forty-five percent now approve of the law, while 50% disapprove, for a net approval score of -5. In June and August, net approval was slightly lower, at -8. These results come from a Gallup poll conducted Oct. 18-20, a few days after the end of the recent government shutdown -- which centered on partisan debates over funding the healthcare
President Obama will cast growing income inequality and a decline in economic mobility as a “fundamental threat to the American dream” during a speech Wednesday in Washington. The speech will serve as an early preview for next year’s State of the Union address, according to a White House official, who said Obama would focus much of his energy over the next three years on the issue. “The decisions we make over the next few years will determine whether or not our children will grow up in an America where, if you work hard, you can get ahead,” the official said.
Good stuff from Jonathan Turley at today’s House hearing on executive power, although I regret that I couldn’t find a more user-friendly format for you to watch. There’s no compilation clip; you’ll have to make do with the C-SPAN embed by fast-forwarding to the time cues I give you and being patient while the vid buffers (and buffers, and buffers).(Snip)That brings us to point two: Even if Congress can’t stop Obama, the courts can. The problem there, though, says Turley, is that O and the DOJ have argued successfully in many cases that no one has standing to sue him
Bill Clinton, the cliché goes, was the first black president, no matter his skin color. That being the case, Barack Obama is not the first black president, or the first African-American president, if you prefer, but the first hippie president. Clinton’s southern background and lifestyle were indeed more typically black, just as Obama’s was more typically hippie. And we’re not just talking about the “Choom gang” here, scarfing “Maui Wowie” on the sands of Oahu. We’re talking about all of it, the whole multi-culti-missing-white-mother-vanished-Kenyan-father-anti-imperialist-America-is-always-the-enemy-and-don’t-you-forget-it-nine-yards. And like most hippie culture as I knew and experienced it, it wasn’t about “peace and love.” Not
During a presentation at the White House in which President Barack Obama touted the benefits of the Affordable Care Act, the president declared that his signature health care reform law was not going to be repealed. This assertion led his administration members, his staff, and audience members to rise from their seats and give the president a standing ovation. Obama said that ACA opponents’ alternative to the health care reform law is to champion repeal and going back to the health care delivery system status quo ante. He specifically cited Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY) who he said was asked directly for
A woman has revealed how difficult it is to eat healthily and stay full when living off an average food stamp budget. Melinda Moulton, from Huntington, Vermont, was one of 200 people to take part in the 3Squares Challenge, which saw her living for a week on just $36 worth of food, or around $1.71 a meal. Opting to try and eat as healthily as possible, Ms Moulton resorted to cheap foods like yogurt for breakfast, two handfuls of peanuts for lunch and lentil stew for dinner, all of which left her unsatisfied.´I don´t know how people do it,´ said
[Video] President Obama on Wednesday declared that addressing income inequality would be the focus of “all” of the White House’s efforts “for the rest of my presidency.” In a sweeping address that touched on raising the minimum wage, investing in infrastructure and ending tax breaks for the wealthy, Obama warned that the American economy has become “profoundly unequal,” declaring economic mobility the “challenge of our time.” “The combined trends of increasing inequality and decreasing mobility pose a fundamental threat to the American dream, our way of life, and what we stand for around the globe,” he said in an hour-long
Just over two weeks ago, MSNBC host Martin Bashir delivered a harsh piece of commentary that culminated in the suggestion that someone should “s-h-i-t” in former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin‘s (R-AK) mouth. Bashir offered an abject apology on his next broadcast, but a chorus of critics continued to demand action against the host. After a reported “vacation” for the host earlier this week, Bashir announced, Wednesday afternoon, that MSNBC and Martin Bashir are parting ways. Here’s the statement from Martin Bashir, via email: After making an on-air apology, I asked for permission to take some additional time out around the Thanksgiving holiday. Upon
Nineteen people stood behind President Obama on stage in the Executive Office Building Tuesday as the president kicked off a new campaign to promote Obamacare. One of those people, a young Florida woman named Monica Weeks, introduced Obama after telling the story of being struck with Crohn´s Disease at age 19 and receiving expensive treatments for several years that were covered by her parents´ health care plan — because Obamacare allowed her to remain on that plan until age 26. Now, Weeks said, she has coverage through a job. "The Affordable Care Act gives young adults who are just starting
CNN host wondered out loud on his show this evening whether the physically unfit Chris Christie could follow the "perfect physical specimen" Barack Obama into the White House: "After the perfect Barack Obama, who´s a perfect physical specimen to many people´s eyes, does it matter?" Morgan asked his guest. "Or is actually somebody very different, someone who´s much more of a regular kind of guy who likes cheeseburgers and beer, but appears to be a straight talker, somebody perhaps more of a straight talker than it appears Barack Obama turned out to be?"
Continued global warming poses a risk of rapid, drastic changes in some human and natural systems, a scientific panel warned Tuesday, citing the possible collapse of polar sea ice, the potential for a mass extinction of plant and animal life and the threat of immense dead zones in the ocean. At the same time, some worst-case fears about climate change that have entered the popular imagination can be ruled out as unlikely, at least over the next century, the panel found. These include a sudden belch of methane from the ocean or the Arctic that would fry the planet, as
Nobody could accuse the press of ignoring the fiasco-on-a-server that is HealthCare.gov. The Obamacare website’s woes are dominating coverage on the network news, the cable talk shows, the blogs and, of course, high-octane websites like POLITICO. But did the press do a good job of covering the Affordable Care Act before the health care exchanges went online—sort of—on Oct. 1? Were we adequately warned of the troubles that were to come? And now that HealthCare.gov’s problems are headline news, is the coverage of it any better? Sure, one can find a few examples of one news outlet or another warning of impending
MSNBC´s Chris Matthews will interview President Barack Obama this Thursday, the network announced Tuesday. The interview is part of Matthews´ "Hardball College Tour," and will take place at American University in Washington, D.C. According to a news release from MSNBC, Matthews, along with university students, will "discuss a variety of topics with the president including voter suppression, healthcare, the decline of confidence in the government and the overall political dysfunction in Washington." On Monday our colleagues Carrie Budoff Brown and Jonathan Allen reported that the White House is launching a coordinated campaign to return attention to why the Affordable Care Act