A Message From Lucianne  







S-G1




























ST-GC


   
 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


Gay Marriage: Bill O´Reilly
Misses the Point

American Thinker, by Monte Kuligowski

Original Article

Posted By:magnante, 4/8/2013 10:57:12 AM

During the highly publicized exchange between Bill O´Reilly and Laura Ingraham on gay marriage, O´Reilly made this statement: "There are Bible thumpers, and all they do is say, ´I object to gay marriage because God objects to it.´ You don´t win a policy debate in America with that." Really? Before central control out of Washington was imposed in 2003, policy arguments for criminalizing homosexual acts were won explicitly "with that." And because of "that," the idea of gay marriage has been unthinkable throughout the history of the American nation.

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: LudicrousSextus, 4/8/2013 11:10:33 AM     (No. 9265234)

It´s pretty amusing watching this all play out. The gay ´activist´ scenario basically antagonized the APA into removing ´gay´ from the DSM-II in the early 70´s - and pretty much every ´advance´ since then has resulted from the same thing - gay activists antagonizing people who don´t believe as they do.

And O´Reilly does miss the point - perhaps he should inform his viewers what the ´gay lobby´ has done to American children over the last dozen years of preaching ´Normal and Healthy!´ to captive grammar school kids, indoctrinating them with garbage advice - to the tune of (currently) 1000 new cases of HIV in 12-21 year old males *monthly* - the only demographic where HIV is still on the upswing.

We´re basically just watching mental health issues ´normalized´ in this country at this point.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    4 persons like this.


Reply 2 - Posted by: lostinmassachusetts, 4/8/2013 11:38:12 AM     (No. 9265291)

BOR misses the point by a mile. Has he not considered why a society should care about the sexual practices of its members, other than for religious reasons? What is as stake for a society to encourage and certify heterosexual unions, as has been the case since ancient times? Is it not to ensure it can continue to exist by producing new healthy and productive members, and stable social units (families). This is why all societies in the past (including pagan ones, which did not eschew homosexual relations) promoted and protected heterosexual marriage as the cornerstone of their social structure. Surely O´Reilly as a former history teacher should know this.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    5 persons like this.


   

 

R-G1
  
R-VAR_AD


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: mickturn, 4/8/2013 11:44:40 AM     (No. 9265305)

No Spin Zone is a Joke...more like the Bill BS Fest!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    5 persons like this.


Reply 4 - Posted by: FelineFine, 4/8/2013 11:49:19 AM     (No. 9265316)

Does anyone still watch this BORe?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


Reply 5 - Posted by: terrywhite, 4/8/2013 11:53:44 AM     (No. 9265328)

Guess Mr. Bill never heard of Martin Luther King, Jr., who marched and demanded equality for blacks while referring to and quoting what God and his justice as presented in His word, the Bible, demand. In other words, our public policy should be based on unchanging truths and righteousness, not on the whims of the day. I can´t imagine a situation where doing what is right will counter what the Bible says! In this case, it affirms that same sex relations are wrong.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    4 persons like this.


Reply 6 - Posted by: msjena, 4/8/2013 12:16:45 PM     (No. 9265364)

We never would have ended slavery in this country if we had had to deal with those Bible-thumpers. Oh wait....

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    10 persons like this.


Reply 7 - Posted by: absalom, 4/8/2013 12:20:24 PM     (No. 9265375)

Does the institution of marriage, which evolved from the dawn of man, in order to socialize children and self regulate sexual activity, pre-date its religious formalities? Yes or no. If yes, then the institution can be firmly defended as a bedrock of culture and civilization; w/o the need for quotations from the Bible, as worthy as they are. Formal religion, due to multiple self inflicted woulds, is held in low esteem by many. Using it to make the case against homosexual ´marriage´ is a weak reed and a mistake. And O´Reilly is indeed a moron.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: belwhatter, 4/8/2013 12:23:00 PM     (No. 9265382)

The Bible set out the laws for living,and there were ten commandments as well as numerous other cautionary statements and illustrations by metaphor on how to do this. The dangers of deliberately ignoring God´s laws are all around us unfortunately as man sets himself over God. Marriage is primarily for the procreation of the species and as such should be protected. Sinfully ignoring this brings a terrible result, the physical body breaks down to match the break down of moral laws.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    7 persons like this.


Reply 9 - Posted by: sunsong, 4/8/2013 12:46:54 PM     (No. 9265411)

This silly little man misses the point. America is NOT a theocracy. If you want that move to Iran or Saudi Arabia where nobody can *violate* what their good book says.

This is America where people are free to do what others consider sin. The Catholic believe that divorce and adultey and pre-marital sex are sins - but people are free to do them.

This argument was lost a long time ago. O Reilly is right. People who want to force others to live by their beliefs or their religion or their morality are immoral! It is about freedom in America and those who are attempting to abolish free will are the true sinners here.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    8 persons like this.


Reply 10 - Posted by: marthaville, 4/8/2013 12:59:30 PM     (No. 9265433)

Is O´Reilly homosexual or bisexual? We learned a few years ago he likes to talk dirty on the telephone, but his opposition to what Laura Ingraham said makes me wonder if he is intimately familiar with the practices of homosexuals.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    4 persons like this.


Reply 11 - Posted by: veritas, 4/8/2013 1:42:19 PM     (No. 9265495)

"Bill O´Reilly Misses the Point"

I think that headline might have been swiped from Taranto´s "News of the Tautological."

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    11 persons like this.


Reply 12 - Posted by: Dignitary Protection, 4/8/2013 2:06:11 PM     (No. 9265531)

In answer to #4, yes I do...BUT I DVR it. I still like Dennis Miller, Bernie Goldberg and the like but fast forward through all the liberals.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    8 persons like this.


   

 

B-G1


 
Reply 13 - Posted by: ebuilder, 4/8/2013 3:15:23 PM     (No. 9265627)

What if everything has a moral context? What if wisdom and discernment and every word in every sentence, in order to make sense, have a moral context? What if sanity itself has a moral context? So that when you try to look "fair" and "amoral" and think you can look out for everyone, including the rich bubble of the hour, your circle of "strange" and narcissist luftmenschen who do not have a controlling legal authority and do not want one -- maybe it is your side that is one dimensional. Is it better to be fair, or to be stupid? Is their a moral context for "stupid" vs. "ignorant"? "Stupid" is a stubborn schlimiel who will finally ruin a country by championing 50 equal and polyamorous internationalist moralities under one big tent, unprincipled social contract, for fairness sake -- then realize he will have to get the folks to champion the need for something like sharia law to guide all men back to the ability to make sense based on "something." "Stupid" goes forward with no vision towards the brave new world of transformed morality. Can you possibly understand this, or do you really "know not what you do?" PS -- the Army Training Manual just called Christian evangelists "extremists like Al Qiadda". Any vision of where this is going?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    8 persons like this.


Reply 14 - Posted by: Rinktum, 4/8/2013 3:40:30 PM     (No. 9265657)

Bill O´Reilly- I´d like to buy him for what he´s worth and sell him for what he thinks he´s worth.

He is so sure of his opinions that he rejects out of hand any differing thoughts from anyone else. This is not a wise man. I believe it is called being a foolish blowhard.

He needs to stick to writing non-fiction for children. He did write a great book about Lincoln that my 11 year old grandson loved.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    5 persons like this.


Reply 15 - Posted by: bemused conservative, 4/8/2013 3:52:07 PM     (No. 9265672)

I love how arguments against same sex marriage always reference what God wants, as though anyone knows. I would think that if God disapproved of homosexuality it wouldn´t exist. Of course, that´s assuming that God gives a rat´s keister about this blue dot at all.

Stop dragging "God´s will" into it and stand on your own feet. You don´t like homos. Great. Don´t marry one.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    5 persons like this.


Reply 16 - Posted by: Razorgirl, 4/8/2013 4:26:48 PM     (No. 9265708)

Have you noticed that from the start this administration has made it their goal to change the definitions of things or to rename things? Their current cause is the definition of marriage. So what will they choose next? Oh yes, no more illegal immigrant. They believe if they change the words they can more easily control the conversation. And guess what? It´s working.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    5 persons like this.



Post Reply   Close thread 730284




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "magnante"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "magnante"



Living in the New York Times World
American Thinker, by J. Paul Masko    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 4/19/2014 7:48:36 AM     Post Reply
I began reading the entirety of the first section of the New York Times at nine years old, and continued that practice, more or less, for decades.(snip) ...the power of reverence, intrinsic to what I call the “cascade” of The Times: the near avalanche-like flow and distribution of information through electronic and print networks: through like-minded network newscasts, magazines, local newspaper s, blogs, daytime talk TV, late-night entertainment, statements at media award ceremonies, the celebrity Twitterverse, etc. The cascade rolls through Saturday Night Live, Jon Stewart, The New Yorker, the mouths of third-grade teachers, Elmo, Madonna and Susan Sarandon …through

Labor Fascism in Chattanooga
American Thinker, by Mathew Vadum    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 4/18/2014 9:08:36 AM     Post Reply
As the labor movement tells the story, two months ago, the silly, ungrateful Volkswagen factory workers in Tennessee foolishly rejected the generous invitation of the company and the United Auto Workers to welcome the Detroit-killing union with open arms. In an election supervised by the federal National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), the workers in VW´s Chattanooga plant rejected UAW representation by a vote of 712 to 626. Amazingly, the UAW and the automaker both refuse to take the workers´ "no" for an answer. The two sides are acting in unison to overturn the democratically expressed will of the workers. Nullifying an election by

Bundy and ´Civil Disobedience´
American Thinker, by Rick Moran    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 4/17/2014 10:02:46 AM     Post Reply
For more than 160 years, Henry David Thoreau´s essay on Civil Disobedience has inspired Americans to "make known what kind of government would command his respect" so that we could live under that government in good conscience. Ultimately, in a free society, that´s all we have that is truly our own; our conscience. Following its dictates, says Thoreau, is the only rational way to live your life and be true to oneself. It had been years since I read Civil Disobedience and I was surpised by how Cliven Bundy´s words echoed many of the theses in the essay. Legal experts overwhelmingly agree

Soros and the Bundy Ranch
American Thinker, by M. Catharine Evans    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 4/17/2014 10:00:58 AM     Post Reply
A Soros-funded nonprofit New Yorker magazine called “one of the most important radical environmental groups in the country” has issued a statement denouncing the Bureau of Land Management‘s (BLM) decision to back away from a showdown with Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy and hundreds of supporters. A scientist for The Center for Biological Diversity (CBD) blasted BLM saying the federal agency “has a sacred duty to manage our public lands in the public interest…instead it is allowing a freeloading rancher and armed thugs to seize hundreds of thousands of acres of the people’s land as their own fiefdom.” CBD is funded by Earthjustice

More prog-on-prog class
warfare in San Francisco
American Thinker, by Thomas Lifson    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 4/16/2014 9:37:52 AM     Post Reply
If you live in flyover country, lay in a supply of popcorn and get ready to watch a continuing comedy drama being staged for your amusement by the progressives of San Francisco. The driving force is the classic dirty little secret of progressivism, greed and envy, and these deadly sins are amply on display in Baghdad-by-the-Bay these days.(snip)Yesterday, hundreds of SEIU members rallied in front of Twitter HQ to denounce the greed of the company that provides jobs and plenty of other tax revenue to assorted governments that employ SEIU members. John Coté reports for the SF Chronicle: City nurses [who

   

 



 
The New Liberal Racism
American Thinker, by E.W. Jackson    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 4/16/2014 9:20:02 AM     Post Reply
Last week we witnessed repeated efforts by Democrats to polarize the country along racial lines. Eric Holder, speaking at Al Sharpton´s conference, implied that he and the President are being treated harshly because they are black. (snip) The Republican base that Steve Israel says is animated by racism, nominated me -- an American of African descent and a great grandson of slaves -- for Lt. Governor of Virginia. They embraced me warmly, treated me respectfully and supported me enthusiastically. The liberal media on the other hand set out to destroy me. My white Democrat opponent was even caught on camera

Time for a little Koch
jiujitsu on Democrats
American Thinker, by Thomas Lifson    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 4/15/2014 9:29:21 AM     Post Reply
Harry Reid’s jihad against the Koch Brothers has already yielded a hilarious video compilation of his 134 mentions of their name. But now with new information, his Koch addiction can become a potent tool in the hands of Republicans. Call it karma, if you like, but the former boxer now leading the Senate majority has left himself wide open. It turns out that Koch Industries employees and PACs have donated to quite a large number of Congressional Democrats.(snip) The ads practically write themselves: Mary Landrieu’s Majority Leader says the Koch Brothers are un-American. [video clip]. So why did Mary accept

Megyn Kelly and the
Sandberg Head Shaker
American Thinker, by Richard F. Miniter    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 4/15/2014 9:16:05 AM     Post Reply
Megyn Kelly’s "Kelly File" is a great news show. She’s incisive, informed and customarily handles the toughest guest with aplomb. But her lengthy interview of Facebook C.O.O. Sheryl Sandberg about her second book in the Lean In series Lean In: For Graduates was a head shaker. Amazing that she of all people allowed Sandberg to restring the same old, same old, shamed, and shopworn feminist myths about women and girls and then jangle it in front of her viewing audience like something new out of the box. Indeed Kelly all but genuflected in front of this woman. Kept her on thru

It´s prog-on-prog class
warfare in San Francisco
American Thinker, by Thomas Lifson    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 4/14/2014 1:42:55 PM     Post Reply
The internal contradictions of the progressive alliance that dominates San Francisco have erupted into violence, and there is every sign it will continue. Conservatives have an opportunity if we are clever. (snip)I had not set foot on Hayes Street for at least a couple of decades when I went there last week. I was utterly shocked by the transformation, and more than that, by the hostility of some of the people I was with toward the newcomers. Twitter’s headquarters is nearby, as are other high tech firms, and around lunch time the sidewalks were crowded with brusque, expensively-dressed people hurrying

The Beat Goes On:
Opposing Obama Is Racist
American Thinker, by Lloyd Marcus    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 4/13/2014 9:31:24 AM     Post Reply
Alas, another reporter asked me the same question I have been repeatedly asked for the past five years. “As an African-American, why are you a member of the Tea Party?” It dawned on me to ask the reporter, “If you are a thinking patriotic American, why are you not a member of the Tea Party?” It is stunning that reporters cannot see the absurdity and racism against white voters in their assumption that Tea Party membership (pushback against Obama's agenda) equals racism. For the first time in U.S. history, are Americans required to submit to their president's agenda or suffer the mainstream media and Democratic party branding an R on

Justice Stevens thinks he knows
how to ´fix´ the Second Amendment
American Thinker, by Rick Moran    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 4/13/2014 9:13:10 AM     Post Reply
Retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens penned a putrid op-ed in the Washington Post claiming he knew how to fix the Second Amendment to end controversy over its true meaning. The first 10 amendments to the Constitution placed limits on the powers of the new federal government. (Snip) As Second Amendment expert and activist Clayton Cramer says, Stevens is pushing a bunch of hornswaggle. I wish that I could say that Justice Stevens was engaged in an accurate although misleading statement. But it is not even that. It is both inaccurate and misleading – and not even in a very clever way.

Why do Jay Carney and Claire Shipman
decorate their house with
Soviet propaganda posters?
American Thinker, by Thomas Lifson    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 4/12/2014 8:56:52 AM     Post Reply
The moral blindness of the American Ruling Class is on display. The Washingtonian Magazine, a glossy lifestyle and politics rag, has published a fawning profile of DC power couple Jay Carney and Claire Shipman that was a bit more revealing than intended. At the top of the piece was a photo of mom Claire with her son and daughter, flipping a fried egg in their beautiful kitchen/great room. The moral blindness of the American Ruling Class is on display. The Washingtonian Magazine, a glossy lifestyle and politics rag, has published a fawning profile of DC power couple Jay Carney and



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Kim Novak responds to post-
Oscars ridicule: ‘I was bullied.’

53 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Soroya Nadia McDonald    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 4/18/2014 5:02:40 AM     Post Reply
After presenting at the Academy Awards this year, Kim Novak didn’t want to leave her house. The Hitchcock screen siren, 81, was too humiliated to venture from her home near the Rogue River in Oregon. She read the cruel posts and Internet snark about her appearance, and it was just too much. “It got to me like it gets kids and teenagers,” she told the Associated Press. The “Vertigo” actress, considered one of the great beauties in her day, posted a note on her Facebook wall Thursday, acknowledging that she’d gotten fat injections in her face and addressing her halted

Analysis: Obama Celebrates
Eight Million ´Enrollments,´
Again Declares Debate ´Over´

45 replie(s)
Townhall, by Guy Benson    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/17/2014 8:56:28 PM     Post Reply
President Obama addressed the White House press corps today, announcing that with the final numbers in, Obamacare´s exchanges have attracted eight million sign-ups -- 35 percent of whom are "under the age of 35," he said. Several elements of his comments were misleading: (1) At first blush, the 35 percent stat is both significant and impressive. As recently as last month, the share of "young invincibles" signing up for plans was struggling in the 25 percent range, far short of the actuarial target of nearly 40 percent. A leap into the mid-30´s, while still shy of the goal, would constitute a major step, and would bode well for the risk pools'

The Folly Of The Bundy Ranch Rebellion
44 replie(s)
The Federalist, by Grace Olmstead    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/18/2014 4:21:46 AM     Post Reply
It’s the stuff of Westerns: a showdown on the desert plains, the big bad government against an underdog farmer. Though the story has only grabbed national headlines in the past several days, rancher Cliven Bundy has illegally grazed cattle on the Nevada land surrounding his farm for over 20 years. He hasn’t paid grazing fees since 1993, and refuses to renew the necessary grazing permit.(Snip)Rather than using the avenues and pathways presented to him, Bundy has staunchly declared his own law and allegiances. Unfortunately, reality doesn’t work this way. If only it did—we could rebel for paying stupid taxes, refuse to

Students Demand Acknowledgement of
Robert E. Lee´s ´Racist and Dishonorable Conduct´

43 replie(s)
Breitbart´s Big Government, by AWR Hawkins    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/18/2014 12:35:28 PM     Post Reply
A group of seven multiracial Washington and Lee University (W&L) students are demanding the school remove all Confederate flags from campus and "acknowledge" General Robert E. Lee´s "dishonorable side." According to the Roanoke Times, "seven multiracial students, calling themselves ´The Committee,´" have also demanded the school "acknowledge and apologize for participating in chattel slavery." They want recognition of "Martin Luther King Jr. Day on the undergraduate campus" and an end to "neo-Confederates" marching across campus "to the Lee Chapel on Lee-Jackson Day." The students say they will "engage in civil disobedience" if their demands are not met by September 1st. They added: "The

White House blames fox for
destroying Michelle’s garden

40 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Vince Coglianese    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/18/2014 3:59:04 PM     Post Reply
The White House is going to war with another fox — and this time, it’s personal. The Wall Street Journal reports that a red fox has been causing chaos around the White House, tripping security alarms, digging up Michelle’s garden and distracting the president from his duties. The Secret Service won’t give any details about how often the fox trips the White House’s obviously sophisticated security alarms, but rest assured, officials say, they’re watching. President Obama was apparently “stunned” to see the fox roaming freely down the oft-photographed White House colonnade, home to the world’s shortest, but most dramatic, outdoor strolls. The bushy-tailed visitor

Pelosi assists in Holy Week
foot-washing ritual

28 replie(s)
San Francisco Chronicle, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Harlowe- 4/18/2014 11:46:54 AM     Post Reply
To "honor the dignity and work of immigrants," Democratic House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi helps Bishop Marc Andrus wash the feet of two children Thursday at Saint John the Evangelist Episcopal Church in San Francisco. Pelosi also used the occasion to talk about passing HR15 - bipartisan immigration legislation that her office says would "reduce the deficit by nearly $1 trillion, secure our borders, unite our families, protect our workers and provide an earned pathway to citizenship." The Democratic leader´s ceremony coincides with Pope Francis´ similar ceremony in Rome to mark Holy Week.

Living in the New York Times World
28 replie(s)
American Thinker, by J. Paul Masko    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 4/19/2014 7:48:36 AM     Post Reply
I began reading the entirety of the first section of the New York Times at nine years old, and continued that practice, more or less, for decades.(snip) ...the power of reverence, intrinsic to what I call the “cascade” of The Times: the near avalanche-like flow and distribution of information through electronic and print networks: through like-minded network newscasts, magazines, local newspaper s, blogs, daytime talk TV, late-night entertainment, statements at media award ceremonies, the celebrity Twitterverse, etc. The cascade rolls through Saturday Night Live, Jon Stewart, The New Yorker, the mouths of third-grade teachers, Elmo, Madonna and Susan Sarandon …through

In a Hole, Golf Considers
Digging a Wider One

28 replie(s)
New York Times, by Bill Pennington    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/19/2014 10:48:33 AM     Post Reply
GREENSBORO, Ga. — Golf holes the size of pizzas. Soccer balls on the back nine. A mulligan on every hole. These are some of the measures — some would say gimmicks — that golf courses across the country have experimented with to stop people from quitting the game. Golf has always reveled in its standards and rich tradition. But increasingly a victim of its own image and hidebound ways, golf has lost five million players in the last decade, according to the National Golf Foundation, with 20 percent of the existing 25 million golfers apt to quit in the next few years. People under 35 have especially spurned the game, saying it takes too

Deadbeat on the Range
27 replie(s)
New York Times, by Timothy Eagan    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/18/2014 3:52:52 PM     Post Reply
Imagine a vendor on the National Mall, selling burgers and dogs, who hasn’t paid his rent in 20 years. He refuses to recognize his landlord, the National Park Service, as a legitimate authority. Every court has ruled against him, and fines have piled up. What’s more, the effluents from his food cart are having a detrimental effect on the spring grass in the capital. Would an armed posse come to his defense, aiming their guns at the park police? Would the lawbreaker get prime airtime on Fox News, breathless updates in the Drudge Report, a sympathetic ear from Tea Party Republicans?

Illinois Dems to offer $100 million in
taxpayer money to lure Obama library site

25 replie(s)
Investor´s Business Daily, by Andrew Malcolm    Original Article
Posted By: SurferLad- 4/18/2014 9:15:50 AM     Post Reply
First, the good news: We are close enough to the end of the Obama presidency for his crowd to talk about a presidential library. Now, the bad news: Obama´s retirement is still 1,008 days distant. Plenty of time though to round up the dough to build it somewhere. Figure they need Solyndra-style money, at least $500 million. The last two presidents – Bill Clinton and George W. Bush -- built their legacy edifices totally with private money. [Snip] However, Obama supporters have a different take. They think taxpayers should put up $100 million in public money for Obama´s library.

Every Media Outlet: Hillary
Grandkid the Most Consequential
Baby Since Jesus

25 replie(s)
Mediaite, by Tina Nguyen    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/18/2014 10:34:40 AM     Post Reply
Less than 16 hours after Chelsea Clinton announced she was pregnant, a lot of major news outlets started staring into the crystal ball of Chelsea’s womb, wondering what this currently floating zygotic multicellular being meant for the prospects of Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign, which is also a floating, zygotic, multicellular being. Their answer: The immaculately conceived Clinton child could mean everything. And no, it’s not just the fact that having a grandchild could be personally fulfilling to Hillary and Bill (mazel tov, by the way), or that a cute baby would be a sweet cherry on top of Hillary’s already

Harry Reid Doubles Down on Bundy
Ranch: ´If They´re Patriots, We´re
in Big Trouble´

25 replie(s)
Breitbart Big Government, by Kerry Picket    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/18/2014 9:39:40 PM     Post Reply
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid on Friday stood by his statement regarding embattled Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy, saying on KSNV’s What’s Your Point?, “If anyone thinks by any figment of their imagination that what happened up there last week was just people rallying to somebody that was oppressed, 600 people came in armed. They had practiced. They had maneuvered.” Reid continued, “They knew what they were doing. They set up snipers in strategic locations with sniper rifles. They had assault weapons. They had automatic weapons. And they boasted about the fact that they put women and children, in fact one

   

Post Reply   Close thread 730284





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google



© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

NQ