A Message From Lucianne  







S-G1




























ST-GC


   
 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


Rob Portman’s gay marriage epiphany
Daily Caller, by Matt K. Lewis

Original Article

Posted By:StormCnter, 3/16/2013 6:26:02 AM

You’ve probably heard that Sen. Rob Portman reversed his position on gay marriage, citing the fact that he recently found out his son was gay. Not everyone on the left is celebrating Portman’s epiphany. In fact, some observers are calling it selfish. For example, Jonathan Chait wrote, “By Portman’s own account … he opposed gay marriage until he realized that opposition to gay marriage stands in the way of his own son’s happiness.” It might surprise you to learn that I agree. This has nothing to do with whether or not gay marriage is good or bad policy,

Comments:
I´m with Lewis. I´m not sure why Portman´s gay son requires a marriage instead of a legally recognized civil union. It´s the marriage part that upsets most of us, not the gay part.

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: mws50, 3/16/2013 6:36:49 AM     (No. 9227699)

hey, Portman... How many grandkids will your son´s "marriage" produce for you?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 2 - Posted by: provide, 3/16/2013 6:45:34 AM     (No. 9227702)

If being married is happiness for gays, then it should be a requirement.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

R-G1
  
R-VAR_AD


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: WhamDBambam, 3/16/2013 6:46:30 AM     (No. 9227704)

Soooo, your oft-spouted ethics were OK until you had to change them because of someone in your family.

How Pharonic.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 4 - Posted by: artman1746, 3/16/2013 7:11:40 AM     (No. 9227721)

Thank goodness he didn´t discover his son was a pedophile. Portman might have gone on a nationwide tour supporting sex with children.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 5 - Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth, 3/16/2013 7:12:21 AM     (No. 9227723)

"Yale?"

Way to stack the deck, pops.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 6 - Posted by: altoona, 3/16/2013 7:26:59 AM     (No. 9227734)

Or does someone have photos/videos? Pardon my cynicism, but maybe this isn´t just about his son.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 7 - Posted by: cheese, 3/16/2013 7:27:09 AM     (No. 9227735)

His son is 21 years old and Portman only found out "recently" that the kid is gay? HOGWASH, the kid didn´t "turn" gay, he´s been gay all of his life and daddy is too stupid or too much of a liar to admit he´s known this since his son was a little boy.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: gerty, 3/16/2013 7:30:31 AM     (No. 9227740)

This is really off topic--but, remotely related.

Maybe that´s one of the reasons priests in the Roman Catholic Church are not allowed to get married. Sometimes emotions and family fidelity can get in the way of clear thinking.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 9 - Posted by: planetgeo, 3/16/2013 7:50:12 AM     (No. 9227768)

Apparently, becoming a Senator requires one to turn in one´s logic gene.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 10 - Posted by: MisterDickens, 3/16/2013 8:09:12 AM     (No. 9227789)

#7 hit it squarely on the head. I am so sick of being played for a fool by these fools.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 11 - Posted by: ROLFnader, 3/16/2013 8:29:55 AM     (No. 9227825)

Shouldn´t that be an epoophany?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 12 - Posted by: snapper451, 3/16/2013 8:37:31 AM     (No. 9227835)

This has to be the reason he was not picked for VP - they knew this would come out. A close family member of ours is gay but that does not change how we feel about him but it also does not change our view on gay marriage. Civil unions for the purposes of benefits, hospital visitation, etc. fine but marriage is between a man and woman, as God defined.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


   

 

B-G1


 
Reply 13 - Posted by: Liberal like Jefferson, 3/16/2013 8:46:35 AM     (No. 9227851)

Get the government out of rewarding or punishing various relationships, and this issue goes away the very next day.

I have a gay child and their union with their partner has brought about THREE wonderful grandchildren for us. Not in the usual way, of course, but they carry my name, just not my DNA.

Oh, by the way, she´s conservative to the core.

If the government wasn´t involved in playing favorites with people or companies, many other problems like political corruption would go away as well.

If you want "traditional" marriage, read the history books. For much of history, traditional marriage involved polygamy.

Throughout history, gays have made up around 3% of every society, except for Islamic ones where they will likely be beheaded for admitting it.

As my daughter once told me: "Do you think I would have chosen this for my life with all we have to endure? It´s far easier to be straight."

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 14 - Posted by: BeatleJeff, 3/16/2013 8:54:06 AM     (No. 9227861)

Spineless

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 15 - Posted by: Fiesta del sol, 3/16/2013 9:14:23 AM     (No. 9227897)

I´m sick of being told that I´m a hater because I don´t agree with gay marriage. It was bad enough when liberals did it. Just because I don´t want gay marriage doesn´t mean I hate gay people. The Republican party is going to lose a lot of social conservative votes over this. Why wouldn´t a social conservative believe that Republicans will cave on abortion next?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 16 - Posted by: fobo, 3/16/2013 9:17:25 AM     (No. 9227902)

I think OP nails it. Nobody really cares what consenting adults do with each other in private, but I chafe at calling these relationships a marriage and I´m surely not alone. As, I think, Hillary Clinton, of all folks, once said, "words mean things."

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 17 - Posted by: tennisbum, 3/16/2013 9:21:08 AM     (No. 9227906)

Portman´s moral foundation is built firmly with sand! Just amazing. What could be the next revelation from Portman....just wait.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

R_DBL_B
  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: Boneshaker, 3/16/2013 9:22:33 AM     (No. 9227908)

So, it turns out that not only is Portman a smarmy, self righteous prig.

He´s a gullible, smarmy, self righteous prig.
.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 19 - Posted by: JAN, 3/16/2013 9:26:24 AM     (No. 9227912)

Glad he wasn´t the veep choice. He creeped me out every time I saw him on TV.

That said, we cannot be intellectually honest in condemning him without remembering Vice President Cheney´s stand that the states have the right to choose whether gays should marry.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 20 - Posted by: Dallasobg, 3/16/2013 9:36:58 AM     (No. 9227928)

Thank you, #13, for your post. I have so many wonderful gay friends and it hurts me to see such hateful comments here.

Several of them are conservative and are harshly criticized for belonging to a party which turns its´ back on gays (see CPAC).

Bless you, #13, and Rob Portman, Dick Chaney, Newt Gingrich, and all the others who have gay family members who deserve their love and support.



  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 21 - Posted by: noproblems, 3/16/2013 9:38:02 AM     (No. 9227930)

#13, there is a relationship between morality and the laws passed by our reprentatives.


Libertarians beleive in nothing other than self-interest.

by your logic polygamy should be legal, as well as marrying your horse.



  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 22 - Posted by: coldborezero, 3/16/2013 9:47:57 AM     (No. 9227946)

Re#13: So, you believe that your daughter and her "partner" are joined in Holy Matrimony in the eyes of God? I suppose that would be true if your god is the State.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: Belle, 3/16/2013 9:50:57 AM     (No. 9227954)

I think the GOP should think long and hard about assuming all conservatives oppose gay marriage. I think there are many fiscal conservatives who think personal actions - as long as not illegal are not our business. Many know gay people and want them treated kindly. I think the GOP should come up with a platform supporting civil unions or marriage but stating religious organizations who don´t want them don´t have to perform them. Hard core opposition and vitriolic views alienate a big segment. We should be a big tent. This issue plays in the hands of liberals. We need to get pas it and recognize there are many different views on this issue.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 24 - Posted by: msjena, 3/16/2013 10:09:58 AM     (No. 9227989)

After the civil union law passed in Illinois, adoption agencies that declined to evaluate prospective gay foster parents on religious grounds had their contracts terminated by the state. There is also a push for gay marriage in Illinois, despite the civil union law.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 25 - Posted by: Philipsonh, 3/16/2013 10:16:37 AM     (No. 9228007)

One can love a child without agreeing with their life-style. Not an equivalent, but mothers visit their children in jail, no matter what reason they are in there for.
They don´t condone the crime, but still love the child.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 26 - Posted by: shurnuff, 3/16/2013 10:38:30 AM     (No. 9228042)

I certainly agree with #13 about this:

Get the government out of rewarding or punishing various relationships, and this issue goes away the very next day.


This is the stance our conservatives should take going into elections. It was solely because democrats purposefully inserted the then-non-issue of birth control at the first debate that cost us the election.
Dems played their game well... it was a pure briar patch moment; and those conservatives running for office just kept fumbling the ball, answering questions that were not relevant to that election and should not have been asked.

If our side took that position and stood by it firmly, it would be a totally different ballgame.


#13´s statement is so simple that it could be a game changer.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 27 - Posted by: Liberal like Jefferson, 3/16/2013 10:44:03 AM     (No. 9228051)

#22 you are reading WAY too much into my post. I said nothing of the sort. What the heck is Holy Matrimony in the eyes of God? That´s not how they define their relationship.

If someone wants to "marry" their horse, I´m fine with that. It´s simply not the government´s role to play favorites with our tax monies. She believes the same thing.

I don´t care if it´s with banks, car companies, "green" energy, or "marriage".

She and her parner are great, tax-paying citizens raising great kids. They pay their bills, and live quiet, respectful lives. They are loved by their coworkers, neighbors and friends.

If you don´t want to "recognize" their relationship in the eyes of your church, fine, but don´t presume to speak for God. Wife and I are Christian, and we always see a red flag when someone loves to speak for God.





  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 28 - Posted by: St. Pitbull, 3/16/2013 10:51:18 AM     (No. 9228064)

I know of few conservatives who have problems with gay people. I know of lots of liberals that do, though. Ask a black person on the street. But marriage - no. There are tons of practical reasons to oppose, just read Ann Coulter´s column from a couple of years ago. And contrary to what lots of people say - there are a large percentage of gays who are gay by choice (they are not really gay - they just subscribe to the gay life style). Just ask any gay person.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 29 - Posted by: kono, 3/16/2013 10:55:11 AM     (No. 9228073)

Discovering that a relative of yours (even an immediate relative) doesn´t have the power to make real something that´s not. Relationships between same-sex couples are NOT just like man-woman relationships. So legislating that the two be affirmed as the same is legislating a lie.

Reality doesn´t conform to our desire or our will. Relativism is a form of dementia.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 30 - Posted by: J F Ackerman, 3/16/2013 10:59:09 AM     (No. 9228082)

Rob Portman´s son´s "happiness" comes before... ? Yet another politician for whom there are no limits.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 31 - Posted by: kono, 3/16/2013 11:00:23 AM     (No. 9228085)

(sorry -- premature end of remark)

If we´re going to pass a law that says gay marriage is the same as traditional marriage, let´s legislate, too, that from now on, oranges are apples. (And let´s dismiss every disagreement as ´bigoted´ and every person opposing it as ´hateful´.)

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 32 - Posted by: msjena, 3/16/2013 11:09:56 AM     (No. 9228103)

#27--shouldn´t the government want to encourage traditional marriages? We are already in a crisis state as to traditional marriage, with the high divorce rate and having children out of wedlock. The social costs are enormous. Taking away the marital deduction or other benefits would drive the nail in the coffin. The government should to more to encourage (note: I said encourage, not mandate) traditional marriage, not less.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 33 - Posted by: DocH, 3/16/2013 11:10:27 AM     (No. 9228106)

No. 28 says he and his wife are Christians who always see red when someone purports to speak for God.

Guess that doesn´t include them, though, because they seem pretty certain what the Bible says doesn´t count, and who could have told them that except God? (Unless it was some other spirit.)

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 34 - Posted by: Liberal like Jefferson, 3/16/2013 11:31:57 AM     (No. 9228134)

Persnally, #28, we use Scripture to measure ourselves, and not measure others.

I don´t know what God thinks of my child´s relationship. That between her and Him. He made her. She talks to Him.

I don´t presume to quote Scriptures and then use that to control or demean the lives of others.

Please point out where I say I am determining what "counts" acording to God. Pro tip: Don´t bother. I never stated that.



  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 35 - Posted by: fritzilou, 3/16/2013 11:51:03 AM     (No. 9228158)

First princiiples are the same under all circumstances. One member of one family who deviates from first principles should not be cause to change what is. We should tolerate differences, while adhering to what is.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 36 - Posted by: fritzilou, 3/16/2013 11:53:41 AM     (No. 9228164)

First principles should not be adjusted for individual members of society. Stability is based upon adherence to a moral order; outside of that order we exhibit tolerance and love.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 37 - Posted by: coldborezero, 3/16/2013 11:59:41 AM     (No. 9228173)

Re#28: I certainly would not presume to speak for God. He has spoken for himself quite eloquently on the subject of homosexuality through the Scriptures. If one does not believe in the Christian Bible or believes and does not choose to adhere to what is there, it is no concern of mine. My position on homosexual "marriage" is the same as my position on most issues: the government should not be involved AT ALL. If two(or more) people want to live together and call it being married, I care not a whit. That is between them and God. They will stand before Him by and by. But by insisting that the government establish homosexual "marriage" by statute, it becomes a public issue and like any other public issue I will exercise my first amendment right to voice my opposition.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 38 - Posted by: Harlowe, 3/16/2013 12:34:39 PM     (No. 9228216)

It is an American tragedy that so many people are being deceived by political correctness into disobeying God’s laws and readily accepting man’s laws that violate God’s laws. Abortion violates the Commandment of “Thou shalt not murder.” Government approval of gay marriage violates the very clear admonitions cited in Old and New Testaments about that lifestyle; Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed because they were full of sin. Like nations throughout history that have lost their moral compass, America will reap what it has sown. God’s laws must, and should, prevail over man’s laws.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 39 - Posted by: Aubreyesque, 3/16/2013 1:02:45 PM     (No. 9228245)

#13 your daughter and her fellow stealer of other women´s babies can play whatever name games they want, they will. never. be. married.

You know why?

Because they aren´t STRAIGHT.

MARRIAGE is between a MAN and WOMAN...it is a BRIDGE, something that spans the gap between two genders, that creates a connection that no homosexual will EVER comprehend. EVER. What can they build if they are on the same side of the river?! Homosexuals will NEVER ´get´ the bond between a man and woman that is created in marriage because there will NEVER be that bridge.

But you know if it makes them and others FEEL GOOD to play word games, go ahead. Create lies. Everyone knows and thinks it anyway: gays will NEVER be MARRIED.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 40 - Posted by: bighambone, 3/16/2013 2:15:31 PM     (No. 9228361)

Clearly this supposed change of heart regarding same sex marriage came along because of a personal conflict of interest involving a family member. No more need be said about this particular wimpy Republican.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 41 - Posted by: Belle, 3/16/2013 2:39:10 PM     (No. 9228396)

I like the idea of coming up with a simple statement to neutralize this issue - like what # 27 said. We can agree to disagree but as long as gays are law abiding and pay their taxes - if marriage is important to them then why not? I think they just want acceptance to live their lives and not be thought of as perverts when they didn´t choose it. Maybe once they discover the marriage penalty in the tax code they´ll help get rid of it. - Or pay more taxes with the rest of us. We have bigger issues and the media will use this issue to distract from them.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 42 - Posted by: Dallasobg, 3/16/2013 4:21:54 PM     (No. 9228499)

#13: Again, thank you for your post. I am a conservative and read and participate in this site every day. Sometimes I cringe at some of the things that are said. Many of the participants here really are racist, and homophobic ( I hate both of those terms) and reinforce the stereotype we get stuck with.

I wish some of you could just hear yourselves.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 43 - Posted by: PI65, 3/16/2013 5:45:08 PM     (No. 9228560)

I think we will never win another National election. There are just too many nutty people on our side.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 44 - Posted by: kono, 3/18/2013 9:10:50 AM     (No. 9230660)

Regarding hated terms, #43 -- Why are we not allowed by our elitist re-creators to disagree with the norming of homosexuality or to dislike the efforts to prioritize their feelings over reality and truth in the law, without being dismissed as simply being AFRAID of them or HATING them?

Nobody has the right or authority to tell me what I believe or what I´ve said. And those who presume to do that are essentially trying to provoke a physical altercation.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.



Post Reply   Close thread 727367




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"



Malaysia Airlines Flight 370:
Ticket purchase adds to mystery
CNN, by Jethro Mullen & Jim Clancy    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 3/9/2014 7:26:04 AM     Post Reply
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia -- Two people who traveled on the missing Malaysia Airlines flight under the passports of an Italian and an Austrian citizen appear to have bought their tickets together. The tickets were bought from China Southern Airlines in Thai baht at identical prices, according to China´s official e-ticket verification system Travelsky. The ticket numbers are contiguous, which indicates the tickets were issued together. The new information adds to the mystery that has enveloped the fate of Malaysia Airlines Flight 370, the passenger jet that disappeared over Southeast Asia early Saturday on its way to Beijing. Italy and Austria have said that

Romney looks right
Boston Herald, by Howie Carr    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 3/9/2014 7:16:05 AM     Post Reply
“I told you so.” Those have to be four of the most satisfying words in the English language. And Mitt Romney has earned the right to speak that short sentence, over and over again, whenever he chooses. Not that he would — it would be “unbecoming,” to use one of Romney’s old-fashioned words that in 2002 had the mandarins of Political Correctness harrumphing about his “sexism,” I believe the charge was that time. But these days, Mitt looks more and more prescient, and his critics ever more deluded. First of all, Russia has become “our number one geopolitical foe,” as he put it

Obama engages in Ukraine diplomacy
from Fla. resort as Russia digs in
Washington Times, by Dave Boyer    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 3/9/2014 7:14:14 AM     Post Reply
From his weekend vacation spot in the Florida keys, President Obama called several European leaders Saturday about the crisis in Ukraine, even as Russia beefed up its military occupation of the contested Crimea region. Mr. Obama, ensconced in an exclusive resort in Key Largo, spoke individually by phone with British Prime Minister David Cameron, French President Francois Hollande and Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi. The leaders “reiterated their grave concern over Russia’s clear violation of international law and reaffirmed their support for Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity,” the White House said.

How the Other California Lives
Wall Street Journal, by Allysia Finley    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 3/9/2014 7:00:00 AM     Post Reply
Tulare, Calif. When Americans think of California, they tend to think of Silicon Valley, Hollywood and the golden coast—"a place where the grass is really greener, warm, wet and wild" as Santa Barbara native Katy Perry swoons in "California Gurls." Or they think of the liberals and environmentalists who dominate state government. Yet there´s another California, set back from the left coast, in the abundantly fertile Central Valley, which produces half of America´s fruits and vegetables; more than 98% of its almonds, pistachios and walnuts; a third of U.S. dairy exports—and Trader Joe´s Two Buck Chuck wine. This California has come

The Job Market’s February Crumble
PJ Media, by Tom Blumer    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 3/9/2014 6:45:42 AM     Post Reply
Friday morning’s monthly jobs report from the government’s Bureau of Labor Statistics showed a level of February job additions which the establishment press quickly portrayed as tremendous news. The Associated Press described the results as “a welcome surprise,” achieved “despite a blast of harsh winter weather.” Bloomberg News claimed that “the U.S. economy is starting to shake off the effects of the severe winter weather.” Reuters heralded it as an “upbeat sign for weather-beaten economy.” Opportunistic Obama administration Labor Secretary Thomas Perez crowed: “We’re moving in the right direction.” Do not be fooled. Especially be wary of “the prevailing view of economists,” which

Why won’t the White House explain how
off-budget ObamaCare money got spent?
Hot Air, by Ed Morrissey    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 3/9/2014 6:43:37 AM     Post Reply
Democrats designed the ObamaCare system to mainly fund itself. The low-income subsidies come directly from taxes levied in the so-called Affordable Care Act, as well as some other spending functions. However, it became clear early on that the Obama administration miscalculated the operational costs of ObamaCare when Kathleen Sebelius began pressuring insurers to contribute to Enroll America after the non-profit hired Obama administration figure Anne Filipic to assist HHS in preparing people for the sign-up launch in October. Republicans called this an attempt to get around the Constitution by creating new lines of funding for executive-branch operations, while they also

Missing plane mystery deepens as Malaysia
Airlines flight may have turned off route
Fox News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 3/9/2014 6:38:32 AM     Post Reply
The mystery of what happened to a Malaysia Airlines flight that disappeared with 239 people on board early Saturday appeared to deepen Sunday when Malaysia´s air force chief told reporters that military radar indicated that the plane may have turned from its flight route before losing contact. Air force chief Rodzali Daud didn´t say which direction the plane might have taken when it apparently went off route. "We are trying to make sense of this," he told a media conference. "The military radar indicated that the aircraft may have made a turn back and in some parts, this was corroborated

Will America heed the
wake-up call of Ukraine?
Washington Post, by Condoleeza Rice    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 3/8/2014 1:32:24 PM     Post Reply
“Meet Viktor Yanu­kovych, who is running for the presidency of Ukraine.” Vladimir Putin and I were standing in his office at the presidential dacha in late 2004 when Yanu­kovych suddenly appeared from a back room. Putin wanted me to get the point. He’s my man, Ukraine is ours — and don’t forget it. The “Ukrainian problem” has been brewing for some time between the West and Russia. Since Ukraine’s Orange Revolution, the United States and Europe have tried to convince Russia that the vast territory should not be a pawn in a great-power conflict but rather an independent nation that could

Israel’s Big Mistake
Mosaic Magazine, by Yoav Sorek    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 3/8/2014 1:21:42 PM     Post Reply
These words are printed in three languages, loud and clear, on big red signs beside Israeli roads leading to Palestinian-governed territories: This road leads to Area “A” under the Palestinian Authority. Entry for Israeli citizens is forbidden, life-threatening, and against Israeli law. The warning is unlikely to shock anyone familiar with Israel today. As those of us who live here know all too well, a trip inside one of these areas can indeed prove fatal. Yet the term “Israeli citizens” belies a deeply unsettling truth: not all Israelis need avoid entering these areas. Israeli Arabs come and go freely, and are even encouraged

Chevron´s U.S. win in Ecuador
case looms over cases elsewhere
Reuters, by Mica Rosenberg    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 3/8/2014 9:12:19 AM     Post Reply
Ecuadorean villagers who are trying to get billions of dollars from Chevron Corp for pollution in the Amazon jungle are ready to refocus their fight on pending suits in other countries after a setback in the United States. A scathing judgment issued by a U.S. judge this week against their lawyer will cast a long shadow over cases filed in Canada, Brazil and Argentina, where the plaintiffs are seeking Chevron assets as payment because the oil giant no longer has a presence in Ecuador. U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan handed down a 500-page decision that found American lawyer Stephen Donziger

The Satoshi Paradox
Reuters, by Felix Salmon    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 3/8/2014 5:53:55 AM     Post Reply
Newsweek wanted a scoop for its relaunch cover story, and boy did it deliver: it uncovered the identity of Satoshi Nakamoto, the inventor of bitcoin. Who then promptly came out and denied everything. Which means that one of the two is wrong: either Nakamoto is lying through his teeth, or Newsweek has made what is probably the biggest and most embarrassing blunder in its 81-year history. But before we try to work out what the answer is, it’s important to separate out the various different questions: Is Dorian Nakamoto the inventor of bitcoin, Satoshi Nakamoto? Do we, and/or Newsweek, have enough evidence to

Senate Intelligence panel staffers
took secret CIA papers years before
agency discovered them missing
McClatchy Newspapers, by Jonathan S. Landay*    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 3/8/2014 5:49:49 AM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON — Democratic staffers of the Senate Intelligence Committee obtained classified documents at the center of a bitter struggle with the CIA some three years before the agency determined that the materials had been spirited out of a secret facility and demanded their return, according to U.S. officials. The officials cited the timing of the discovery in contending that the CIA didn’t actively monitor computers used by the staffers to compile a report on the agency’s secret detention and interrogation program, but instead had to go back and scour security logs kept on all classified systems. The alleged unauthorized removal of the



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



John McCain: Ted Cruz Should Apologize
for CPAC Comments

42 replie(s)
Mediaite, by Matt Wilstein    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 3/7/2014 5:25:58 PM     Post Reply
During his speech to the CPAC crowd on Thursday, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) facetiously recalled “Presidents” Bob Dole, John McCain and Mitt Romney to make a point about how Republicans need to “stand for principle” in order to win big elections. Today, Sen. McCain fired back at Cruz during an appearance on MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell Reports. McCain said he spoke to Cruz about the comments and it was “cordial” but he took specific offense at the remarks concerning Dole. “He can say what he wants to about me and he can say anything he wants to about Mitt,” McCain said,

McCain: I want Ted Cruz
to apologize to Bob Dole

42 replie(s)
Hot Air, by Allahpundit    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 3/7/2014 6:15:52 PM     Post Reply
Via Matt Lewis, here’s Maverick once again demonstrating that “cordial relationship” in politico-speak means “two people who can’t publicly admit to hating each other but obviously do.” And it’s a cheap shot. Cruz’s point yesterday at CPAC was that Dole, McCain, and Romney lost because they weren’t conservative enough. That’s not because they’re gutless — he said specifically that they were “good” and “decent” men — but because they’re not committed, full-throated ideologues, even less so when they’re fighting for purple states in a national election. We can debate whether that’s true but there’s nothing offensive in raising the subject.

Issa apologizes to Cummings
32 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Aaron Blake    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 3/7/2014 7:46:58 PM     Post Reply
House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) apologized Thursday to his committee´s ranking Democratic member for cutting off his microphone at the end of a hearing Wednesday, according to a local report. Issa told the San Diego Union-Tribune that he personally apologized to Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-Md.). His apology comes after the House earlier Thursday voted down a motion to censure the chairman for his treatment of Cummings. Issa ended a hearing on the IRS scandal Wednesday despite Cummings´s attempt to make a statement and ask a question. When Cummings persisted in his effort to speak, Issa personally cut

The IRS’s behavior taxes credulity
32 replie(s)
Washington Post, by George F. Will    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 3/8/2014 2:53:57 AM     Post Reply
What’s been said of confession — that it is good for one’s soul but bad for one’s reputation — can also be true of testifying to Congress, so Lois Lerner has chosen to stay silent. Hers, however, is an eloquent silence. The most intrusive and potentially most punitive federal agency has been politicized; the IRS has become an appendage of Barack Obama’s party. Furthermore, congruent with exhortations from some congressional Democrats, it is intensifying its efforts to suffocate groups critical of progressives, by delaying what once was the swift, routine granting of tax-exempt status. So, the IRS, far from repenting

A New Report Shows How Young Liberals
Own the Future of American Politics

32 replie(s)
New York Magazine, by Jonathan Chait    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 3/8/2014 10:11:22 AM     Post Reply
One of the most seismic changes in American politics over the last decade has been the emergence of a sharp generational split among the electorate. The Democratic Party owes its success in the last two presidential elections almost entirely to overwhelming support among the very young, which has overcome continued conservatism among older voters. The Pew Research Institute has dominated the field of exploring the ideological cleavages among different generations. And its latest survey shows again how the liberalism of the youngest voting cohort, millennials, remains firm, and likely to continue to recast the electorate. A few charts from the survey

You betcha? Sarah Palin says she´ll run
for president if Republicans don´t find a
candidate ´who can so respect our*

31 replie(s)
Daily Mail [UK], by David Martosko    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 3/8/2014 1:43:18 PM     Post Reply
Sarah Palin, the tea-party-darling former Alaska governor who ran for vice president in 2008, is leaving the door open for a president run in 2016. ´It depends on what it is that Americans really, really want in a candidate,´ Palin said Friday night. ´If they want a fighter, if they want someone who can so respect our exceptionalism, everything that makes America great, the promise of America. And if we don´t find that, then I would run.´ [Snip] Asked who her favorite presidential hopefuls are so far, she singled out Texas Sen. Ted Cruz and Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul while

The Marriage of Obama´s Parents:
´In Name Only´?

30 replie(s)
American Thinker, by Shawn Glasco    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 3/8/2014 9:08:19 AM     Post Reply
Barack Obama´s parents were "married in name only," according to David Maraniss´s 2012 Barack Obama: The Story. But since definitions of an "in name only" marriage vary, such as "a marriage of convenience" or "a sexless marriage," and Maraniss failed to explain his claim, it is unclear what he was implying. Therefore, Obama´s oft-told nativity story must be searched for the full implications of Obama´s parents´ "in name only" marriage. (snip) So when did Ann´s and Obama Sr.´s "whatever happened happened fast" wedding happen? For no apparent reason, confusion abounds among Obama´s biographers over the wedding date:

EXCLUSIVE: ´Spoiled´ cheerleader suing
her parents got so drunk on vodka at home
of millionaire attorney paying her fees that
she ´threw up in a sidewalk garbage can´

28 replie(s)
Daily Mail [UK], by Will Payne    Original Article
Posted By: earlybird- 3/7/2014 11:04:36 AM     Post Reply
The millionaire attorney funding a ‘spoiled’ cheerleader’s lawsuit against her own parents let the teenager drink in his house, threw ‘alcoholic parties’ and apparently allowed her to have her first drop of booze, according to court documents. When Rachel Canning was a 15-year-old freshman she got so drunk on vodka at Jon Inglesino’s home that she was sick all over the sidewalk and into a garbage can after her dad Sean picked her up for a basketball game. And according to the Canning family, Inglesino’s wife Amy gave Rachel and her friends wine coolers in the back of a limo

´What´s the chance of two ex-Navy SEALs
turning up dead in the same room?´
Family and friends demand U.S. investigation
into mystery ´hookers and heroin´ deaths
on ship made famous by Captain Philips

28 replie(s)
Daily Mail [UK], by Paul Thompson    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 3/7/2014 9:41:30 PM     Post Reply
Disbelieving family and friends of an ex-Navy SEAL who died of an apparent drugs overdose on the ship made famous in the movie Captain Phillips are convinced of a ´cover-up´ and have called for a US investigation into his death, MailOnline can reveal today. The body of Mark Kennedy, a super fit, highly-decorated member of the elite fighting force, was found inside a cabin on the cargo ship Maersk Alabama - the vessel involved in a 2009 hijacking that ended with Somali pirates shot dead by SEALs. Another former SEAL, Jeffrey Reynolds, was found alongside him, also dead from a suspected drug

Bill de Blasio suffering
Hollande-like slide in approval

27 replie(s)
American Interest, by Walter Russell Mead & Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Hazymac- 3/8/2014 2:12:58 PM     Post Reply
New York City lefty Mayor Bill de Blasio was elected in a landslide with more than 73 percent of the vote last November. Yet after only two months on the job, his approval rating has been cut nearly in half, with only 39 percent of city voters expressing approval of the job he has done so far. (Snip) But this is a brutal start. For a worst-case scenario, consider the rapid slide of President François Hollande—another far-left candidate who swept into office in a landslide. He saw his approval rating crater within months of taking office; it now sits at

Caribbean nations consider
push for slavery reparations

26 replie(s)
Reuters, by Aileen Torres    Original Article
Posted By: Hazymac- 3/7/2014 5:27:04 PM     Post Reply
KINGSTON - More than 150 years after European colonial powers abolished slavery, a coalition of Caribbean nations is considering legal action to seek a formal apology and monetary compensation. Caribbean leaders meeting next week in St. Vincent are expected to study a broad legal outline for the reparations claim prepared by a British law firm. The subject of reparations has simmered in the Caribbean for many years and opinions are divided. Some see reparations as delayed justice, while others see it as an empty claim and a distraction from modern social problems in Caribbean societies. Slavery ended throughout the Caribbean

Malaysia Airlines plane
crashes in South China Sea
with 239 people aboard: report

26 replie(s)
Reuters, by Stuart Grudgings & Anuradha Raghu*    Original Article
Posted By: LittleHoodedMonk- 3/8/2014 1:35:09 AM     Post Reply
Kuala Lumpur - A Malaysia Airlines flight carrying 227 passengers and 12 crew crashed in the South China Sea on Saturday, Vietnamese state media said, quoting a senior naval official. The Boeing 777-200ER flight from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing had been missing for hours when Vietnam´s Tuoi Tre news quoted Admiral Ngo Van Phat as saying he had asked boats from an island off south Vietnam to rush to the crash site. If the report is confirmed, it would mark the U.S.-built airliner´s deadliest crash since entering service 19 years ago. Malaysia Airlines had yet to confirm that the aircraft had crashed. It said earlier in the day that no distress signal


Post Reply   Close thread 727367





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google



© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

FS