 A Message From Lucianne
Now More Than Ever Get Your Eagles Up! Lucianne Tees - in Black or White Click to Buy
|
|
How will conservatives greet Mitt Romney´s reappearance?
Washington Examiner, by Byron York
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:Desert Fox, 3/1/2013 7:30:26 AM
|
| Mitt Romney is coming back into public view. This weekend the former Republican presidential candidate will appear on "Fox News Sunday," his first interview since losing to Barack Obama nearly four months ago. And on March 15, Romney will speak to the Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington, the same event at which he declared himself a "severely conservative Republican governor" during a 2012 speech. Romney´s re-emergence is likely to be met by a mixed response from Republicans. Yes, many respect him as a decent man who has done a lot of good things in his life.
|
Comments: Like an old politician, he just needs to Fade Away!!!
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
tisHimself, 3/1/2013 7:35:17 AM (No. 9202175)
CPAC has stacked the deck with Romney and Bush loyalists, so what does the C stand for?
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Spidey, 3/1/2013 7:35:17 AM (No. 9202174)
Whatever shortcomings Romney had,they were far from Obama´s socialist attacks on the country. Romney also had a terrible team of advisers and did a poor job at utilizing technology. Still I don´t really believe he lost,the eleectin was stolen in targeted swing states.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Catherine, 3/1/2013 7:37:49 AM (No. 9202180)
I guess those who listen to Limbaugh need not appear or show interest. We aren´t good enough for this bunch of elites who still don´t get it.
I agree, the election was stolen, but Romney might have squeaked by if enough people cared about him and voted. I kept saying he was not liked and then he wimps out in the last debate. Why is he back in the news. His son said he didn´t really want to win - so stay home and bake cookies or something.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Crosscut, 3/1/2013 7:40:41 AM (No. 9202187)
None of the current mess in Washington would be going on if Romney had been elected. Obamacare would be on it´s way out, the pipeline would be under way, gas would be under three bucks and businesses would be hiring. Elections have consequences.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Malia2012, 3/1/2013 7:47:29 AM (No. 9202201)
Ahh yes, Byron York..he did a great deal to help Republicans "win" the Presidential election with his constant sniping and whining about "conservatives". We´re reminded everyday we have to look at obama just how lucky we are that Mitt Romney was NOT elected President...Thanks again, Byron, job well done...What #2 & #4 said. IMHO anyone who believes or declares that obama "won" this election really wasn´t paying attention. The same old hatin´-on-Romney-group of "gopers" appear out of nowhere. They may be gone for awhile, but can never be forgotten....OR ignored....obviously.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Donna M, 3/1/2013 7:48:02 AM (No. 9202203)
Let´s listen to what Romney has to say in this venue. I´m kind of surprised at this reemergence myself.From the clips of the Wallace interview airing on Fox, Mitt and Ann don´t have that much to say of consequence. My own thought is that Clan Romney would be moving out of the US to friendlier climes (to Mormons, business and freedom) but he may be having some last looks back, to see if there´s anything to save here.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
StormCnter, 3/1/2013 7:50:17 AM (No. 9202210)
Why would York assume conservative GOPers would do anything other than warmly welcome Governor Romney? Many of them voted for him and more of them should have, once he became the nominee. He´ll be welcomed, his speech will be cheered and then attention will be paid to the younger, newer and fresher personalities at the event. Conservatives know how to behave, Byron.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
tonyl, 3/1/2013 7:50:25 AM (No. 9202211)
100% #2. This election was stolen but the "I´m taking the ball and going home republicans" didn´t help. Mitt got 10% of the black vote nationally but didn´t get 1 single vote in 59 voting districts in Philly?? A mathematical and statistical impossibility. Once voter fraud is covered up by the media, we´re nothing more than a Venezuela and Cuba now.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Wetlandz, 3/1/2013 7:50:42 AM (No. 9202212)
One more chance for the OP to bash Romney. Guess what? We´ve got no one on the horizon for leadership now, how do ya like them apples? Our remaining guys are too green. Romney didn´t run for the office except to try and make a diff, that´s all tagg was trying to say. Now we´re not going to win midterms and Obama gets more out of control by the day. If they can treat bob Woodward like an Alzheimer´s patient why did we expect fair treatment for Romney?
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
bnrmusa, 3/1/2013 8:05:11 AM (No. 9202233)
I have great respect for Mitt Romney and his family. I´m not interested in re-hashing last year.
I wished he had won, dittoes #2 and #4.
We have a lot of work to do, and quitting is not an option. I´d be happy to hear anything Mitt has to say.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
pineledger, 3/1/2013 8:15:57 AM (No. 9202254)
I voted for and supported Romney, though he was not my first choice.
Now, however, I cannot imagine what he could say that would possibly be of interest.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Vivi, 3/1/2013 8:28:35 AM (No. 9202281)
We need every non -socialist voice in the coversation. Every one. There are no perfect conservatives and we have systemic vote issues, among other serious threats to our liberties and economy, that someone has to be brave enough to take on. The media can´t Palin everyone but they will try. All oars in the water. All skate.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
alpha91c, 3/1/2013 8:35:16 AM (No. 9202289)
Conservatives and republicans don´t want to win bad enough to beat democrats. The dems WANT to win and when the chips are down will do anything to acquire and hold on to power. Coservatives and republicans just don´t care enough to go the extra mile.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Blue-Z-Anna, 3/1/2013 8:36:20 AM (No. 9202293)
Ted Cruz / Trey Gowdy
We need people who can throw a punch and follow up with a combination.
Another Republican failure will lead to civil war or worse.
Dictatorial Socialism = Worse.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
happywarrior, 3/1/2013 8:38:12 AM (No. 9202298)
In one interview he talks about roller coaster rides and that´s it was time to get off. Really? I always suspected that, although he is extremely sharp when it comes to numbers, socially he is not the brightest bulb in the pack. Ann out-shines him in that department!
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
happywarrior, 3/1/2013 8:39:03 AM (No. 9202299)
*that it was
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
Wilko, 3/1/2013 8:40:03 AM (No. 9202302)
I doubt we´d be in the mess we´re in had Romney won.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
LouD, 3/1/2013 8:57:05 AM (No. 9202345)
Say what you want about Mitt, but as governor of Massachusetts, he left the state with a billion dollar surplus, (since spent by the dems) and did it with a democrat legislature who fought him all the time. He would have been great for the country. For you Romney haters, who would you have picked that had a better chance against the dem machine?
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
gallo3, 3/1/2013 9:10:22 AM (No. 9202373)
Romney was a good enough candidate but had a poor strategery.
Never called Obammy out for being a ´conomy wreckin´ commy, let him slide on Benghazi, and after the first debate, tried not to lose, instead of trying to win.
Chickened out on using the C word. Had he done that the Obammy Media- and Obammy himself- would have stroked out.
Then there was the cheating.
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
lostinmassachusetts, 3/1/2013 9:13:22 AM (No. 9202380)
The sensible ones will greet it with regrets that a good man like Romney was unable to wrest power from Obama and his cabal. The less sensible ones will continue to rail against Romney, the Republican Party and "RINOs" while ignoring the real enemies of America.
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
CleanhouseinDc, 3/1/2013 9:28:04 AM (No. 9202409)
Personally, I could care less. I do think he is not the "statesman" or frankly should even be out trying to be in front of anyone.
He should just go away, and live out the rest of his days enjoying his family and money, while the rest of us suffer his teams incompetence.
I´ll never hold my nose again.
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
tank, 3/1/2013 9:31:24 AM (No. 9202419)
This country would have certainly benefitted from his leadership. The discipline we´ve seen out of his team since the election is something that would have carried over to the White House. Sure would´ve been nice to have some adults back in the WH.
However, unless he´s willing to come out and throw a few punches, what does he now have to offer? He won´t be forceful enough in the interview, just as he wasn´t near the end of the campaign. So what does this give us, aside from a graceful exit off the world stage?
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
rayscain, 3/1/2013 10:18:30 AM (No. 9202528)
If Mitt had half the passion he used on his fellow republicans he would be president right now!
Not going after Obama and his marxist ways was Mitt´s downfall. And, I am sorry to say, the United States of America!!
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
TexaTucky, 3/1/2013 10:39:56 AM (No. 9202594)
Oh stop it with the "conservatives stayed home" crap. It´s not true.
The slim margin by which Romney lost to Obama was .7%. That´s POINT SEVEN percent. He got 48.1% of the vote vs McCain´s 44.5% in 2008, so the Republican share of the vote went UP !!!
Maybe I´m weird, but as a Tea partying enthusiast who despises and rails against "purist" epithets, I love Sarah Palin AND George Bush AND Ted Cruz AND Mitt Romney. I like different things about each of them just as I dislike different things about each of them. America would be a much better place right now if Romney were president, and that´s why I voted for him wholeheartedly.
|
Reply 25 - Posted by:
TexaTucky, 3/1/2013 10:42:00 AM (No. 9202601)
#23, although I clearly recognize that you were not espousing that belief about conservatives staying home, it just reminded me that some do.
|
Reply 26 - Posted by:
tomishere, 3/1/2013 10:42:49 AM (No. 9202602)
#23 I think it might be both, they never tested the get out the vote technology and it crashed on election day. I have read about three million conservatives stayed home on election day. I think we can all agree if that´s true those three million conservatives that stayed home and gave us O are traitors to their country.
|
Reply 27 - Posted by:
viking diver, 3/1/2013 11:12:00 AM (No. 9202689)
I cannot believe what I´m reading today! this is a free country, we are not bound in lockstep of who to vote for, and if we vote for someone else that doesn´t make us traitors to this country. Romney wasn´t a constitutionalist, he was obummer light. he wasn´t even center on his politics, but mainly left leaning. Romney only had to come out swinging and he would of won. Yeah there was major cheating going on and he let them get away with it. Did he want to win I think not, did not use any of the money donated to counter the democrapts attacks and get the message out. As to helping Mass out as governor he signed the romney care into law raised taxes and now their health system is in shambles and is a model of what obummer care will be in the next few years. The American tax payers have been bailing out Mass for the last few years FYI Romney, you didn´t try, you didn´t win, your rino coat was exposed, tme to go home lick your wounds and fade away into history´s dust bin.
|
Reply 28 - Posted by:
An Afternoon Walk, 3/1/2013 12:38:11 PM (No. 9202935)
I have voted Republican all my life, including twice for Bush Senior and twice for George W. I have almost all of Peggy Noonan´s books and am a conservative Catholic.
I always believed that our side were for the ordinary American heroes who made the world a better place, who made it on their own without family wealth or powerful mentors or political connections or Ivy League privilege or giving favors or marrying or sleeping their way to the top or marrying the rich and powerful.
I always believed that our side would always defend those American heroes. Then my eyes were opened when I saw how Peggy Noonan and Barbara Bush and our Republican party leaders treated Sarah Palin. Precisely because she had no real political connections, and because she blew all the other Republican players away when she walked out on that stage in 2008, our side joined in with the Left in mocking and destroying her.
I voted my conscience and dialed in Sarah Palin´s name in the presidential election and my vote was in honor of Molly, Storm, and Plu. Thank you gals for helping to open my eyes to what kind of people are in charge of the party I always defended and clung to and who are now almost indistinguishable from the nasty, dishonest, jealous, petty cowards of the Left.
|
Reply 29 - Posted by:
Rakasha, 3/1/2013 1:00:35 PM (No. 9202999)
It is interesting that Romney is expected to be treated with respect and dignity (I happen to agree with that idea), but Gingrich, Santorum, Cain, Bachmann, et. al. were told to sit down, shut up, get lost, go away.
|
Reply 30 - Posted by:
Susannah, 3/1/2013 1:06:30 PM (No. 9203015)
Well, #30, that´s a superb reason to vote for Obama (which a vote for Palin was)--to spite three posters at Lucianne.
Palin chose not to run. No one was preventing her from so doing. Not Karl Rove. Not Mitt Romney. No one. If she´d had the tremendous groundswell of support her admirers claim, nothing could have stopped her sweeping to a landslide victory. And if she is, as some claim, the bravest woman in the world, or "the only man in the Republican party," she wouldn´t have let anything stand in her way.
|
Reply 31 - Posted by:
An Afternoon Walk, 3/1/2013 1:54:17 PM (No. 9203100)
sorry for the 2nd post. I rarely post on Lucianne because of the bullying from the Palin haters. A civil conversation about SP is never possible with them, just petty insults and faux disdain and venom is the way they roll.
Just wanted to say that I forgot to add #32´s typical mocking was also an eye-opener. Look in the mirror gals, your unnecessary and constant attacks on Sarah Palin and anyone who didn´t fall in line with your bullying are your own doing.
I voted for Sarah Palin, not for "spite" (there you go again twisting the truth to suit your own agenda) but because she deserved my vote and because my conscience would not allow me to do anything less. I will stand up for her even if no one else will.
|
Reply 32 - Posted by:
absalom, 3/1/2013 2:28:11 PM (No. 9203171)
So Romney was a good man? Perhaps and so what. As the WSJ and Gallup empirically demonstrated, the real unemployment rate in ´12 was 17.2%, a level not experienced since 1937!!! And yet this ´numbers guy´ couldn´t make a case to the average voter? Romney is the quintessential definition of a feckless and inept loser. As for the ´stolen election´ canard; Romney lost every battleground state; where the Executive (Gov, Lt. Gov, AG, S´ecy of State etc) and Legislative (Senate Leader and Assembly Speaker) Branch was controlled by the R party. So they all conspired w/Axelrod and Jarrett to steal the election, did they? This is utter paranoia on full frontal display. In plain English, the voters took the measure of Romney, grasped his lack of conviction and core principle, then decided they would stick w/the devil they knew. Real simple. The assertion that ´conservatives stayed home´ is an ignorant slander advanced by Romney´s water boys who insisted that he was the man; telling all who demurred to shut up and sit down. In fact, the long suffering right of center rank and file is the R anchor and its most loyal component; despite the buffoons the DC establishment has offered up as POTUS nominees for most of the last century. All this sturm und drang is a metaphor for introspection and re-examination, a sign of vitality. A new party is on the way. Embrace it as it sets all free of the fundamentally dishonest premise that the republican party is the keeper of the flame of principled conservatism. Complete nonsense.
|
Reply 33 - Posted by:
StormCnter, 3/1/2013 2:36:54 PM (No. 9203181)
Sheesh! I find it hard to believe that any mature L-Dotter would boast about throwing her presidential vote away because of injured feelings. I consider my own vote to be more valuable than to do such a thing. I´ve voted for a lot of candidates I was not enthusiastic about, but I have never helped elect a Democrat.
|
Reply 34 - Posted by:
Rakasha, 3/1/2013 3:33:58 PM (No. 9203285)
I find it hard to believe that any mature L-dotter would accuse another of voting for a Democrat when they voted their conscience. An individual´s vote does not belong to The Party. It does not belong to demagogues or agitprops. It belongs to the individual and every individual considers their vote valuable. Just because someone does not use their vote the way another person would does not mean it is wasted or thrown away.
Let each citizen remember at the moment he is offering his vote that he is not making a present or a compliment to please an individual — or at least that he ought not so to do; but that he is executing one of the most solemn trusts in human society for which he is accountable to God and his country.
~ Samuel Adams ~
When the sturdy Roman plebeian, who lived by his own labor, who voted without reward according to his own convictions... had been changed into an idle creature ... who directly or indirectly sold his vote to the highest bidder, then the end of the republic was at hand, and nothing could save it.
~ Teddy Roosevelt ~
|
Reply 35 - Posted by:
tomishere, 3/1/2013 4:27:15 PM (No. 9203386)
#36 that´s a giant rationalization, that vote went for a candidate other than the standard bearer was a vote for Obama, it´s simple math. This is the difference between liberals and conservatives. Some would rather "vote their conscience" translation I send my country to hell so I could feel a sense of moral superiority.
I will now try to understand the logic of this. I´m going to write in Sara Palin that´s not running because our candidate is not conservative enough and some stupid people made fun of her. I will do this knowing I am helping to elect a man that hates this country and may send it over the edge destroying my life and my childrens life. Well who can argue with that logic, my leg hurts so let me shoot myself in the head. Our country may never be the same because of the actions of some people.
|
Reply 36 - Posted by:
Sunhan65, 3/2/2013 2:30:58 AM (No. 9203982)
I see we´re all here. I wish the folks who spent the past year pushing Romney, and denigrating those they felt were not pro-Romney enough, would give us all a break. That´s not a figure of speech; it´s a sincere request. No matter how many different ways people try to alibi it, the simple political facts are these: Mitt Romney lost. Every excuse put forward now to alibi his defeat is just another unintended confirmation of things folks were warned about before but refused to hear. Blaming conservatives for staying home is admitting that Romney couldn´t mobilize voters and unify the party. Blaming the media just confirms that Romney couldn´t handle the press. Blaming voter fraud confirms the warning that Romney was a born good loser who wouldn´t fight when it mattered. I´ll grant that even Mitt´s harshest critics didn´t expect him to hire a cadre of delusional morons to run his campaign.
So if you´re looking to place blame for this election, don´t pick on the folks who tried to warn you this would happen. Put it where it belongs: Mitt Romney re-elected Barack Obama. And if you were part of pushing Romney forward, you own a piece of that too.
|
Reply 37 - Posted by:
PoliticalJunky, 3/2/2013 8:18:51 AM (No. 9204231)
The person who says he/she voted their conscience by writing in Sarah Palin´s name claims that anyone who expresses shock at such action hates Sarah Palin.
What kind of logic is that? The disapproval is of the wasted vote and has nothing to do with Sarah Palin. I don´t care whose name was written in. It was wrong and helped Obama destroy our Republic.
|
Reply 38 - Posted by:
badrad, 3/2/2013 10:11:47 PM (No. 9205333)
Above poster might blame the Hard right fundamentalists that the country loves to hate and fear more that they fear the hard left human secularists and atheists.
It was in the inner city places such as in Philadelphia where the obMao machine overcame the Romney/Ryan express--which should all just lie on the broad shoulders of Mitt the Mormon.
As we eat our own as is typical of those who just will not bend in cooperation and compromise, it may surprise you with what grace Romney handles his "loss". He was a cut above most people and still is IMO. By his fruits he should be judged (I noticed it is no longer a badge of infamy to be rich as obaMao hangs out with Tiger Woods and his Missus crashes Hollywood´s big event. How do you spell Putzes?)
It will be a very big "Hoorah" from me if the Governor acts as unprecedentedly as ol´ BJC and keeps his opinions in the forefront. We need someone to speak until a successor and leader emerges. No one is fully responsive to Rove or to Rand Paul.
Opportunist Rubio and all Hispanic all the time to replace all black all the time?
|
Reply 39 - Posted by:
tisHimself, 3/2/2013 10:47:20 PM (No. 9205360)
XXXIV and XXXVIII. Reasons for optimism. Look at how many you have inspired to stand up and push back!
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Desert Fox"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "Desert Fox"
|
|
In Defense of Carbon Dioxide
|
|
Wall Street Journal, by Harrison H. Schmitt and William Happer
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/8/2013 8:57:01 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Of all of the world´s chemical compounds, none has a worse reputation than carbon dioxide. Thanks to the single-minded demonization of this natural and essential atmospheric gas by advocates of government control of energy production, the conventional wisdom about carbon dioxide is that it is a dangerous pollutant. That´s simply not the case. Contrary to what some would have us believe, increased carbon dioxide in the atmosphere will benefit the increasing population on the planet by increasing agricultural productivity. The cessation of observed global warming for the past decade or so has shown how exaggerated NASA´s and most
|
|
Meet Generation Jobbed
|
|
Wall Street Journal, by Daniel Henninger
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/8/2013 8:23:53 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Twitter has reduced historical memory to minutes, but think back to what had the political class atwitter last week. Back then the air filled with worry on the left that Barack Obama was losing his juice after the gun-control setback, the sequester backfire and the Syrian red-line roll-up. The left can breathe easy. Conservatives this week, clearly over the funk of losing to him last November, have resumed their favorite political blood sport: Tearing each other apart. The conservative tribes are at it again over that most ancient of all grievances: immigration.
|
NASA Makes Another Useless Global Warming Prediction
|
|
Investor´s Business Daily, by Editorial
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/8/2013 8:22:20 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Junk Science: A new NASA study says global warming could "increase the risk for extreme rainfall and drought." We´ve heard this sort of threat many times before and, no, there´s nothing to see here. According to NASA: "Analysis of computer simulations from 14 climate models indicates wet regions of the world, will see increases in heavy precipitation because of warming resulting from projected increases in carbon dioxide levels. Arid land areas outside the tropics and many regions with moderate rainfall could become drier." How about that? Heavy rain in soggy regions and drought in the parched ones.
|
On Immigration, Pay Attention To Milton Friedman
|
|
Investor´s Business Daily, by Editorial
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/8/2013 7:26:36 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Immigration: Free-market economist Milton Friedman once warned that open borders are incompatible with a welfare state. The $6.3 trillion cost of amnesty forecast by the Heritage Foundation illustrates it in spades. As the Gang of Eight immigration reform bill wends through Congress, it´s useful to have a report from Heritage showing just how much legalizing some 11 million unlawful immigrants will cost the taxpayers amid all the champagne-glass clinking from the anything-but-in-the-shadows illegals. Based on direct benefits such as Social Security, Medicare, unemployment insurance, and workers´ compensation; means-tested benefits, which include more than 80 different welfare programs;
|
|
Benghazi Whistle-Blowers: ´It Matters´
|
|
Investor´s Business Daily, by Editorial
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/8/2013 7:22:54 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The Scandal In Libya: Testimony by the Benghazi whistle-blowers presents clear evidence of shameful political manipulation of the truth seven weeks before an election and a willingness to let four Americans die to maintain a campaign narrative. What difference at this point does the truth about Benghazi make? In an emotional opening statement at Wednesday´s hearing of the House Oversight Committee, Eric Nordstrom, a regional security officer of the U.S. Mission to Libya from September 2011 to July 2012, answered that question with voice cracking and a simple declarative sentence:
|
Benghazi: How Do You Explain the Inexplicable?
|
|
Rushlimbaugh.com, by Rush Limbaugh
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/8/2013 5:32:47 PM
Post Reply
|
|
RUSH: Joe in Louisville. Great to have you on the program. Welcome to the EIB Network. CALLER: Great. You know, this is only the second time in my life I´ve ever really felt a need to call you because of something I felt passionate about. The first time I couldn´t get through. Being a Marine it really bothers me that our State Department has dwindled down the amount of Marines that are attached at embassies, because there´s only 1,200, at 130 different embassies, and if you had just the ten
|
Emotional Testimony Recalls Benghazi Attacks
|
|
Wall Street Journal, by Siobahn Hughes & Adam Entous
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/8/2013 5:24:59 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON—A high-ranking American diplomat delivered an emotional reconstruction Wednesday of the Sept. 11, 2012, attacks on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya, providing new details about frantic efforts to get military assistance, locate the missing ambassador and evacuate the surviving Americans. In testimony before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, Gregory Hicks, the former deputy chief of mission in Libya, recounted what he saw as unanswered appeals for help, taunting calls from the missing ambassador´s phone, the saddest conversation of his life and the frantic efforts of an office manager to destroy sensitive information.
|
We Live in an Upside-Down World: TV Networks Ignore Benghazi Hearings
|
|
Rushlimbaugh.com, by Rush Limbaugh
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/8/2013 5:23:38 PM
Post Reply
|
|
RUSH: What a shock. What an absolute shock, ladies and gentlemen. It looks like no other news network, not even cable news, is covering the Benghazi hearings, except for Fox News. We live in an upside-down world, ladies and gentlemen, where most everybody is going to ignore what happens here in these hearings, and, when it´s over, they´re going to say, "What´s the big deal anyway?" CNN has joined now. They have got Gregory Hicks and I guess it makes some kind of sense because Jacob Tapper has been front
|
|
´Stop Being a Baby´
|
|
Wall Street Journal, by James Taranto
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/8/2013 5:20:24 PM
Post Reply
|
|
How safe is abortion?" asks the frequently-asked-questions page of the Potomac Family Planning Center, a regional chain of four abortion stores in the District of Columbia, Maryland and Pennsylvania. The answer: "Very safe. Our doctors are gynecologists who have years of experience specializing in abortion care. It´s unusual to have even minor problems." Tell that to Desiree Hawkins. Kirsten Powers reported in USA Today recently on what happened when Hawkins, now 20, visited Potomac´s Hagerstown, Md., shop as a pregnant 16-year-old:
|
Congressman Elijah Cummings Sums Up Benghazi: "Death is a Part of Life"
|
|
Rushlimbaugh.com, by Rush Limbaugh
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/8/2013 5:18:26 PM
Post Reply
|
|
RUSH: Elijah Cummings is the ranking Democrat on the House committee that is investigating Benghazi, and he decried the full-scale media campaign unleashed over the last few weeks that is not designed to investigate what happened in a responsible and bipartisan way and rather to launch unfounded accusations to smear public officials. This is how he tried to characterize what´s happening today. He´s the first Democrat member of Congress to speak during the hearing today. He didn´t waste any time before going after the chairman, Darrell Issa, for what he believes was the
|
Dem Congressman At Benghazi Hearing: "Death Is A Part Of Life"
|
|
Real Clear Politics, by Ian Schwartz
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/8/2013 2:27:15 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD), ranking member of the House Oversight Committee, tells Benghazi witnesses that "death is a part of life." CUMMINGS: And, as I listen to your testimony I could not help but think of something that I said very recently -- two years ago now -- in a eulogy for a relative. I said that death is a part of life, so often we have to find a way to make life a part of death. And, I guess the reason why I´m saying that, going back to something Mr. Nordstrom said, he wanted,
|
U.S. Is Weighing Wide Overhaul of Wiretap Laws
|
|
New York Times, by Charlie Savage
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/8/2013 10:34:33 AM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON — The Obama administration, resolving years of internal debate, is on the verge of backing a Federal Bureau of Investigation plan for a sweeping overhaul of surveillance laws that would make it easier to wiretap people who communicate using the Internet rather than by traditional phone services, according to officials familiar with the deliberations. The F.B.I. director, Robert S. Mueller III, has argued that the bureau’s ability to carry out court-approved eavesdropping on suspects is “going dark” as communications technology evolves, and since 2010 has pushed for a legal mandate requiring companies like
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Hillary Clinton — culpable for Benghazi from beginning to end
|
|
Power Line, by Paul Mirengoff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/7/2013 5:14:14 AM
Post Reply
|
|
When it first became clear that the CIA’s Benghazi talking points had been altered, many of us viewed the White House as the prime suspect. After all, it served President Obama’s political purposes to claim, at the height of a political campaign in which he was taking credit for the fall of al Qaeda, that the death of a U.S. ambassador was down to spontaneous outrage over a video, rather than pre-planned terrorism. It turns out, however, that the State Department was the prime culprit. It was State that pushed back hard against the original talking points.
|
Republican probe of Benghazi attacks turns to Hillary Clinton
|
|
Washington Post, by Philip Rucker
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/8/2013 6:52:16 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Republican lawmakers, who have spent months seeking to tie President Obama to last year’s deadly attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, are increasingly focusing their probe on a new target: former secretary of state Hillary Rodham Clinton. The GOP-led investigation of the Sept. 11, 2012, assaults that killed U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and three others now centers heavily on the State Department and whether officials there deliberately misled the public about the nature of the assault. Three State Department officials are scheduled to testify before a House committee on Wednesday about the Benghazi attack and its aftermath.
|
Turning on Obama
|
|
Amerian Spectator, by Ross Kaminsky
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/7/2013 6:19:30 AM
Post Reply
|
|
If ponies rode men and grass ate cows, And cats were chased into holes by the mouse … If summer were spring and the other way round, Then all the world would be upside down. Once in a long while, an event evokes one of my favorite historical images: the British Army band, at Lord Cornwallis’ surrender at Yorktown which sealed the Americans’ revolutionary victory, playing “The World Turned Upside Down.” In this case, the event is the dramatic change over the past two weeks
|
Seattle to melt buyback guns into peace bricks
|
|
Associated Press, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: maggie2u- 5/7/2013 1:13:31 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The Seattle Police Department collected more than 700 guns during a buyback in January, and now city officials have a plan for what to do with them. Mayor Mike McGinn is expected to announce Tuesday that they´ll be melted into bricks carrying messages of peace, and the bricks will be placed around the city. The buyback program was announced a month after last December´s elementary school massacre in Newtown, Conn., by city leaders sick of hearing about gun violence. Private sponsors including Amazon.com contributed tens of thousands of dollars
|
Sanford gets second chance: On political scrapheap 4 years ago, ex-governor wins 1st district seat
|
|
Post & Courier [Charleston, SC], by Glenn Smith*
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Attercliffe- 5/8/2013 12:59:28 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Former Gov. Mark Sanford completed the trail to political redemption Tuesday with a win over Democrat Elizabeth Colbert Busch to reclaim his old seat in Congress. Sanford defeated Colbert Busch 54 percent to 45 percent, according to full unofficial results. Turnout was heavier than expected, with about 32 percent of the district’s 455,702 registered voters casting ballots. Sanford, who has never lost an election, returns to the 1st District seat he held for three terms from 1995-2001. It’s a remarkable comeback for a man many pundits had written off after his highly publicized affair with an Argentine
|
Dem Congressman At Benghazi Hearing: "Death Is A Part Of Life"
|
|
Real Clear Politics, by Ian Schwartz
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/8/2013 2:27:15 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD), ranking member of the House Oversight Committee, tells Benghazi witnesses that "death is a part of life." CUMMINGS: And, as I listen to your testimony I could not help but think of something that I said very recently -- two years ago now -- in a eulogy for a relative. I said that death is a part of life, so often we have to find a way to make life a part of death. And, I guess the reason why I´m saying that, going back to something Mr. Nordstrom said, he wanted,
|
A new ‘Dawn’ at ABC: Newsman becomes newswoman
|
|
New York Post, by Tara Palmeri
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/8/2013 11:26:11 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Top ABC News editor Don Ennis walked into his Manhattan office on Friday in a “little black dress” and a brunette bobbed wig and announced to colleagues that from now on, he would like to be known as Dawn. The 49-year-old father of three said he’s splitting from his wife of 17 years to become a woman, or Dawn Stacey Ennis, as she is now known on her governmental records. “Today I begin anew,” she wrote on her Facebook timeline, where she debuted a flirty new profile picture. “Please understand: This is not a game of
|
Benghazi: Incompetence, but no cover-up
|
|
National Journal, by Michael Hirsh
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 5/8/2013 6:04:54 PM
Post Reply
|
|
There was tragic incompetence, plainly, in the Obama administration’s handling of the Benghazi attacks, and even possibly some political calculation. It is a record that may well come to haunt Hillary Clinton, the first Secretary of State to lose an ambassador in the field in more than three decades, if she runs for president in 2016. But the obvious Republican effort to turn this inquiry into the Democratic (Obama) version of the Iraq intelligence scandal that has tarred the GOP since the George W. Bush years -- led by that least-credible of champions, the almost-always-wrong Darrell Issa --
|
Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee: Constitution implies a right to health care, education
|
|
Washington Times, by Douglas Ernst
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/7/2013 8:22:18 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee took to the House floor Monday night and implied that the right to health care and education exists in the Constitution. Ms. Jackson Lee, Texas Democrat, also made the case that the moral authority for such services is also derived from the Declaration of Independence. “One might argue that education and health care fall into those provisions of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness,” she said. Ms. Jackson Lee added, “I think that what should be continuously emphasized is the president’s leadership on one single point: that although health care was not
|
Mark Sanford wins South Carolina special election
|
|
Washington Post, by Rachel Weiner
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: supersid- 5/7/2013 8:55:20 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Mark Sanford has won the South Carolina special election in a competitive race for what in normal circumstances is a safe Republican seat. The former governor beat Democrat Elizabeth Colbert Busch, the sister of comedian Stephen Colbert Busch, for the state’s 1st congressional district. The AP called the race for Sanford early in the evening, with the Republican leading Colbert Busch 54 percent 46 percent.
|
|

© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
FS
|
|