Good article. I suspect Chrysler is as financially unstable as GM, but it is hiding in the rusted out body of Fiat.

Would be delighted to see GM go down, completely down. Who would suffer? Unions that own it now thanks to the biggest liar since Horn Dog and Hildabeast Clinton.

What goes around occasionally comes around. I hope so for this communist asshat and his union enablers.

Who would suffer, #2?
The taxpayer would suffer.
The Pension Guarantee Trust Fund, currently nearly insolvent, would have to pay for all thos fat union pensions.

#2 - Don´t think I coulda said it any better! Amen.
And to think it just last week we were hearing how great GM was doing thanks to the J-School flunkies that make up the complicit knee-pad press!

#3 - We´re already suffering. We´re never going to see that money come back so now it´s called cut your losses time.

Short GM and go long on al-Qaida. That about covers it. I wonder where al-Qaida is traded?

YOU MUST SPLIT WIDE HEADLINES.

WHY DOESN´T THE HEADLINE BLOCK HAVE A FLIPPIN´ TEXT BREAK WRAPAROUND FEATURE?!?!?!?!

Things are no better in America and will probably get worse over the next four years. Elections have consequences.

First of all, the taxpayer will NEVER EVER get paid back what GM owes. They take their profits and turn it into union bonuses and GM got a gift from Barry in that they don´t have to pay corpororate taxes for 20 years. Second, if GM goes under, those union pensioners are in for a surprise because the goobermint limited the dollar amount of what they would hand over in pensions (unless Barry intervenes by EO and gives them the same pension plus a raise).

If this article doesn´t cheer you up, just consider the fact that the average UAW ´workers´ at GM and Chrysler are getting a profit sharing check this year for $7,000.

You know , those ´working families´ that Obama always talks about.