 A Message From Lucianne
Now More Than Ever Get Your Eagles Up! Lucianne Tees - in Black or White Click to Buy
|
|
Obama recess appointments unconstitutional
Washington Times, by Stephen Dinan
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:Dreadnought, 1/26/2013 12:33:45 AM
|
| In a case freighted with major constitutional implications, a federal appeals court on Friday overturned President Obama’s controversial recess appointments from last year, ruling he abused his powers and acted when the Senate was not actually in a recess. The three-judge panel’s ruling is a major blow to Mr. Obama. The judges ruled that the appointments he made to the National Labor Relations Board are illegal, and hence the five-person board did not have a quorum to operate. But the ruling has even broader constitutional significance
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
PChristopher, 1/26/2013 1:14:46 AM (No. 9139930)
Don´t stop there...expand that to include his entire ´presidency´. Do it now!
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
sw penn, 1/26/2013 1:31:18 AM (No. 9139942)
“This panel of the D.C. circuit has accomplished what Minority Leader Mitch McConnell failed to do. Minority Leader McConnell said that his No. 1 objective was defeating Barack Obama and Barack Obama’s attempt to govern. This D.C. circuit panel has been successful where McConnell failed. they have really, effectively challenges the president’s ability to govern,” Mr. Williams said.
Mr. Williams the Founders did not set up the federal government so that the President could govern efficiently.
They set up the federal government so that the President was required to govern minimally.
We find ourselves were we are because liberals like you persistently, perniciously, refuse to accept that fact.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
4Justice, 1/26/2013 1:56:39 AM (No. 9139952)
This is wonderful...finally, someone is standing up against this miserable tyrant who sees nothing wrong with breaking the absolute law of the land. Evil cretin. We need more men and women of integrity to stand up and stop the powermongers who are destroying this country.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
steveW, 1/26/2013 2:03:59 AM (No. 9139958)
What difference, at this point, does it make?
If he decides to make legal appointments instead of illegal ones, his appointees will all be seditious Leftists anyway. With Obama, it´s always a lose-lose situation for the country.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Coy860, 1/26/2013 8:17:30 AM (No. 9140167)
The NLRB insists that is will continue, which make it a rogue board in contempt of court. Now Boehner must defund it.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
sorosisbehindit, 1/26/2013 8:22:49 AM (No. 9140179)
Just wait for him to finish stacking the Supreme Court to his liking and all such rulings will be appealed and dismissed.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Janjan, 1/26/2013 8:27:42 AM (No. 9140184)
Jay Carney mumbles his usual intelligent legal argument that ´everybody else did it´ completely missing the point that it was unconstitutional when everybody else did it too.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
4freedom, 1/26/2013 8:43:58 AM (No. 9140216)
I expect any day now the judges will come out and say they decided not to pursue this after all, it was a silly mistake, sorry about that.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
wherewithal, 1/26/2013 8:57:11 AM (No. 9140232)
This is only one of the many unconstitutional acts this sack of pus has performed. Then there are all of the unconstitutional acts by the congress. A long, long, long way to go to get back even close to where we should be.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
stryker714, 1/26/2013 9:07:19 AM (No. 9140243)
Oh wow bamboozler thought he had free reign to reign with no reference to any laws. If this goes the same was as the healthcare bill, the supremes will rule in his favor. Roberts will say we´ve come too far with what bamster has done to turn back now, which raises a new point: Do we have to tolerate Supremes who always rule in bamboozler´s favor? Is that objective? Watch Kagan and Sotomayor rule his way every time, day in, day out. We should start a petition to have them removed, once proven they cannot be objective and are nothing more than Obama stooges. We do not have to accept status quo.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
pontique, 1/26/2013 9:19:57 AM (No. 9140263)
Maybe now the courts will have the fortitude to attack the BIG question of Obambi´s constitutional qualifications. I´d accept a riot in South Central Los Angeles because he was run from office than to have our Constitutiuon torn to shreds. The riots will end but a loss of our rule of law will live forever
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
spengler, 1/26/2013 9:26:46 AM (No. 9140270)
The Messiah does not obey any court unless he agrees with it. It is not Sharia; this will not stop the Imam.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Teleologicus, 1/26/2013 9:48:42 AM (No. 9140298)
Radical Leftists like Obama do not agree with the American political system of checks and balances. Many do not even understand it. Their mentality is that of Lenin and the Dictatorship of the Proletariat. They have contempt for true representative government because it inevitably presents and presses for a wide variety of political opinions. Leftists are elitists are authoritarians at heart. They despise the mess, clamor, confusion and above all the delay of democracy. Though they profess devotion to democratic, egalitarian ideals, what most of them actually want is a submissive population and unfettered political power to do what they think is best. Though it sounds strange to say it, a remarkable number of radical Leftists like Obama are simply unable to comprehend the idea that they just might not know and be right about everything - that people who disagree with them not only have the right to do so, but may even upon occasion prove to be correct.
American schools and universities do not seem to be doing a satisfactory job of educating future citizens in the basic principles of representative Constitutional government. This can and will have grave consequences for the Republic if it continues.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
oh-heck, 1/26/2013 10:15:19 AM (No. 9140331)
These picks were so bad that Reid wasn´t going to get them confirmed. Obama decided to break the rules and deal with the consequences if some judge ruled against him. It just the end of his first term, but a growing number of judges have learned that he´s a lousy constitutional scholar and often chooses to operate outside the law.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Trapper, 1/26/2013 10:18:47 AM (No. 9140334)
Any normal person would be taking a hard look at the lawyer who gave them the bad legal advice that they could make these appointments. But these people are all hardcore ideologues. They know precisely what action they intend to take, and then fabricate tortured and erroneous legal arguments to support their illegal actions.
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
hicokid, 1/26/2013 10:30:51 AM (No. 9140353)
This is a great victory and maybe a turning point in obama´s lawless behavior. We will now see if our system is truly broken. All rulings by this illegal board should be null and void. And why should the Supremes take this up? The Constitution is clear, and the court´s decision was unanimous.
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
Butch59, 1/26/2013 10:33:52 AM (No. 9140386)
This ruling isn´t going to make a whit of difference to Obozo. He will just ignore it like he did that federal judge´s ruling during the Deepwater Horizon episode. And what will be the consequences of that action? Do you really think that a federal marshall is going to the WH and arrest him? He is creating a Constitutional train wreck and that is just what he wants. To rule, not govern, without any restraints. And it seems that he is getting just that.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
texas_gop, 1/26/2013 10:56:42 AM (No. 9140444)
OK. Lets say this goes to the sort-of Supreme Court and Obama loses again. What difference does it make? Who will do anything about it and enforce the constitution? No one, in my opinion. He can just thumb his nose at everyone and half of the country will support him. Heck, they don´t even know what the LRB is or does, they don´t care. Even if the House impeached there is no way the Senate would do anything as there are probably only a dozen senators with any brass.
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
RancherJack, 1/26/2013 11:01:11 AM (No. 9140455)
Obama is unConstitutional
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
Dodge Boy, 1/26/2013 11:27:32 AM (No. 9140507)
Well..ok,,,it´s a start. Better late than never I guess. When the supreme´s rule the Kenyan in the WH as non-eligible, can only dream for this day.
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
JustCause, 1/26/2013 11:32:09 AM (No. 9140516)
It´s a start - but it´s a start that is too late.
The judges decision will be ignored (ala Gulf drilling) and nothing will happen.
Obo knew this should be the outcome of his appointments. It was a gamble since the Supreme Court is not reliable constitutionalists. (ala Obamacare, McCain/Feingold)
NLRB should be defunded immediately since there is not a legal quorum sitting on the board.
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
MattMusson, 1/26/2013 11:33:03 AM (No. 9140519)
At least someone had the cajones to stand up for fairness and justice and the rule of law.
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
Davids918, 1/26/2013 11:54:42 AM (No. 9140573)
#15, it´s time to link the reckless disregard for the rule of law to the out-of-control Senate Democrats who didn´t stand-up and defend the U.S. Constitution like they´re required to do, and took oath.
There are a bunch of Senate Democrats who are running in 2014, and it´s time to stick them with the out-of-control spending, debt and everything else. After all, they didn´t do their job in last 4 years.
Put the heat on Senate Democrats.
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
chicodon, 1/26/2013 12:24:37 PM (No. 9140625)
One thing is for sure. We can´t let Obama put another Communist on the Supreme Court.
|
Reply 25 - Posted by:
cgood, 1/26/2013 12:52:44 PM (No. 9140682)
No, #7. The media is misrepresenting the issue - even Fox news - so it is no surprise that people don´t understand. NO one else has ever done this, because Obama made these recess appointments when the Senate was still technically in session. Actual recess appointments are not unconstitutional and it does not matter how many were made by Bush or Reagan. When the dems began using profarma sessions to prevent recess appointments by Bush, he did not try to make appointments anyway as Obama has. The distinction is quite pronounced.
|
Reply 26 - Posted by:
saraguay, 1/26/2013 12:57:22 PM (No. 9140694)
no, because obama is above the law and he´ll do what he wants anyway or "appeal" to the supreme court where justice roberts will roll with his new buddies and overturn this decision. sick sick sick
|
Reply 27 - Posted by:
larryp, 1/26/2013 1:03:35 PM (No. 9140710)
Anytime we get an abuse-of-oower ruling from an appeals court, that is prtty good. Levin says it is not a criminal situation but that any of the cases before the NLRB during this time shoud file suit and firle to have the suit result overturned.
This will come up later as abuse of power. If we can get 3 or so of these sbuse of power ruling it will smear his legacy and might be more. thing grind slowly in the US jurisprudence
|
Reply 28 - Posted by:
Dignitary Protection, 1/26/2013 1:08:46 PM (No. 9140716)
Thank you Mark Levin and the Landmark Legal Foundation.
|
Reply 29 - Posted by:
gator, 1/26/2013 1:09:40 PM (No. 9140717)
That information and $5 will get you a cup of joe at Starbucks, This is a drop in the bucket of his crimes, but who gonna do anything about it. The GOP...roflmao
|
Reply 30 - Posted by:
cgood, 1/26/2013 1:28:07 PM (No. 9140751)
Apologies to #7. You are not wrong. Although the suit was brought because Obama made appointments while the Senate was still technically in session, the judges decision is much broader and puts other recess appointments in question.
|
Reply 31 - Posted by:
Grambo, 1/26/2013 2:12:13 PM (No. 9140817)
#1 said it all, remove the Kenyan, British subject, Indonesian citizen, false SSN using, forged bc uspurper and all his works from the public record.
|
Reply 32 - Posted by:
Penney, 1/26/2013 2:24:08 PM (No. 9140839)
Dittos, #29! Mark Levin is a National Treasure!
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"
|
Democrats push problem solvers in House contests
|
|
Washington Post, by Paul Kane
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 11:38:26 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Democratic Party officials believe that Kevin Strouse is exactly the kind of candidate who can help them retake the House next year. He’s a smart, young former Army Ranger — good qualities for any aspiring politician. But what party leaders really like is that Strouse doesn’t have particularly strong views on the country’s hottest issues. Immigration? Tax policy? “Certainly I have a lot of research to do,” Strouse acknowledged in an interview Thursday as he announced his candidacy in a suburban Philadelphia House district. Strouse’s candidacy reflects an emerging
|
Texas prosecutors’ slayings unnerve rural Kaufman County
|
|
Washington Post, by Stephanie McCrummen
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 11:33:08 PM
Post Reply
|
|
KAUFMAN, Tex. — The judge was on the phone. “Yep, I said I’ll do anything,” Bruce Wood told the person on the other end, rubbing his forehead. “They asked me to do a eulogy. I don’t know what I’m going to say.” Elsewhere in the Kaufman County Courthouse, a sheriff’s deputy was handing out bulletproof vests. “I brought the smallest one,” he said to a secretary, who stared at the khaki armor as he explained how to adjust the side straps should the need arise. “These have the neck for a female.” Outside, two armed guards
|
Vanishing workforce weighs on growth
|
|
Washington Post, by Jim Tankersley
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 11:28:59 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Put out an all-points bulletin: Millions of Americans have gone missing from the workforce. Every month that those would-be workers are gone raises the odds that they might never come back, dimming the prospects for future economic growth. The vanishing trend is more than a decade old, but it accelerated during the Great Recession. Throughout 2012, economists held out hope that it had stopped. But then came Friday’s jobs report, and hopes were dashed. The Labor Department reported that the U.S. labor force — everyone who has a job or is looking for one — shrank
|
A Reporter Explains Why Gun Coverage Is So Biased
|
|
Power Line, by John Hinderaker
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 9:13:14 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Well, not intentionally. But Jim Ragsdale of the Minneapolis Star Tribune attended a conference in Chicago on covering gun issues, which he describes this way: “Covering Guns” brought reporters with front-line experience covering mass shootings in Tucson, Ariz.; Aurora, Colo.; Newtown, Conn., and Red Lake, Minn., to meet with gun experts and advocates and gun trainers. Sponsored by the Poynter journalism center and funded by the McCormick Foundation of Chicago, we gathered in a city that witnessed 506 homicides last year. The idea, I take it
|
Report: Carbon Emissions in US Lowest Since 1994
|
|
PJ Media, by Rick Moran
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 9:03:02 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Carbon emissions in the US were at their lowest level in 2012 since 1994, according to figures released by the US Energy Information Administration. We did it without carbon trading scams, the EPA making carbon dioxide a poison, or obeying the dictates of the Kyoto climate Treaty. We did it partly because of decreased economic activity as a result of the Obama recovery-that-isn’t, but mostly because of good old fashioned market forces; competition between natural gas and coal: Energy-related carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in 2012 were the lowest in the United States since 1994
|
Video: Parents Turn on Fossil- Fuel Protesters at Tufts
|
|
National Review Online, by Stanley Kurtz
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 8:33:04 PM
Post Reply
|
|
When I tell campus horror-stories like “What’s the Matter With Vassar?” people ask if parents know what’s going on at these schools. I don’t think they want to know. But guess what happens when protesters step on others’ rights in full view of parents? Tufts has one of the most active campus fossil-fuel divestment groups. Lately these protesters have been infiltrating orientation sessions and campus tours for prospective students, mostly high school juniors traveling with their parents. Climate protesters interrupt these recruitment activities with questions
|
Behind the Dismal Jobs Numbers: The ‘New’ Economy Takes Shape
|
|
PJ Media, by Rick Moran
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 8:27:24 PM
Post Reply
|
|
It is amazing just how wrong economists were in their predictions for the number of jobs that were to be created in March. The “consensus” figure was 200,000 — a far cry from the actual number created which was 88,000. Totally “unexpected,” as usual. In one way, you can’t blame them. After a better than average gain in February of 236,000 (revised upward this month to 268,000), along with some positive numbers in housing and consumer spending, there were no doubt many analysts who began breathing a sigh of relief and believing that the long-awaited jobs recovery was upon us.
|
|
The New Climate Deniers?
|
|
American Thinker, by David Lawrence
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 9:33:09 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Rich Lowery in the New York Post (4-02-2013) accuses the liberals of being the new climate deniers, considering that they don´t recognize that there´s been no global warming for the last fifteen years. This shouldn´t surprise Lowery. When the liberals hang onto the neck of a cause, they don´t let go. They have ignored murders, rapes, wars, nuclear proliferation, and everything wrong with the world to focus in on their little area -- the horror of carbon emissions. You´d think liberals would have learned from their earlier panic about overpopulation
|
|
Obama’s feeble salary ‘sacrifice’
|
|
Washington Post, by Dana Milbank
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/5/2013 11:13:50 PM
Post Reply
|
|
“President Obama plans to give up 5 percent of his salary this year to draw attention to the financial sacrifice of more than 1 million federal employees who will be furloughed.” — The Washington Post, April 4 “Here’s the plan. We get the warhead and we hold the world ransom for 1 MILLION DOLLARS !” — Dr. Evil in “Austin Powers: International Man of Mystery” At the annual White House Easter Egg Roll this week, President Obama decided to shoot some hoops with the kids. He wound up going 2 for 22. The abysmal field-goal percentage — 9 percent
|
Johns Hopkins’s and Planned Parenthood’s troubling extremism
|
|
Washington Post, by George F. Will
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/5/2013 11:05:52 PM
Post Reply
|
|
We know Johns Hopkins University is devoted to diversity, because it says so. Its “Diversity and Inclusion Statement,” a classic of the genre, says the university is “committed to sharing values of diversity and inclusion .?.?. by recruiting and retaining a diverse group of students.” Hopkins has an Office of Institutional Equity and a “Diversity Leadership Council” that defines “inclusion” as “active, thoughtful and ongoing engagement with each other.” Unless you are a member of Voice for Life (VFL), an antiabortion group. Hopkins’s Student Government Association has denied VFL status
|
Obama budget would cut entitlements in exchange for tax increases
|
|
Washington Post, by Zachary A. Goldfarb and Karen Tumulty
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/5/2013 11:02:41 PM
Post Reply
|
|
President Obama will propose a budget next week that embraces a risky strategy of courting Republicans for a grand bargain on the debt while angering Democratic allies with cuts to the nation’s entitlement programs. White House officials said Friday that Obama’s budget would cut Medicare and Social Security and ask for less tax revenue than he has previously sought. The budget, to be released Wednesday, will fully incorporate the offer Obama made to House Speaker John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) during December’s “fiscal cliff” talks — which included $1.8 trillion in deficit reduction through spending cuts and tax increases.
|
NRA tactics erode post-Newtown support for gun-control measures
|
|
Washington Post, by Tom Hamburger
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/5/2013 11:00:22 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Sen Mark Begich declared a “sea change” in the politics of gun control immediately after the school shooting in Newtown, Conn., telling his local newspaper that he would not hesitate to buck the powerful National Rifle Association. But in the months since, the gun rights group has made itself impossible for the Alaska Democrat, and many other lawmakers, to resist. Begich has signed on as a co-sponsor of a bill, drafted in consultation with the NRA, that would change the way mental illness is reported in the background check system — a measure that critics say
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
We Are Living in a Dying Country
|
|
Rushlimbaugh.com, by Rush Limbaugh
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/5/2013 4:53:10 PM
Post Reply
|
|
RUSH: Folks, I don´t know how else to categorize this. We are living in a dying country. I don´t know how else to categorize what´s happening -- 88,000 new jobs. The unemployment rate, because of a terrible statistic, is down to 7.6%. The number of people in this country who are not working is shameful. Ninety million Americans are no longer in the workforce. Ninety million. People not in the labor force grew by 663,000, and now 90 million. That´s the labor force participation rate. This is 1979 levels.
|
Why Obama´s ´Best-Looking Attorney General´ Comment Was a Gaffe
|
|
The Atlantic, by Garance Franke-Ruta
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 6:51:15 AM
Post Reply
|
|
President Obama´s biggest gaffe yesterday when speaking of California Attorney General Kamala Harris was not in flirtatiously complimenting her as "the best-looking attorney general," but in introducing an observation from the system of beauty into a forum that was about the system of power.What´s that, you say? Irin Carmon does a great job in Salon in laying out the bounds of propriety for when it´s appropriate to talk about a woman´s looks as a general matter. But I´ve long felt we lack a solid theoretical underpinning for easily discussing these issues, and why precisely it is that
|
Hillary Clinton Would Not ´Clear the Field´ for 2016
|
|
New Republic, by Tod Lindberg
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/6/2013 5:22:36 AM
Post Reply
|
|
No one is more preoccupied these days with Hillary Clinton´s 2016 plans than the Beltway political class—not even the former presidential candidate herself. To hear some tell it, her decision will be dispositive for all other Democrats thinking of entering the race. And pundits and reporters aren´t the only ones positing the "The Hillary Factor": No less than the House Democratic whip, Steny Hoyer, told BuzzFeed, “I don´t know that anybody would run against Hillary…. If she runs, she clears the field.” It´s an understandable conclusion, given Clinton´s stature in the Democratic Party and her 70 percent
|
Obama critic apologizes for his ´poorly chosen words´ on gay marriage
|
|
The Hill [Washington DC], by Alexandra Jaffe
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/6/2013 12:18:19 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Neurosurgeon Ben Carson, considered by some to be a potential Republican contender for president, apologized to Johns Hopkins University for the "poorly chosen words" he used in expressing his opposition to gay marriage last month.“I am sorry for any embarrassment this has caused,” Carson said in the letter, reported in New York Magazine.(Snip) "Although I do believe marriage is between a man and a woman, there are much less offensive ways to make that point. I hope all will look at a lifetime of service over some poorly chosen words.” Carson will remain as commencement speaker at Johns Hopkins,
|
´My bangs are getting a little irritating´: Michelle Obama admits she already regrets her high-maintenance hairdo
|
|
Daily Mail (UK), by Margot Peppers
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: pineledger- 4/7/2013 7:43:42 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Michelle Obama has admitted that she is already tired of the bangs she first sported in January. The First Lady said in an interview with Entertainment Tonight: ´Bangs are a day-by-day proposition. They´re starting to grow out, get a little irritating.´ Still, she hasn´t let her hairdo woes get her down. ´It´s okay,´ she said after her initial complaint. ´We´ll be good.´ The first indication that her hairstyle was becoming a burden came about last weekend, when Malia, 14, was spotted adjusting her mother´s hair during the White House Easter Egg Roll.
|
Hillary Clinton: The clock is turning back for women in America
|
|
Washington Examiner, by Charlie Spiering
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/5/2013 3:25:20 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton explained to the Women in the World summit in New York today that the clock is turning back for women in America. Clinton praised her own mother for helping empower her to success and marveled at the opportunities that her own daughter Chelsea has pursued. But Clinton warned that there is still so much to do to promote women´s rights in America. "As I look at all these young women that I am privileged to work with, or know through Chelsea, and its hard to imagine turning the clock on them," Clinton said.
|
White House Blames Jobs Numbers on Sequester
|
|
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Wynton Hall
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/5/2013 8:02:58 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The Obama White House is scrambling to blame Friday’s abysmal March jobs numbers on the sequester’s trimming of the rate of growth in federal budgets that have yet to fully commence. After the Labor Department announced that a mass exodus of 663,000 workers left the U.S. workforce last month and that job creation fell 112,000 jobs short of projections, Obama’s top economic adviser Alan B. Krueger, took to the White House blog to blame the sequester: It is important to bear in mind that the March household and payroll surveys are the first monthly surveys to look
|
The Deafening Silence that Signals Our Demise
|
|
Townhall, by Diana West
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Drive- 4/5/2013 11:56:32 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Get ready for the last straw. First, though, I´d like to suggest that anyone reading this column in a local newspaper or news site pat the editor on the back for publishing what in our neo-medieval world of fear amounts to a forbidden column. Yup, I am about to say something about the Great Barack Obama Identity/Eligibility Scandal again. I know that this is one rich and urgent topic that doesn´t see the light of day in certain so-called news outlets -- and I say that from the experience of watching my own syndicated columns
|
Trayvon Martin´s parents settle wrongful death claim
|
|
Orlando Sentinel, by Rene Stutzman
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/5/2013 3:15:25 PM
Post Reply
|
|
SANFORD - Trayvon Martin´s parents have settled a wrongful death claim for an amount believed to be more than $1 million against the homeowners association of the Sanford subdivision where their teenage son was killed. Their attorney, Benjamin Crump, filed that paperwork at the Seminole County Courthouse, a portion of which was made public today. In the five pages of the settlement that were available for public review, the settlement amount had been marked out. Lower in the agreement, the parties specified that they would keep that amount confidential. When asked during an earlier interview whether the amount was
|
Beyonce, Jay-Z celebrate 5th anniversary in Havana, Cuba
|
|
Los Angeles Times, by Nardine Saad
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 4/6/2013 8:20:04 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Beyonce and Jay-Z celebrated their fifth wedding anniversary in Cuba this week. The couple, who married on April 4, 2008, took in the sights of Old Havana, visited a school, dined on a rooftop terrace and strolled the fan-filled streets in their island best.(snip).The power couple declined to answer journalists´ questions about their visit to the island nation, but some outlets are reporting that the moguls are there as tourists, though that would be illegal because of the half-century embargo the U.S. has on the Communist country. However, the Miami Herald said Washington has issued special licenses for
|
Obama Budget to Cap Retirement Accounts at $3 Million
|
|
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Tony Lee
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/5/2013 9:40:39 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The budget President Barack Obama will submit on April 10 will contain a proposal that would prohibit individuals from accumulating more than $3 million in Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs) and tax-preferred retirement accounts. According to a White House statement, the Obama administration believes the current rules allow some wealthy individuals "to accumulate many millions of dollars in these accounts, substantially more than is needed to fund reasonable levels of retirement saving." "The budget would limit an individual’s total balance across tax-preferred accounts to an amount sufficient to finance an annuity of not more than $205,000 per
|
|

© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
FS
|
|