 A Message From Lucianne
Now More Than Ever Get Your Eagles Up! Lucianne Tees - in Black or White Click to Buy
|
|
The Feinstein “Assault Weapons” Ban: What’s It All About?
Power Line, by John Hinderaker
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:Dreadnought, 1/24/2013 10:46:20 PM
|
| Today Senator Dianne Feinstein unveiled her long-promised legislation to ban “assault weapons.” Since there is no such thing as an assault weapon, we will have to read the text of the law to see what it actually does. So far, I haven’t seen the text anywhere, but Feinstein’s web site has a fairly detailed description of the bill, including a list of the 157 weapons that are specifically banned. News coverage of Feinstein’s proposal has been laughably bad. Feinstein’s bill purports to toughen the 1994 assault weapons ban by reducing the number of “military style” features that make a firearm
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Bobn.T, 1/24/2013 10:56:00 PM (No. 9137810)
I just gave the NRA a contribution. I pray that God will deliver us from this evil destroying the country.
America needs a white knight on a white horse.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
ccyr, 1/24/2013 10:59:22 PM (No. 9137814)
I just figured it was a way to sell more AR-15´s because that´s exactly what it´s doing. While I was waiting for a lane to open up, I saw ten of them jump off the shelf in a little more than an hour this afternoon at $1,600 to $2,300 a piece.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
thewarden, 1/24/2013 11:10:27 PM (No. 9137822)
Wake me up when I care what a filthy rich eitist with personal security and an unrestricted concealed carry permit says...
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
ccyr, 1/24/2013 11:13:17 PM (No. 9137825)
If we are going to pass a law to keep Sandy Hook from happening again, shouldn´t we pass a law that would have saved a single victim had it been enacted at the time of the shooting rather than a law that wouldn´t have saved a single life had it been enacted before the shooting?
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
King of all trolls, 1/24/2013 11:29:43 PM (No. 9137837)
Crime rates have been dropping precipitously over the last 20 years. Some psychopath commits a heinous crime with a stolen weapon and suddenly our Constitutional rights are negotiable.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
jl80863, 1/25/2013 12:14:15 AM (No. 9137869)
If they want to ban "ugly guns" again can we ban ugly legislators?
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
dvc, 1/25/2013 1:01:34 AM (No. 9137889)
Feinstein hates military styled weapons, mental illness on her part. She is psychotic, totally illogical.
ALL these bills are OBVIOUSLY infringement on our right to keep and bear arms and are clearly unconstitutional. We need to stop this in the Senate AND in the House, BOTH.
Remember - the "no private sales" push, being sold as the ´gun show loophole´ is equally fictional, but the push is intended to result in registering all guns. Confiscation to follow.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
gator, 1/25/2013 2:31:46 AM (No. 9137933)
The bill, like the woman, is stupid. But so are many Americans who (if even aware of it) will swallow it hook, line, and sinker.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
hoosierblue, 1/25/2013 5:04:42 AM (No. 9137960)
The Feinstein “Assault Weapons” Ban: What’s It All About? -------CONTROL !!!!!
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Trigger2, 1/25/2013 5:27:10 AM (No. 9137971)
What´s it about? Removing guns behind every blade of grass so the country is wide open for muslim/chinese/fill in the blank takeover.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Red Jeep, 1/25/2013 7:32:06 AM (No. 9138077)
"...the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."
I should be able to own any weapon I want without licensing, registration or a background check.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Janjan, 1/25/2013 7:33:41 AM (No. 9138080)
Unless Obama can put the full force of the military on the streets, assuming they would obey such an order, no one in the Federal Government is going to disarm Americans. They will just turn us all into criminals.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
4Justice, 1/25/2013 7:46:21 AM (No. 9138089)
I want to make a bumper sticker for that one #6. Ban ugly and scary legislators!! Totally agree, #11.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Bad Dog, 1/25/2013 7:58:30 AM (No. 9138118)
Yeah, somebody go tell the thugs in the ghettos that their favorite toys are being banned by their favorite politicians.
And watch them laugh and blast their way into YOUR saferoom.....
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
stablemoney, 1/25/2013 7:58:32 AM (No. 9138119)
Did the NRA shoot anybody, Dianne? The NRA was home watching tv at the time of the crime.
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
miceal, 1/25/2013 8:06:49 AM (No. 9138142)
She should be impeached, she is attempting to circumvent our Constitution without the required amendment. Articles of Impeachment and at least a LONG prison sentence....
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
disasterman, 1/25/2013 8:07:10 AM (No. 9138144)
A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity. Sigmund Freud
This about sums up most of the liberals/progressives that I know.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
preciosodrogas, 1/25/2013 8:29:50 AM (No. 9138200)
Of course it is grandstanding, and look at the attention it has gotten her. But then gun bands are not about preventing violence, it is all about wanting to project the fantasy that all is well in lala land. Needing a gun for self defense or protection against tyranny exposes the truth and they simply can´t handle the truth. They so want to control all the pieces because they want reality to conform to their beliefs. They are scared and can´t handle the truth so we must sacrifice our liberties so they can live in their pretend world.
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
Mr. Know-It-All, 1/25/2013 8:32:36 AM (No. 9138206)
I have seen the supposed list. It specifically bans the Ruger Mini 14 tactical rifle. The only difference between the tactical version and a run of the mill ranch rifle is the stock. Period. All of the important stuff is exactly the same.
You can buy a ranch rifle and make into a tactical by buying an after market folding and adjustable length stock. So I suppose that such stocks should be made illegal so that you cannot do that.
As hildabeast would say, what does it matter? The ranch rifle fires the same rounds, in the same manner, and at the same rate. The only difference is how they look.
Feinstein is obviously driven by some kind of mental aberration against the way a rifle looks. Or to put it another way; she´s a loon.
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
texaseducator, 1/25/2013 8:37:49 AM (No. 9138222)
The only thing most of these people know about weapons is what they see on tv and at the movies and Toys R Us. They have no idea how weapons work or why they are designed the way they are or what the real descriptive terms mean. They reveal their ignorance everytime they talk about weapons. The scary thing is they know about the same amount on everything they talk about.
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
safesword, 1/25/2013 8:50:26 AM (No. 9138247)
these idiots in congress...every time i read what they are up to,i scream so many four letter words...for hours at a time!!!..they drive me to become so apoplectic!!!!!UGGGHHHH!!! i cant take reading anymore!!
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
marthaville, 1/25/2013 9:12:06 AM (No. 9138305)
Waiting for Sen. Feinstein to start crying like Hillary did. That always, always disarms the men.
Don´t you love being told what to do by a wealthy woman who has spent her life working in government jobs? Redistribute your wealth, Dianne.
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
bob913, 1/25/2013 9:37:14 AM (No. 9138375)
Whada ya know
Feinstein Gun Control Bill Would Exempt Government Officials...
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
pete moss, 1/25/2013 10:09:57 AM (No. 9138463)
"Could Diane Feinstein´s assault on our civil rights actually be a smoke screen to divert attention from this? On the day the new Congress convened this year she introduced legislation to route $25 billion in tax payer money to a government agency that had just awarded her husband´s real estate firm a lucrative contract to sell foreclosed properties at compensation rates higher than the industry norms. Her intervention on behalf of the FDIC is unusual since she isn´t a member of the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban affairs with jurisdiction over FDIC; and the committee is supposed to operate from money it raises from bank-paid insurance payments- not direct federal dollars." In other words, she´s a crook.
|
Reply 25 - Posted by:
Mr. Hanky, 1/25/2013 10:12:05 AM (No. 9138473)
And "government officials" are exempted.
|
Reply 26 - Posted by:
Grambo, 1/25/2013 10:28:19 AM (No. 9138513)
The Left lives for control, and an armed and obstinate American is problematic to them. So, what to do…oh, I know….
|
Reply 27 - Posted by:
RancherJack, 1/25/2013 10:55:38 AM (No. 9138583)
Feinstein exempts government employees, contractors.
That´s all we need to know.
It is us v. Them.
|
Reply 28 - Posted by:
capt scurvey, 1/25/2013 11:03:41 AM (No. 9138613)
Disarm Chicago´s ghettos first as a test run, DiFi, then get back to us when that´s been accomplished...
|
Reply 29 - Posted by:
sdish, 1/25/2013 11:08:54 AM (No. 9138625)
This is an attempt to ban guns having certain cosmetic features with legislation that’s based on foolish reasoning, promoted by liberal politicians for deceitful purposes.
|
Reply 30 - Posted by:
Marzipan, 1/25/2013 11:16:51 AM (No. 9138645)
Meanwhile back at the peoples house Mr. pResident is mandating all high schools outfit their sports programs to be totally accessible to the handicapped. Hmmm, not enough money for teaching them, let´s have them spend more to include a special olympics theme. I do think high schools make the sports available already for those kids that are truly motivated.. It´s all about spend spend spend so we the legislative ruling class can continue to eat cake.
|
Reply 31 - Posted by:
bighambone, 1/25/2013 11:20:34 AM (No. 9138659)
The liberal Democrats can´t stop criminals and crazy people from getting their hands on guns because there are too many guns out there for the liberals to ever effectively control. Banning guns and ammunition magazines will only create new black markets for those items throughout the USA.
What the liberals really want to do is wipe out most of the US small arms and related industries that the liberals consider to be conservative oriented enterprises. Once just about all modern firearms produced and sold in the USA, both rifles and handguns, are banned, there is no way that those industries could survive by bidding on ever diminishing military contracts alone. With those industries gone, all the tens of thousands of well paying American jobs and the technical know how connected to them would also be gone.
The liberal mission there is clear, and at the same time the liberals refer to the mentally ill, a few of who perpetrate the mass shootings, as being victims who they want to help. The liberals also are silent on the movie, TV, and addictive violent video game industries those entertainment products give vulnerable young people with mental disorders, who grow up in places like peaceful small Connecticut towns, ideas completely foreign to those places, like that to gain media attention to themselves the thing to do is to commit criminally insane acts while setting out on their own individual suicide missions. Of course the mental health industry and the makers of violent movie, TV, and video games are all liberal Democrat constituency groups.
|
Reply 32 - Posted by:
Butch59, 1/25/2013 11:21:40 AM (No. 9138665)
In a quick response to the author, yes, there are, or have been, rifle launched grenades. The old M1 Garand of WWII fame had the capable of firing them. I fired on during basic training the Ft. Polk, La. 1963.
And, if I came up and beat you to a pulp with a wooden club or any other blunt object, whould that also be classified as an assult weapon? After all, I "assulted" you with one.
And in response to poster #12, Obozo won´t turn the military on Americian citizens en mass. He will act piece meal by sending federal agents to individuals or small groups and threaten them with prison if they don´t turn it their guns. Or do what the Russians did in 1917-1918. Just round them up and shoot them.
|
Reply 33 - Posted by:
chicodon, 1/25/2013 11:41:23 AM (No. 9138722)
We need to have this conversation once and for all. If they want to modify the 2nd Amendment then they can make their case. There´s a mechanism for amending the Constitution. The founders couldn´t envision the day that the citizens would be so unequally outgunned. It began with the National Firearms Act in 1934 and now this. Let´s get it out in the open. Either we have a right to "bear" arms or we don´t.
|
Reply 34 - Posted by:
loveUSA, 1/25/2013 12:17:18 PM (No. 9138812)
Have you noticed that these so called gun safety laws exempt Congress? This proposed assault weapons bill exempts them.
ObamaCare exempts them. Congress has their own health care. They make laws for the citizens, but these laws don´t apply to them, the ruling class. That´s the definition of an elitist. And the definition of evil.
|
Reply 35 - Posted by:
kctiger, 1/25/2013 1:20:42 PM (No. 9138973)
It´s not God´s job to deliver us from the evils of this world.
It is our job to keep evil at bay while we are in this world!
We are failing miserably!
|
Reply 36 - Posted by:
jintz, 1/25/2013 1:38:36 PM (No. 9139006)
Any bets that all Pols will be exempt from the gun bill just as with the health care bill,phonies the whole bunch of them
|
Reply 37 - Posted by:
RKFree2b, 1/25/2013 1:40:23 PM (No. 9139013)
It´s about taking time trying to control something (guns) that congress and the white house have no constitutional authority to do.
It´s about not taking time to control something(federal government spending) that congress and the white house are constitutionally mandated to do.
It´s about transforming the United States Federal government into a tyrannical government.
C U T T H E S P E N D I N G ! ! !
|
Reply 38 - Posted by:
weejun, 1/25/2013 2:05:14 PM (No. 9139052)
As a an avid gun owner, the current "debate" is maddening: the misinformation in the press is staggering, and the public is being manipulated like putty by the liberals. Even John Elway - bless his heart - was duped last night by Piers Morgan, who asked him if he could see any reason why a citizen should own a rifle that can spew out "hundreds of rounds" at a time? Poor John´s reply: I don´t personally own a MACHINE GUN and I can´t see why anybody should." There´s a reason, John: except for holders of expensive and hard to get Class III firearm licenses, these weapons have been strictly controlled/registered in the US since 1934. Why can´t the press at least acknowledge that it doesn´t have a clue what it´s talking about when it comes to "assault weapons" (rhetorical question - sorry)? The job to fix this lack of knowledge and our inability to understand the true facts about gun murders in the US is almost too overwhelming to address. We have a long, hard fight ahead of us.
|
Reply 39 - Posted by:
caddyjak, 1/25/2013 2:09:30 PM (No. 9139058)
Wasn´t it either Feinsteen or Boxer´s husband who sold tech secrets to the Chinese? Combine those two with Piloopsy and California voters should be disenfranchised immediately.
|
Reply 40 - Posted by:
woodsman, 1/25/2013 3:20:58 PM (No. 9139189)
I noticed that too #19 about the mini 14...This won´t pass and if it does expect a lot of new manufacturers offering retrofit more "hunting" looking wooden stocks for AR´s and AKs....New stock....new gun....easy.
|
Reply 41 - Posted by:
kenecarroll, 1/25/2013 4:06:44 PM (No. 9139275)
Oh...but wait....we have to pass the gun control bill first before you can see what is in it.
|
Reply 42 - Posted by:
vesicant, 1/25/2013 4:19:44 PM (No. 9139294)
This guy Hinderaker, whoever he is, needs some education too. For instance, barrels are threaded not just for silencers, but also to accept flash suppressors (which only suppress the flash for the user, not those downrange), muzzle brakes, or thread protectors.
|
Reply 43 - Posted by:
larryp, 1/25/2013 8:55:54 PM (No. 9139738)
I called a radio station a few yrs ago about the NRA. I said to the answerer onthe Phone "why doesn´t the NRA buy some TV time or News paper space to outline the group´s views ? He said tjat they can´t. I said Why? He said that the newspapersand the TV stations won´t sell any time or space to the NRA! I don´t know if that is still true but when have you seen a full page ad from the NRA in the Paper or a TV special?
|
Reply 44 - Posted by:
Kennerboy, 1/25/2013 9:44:36 PM (No. 9139786)
Time to get serious about term limits.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"
|
Democrats push problem solvers in House contests
|
|
Washington Post, by Paul Kane
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 11:38:26 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Democratic Party officials believe that Kevin Strouse is exactly the kind of candidate who can help them retake the House next year. He’s a smart, young former Army Ranger — good qualities for any aspiring politician. But what party leaders really like is that Strouse doesn’t have particularly strong views on the country’s hottest issues. Immigration? Tax policy? “Certainly I have a lot of research to do,” Strouse acknowledged in an interview Thursday as he announced his candidacy in a suburban Philadelphia House district. Strouse’s candidacy reflects an emerging
|
Texas prosecutors’ slayings unnerve rural Kaufman County
|
|
Washington Post, by Stephanie McCrummen
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 11:33:08 PM
Post Reply
|
|
KAUFMAN, Tex. — The judge was on the phone. “Yep, I said I’ll do anything,” Bruce Wood told the person on the other end, rubbing his forehead. “They asked me to do a eulogy. I don’t know what I’m going to say.” Elsewhere in the Kaufman County Courthouse, a sheriff’s deputy was handing out bulletproof vests. “I brought the smallest one,” he said to a secretary, who stared at the khaki armor as he explained how to adjust the side straps should the need arise. “These have the neck for a female.” Outside, two armed guards
|
Vanishing workforce weighs on growth
|
|
Washington Post, by Jim Tankersley
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 11:28:59 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Put out an all-points bulletin: Millions of Americans have gone missing from the workforce. Every month that those would-be workers are gone raises the odds that they might never come back, dimming the prospects for future economic growth. The vanishing trend is more than a decade old, but it accelerated during the Great Recession. Throughout 2012, economists held out hope that it had stopped. But then came Friday’s jobs report, and hopes were dashed. The Labor Department reported that the U.S. labor force — everyone who has a job or is looking for one — shrank
|
A Reporter Explains Why Gun Coverage Is So Biased
|
|
Power Line, by John Hinderaker
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 9:13:14 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Well, not intentionally. But Jim Ragsdale of the Minneapolis Star Tribune attended a conference in Chicago on covering gun issues, which he describes this way: “Covering Guns” brought reporters with front-line experience covering mass shootings in Tucson, Ariz.; Aurora, Colo.; Newtown, Conn., and Red Lake, Minn., to meet with gun experts and advocates and gun trainers. Sponsored by the Poynter journalism center and funded by the McCormick Foundation of Chicago, we gathered in a city that witnessed 506 homicides last year. The idea, I take it
|
Report: Carbon Emissions in US Lowest Since 1994
|
|
PJ Media, by Rick Moran
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 9:03:02 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Carbon emissions in the US were at their lowest level in 2012 since 1994, according to figures released by the US Energy Information Administration. We did it without carbon trading scams, the EPA making carbon dioxide a poison, or obeying the dictates of the Kyoto climate Treaty. We did it partly because of decreased economic activity as a result of the Obama recovery-that-isn’t, but mostly because of good old fashioned market forces; competition between natural gas and coal: Energy-related carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in 2012 were the lowest in the United States since 1994
|
Video: Parents Turn on Fossil- Fuel Protesters at Tufts
|
|
National Review Online, by Stanley Kurtz
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 8:33:04 PM
Post Reply
|
|
When I tell campus horror-stories like “What’s the Matter With Vassar?” people ask if parents know what’s going on at these schools. I don’t think they want to know. But guess what happens when protesters step on others’ rights in full view of parents? Tufts has one of the most active campus fossil-fuel divestment groups. Lately these protesters have been infiltrating orientation sessions and campus tours for prospective students, mostly high school juniors traveling with their parents. Climate protesters interrupt these recruitment activities with questions
|
Behind the Dismal Jobs Numbers: The ‘New’ Economy Takes Shape
|
|
PJ Media, by Rick Moran
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 8:27:24 PM
Post Reply
|
|
It is amazing just how wrong economists were in their predictions for the number of jobs that were to be created in March. The “consensus” figure was 200,000 — a far cry from the actual number created which was 88,000. Totally “unexpected,” as usual. In one way, you can’t blame them. After a better than average gain in February of 236,000 (revised upward this month to 268,000), along with some positive numbers in housing and consumer spending, there were no doubt many analysts who began breathing a sigh of relief and believing that the long-awaited jobs recovery was upon us.
|
|
The New Climate Deniers?
|
|
American Thinker, by David Lawrence
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 9:33:09 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Rich Lowery in the New York Post (4-02-2013) accuses the liberals of being the new climate deniers, considering that they don´t recognize that there´s been no global warming for the last fifteen years. This shouldn´t surprise Lowery. When the liberals hang onto the neck of a cause, they don´t let go. They have ignored murders, rapes, wars, nuclear proliferation, and everything wrong with the world to focus in on their little area -- the horror of carbon emissions. You´d think liberals would have learned from their earlier panic about overpopulation
|
|
Obama’s feeble salary ‘sacrifice’
|
|
Washington Post, by Dana Milbank
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/5/2013 11:13:50 PM
Post Reply
|
|
“President Obama plans to give up 5 percent of his salary this year to draw attention to the financial sacrifice of more than 1 million federal employees who will be furloughed.” — The Washington Post, April 4 “Here’s the plan. We get the warhead and we hold the world ransom for 1 MILLION DOLLARS !” — Dr. Evil in “Austin Powers: International Man of Mystery” At the annual White House Easter Egg Roll this week, President Obama decided to shoot some hoops with the kids. He wound up going 2 for 22. The abysmal field-goal percentage — 9 percent
|
Johns Hopkins’s and Planned Parenthood’s troubling extremism
|
|
Washington Post, by George F. Will
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/5/2013 11:05:52 PM
Post Reply
|
|
We know Johns Hopkins University is devoted to diversity, because it says so. Its “Diversity and Inclusion Statement,” a classic of the genre, says the university is “committed to sharing values of diversity and inclusion .?.?. by recruiting and retaining a diverse group of students.” Hopkins has an Office of Institutional Equity and a “Diversity Leadership Council” that defines “inclusion” as “active, thoughtful and ongoing engagement with each other.” Unless you are a member of Voice for Life (VFL), an antiabortion group. Hopkins’s Student Government Association has denied VFL status
|
Obama budget would cut entitlements in exchange for tax increases
|
|
Washington Post, by Zachary A. Goldfarb and Karen Tumulty
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/5/2013 11:02:41 PM
Post Reply
|
|
President Obama will propose a budget next week that embraces a risky strategy of courting Republicans for a grand bargain on the debt while angering Democratic allies with cuts to the nation’s entitlement programs. White House officials said Friday that Obama’s budget would cut Medicare and Social Security and ask for less tax revenue than he has previously sought. The budget, to be released Wednesday, will fully incorporate the offer Obama made to House Speaker John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) during December’s “fiscal cliff” talks — which included $1.8 trillion in deficit reduction through spending cuts and tax increases.
|
NRA tactics erode post-Newtown support for gun-control measures
|
|
Washington Post, by Tom Hamburger
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/5/2013 11:00:22 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Sen Mark Begich declared a “sea change” in the politics of gun control immediately after the school shooting in Newtown, Conn., telling his local newspaper that he would not hesitate to buck the powerful National Rifle Association. But in the months since, the gun rights group has made itself impossible for the Alaska Democrat, and many other lawmakers, to resist. Begich has signed on as a co-sponsor of a bill, drafted in consultation with the NRA, that would change the way mental illness is reported in the background check system — a measure that critics say
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
´My bangs are getting a little irritating´: Michelle Obama admits she already regrets her high-maintenance hairdo
|
|
Daily Mail (UK), by Margot Peppers
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: pineledger- 4/7/2013 7:43:42 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Michelle Obama has admitted that she is already tired of the bangs she first sported in January. The First Lady said in an interview with Entertainment Tonight: ´Bangs are a day-by-day proposition. They´re starting to grow out, get a little irritating.´ Still, she hasn´t let her hairdo woes get her down. ´It´s okay,´ she said after her initial complaint. ´We´ll be good.´ The first indication that her hairstyle was becoming a burden came about last weekend, when Malia, 14, was spotted adjusting her mother´s hair during the White House Easter Egg Roll.
|
McCain: ´I don´t understand´ GOP filibuster on guns
|
|
Politico, by Jennifer Epstein
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/7/2013 12:18:14 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Sen. John McCain says he doesn´t understand the threats from some of his Republican colleagues to filibuster a bill on background checks to buy guns. "I don´t understand it," the Arizona Republican said on Sunday of the threat coming from Sen. Rand Paul,Sen. Ted Cruz, Sen. Mike Lee and nine other Republicans. "The purpose of the United States Senate is to debate and to vote and to let the people know where we stand.” "What are we afraid of? ... If this issue is as important as we all think it is, why not take ... it up and debate?"
|
Why Obama´s ´Best-Looking Attorney General´ Comment Was a Gaffe
|
|
The Atlantic, by Garance Franke-Ruta
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 6:51:15 AM
Post Reply
|
|
President Obama´s biggest gaffe yesterday when speaking of California Attorney General Kamala Harris was not in flirtatiously complimenting her as "the best-looking attorney general," but in introducing an observation from the system of beauty into a forum that was about the system of power.What´s that, you say? Irin Carmon does a great job in Salon in laying out the bounds of propriety for when it´s appropriate to talk about a woman´s looks as a general matter. But I´ve long felt we lack a solid theoretical underpinning for easily discussing these issues, and why precisely it is that
|
Mother Of Slain Benghazi Officer To Sean Hannity: ‘They Want Me To Shut Up’
|
|
Mediaite, by A.J. Delgado
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 5:00:16 AM
Post Reply
|
|
On Friday, Sean Hannity brought Pat Smith, mother of the late Sean Smith, on his radio program. The 34-year-old information management officer was one of four Americans murdered in the Benghazi embassy attack on September 11, 2012. In the chilling interview, a distraught Ms. Smith, in tears, pleaded for answers and spoke of the efforts to silence her. Ms. Smith first relayed how her son, prior to the attack, requested additional security in advance and warned the State Department: He did tell them, ahead of time, he typed it into his little typewriter over there,
|
Hillary Clinton Would Not ´Clear the Field´ for 2016
|
|
New Republic, by Tod Lindberg
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/6/2013 5:22:36 AM
Post Reply
|
|
No one is more preoccupied these days with Hillary Clinton´s 2016 plans than the Beltway political class—not even the former presidential candidate herself. To hear some tell it, her decision will be dispositive for all other Democrats thinking of entering the race. And pundits and reporters aren´t the only ones positing the "The Hillary Factor": No less than the House Democratic whip, Steny Hoyer, told BuzzFeed, “I don´t know that anybody would run against Hillary…. If she runs, she clears the field.” It´s an understandable conclusion, given Clinton´s stature in the Democratic Party and her 70 percent
|
Obama critic apologizes for his ´poorly chosen words´ on gay marriage
|
|
The Hill [Washington DC], by Alexandra Jaffe
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/6/2013 12:18:19 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Neurosurgeon Ben Carson, considered by some to be a potential Republican contender for president, apologized to Johns Hopkins University for the "poorly chosen words" he used in expressing his opposition to gay marriage last month.“I am sorry for any embarrassment this has caused,” Carson said in the letter, reported in New York Magazine.(Snip) "Although I do believe marriage is between a man and a woman, there are much less offensive ways to make that point. I hope all will look at a lifetime of service over some poorly chosen words.” Carson will remain as commencement speaker at Johns Hopkins,
|
Vanishing workforce weighs on growth
|
|
Washington Post, by Jim Tankersley
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 11:28:59 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Put out an all-points bulletin: Millions of Americans have gone missing from the workforce. Every month that those would-be workers are gone raises the odds that they might never come back, dimming the prospects for future economic growth. The vanishing trend is more than a decade old, but it accelerated during the Great Recession. Throughout 2012, economists held out hope that it had stopped. But then came Friday’s jobs report, and hopes were dashed. The Labor Department reported that the U.S. labor force — everyone who has a job or is looking for one — shrank
|
The Secrets of Princeton
|
|
New York Times, by Ross Douthat
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Oblio- 4/7/2013 8:08:09 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Susan Patton, the Princeton alumna who became famous for her letter urging Ivy League women to use their college years to find a mate, has been denounced as a traitor to feminism, to coeducation, to the university ideal. But really she’s something much more interesting: a traitor to her class. Her betrayal consists of being gauche enough to acknowledge publicly a truth that everyone who’s come up through Ivy League culture knows intuitively —
|
Broadcasters worry about ´Zero TV´ homes
|
|
Associated Press, by Ryan Nakashima
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Ribicon- 4/7/2013 2:43:40 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Los Angeles — Some people have had it with TV. They´ve had enough of the 100-plus channel universe. They don´t like timing their lives around network show schedules. They´re tired of $100-plus monthly bills. A growing number of them have stopped paying for cable and satellite TV service, and don´t even use an antenna to get free signals over the air. (Snip) Last month, the Nielsen Co. started labeling people in this group "Zero TV" households, because they fall outside the traditional definition of a TV home. There are 5 million of these residences in the U.S., up from
|
Christians, here´s why we´re losing our religion
|
|
Fox News, by Craig Groeschel
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: STLstudent- 4/7/2013 5:13:55 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Recent research indicates that the number of people who do not consider themselves a part of an organized religion is steadily on the rise. Interestingly enough, though the number of those religiously unaffiliated is increasing, there is little to no trend in the number of those who express atheist or agnostic beliefs. People aren’t saying they don’t believe in God. They’re saying they don’t believe in religion. They are not rejecting Christ. They are rejecting the church. This begs the question, “Why are we losing our religion?”
|
Beyonce, Jay-Z celebrate 5th anniversary in Havana, Cuba
|
|
Los Angeles Times, by Nardine Saad
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 4/6/2013 8:20:04 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Beyonce and Jay-Z celebrated their fifth wedding anniversary in Cuba this week. The couple, who married on April 4, 2008, took in the sights of Old Havana, visited a school, dined on a rooftop terrace and strolled the fan-filled streets in their island best.(snip).The power couple declined to answer journalists´ questions about their visit to the island nation, but some outlets are reporting that the moguls are there as tourists, though that would be illegal because of the half-century embargo the U.S. has on the Communist country. However, the Miami Herald said Washington has issued special licenses for
|
|

© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
FS
|
|