A Message From Lucianne  







S-G1




























ST-GC


   
 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


Panetta: ´Everyone Entitled to a
Chance´ to be Combat Soldier
in ´Gender Neutral´ Military

Cybercast News Service, by Matt Cover

Original Article

Posted By:KarenJ1, 1/24/2013 7:34:22 PM

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said Thursday that whether they are male or female "everyone is entitled to a chance" to become a combat soldier in a military that will now adopt "gender netural" standards. “If members of our military can meet the qualifications for a job--and let me be clear, we’re not talking about reducing the qualifications for a job--if they can meet the qualifications for the job then they should have the right to serve,” Panetta said at a Pentagon press conference. The Defense Department announced today that it would rescind its 1994 policy restricting women

Comments:
Un.be.lievable. I´m glad my father who was in the Navy in WWII is not here to see this disgraceful, shocking behavior of those in Washington. They are totally unleashed with 0bama´s re-election. They won´t be happy until they destroy everything in this country. It is infuriating.

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: NorthernDog, 1/24/2013 7:40:31 PM     (No. 9137527)

Here they admit that standards will be lowered:

FTA: If we do decide that a particular standard is so high that women couldn’t make it, the burden is now on the service to come back and explain to the Secretary why is it that high, does it really have to be that high, Dempsey said.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 2 - Posted by: Bpl40, 1/24/2013 7:51:21 PM     (No. 9137547)

If I was the mother or wife of someone going into harm´s way I would be livid. I am the father but luckily my son is back in one piece.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


   

 

R-G1
  
R-VAR_AD


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: god of irony, 1/24/2013 7:54:06 PM     (No. 9137553)

The result will be fewer women in the military. But then again there goal is to destroy the military.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 4 - Posted by: fmrusmc0302, 1/24/2013 7:54:58 PM     (No. 9137555)

agree with poster #2. The perfumed princes of the pentagon and their fellow lambs just don´t have to stones to dissent. They are just concerned about how many stars they can wear on their shoulders. This is a damned obscenity

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 5 - Posted by: Sfacheem, 1/24/2013 7:57:04 PM     (No. 9137558)

Another d***less wonder.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 6 - Posted by: bighambone, 1/24/2013 8:01:00 PM     (No. 9137569)

There is no such thing as "gender neutral" in human nature. The liberal Democrats will want to see big results from this policy change to sooth the very liberal advocacy groups who have been pushing for this. In order to reach that level of desired result they are going to have to lower the physical fitness standard for females there is no way around that.

If females really could keep up with men physically you would see women playing baseball in the major leagues, basketball in the NBA, football in the NFL, and hockey in the NHL. The reason that women are not in those professional sports leagues is that their physical fitness would break down pretty quickly. It will be the same during sustained infantry type combat operations. If they would keep the standards up I would say give the woman a chance to show what they can do, but that´s not the way it works with the liberal Democrats.

Very few women want to go in the infantry. for the women who do, this will give them the chance to punch their ticket to qualify for higher rank. That´s really what all this is all about.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 7 - Posted by: CEP, 1/24/2013 8:11:37 PM     (No. 9137586)

With the current crop of so called leaders that are at the top in the military, there is no way that our country can defend itself. Everyone will be having to explain themselves lest they might insult the enemy.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: Nevadadad46, 1/24/2013 8:17:28 PM     (No. 9137598)

I say do it- do it now, before we get into something really big and really ansty. I have been in combat, some of the worst in modern warfare and was fortunate enough to be among the few survivors. Let me be the first to say, there is a reason the women are not playing NFL football. There is a reason women are not out there on the pro hard ball fields. and there is a very good reason women should never be brought onto the full scale battle field. Before folks get to shouting "Sexist" at me, they had better take in a huge dose of reality- leave their idiotic Angelina Jolie movies behind in the kiddies in childhood locker. The real world is full of horror and tough stuff. Putting women in the Chosen Reservoir, on Guadalcanal, or in the swampland battlefield of Vietnam will do a whole lot to get Americans killed in wholesale lots! AS in Desert Storm warm up in the navy- on the carriers, in two week of the run-up, the women on board began reporting to sick call claiming pregnant – doing all they could to get out of it when everyone though Saddam had ship killer missiles and lots of them. Very quickly, critical sections were left undermanned as the gals were taken off ship. I know how the mind reels when you get orders to go to a combat zone and you have a combat MOS! This Panetta thinking is nothing but liberal fantasy BS!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 9 - Posted by: Mike PHX, 1/24/2013 8:19:16 PM     (No. 9137601)

"Oh, my non-balls! They got my non-balls!
Corpse-man! Corpse-man!!"

Thank GOD I grew up in the era that I did. You poor kids.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 10 - Posted by: crimea river, 1/24/2013 8:25:25 PM     (No. 9137613)

To Dimocrats the military is just another jobs program. Real ground combat is messy and expensive, and will be avoided at all costs. So in their minds, the ´Gender Neutral´ Military has no downside. This is where the real world will come crashing in.



  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 11 - Posted by: krause, 1/24/2013 8:29:19 PM     (No. 9137618)

Don´t forget to make room for the transgendered, too. In any stage, thereof.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 12 - Posted by: CEP, 1/24/2013 8:55:29 PM     (No. 9137654)

But what Panetta forgets is that not everyone is entitled to get someone killed because they just aren´t up to the job that is required especially one that involves combat in the military. It ain´t just about shooting a gun.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


   

 

B-G1


 
Reply 13 - Posted by: BaseballFan, 1/24/2013 8:58:40 PM     (No. 9137659)

Somewhere, Pat Schroeder is doing her little ´squinty smile´ at this. Barf.

Somewhere else, General George Patton is either weeping or cursing a blue streak. Probably both.

"Gender neutral" ? WTH is that ?!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 14 - Posted by: Teleologicus, 1/24/2013 9:04:26 PM     (No. 9137666)

There are several agendas and lots of confusion on this topic. There is nothing new in the idea - the Soviets, among others, were there long ago. So was Plato in the Republic. It is the logical extension of radical egalitarianism, which ultimately fades into totalitarianism. It is an interesting and perhaps fatal internal contradiction of democracy that it results in the abolition of the individual. Everybody is equal, nobody is different, difference is forbidden. Ridiculous scenarios ensue.

But there is an even deeper, if unacknowledged issue. Does America want to become the kind of society that sends its women -wives, daughters, mothers- to do its fighting for it? What are the implications of such a policy? More is involved than the ability to do the job and the inevitable consequences of putting young men and women together in close quarters. Have people really thought through the notion of gender neutrality?

Ironic, indeed, that the males of the Sixties skedaddled in large numbers when their country called them - and now the same crowd is all in favor of putting women on the front lines.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 15 - Posted by: beancounter, 1/24/2013 9:09:09 PM     (No. 9137672)

So when do women start registering for the draft?

The administration is good at handing out goodies, lousy at carrying out its duties.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 16 - Posted by: Penney, 1/24/2013 9:09:22 PM     (No. 9137673)

The formerly required physical standards have already been changed & the bar has been lowered throughout law enforcement in order to accommodate unrealistic social experimentation, and now the military is being forced to do the same, which presents an even more ominous threat to the security of the entire country? This will not work out well.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 17 - Posted by: Reillybinx, 1/24/2013 9:18:41 PM     (No. 9137690)

Enlistments have been at an all-time low since Obama became President.
Proof now that the dems have a war on women!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


   

 

R_DBL_B
  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: Ida Lou Pino, 1/24/2013 9:21:16 PM     (No. 9137694)

Hmmm - - I wonder how many "gender-neutral? men will become pregnant in the combat zone?

By the way, Leon - - "gender" is a grammatical term. What you really meant to say is "sex neutral" - - isn´t it?

Yeah - - that´s what I thought.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 19 - Posted by: Pros7767, 1/24/2013 9:34:47 PM     (No. 9137709)

These people have truly lost their minds! Any woman who wants to be on the front lines against the Islamists has lost hers too.

I wonder how many men will lose their lives trying to protect their female counterparts because of this idiotic policy. I am sooooo tired of this administration, the feminists and the liberal/progressives. They all disgust me.

And I´m a woman.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 20 - Posted by: reilly, 1/24/2013 9:37:47 PM     (No. 9137712)


They´ll love taking a dump in a foxhole.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


Reply 21 - Posted by: Keekng, 1/24/2013 9:51:50 PM     (No. 9137739)

The obamanation is doing everything possible to ruin this country.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 22 - Posted by: billa, 1/24/2013 10:20:31 PM     (No. 9137771)

I am woman and believe in all kinds of "equality" and people who have the skills to have an opportunity to prove it. But not on this point. But lower standards to accommodate a privilege group has no place in our domestic and national defense.

I understand the argument regarding the rank system and the ways to fast track to advancement, but not at the cost of our soldier´s lives and our defense.

Any one who believes in gender neutrality is utterly ignorant of human nature.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: smcchk, 1/24/2013 10:26:56 PM     (No. 9137777)

Every day, the Islamists´ day is made by the USA. They can not believe their luck.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 24 - Posted by: The Advocate, 1/24/2013 10:30:21 PM     (No. 9137780)

Obama is systematically weakening our military.
He is turning it into the USPS for jobs.
Obama sent Amb. Stevens to Benghazi to be sodomized and murdered.
Why should women be any different?
He truly is The Lord of the flies.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 25 - Posted by: Revolution76, 1/24/2013 10:37:56 PM     (No. 9137786)

How many gang rapes by enemy combatants and women who didn´t know they were pregnant coming home in body bags will it take before this insanity ends?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 26 - Posted by: manitouman, 1/24/2013 11:37:19 PM     (No. 9137845)

A soldier is entitled to honor among his leaders.

That´s the only entitlement in the military.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 27 - Posted by: otronome, 1/25/2013 12:00:10 AM     (No. 9137857)

Nex t high priority exercise and budget allocation will be implementing wheel chair ramps to all combat zones so absolutely nobody is left out. After making all accomodations and access points comply with ADA, a special task force will design battl filed accommodations for the blind.

Why have any priority other than "fairness" however it might be defined.



  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 28 - Posted by: doctorfixit, 1/25/2013 1:11:44 AM     (No. 9137895)

The military is now thoroughly politicized. You cannot get rank without passing the PC tests. They will dumb down the tests, just like they did for firemen and policemen. But the politicizing has far more ominous threats, because top officers are now being pressured into thinking about firing on US citizens.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 29 - Posted by: bighambone, 1/25/2013 1:40:24 AM     (No. 9137917)

Obama and his liberal crew are micro managers when it comes to implementing liberal social policies in the military and elsewhere. In that respect the admirals and generals that Obama has put on the Joint Chiefs of Staff have been relegated to being nothing more then yes men when it comes to liberal policies like this.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 30 - Posted by: PChristopher, 1/25/2013 1:44:07 AM     (No. 9137921)

Has Panetta ever served? The Sec. of Defense and, most importantly, the Prezdent, should be required to have served. It gives a better perspective.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


Reply 31 - Posted by: tommyr, 1/25/2013 9:27:08 AM     (No. 9138343)

According to Wikipedia, Panetta served two years as a Lieutenant in Army Intelligence.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.



Post Reply   Close thread 720471




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"



Concerned Women for America: Miley
Cyrus´ Behavior Sign of ´Cultural Sewage´
Breitbart´s Big Hollywood, by Dr. Susan Berry    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 2/24/2014 10:16:15 PM     Post Reply
Singer Miley Cyrus may have thumbed her nose at critics of her risqué Bangerz tour, but parents and concerned citizen groups are still weighing in on what many see as a performer who is evolving into a symbol of cultural decay. As Breitbart News’ Christian Toto has reported, Cyrus tweeted a message to critics of her racy on-stage antics: “Save your complaints for the McDonalds drive thru when they forget the ‘fries with that.’” People has reported Cyrus’ latest surprise. Dressed in a sparkling black cat suit and platform pumps, the former Hannah Montana, while singing Adore You during her

US Chamber of Commerce Pres: Pass
Amnesty Now Before It Gets Tougher
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Tony Lee    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 2/24/2014 10:06:54 PM     Post Reply
Saying the political landscape will not be more conducive to amnesty legislation in two or four years, U.S. Chamber of Commerce President Tom Donohue wrote on Monday that immigration reform must happen now. Donohue has previously said that the U.S. Chamber of Commerce would "pull out all the stops" to get immigration reform this year. The group reportedly plans to spend $50 million to blunt the influence of the Tea Party, largely because it opposes amnesty, and millions more to push for immigration reform legislation that the Congressional Budget Office has said would lower the wages of American workers. Donohue wrote that

Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers: Amnesty
Legislation ´Still a Possibility´
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Tony Lee    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 2/24/2014 10:02:17 PM     Post Reply
One of the top Republican leaders in the House believes it is still possible to pass immigration legislation this year. Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-WA), the House Republican Conference Chair, sounded more hopeful than other amnesty supporters in the House when speaking to her constituents in Washington state last week. “I think immigration is still a possibility,” McMorris Rodgers said in Spokane, Washington. “There’s a recognition that we need to fix what is a broken immigration system." McMorris Rodgers pushed for immigration reform in her response to President Barack Obama´s State of the Union address and also said

One boy´s response to Michelle
Obama´s ´knuckleheads´ comment
goes viral on #LetsMove hashtag
Washington Examiner, by Charlie Spiering    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 2/24/2014 9:55:38 PM     Post Reply
After first lady Michelle Obama jokingly referred to young people as "knuckleheads" on the "Tonight Show" with Jimmy Fallon on Friday, one boy decided to respond. My son´s response to being called a knucklehead by #FLOTUS #letsmove #tcot #teaparty 11:29 AM - 21 Feb 2014 Tanya Bachand, a mom who identified herself on Twitter as a Connecticut conservative and Tea Party supporter, tweeted out a photo of her son holding a sign in response. Dear #FLOTUS, I am not a knucklehead. I can read and I understand the Constitution," the message read. "#LetsMove on to shrinking the government so I can secure my

Throwdown: Conservative Ann
Coulter challenges Democrats
to debate her at CPAC
Washington Examiner, by Paul Bedard    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 2/24/2014 9:48:40 PM     Post Reply
Ann Coulter, Public Enemy No. 1 in the eyes of Obama supporters, is making a public challenge to Democrats to cough up a liberal for a debate about “the creeping socialism of Obama´s America” at next month´s annual Conservative Political Action Conference hosted by the American Conservative Union. The famous columnist and author of several books including “If Democrats Had Any Brains, They´d Be Republicans,” has long been a star of the event, but is now looking to revive the slugfests conservative Robert Novak used to have with TV’s Sam Donaldson at past CPAC conventions. Dan Schneider, executive director of the

Obama, John Boehner to
meet Tuesday in Oval Office
Washington Examiner, by Meghashyam Mali    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 2/24/2014 9:44:34 PM     Post Reply
President Obama will meet with House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, on Tuesday morning, the White House announced. The two are scheduled to speak at 11:30 a.m. in the Oval Office. The president and speaker will discuss a “broad set of topics,” according to Boehner´s office. The meeting comes as President Obama has sought to bypass Congress on a number of policy initiatives, vowing a “year of action” on fighting income inequality and boosting the middle class. Obama has said that he will resort to executive actions after his push for gun control, immigration reform and other priorities stalled in Congress

Cuomo seeks Republicans
to back his re-election
New York Post, by Carl Campanile    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 2/24/2014 8:26:06 PM     Post Reply
Gov. Cuomo is making another pitch Monday for Republican heavy hitters to back his re-election campaign. Home Depot founder Ken Langone is hosting a “Republicans for Cuomo” event at the Harvard Club at 8:30 a.m. Cuomo will address the well-heeled Wall Street and real-estate titans and field questions. David Malpass, who ran in the 2010 Republican US Senate primary, also was involved in planning the breakfast, sources said. Cuomo attended a similar event last month. The Cuomo campaign wants to woo Republican backers to keep their big bucks from going to the eventual GOP nominee.

GOP Lobbyist Pushing for Ban
on Openly Gay NFL Players
Mediaite, by Josh Feldman    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 2/24/2014 6:14:26 PM     Post Reply
Republican lobbyist Jack Burkman is pushing for legislation that would ban openly gay athletes from the National Football League, spurred on by the recent news about Michael Sam publicly coming out. He is appealing directly to Republican members of Congress to propose a bill on the issue, telling The Huffington Post that there are five House members and one senator “interested in co-sponsoring the bill” and he expects more to join on. Burkman acknowledges that normally, conservatives don’t like the idea of imposing policy on private businesses, but says that this belief is now “trumped for reason of great urgency or

Obama needs to do more,
not less, on his own
Washington Post, by E.J. Dionne, Jr.    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 2/24/2014 5:10:07 PM     Post Reply
Republicans are unhappy that President Obama is invoking his executive powers to govern in the face of a do-nothing-in-2014 House of Representatives. To hear them talk, you would think our chief executive is modeling himself on the late Hugo Chavez and wants to seize dictatorial control. This, of course, is nonsense. In fact, Obama has in many ways been less aggressive in his use of executive authority than his predecessors. Take the matter of executive orders. According to the American Presidency Project at the University of California at Santa Barbara, Obama issued 147 executive orders in his first term. This compares

The FCC Can Have My Pen and My
Microphone When They Pry Them
From My Cold, Dead Hands
Townhall, by John Ransom    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 2/24/2014 5:02:10 PM     Post Reply
I got a pen; I got a microphone. And they can have them when they pry them from my cold, dead hands. While it looks like the FCC has at least temporarily backed down from their threats of putting monitors into newsrooms, we haven’t seen the last of it. This has been a dream of liberals for a long time. “According to the research design presented to the FCC by a government contractor named Social Solutions International Inc.,” writes RealClearPolitics, “it wasn’t just television stations, either: Internet news organizations and newspapers were to be included in this information sweep, as if that were

Wasserman Schultz Says Voters’
‘Buyer’s Remorse,’ GOP ‘Civil
War’ Could Help Dems Gain Seats
PJ Media, by Bridget Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 2/24/2014 4:39:29 PM     Post Reply
The chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee said she believes her party will gain seats in the fall because Americans have “buyer’s remorse” about electing so many Tea Party members in the past. “How many times does President Obama have to — extended his hand across the aisle, offered to sit down, said let’s sit down and work things out, put things in his budget that our party has fundamental problems with, simply to be able to get the Republicans to understand that we want to find common ground?” Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.) said this morning on CNN. “The tea party

Kerry’s lawyer plays Kennedy
card in drugged driving trial
New York Post, by Laurel Babcock*    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 2/24/2014 4:24:37 PM     Post Reply
Kerry Kennedy’s drugged-driving trial kicked off Monday with her lawyer touting her famous lineage — and her matriarch mom Ethel making a rare public appearance in court to support her. “She is a daughter of Ethel and Robert Kennedy and a niece of our past president, John Fitzgerald Kennedy,” said high-powered Kennedy lawyer Gerald Lefcourt to jurors in the packed White Plains court room, where two of Kerry’s brothers, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Douglas, also sat. Lefcourt rattled off other personal tidbits about his “serious and religious’’ client — even the fact that she has two daughters in Ivy League schools



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Cancer, Obamacare Victim at
Center of Political Storm

64 replie(s)
Washington Free Beacon, by Adam Kredo    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 2/23/2014 5:46:30 AM     Post Reply
Julie Boonstra, a cancer patient who was kicked of off her health plan due to Obamacare, lashed out at Rep. Gary Peters (D., Mich.) on Saturday after lawyers for his campaign demanded that Michigan broadcasters cease airing ads featuring her story. Boonstra, a Michigan resident, was diagnosed with leukemia five years ago. She was recently kicked off of her healthcare plan due to regulations passed as part of President Barack Obama’s Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, which Peters voted in favor of. After relating her story publicly in an ad produced by the advocacy group Americans for Prosperity (AFP), Peters dispatched

Alec Baldwin Quits Media,
Blames Breitbart

40 replie(s)
Breitbart Big Hollywood, by Joel B. Pollak    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 2/24/2014 9:28:04 AM     Post Reply
On Sunday evening, award-winning actor and prominent left-wing activist Alec Baldwin announced that he was leaving "public life"--and blamed "Roger Ailes. And Fox. And Breitbart." In an extended rant to Joe Hogan, posted on vulture.com and published in New York magazine, Baldwin recounted his run-ins with paparazzi, his gay slur controversies, and his ill-fated talk show on MSNBC--but he reserved special resentment for Breitbart. "There is a core of outlets that are pushing these stories out. Breitbart clutters the blogosphere with ´Alec Baldwin, he’s the Devil, he’s Fidel Baldwin,´" Baldwin claimed. "....And this is all about hate.

Rice’s “No Regrets” and Obama’s Arrogance
39 replie(s)
Commentary Magazine, by Jonathan S.Tobin    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 2/23/2014 7:49:52 PM     Post Reply
It’s hard to understand exactly why Susan Rice is still refusing to admit fault about her lies about the Benghazi attack. When asked this morning on Meet the Press by David Gregory whether she had any regrets about appearing on four network news shows the Sunday after the 9/11/12 attacks that took the lives of four Americans and telling the nation that what happened was the result of a demonstration against a video, Rice said she had none: David, no. Because what I said to you that morning, and what I did every day since, was to share the best

Revealed: Obama’s ‘attack’
on Medicare Part D

37 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Patrick Howley    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 2/23/2014 9:43:06 PM     Post Reply
The Obama administration is launching an “attack” on the Medicare Advantage and Medicare Part D programs as part of Obamacare that will result in higher costs and fewer health care options for seniors, according to a U.S. House subcommittee. The administration is quietly introducing “policies that would undermine the integrity and success of the Medicare Part D program” according to the subcommittee. President Bush signed Medicare Part D into law in 2003 to subsidize prescription drug costs for Medicare beneficiaries. The Daily Caller has learned that the House Energy and Commerce Committee’s Subcommittee on Health will hold a hearing Feb.

NFL to penalize use of racial slur
37 replie(s)
ESPN.com & Associated Press, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 2/23/2014 10:07:37 PM     Post Reply
The head of the Fritz Pollard Alliance, which monitors diversity in the NFL, expects the league to institute a rule where players would be penalized 15 yards for using the N-word on the field. John Wooten, the head of the Fritz Pollard Alliance, anticipates that the NFL´s competition committee will enact the rule at the owners´ meeting next month. "We did talk about it, I´m sure that you saw near the end of the year that Fritz Pollard (Alliance) came out very strong with the message that the league needs to do something about the language on the field," said

Piers Morgan and CNN Plan
End to His Prime-Time Show

33 replie(s)
New York Times, by David Carr    Original Article
Posted By: Bubbasuncle- 2/23/2014 8:41:12 PM     Post Reply
There have been times when the CNN host Piers Morgan didn’t seem to like America very much — and American audiences have been more than willing to return the favor. Three years after taking over for Larry King, Mr. Morgan has seen the ratings for “Piers Morgan Live” hit some new lows, drawing a fraction of viewers compared with competitors at Fox News and MSNBC. (Snip) It’s been an unhappy collision between a British television personality who refuses to assimilate — the only football he cares about is round and his lectures on guns were rife with contempt — and a CNN audience that

U.S. warns Russia to keep
its military out of Ukraine after
protesters force president out

32 replie(s)
WashingtonTimes, by Guy Taylor and Valerie Richardson    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 2/23/2014 10:43:04 PM     Post Reply
The Obama administration warned Russian President Vladimir Putin on Sunday not to react too aggressively to the fast-moving developments in Ukraine, where pro-Western demonstrators forced the nation’s Moscow-backed president from power over the weekend. National Security Adviser Susan E. Rice said the situation unfolding in Kiev “reflects the will of the Ukrainian people and the interests of the United States and Europe,” and that Russia would be making a “grave mistake” if it sends in military forces to try to reverse the developments — or to seize control of pro-Moscow eastern Ukraine. The Putin government has shown no outward signs

Harvard writer: Free speech threatens
liberalism and must be destroyed

28 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Robby Soave    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 2/24/2014 5:21:14 AM     Post Reply
If this Harvard University student got her way, free speech on campus would be abolished and professors with dissenting views fired, because radical leftism is the only permissible political philosophy and the First Amendment is a barrier preventing modern colleges from fulfilling their proper role as indoctrination camps. Her name is Sandra Korn. She is a senior at Harvard and columnist for the Harvard Crimson. In a recent column, Korn unambiguously insisted that the university should stop guaranteeing professors and students the right to hold controversial views and pursue research that challenges liberalism. “If our university community opposes racism, sexism, and heterosexism, why

Rice: No regrets on
Benghazi TV appearances

26 replie(s)
Politico, by Byron Tau    Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight- 2/23/2014 12:34:01 PM     Post Reply
National Security Adviser Susan Rice said Sunday she has no regrets about her now-infamous round of TV interviews in 2012 about the the attacks on the U.S. mission in Benghazi, Libya.Rice, appearing on “Meet the Press," said that nobody in the Obama administration intended to mislead the American people when she appeared on Fox, ABC, CNN, NBC and CBS in 2012 shortly after the attacks.Asked by host David Gregory if she had any regrets about the interviews, Rice replied: “No.” Because what I said to you that morning, and what I did every day since, was to share the best

Obama to unveil new manufacturing
institutes in Chicago, Detroit

25 replie(s)
Los Angeles Times, by Christi Parsons & Melissa Harris    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 2/23/2014 5:10:26 AM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON — President Obama plans to announce on Tuesday the opening of two new manufacturing institutes in the Chicago and Detroit areas as part of a larger plan to use public-private partnerships to advance his agenda despite opposition from Republicans in Congress. Several federal agencies will join forces with companies and universities to run the institutes, which will be devoted to bridging the gap between applied research and product development, according to an administration official familiar with the plans. Each institute will function as a “teaching factory,” the official said, and will provide training for workers while also helping companies get the

Farrakhan: African Americans
deserve their own courts

25 replie(s)
USA Today, by Niraj Warikoo    Original Article
Posted By: Scottyboy- 2/24/2014 6:05:40 PM     Post Reply
DETROIT -- In a fiery speech Sunday delivered to 18,000 at Joe Louis Arena, Minister Louis Farrakhan blasted the judicial systems in the U.S. as being biased against African Americans, calling upon the community to set up their own courts. "We want equal justice under the law," Farrakhan said on the last day of the Nation of Islam´s annual convention, held in Detroit this year. "Our people can´t take much more. We have to have our own courts." With Rep. John Conyers, D-Mich., and Detroit City Council President Brenda Jones sitting behind him, Farrakhan spoke for nearly three hours, reiterating the Nation

GOP Lobbyist Pushing for Ban
on Openly Gay NFL Players

25 replie(s)
Mediaite, by Josh Feldman    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 2/24/2014 6:14:26 PM     Post Reply
Republican lobbyist Jack Burkman is pushing for legislation that would ban openly gay athletes from the National Football League, spurred on by the recent news about Michael Sam publicly coming out. He is appealing directly to Republican members of Congress to propose a bill on the issue, telling The Huffington Post that there are five House members and one senator “interested in co-sponsoring the bill” and he expects more to join on. Burkman acknowledges that normally, conservatives don’t like the idea of imposing policy on private businesses, but says that this belief is now “trumped for reason of great urgency or


Post Reply   Close thread 720471





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google



© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

FS