And this will do zero in preventing crime. It will put law-abiding citizens at a disadvantage.

We have to keep saying it, over and over and over. The Second Amendment is not about hunting and sportsmen. This is their "divide and conquer" strategy; get those firearm owners whose only interest is hunting or competition to side with the gun-grabbers by pretending to protect them. I´m already seeing the letters to the editor saying "I´m a hunter, and I agree that we just don´t need "assault rifles" and thirty-round magazines."

Since the information is now out there that "assault weapons" her words not mine were NOT used in the killings at Sandy Point, by what justification are politicians proceeding with this bogus premise?
If these communist politicians can ignore the second amendment, what amendment will they come after next?
Beware American People.

I propose to outlaw Jewish politicians....how would they like that?
I mean it´s legal to be one, like a gunowner, but ...
just sayin´

Feinstupe is right. We give up our guns and then muslim broBama can give them to Morsi along with all the jets and tanks they want. We can defend our homes and country with our surplus over-priced solar panels.

I´ve got a better idea, Di-Fi, you dry up and blow away.

This is a theater for their real objective, a national database of all gun owners. With that they will pick us off one small subset at a time.

Just as the ban on cocaine has dried up the supply over time. I know that they actually don´t care but it should be obvious that the government has NEVER been able to ban anything without creating a lucrative black market which keeps the supply lines just as full of product as before the ban.

#2 is right, and I too have seen the same dupes writing into newspapers and websites...

These "hunters" just don´t understand that liberals never stop when they start with the "sensible" gun law thing.

Those "hunters" are probably libs sending in bogus letters to the editor. As far as I am concerned DiFi has dried up a long time ago.

Molon Labe. It means in Greek "Come and Take". It was King Leonidas I response to the Persian army´s demand that the Spartans surrender their weapons at the Battle of Thermopylae.

So Sen. Fienstein, Molon Labe

But..but..she prayed and everything...

According to Mark Levin´s Landmark Legal Foundation, Feinstein carries an unrestricted concealed weapons permit.

See:

"Second Amendment Hypocrites: Senators Schumer and Feinstein Pack Heat"

http://www.federalobserver.com/archive.php?aid=10104
.

F U DIFI

I hope the citizens don´t take a French Revolution type action against ruling elites like Feinstein.

Yes, this will definitely dry up LEGAL weapons over time, but the black-market in these products will skyrocket, much as has happened with drugs. It´s just fine with this Administration to move weapons to "insurgents" in OTHER Countries, just as long as our own citizenry toes the line. More people than ever will be injured or killed, because now they can fight over guns as they do with other products. Obviously they have not read their American history books and reviewed "Prohibition".

DiFi provides evidence that she´s graduated from democrat to dementia-afflicted, from socialist to psychotic. This ill-conceived (and repeatedly-proven-to-be-ineffective) proposal will only dry up the supply of liberty, as a disarmed populace will be even more at the mercy of the violent and unable to stand up for their rights.

And I wish I could get away with wearing a teeshirt bearing #15´s remark, without risking the loss of job, home, and freedom. (Though the latter is dwindling in size faster than Kate Moss on a starvation diet.)

Unfortunately, this has already been foisted upon us once ... the fully automatic weapon ban of those firearms made past 1986. That is, they limited the pool to existing weapons which has driven up demand (supply diminished because no one wanted to sell) and you had to get "permission" (BATFE tax stamp for ANY transfer).

I personally believe that private individuals should be able to own ANY weapon held by the government/military. We pay for theirs and you should not diminish your resistive capability to a potential enemy.

Stop this unconstitutional nonsense.

Start C U T T I N G T H E S P E N D I N G


There should be no sunset law on cutting the spending!!!

These politicians are revealing their tyrannical true colors. They should be impeached for these anti-constitutional and subversive activities.

Hammer your House Reps to not pass this legislation or your rights will disappear. We all know how much Boehner likes to cave.

Diane Feinstein at age 79 should be concerned with avoiding her to be mandated end of life discussions about how to go out without a fuss than messing with a Constitutional right she shouldn´t outlive.

Yep, I´m sure Feinstein can tell us all about ´drying up´!

Don´t tread on the second amendment rights...the real purpose should be to dry up old hags and nags over time! What is this woman´s problem?

‘The Purpose Is to Dry Up the Supply of
These Weapons Over Time’

Just like the major bullet buy by the gov last year ?

The wicked witch of the west and her evil flying monkeys trying to take away our firearms. We must not let this pass.

Also, don´t be fooled by the ´gun show loophole´ lie, it is gun registration.