A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy

































   
 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


Panetta opens combat
roles to women

Associated Press, by Staff

Original Article

Posted By:Judy W., 1/23/2013 3:53:54 PM

Senior defense officials say Pentagon chief Leon Panetta is removing the military´s ban on women serving in combat, opening hundreds of thousands of front-line positions and potentially elite commando jobs after more than a decade at war. The groundbreaking move recommended by the Joint Chiefs of Staff overturns a 1994 rule banning women from being assigned to smaller ground combat units. Panetta´s decision gives the military services until January 2016 to seek special exceptions if they believe any positions must remain closed to women.

Comments:
Good grief, what are we coming to? (That´s the whole article.)

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: yuban, 1/23/2013 3:58:50 PM     (No. 9134868)

Send HRC to the front lines NOW.


Reply 2 - Posted by: Susieq1, 1/23/2013 4:01:10 PM     (No. 9134875)

Foolish!


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: aasilver, 1/23/2013 4:01:52 PM     (No. 9134876)

Our first line of defense -- Gays and women.

Sounds like a plan -- to destroy the USA.


Reply 4 - Posted by: fhancock, 1/23/2013 4:06:41 PM     (No. 9134892)

When do they sign up for Selective Service ...if they are good enough to go into the infantry they should be eligible if and when a draft comes...otherwise they are STILL second-class soldiers...


Reply 5 - Posted by: wsdiego, 1/23/2013 4:06:45 PM     (No. 9134893)

They won´t last long on an Amtrac!
Semper Fi The Dirty Bird, Marine Amtracs


Reply 6 - Posted by: Johnny Angle, 1/23/2013 4:07:22 PM     (No. 9134895)

How do now they justify Selective Service for men only?


Reply 7 - Posted by: JoniTx, 1/23/2013 4:08:50 PM     (No. 9134899)

Doesn´t Congress have a voice on this decision? Just curious...


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: GOPinTN, 1/23/2013 4:13:53 PM     (No. 9134907)

Rarely do we find men who willingly engage in hard, solid thinking. There is an almost universal quest for easy answers and half-baked solutions. Nothing pains some people more than having to think.- Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.


Reply 9 - Posted by: TXknitter, 1/23/2013 4:16:19 PM     (No. 9134912)

A lot of women say fine, go for it. BUT no whining, special treatment or lawsuits if you get your body parts blown to smithereens.


Reply 10 - Posted by: Coy860, 1/23/2013 4:16:32 PM     (No. 9134914)

ANY woman in combat better damned well be qualified to carry my grandson to safety if he is wounded in combat. IF not, get OUT.
This is a stupid move.


Reply 11 - Posted by: Not your typical New Yorker, 1/23/2013 4:16:57 PM     (No. 9134917)

The democrats continue to turn our military into politically correct mush.


Reply 12 - Posted by: Attila DiMedici, 1/23/2013 4:20:30 PM     (No. 9134924)

#7, that was my though as well. I thought that the ban on women in combat was legislated. However, I just did some research and such is apparently not the case.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: on fire, 1/23/2013 4:30:36 PM     (No. 9134942)

Yep, the guys on the front line love nothing better than squandering time carrying gear for tired females or helping them keep up.

Panetta is ridiculous.


Reply 14 - Posted by: RIsailor, 1/23/2013 4:30:56 PM     (No. 9134946)

The Marine Corps runs a combat school for new Marine officers and opened the school to women last year. Several tried out and flunked. No more women lieutenants are applying.


Reply 15 - Posted by: tulipwood, 1/23/2013 4:34:55 PM     (No. 9134952)

Say good-by to men. Men will not compete with women, nor will they compete against a culture that has become so repulsively feminized. Ladies, you are on your own.


Reply 16 - Posted by: lazyman, 1/23/2013 4:38:00 PM     (No. 9134959)

We could have used them in Nam. We still would have lost but the year would have gone faster for me.


Reply 17 - Posted by: Trust No One, 1/23/2013 4:42:55 PM     (No. 9134969)

How I see it.

Next step - required to sign for Selective Service.

Wars in Africa and Defending Japan from China

Need for more soliders

Draft reinstated

Call up Men AND Women to fight global wars to inrich bankers, military complex and to TRY to keep global economy from crashing DOWN into FIAT oblivion.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: stablemoney, 1/23/2013 4:44:27 PM     (No. 9134973)

The chiefs will stand far in the rear while they are sent forward for cannon fodder.


Reply 19 - Posted by: King of all trolls, 1/23/2013 4:46:01 PM     (No. 9134977)

There goes chivalry. Why should a man bother to endure what he does in the service if some chick can do the job for him. Stay home. Play video games. What´s the point?


Reply 20 - Posted by: whyyeseyec, 1/23/2013 4:48:49 PM     (No. 9134982)

Send only women into combat. Men have carried the load far too long. If we `need` more women in govn and business then we need more women in combat.


Reply 21 - Posted by: Scribelus, 1/23/2013 4:49:22 PM     (No. 9134983)

The women involved are volunteers, just like the men. Time will tell if the nation can bear larger female casualty lists.


Reply 22 - Posted by: TexasHillCountry, 1/23/2013 5:06:11 PM     (No. 9135000)

A VERY BAD IDEA.

Not what casualties the public can bear, but the real, and known, loss in combat efficiency? The biggest part of combat for the front-line troops is hard, brutal, dirty work that makes physical, emotional, and psychological demands that have to be experienced to be understood.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: dittohead, 1/23/2013 5:11:34 PM     (No. 9135008)

True Confession: NO ONE would want to depend on ME on the front lines!!! VERY FOOLISH MOVE!


Reply 24 - Posted by: 6079 Smith, W, 1/23/2013 5:12:00 PM     (No. 9135009)

Oh, dear! Another opportunity for us to be beat over the head with "the first woman in combat", "the first black woman in combat", "the first transgendered woman in combat", "the first latina woman in combat", "the first woman killed in combat", "the first black woman killed in combat"...


Reply 25 - Posted by: fayebeck, 1/23/2013 5:14:48 PM     (No. 9135012)

I say only women who support abortion or have had one thereby qualifying them for killing, be put on the front lines. Also just a piggish comment from a pig. Seems women are the only "minority" who lobbied to give up special status. Of course that special status would be considering them "ladies". BUT today´s slutty women would make great soldiers. You won "ladies" now go for it.


Reply 26 - Posted by: HistoryBuff, 1/23/2013 5:19:36 PM     (No. 9135019)

Whoppee! The Academics have ruled!

The sign of equality is that now women can become trained killers.


Lets see how that works out.


Reply 27 - Posted by: Freeloader, 1/23/2013 5:23:07 PM     (No. 9135028)

And from the foxholes, torpedo rooms, tactical command posts, bivouac areas and boondocks around the globe, the new "battle cry" will be heard..."Come on baba, you drive me crazy...Goodness gracious great balls of fire!"


Reply 28 - Posted by: msjena, 1/23/2013 5:25:34 PM     (No. 9135034)

This is progress? Well, I suppose if you think there are too many people already it is.


Reply 29 - Posted by: Packard Man, 1/23/2013 5:25:45 PM     (No. 9135035)

Interestingly revealed on the day Hillary goes before congress.


Reply 30 - Posted by: chumley, 1/23/2013 5:29:11 PM     (No. 9135040)

I served with a lot of women during my time in. The vast majority did their regular jobs exceptionally well.
When we went into the field or on a remote was another matter entirely. Very few had the strength or stamina to do the work. Their very presence created resentment as someone else had to do two jobs.
Plus, they create drama just by being there. Romances develop all the time, and the last thing some lonely GI needs is to see someone else playing high school lovey games. I saw it on every assignment and every deployment.
This is a bad idea, which means it will be embraced by those who wish to further degrade our military.


Reply 31 - Posted by: semperparatus, 1/23/2013 5:30:08 PM     (No. 9135042)

Of course this is a bad idea, another moronic event in the life of liberals and their followers. Ask anyone aboard ship what they think of this idea.

#27 - I believe the United States has already passed the test when it comes to women killers. A disgusting topic to be sure, but, are we not at the 55 million abortion mark now?

55 million... more than the number of deaths (conservative number) in World War II. Hitler and Stalin would be proud.

Semper Paratus


Reply 32 - Posted by: viking diver, 1/23/2013 5:32:18 PM     (No. 9135046)

unbelievable and simply stupid, panetta playing PC with the very lives that men will give their lives to defend.
Are women ready to be raped repeatedly by the enemy before being killed.
some of the villages that were friendly and provided security and food to us in Nam, sometimes would be overrun if found out and it wasn´t pretty what was left.
what a way to ruin a combat effective squad by putting a woman in the mix, will she be able to carry 65 lbs of equipment or more while on foot, walk long distances. I remember the Air Force in its infinite wisdom once put a woman with the 5 of us on a mountain top for a remote 6 month tour, we had to give up space for her privacy, and set aside time for the shows just for her, and she still ended up getting pregnant and I don´t think her husband was too pleased by that either.


Reply 33 - Posted by: cav160, 1/23/2013 5:57:57 PM     (No. 9135086)

Well since we are on a PC role lets have a couple of all female Infantry Battalions, commanded by first female Battalion Commander! Throw them into Horn of Africa to show how effective they can be.


Reply 34 - Posted by: FL_Absentee_Voter, 1/23/2013 5:58:42 PM     (No. 9135089)

Sea duty has been opened up to women since 1978 and it seems to be working our real well: more than half of the commanding officers relieved of their commands last year were fired due to some form of sexual misconduct.

Just saw Howitzer Explosion Guy ("Party on, Wayne!") on the cafeteria flat screen - he´s all giddy over the news and had out-of-the-closet helo pilot tammy duckworth on as his guest. Finally, something brings a smile to her face. Up until now, she´s always worn a frown - I didn´t know if it was because she´s merely another angry lesbian or that she lost both legs while fighting in George Bush´s War.


Reply 35 - Posted by: Magic8Ball, 1/23/2013 6:01:09 PM     (No. 9135094)

War against women.


Reply 36 - Posted by: oldsfc, 1/23/2013 6:05:08 PM     (No. 9135102)

The strongest women is still weaker than the average male. I would love to see Mary hump a 50lb ruck. Hah!


Reply 37 - Posted by: Antiquegolf, 1/23/2013 6:06:23 PM     (No. 9135104)

Reply 26, any population control secondary to abortion and other factors is more than canceled by the illegal alien invasion. The population of the USA is increasing at the rate of a 3rd world country. Almost all of the growth is due to immigration. And it´s not just hispanics. The average muslim "family" in USA has 7 children.


Reply 38 - Posted by: mythman, 1/23/2013 6:06:50 PM     (No. 9135107)

It´s been tried before in other armies. As I recall, besides the strength issue there are two more: 1) the maiming of women soldiers in combat has a devastating effect on all present 2) women decide to opt out by getting pregnant in considerable numbers.


Reply 39 - Posted by: Alpha91c, 1/23/2013 6:07:06 PM     (No. 9135109)

Mark my words, this will not end well. PC run amok.


Reply 40 - Posted by: anonymous, 1/23/2013 6:08:02 PM     (No. 9135112)

Well, if this is to be then the Obama administration should immediately require that all young women register for the draft.


Reply 41 - Posted by: Ida Lil, 1/23/2013 6:14:29 PM     (No. 9135120)

Oh My the yang factor at work Obama style. He voices all out protection for women while his minion declares women will be in combat.
Of course the protection from Obe is only in matters of lady parts in political sexual terms while pretending those parts are not included in death or dismemberment in combat.
Like everything else in his governing agenda open mouth stick in foot then cram in the opposite one.


Reply 42 - Posted by: ScarletPimpernel, 1/23/2013 6:21:07 PM     (No. 9135138)

And earlier this afternoon, Valerie Jarrett tweeted, "If there´s one thing we should all agree on, it´s protecting women from violence. Congress needs to pass the Violence Against Women Act." (You can access the link on Drudge.) How screwed up is this Administration??


Reply 43 - Posted by: HistoryBuff, 1/23/2013 6:34:00 PM     (No. 9135159)

Good.

Now make all 18 year old women of America REGISTER FOR THE DRAFT.

It´ll get reeaaallll quiet.


Reply 44 - Posted by: Penney, 1/23/2013 6:48:43 PM     (No. 9135186)

Poster is exactly right. This is 0bama´s war against women, indeed the entire dem party´s decades-old war against women. The radical militant lefty/libs have betrayed femininity and demeaned masculinity since the 1960s! Their statist policies have fractured the American family unit over the past 4 decades. ...This will NOT work out well.


Reply 45 - Posted by: Rafter, 1/23/2013 6:55:20 PM     (No. 9135190)

#1 and #3...

Remember that old bromide...
"kill two birds with one stone"... ?

Well...
Send Hill-err-ee-ass Herself to combat...
and you got gay women at the front!

Pretty certain she´ll come out as gay before the next election.
Wants all those votes.
Nothing to stop her this time.

Probably plans to marry Jodie Foster in the White House in 2017.
That is...
If she survives her combat role.
Army boots and a camo pants suit.
Trendy.


Reply 46 - Posted by: BaseballFan, 1/23/2013 7:05:58 PM     (No. 9135204)

I envision that this will be as "successful" as putting women on Navy ships. Until they decide (at the last minute) they don´t want to deploy.
Then some poor GI is going to find out he´s being FORCED to do back-to-back deployments.


Reply 47 - Posted by: OC Jackson, 1/23/2013 7:12:00 PM     (No. 9135210)

Lousy idea. One poster talked about a 50 lb. rucksack. More realistically, try a 75 lb. load.

Register all 18 year-old females for the draft. Those who are "selected" for motor pool specialties, are required to change tires on their own. Those selected for the Artillery must be capable of loading an 8" howitzer. The rounds weigh 200 lbs, by the way.

I´ve served with females, officer and enlisted. In the office, they were fine soldiers. The problem came with their relationships (inevitable) with their male counterparts. Young women and men, thrown together in stressful environments will become sexually involved. Problems will range from jealousy to physical conflict.

This is a stupid, PC idea.


Reply 48 - Posted by: dr fate, 1/23/2013 7:27:51 PM     (No. 9135229)

Hey, if Demi Moore could do it so well in a movie, then what´s the big deal?


Reply 49 - Posted by: Bubby, 1/23/2013 8:00:18 PM     (No. 9135269)

This is just another attack by Democrats to destroy the greatest army on earth. First gays and now women. This is purposeful and destructive. I would not go into combat with women period! I don´t care what anyone thinks of this post I wouldn´t do it. It won´t be long before all the physical strength requirements will be revised downward to accomodate women. The result will be more combat deaths to be pc. It´s discusting what the Democrats are doing to this country!


Reply 50 - Posted by: grandpa, 1/23/2013 10:24:40 PM     (No. 9135472)

Come on guys, this could be a good thing. Now soldiers won´t need so many camp followers or local whores. Between this built-in nookie supply and being serviced by the open gays, soldiers are going to be in sexual heaven. Wow, what a country!


Reply 51 - Posted by: bighambone, 1/24/2013 12:56:43 AM     (No. 9135680)

The only reason that the liberals are able to run with such a ludicrous policy change is that only about 1% of the US population ever serves in the military these days. The percentage that make up the army and marine ground combat units that close with the enemy during ground combat is much less then that 1%. The rest of the about 99% of the population knows little about the military and it´s traditions, or the extreme hardships that marines and soldiers actually face and experience during sustained ground combat operations.


Reply 52 - Posted by: broken01, 1/24/2013 11:47:58 AM     (No. 9136494)

This may look good on paper in the liberal halls of the WH, Pentagon, ACLU, and college campi but being a Navy veteran of 20yrs I´m here tell you this will blow up the dopey liberal´s faces. How you might ask? The first time that ANY terrorist group gets their filthy hands on a female servicemember and uses her to either make her give it up(secrets folks not what your thinking)or tortures her to make some other captive spill the classifed beans. The blowback would make the above institutions rethink this ridiculous idea. Mark my words that will happen.



Post Reply   Close thread 720286




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Judy W."

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Judy W."



U.K. Independence Party
finds its voice amid
growing anti-immigrant wave
Washington Post, by Anthony Faiola    Original Article
Posted By: Judy W.- 4/1/2013 8:44:11 AM     Post Reply
EASTLEIGH, ENGLAND — For the United Kingdom Independence Party, defeat has never looked this much like victory. After a Liberal Democrat member of the House of Commons was jailed on criminal charges, this struggling railroad town near the English Channel held a special election to pick his successor. (Snip) Its best-yet showing in a national race has, nevertheless, thrust into the national limelight a political movement that is part of a wave of anti-immigrant populism surging across Europe. The outcome of the Feb. 28 vote, coupled with national polls showing UKIP support at an all-time high,

IRS knowingly sends Billions
in Fraudulent Refunds
to Illegal Immigrants
Townhall, by Bob Beauprez    Original Article
Posted By: Judy W.- 3/30/2013 9:58:51 AM     Post Reply
A WTHR-TV Indianapolis investigative report exposes a fraudulent scheme wherein the IRS is sending $4.2 billion per year to illegal immigrants as an "additional child tax credit" for children who don´t even live in the U.S. Further, the IRS and Congress have been ignoring the scheme for years. The Inspector General´s office has repeatedly identified the problem in audit after audit. The IG, Russell George says, "The magnitude of the problem has grown exponentially," but the IRS is doing nothing to stop it. "It´s so easy it´s ridiculous," the tax preparer whistleblower

SDI at 30, Part V
National Review, by Jay Nordlinger    Original Article
Posted By: Judy W.- 3/30/2013 6:37:08 AM     Post Reply
In that speech of his, 30 years ago, Reagan said, I know this is a formidable technical task, one that may not be accomplished before the end of this century. Yet current technology has attained a level of sophistication where it’s reasonable for us to begin this effort. It will take years, probably decades, of effort on many fronts. There will be failures and setbacks, just as there will be successes and breakthroughs. Yes — failures and setbacks, and successes and breakthroughs. How patient have people been with the failures and setbacks?

Sowell, Race Hustlers,
and David Hume
American Spectator, by David Hogberg    Original Article
Posted By: Judy W.- 3/30/2013 6:10:22 AM     Post Reply
The economist Thomas Sowell has just released a new book entitled Intellectuals and Race. (Snip) AmSpec: In the book you have a definition of “multiculturalism.” Can you talk about that and its implications? Sowell: The central premise of multiculturalism is that no culture is superior to another. The proponents of this draw conclusions such as it is wrong for school teachers to insist that black kids from the ghetto speak standard English. The idea that no culture is superior is another fact-free premise. If you look at the actual history of any society, they borrow from other societies.

Thomas Sowell and
the Intellectuals
American Spectator, by David Hogberg    Original Article
Posted By: Judy W.- 3/28/2013 12:17:03 PM     Post Reply
The economist Thomas Sowell has just released a new book entitled Intellectuals and Race. The American Spectator sat down with him recently for a lengthy interview. In this first part of the interview, we discuss some of the causes of differences between ethnic groups, and how intellectuals in the early 20th century viewed race versus intellectuals today. (Snip) AmSpec: One of the things that comes across in the book is that it’s possible different racial groups will have different outcomes but those differences may be in no way related to genetics. So, what are the causes of difference?

Eagle Scouts: We’re Being
Bullied by Gay Rights Activists
Townhall, by Todd Starnes    Original Article
Posted By: Judy W.- 3/28/2013 8:08:13 AM     Post Reply
A coalition of Eagle Scouts, Scoutmasters, and parents have launched a new organization vowing to keep sex and politics out of the Boy Scouts of America. “The Boy Scouts are one of the great jewels of American culture,” said John Stemberger, an Eagle Scout and the founder of OnMyHonor.net. Representatives from more than a dozen states gathered in Florida to announce the opposition to any attempt to allow open homosexuality in the BSA. The BSA is expected to offer a proposal that would remove the national rule banning open homosexuality -- and replacing it with a local option.

I Lived Through the
Real ObamaCare
FrontPage Magazine, by Borek Volarik    Original Article
Posted By: Judy W.- 3/26/2013 8:20:47 AM     Post Reply
In the Czechoslovak Socialist Republic all health care was free for everybody! Oh, what a paradise….well, until you actually experienced the “worker’s paradise,” as the communists proudly called it, in real life. (Snip) What do you expect from a dentist on a salary set by the state’s pay scales? How about a really ugly crown and no anesthetics (Novocain was in short supply, distributed by the state to dentists by a system of rations on monthly a basis); well, a small envelope with big money…casually left at the receptionist’s desk, would make miracles.

The Darkness of Earth Hour
FrontPage Magazine, by Daniel Greenfield    Original Article
Posted By: Judy W.- 3/25/2013 12:16:32 PM     Post Reply
Forget the World’s Fair, we now have a new way to celebrate human accomplishment. Instead of seeing a vision of the future, we turn off the lights and sit in the dark for an hour. Earth Hour shows how far we have come from celebrating human accomplishment to celebrating the lack of accomplishment as an accomplishment. For all the pretense of activism, environmentalism celebrates inaction. Don’t build, don’t create and don’t do– are its mandates. (Snip) Kill yourself and save the planet. Put out the lights, tear down the city

Have We Lost America?
Hell No!
Townhall, by Kurt Schlichter    Original Article
Posted By: Judy W.- 3/25/2013 7:43:27 AM     Post Reply
It’s the easiest thing in the world to be a pessimist, and the least American. We’re optimists, and as tough as things are, as many skirmishes as we’ve lost, we haven’t lost this country to the left quite yet. If you had to choose between being them or us, you’d be crazy to choose being them. We’re going to win, and America is going to rise again. Pessimism is a cop-out, an excuse to do nothing and wait for the end instead of figuratively fixing bayonets and charging head-long into the enemy.

Desmond Tutu:
Godfather of Hell
FrontPage Magazine, by Daniel Greenfield    Original Article
Posted By: Judy W.- 3/25/2013 6:46:22 AM     Post Reply
Desmond Tutu has been busy lately. Two weeks ago he wrote an editorial calling for the abolition of nuclear weapons. A week later he joined an international anti-tobacco campaign. Last month he condemned American drones for killing Muslim terrorists. Last summer he denounced a military-themed NBC Reality Show. A grinning and giggling social butterfly, Tutu is always going somewhere and expressing his opinion on something. One minute he’s in Myanmar and the next minute he’s weighing in on Bradley Manning. Wait a little longer and there will be a Tutu column, video or letter on climate change, the death penalty

The Meaning and Consequences
of Israel’s Apology to Turkey
FrontPage Magazine, by Caroline Glick    Original Article
Posted By: Judy W.- 3/25/2013 6:31:00 AM     Post Reply
US President Barack Obama was on the line when Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan to apologize for the deaths of nine Turkish protesters aboard the Turkish ship Mavi Marmara on May 31, 2010. For those who don’t remember, the Mavi Marmara was a Turkish ship that set sail in a bid to break Israel’s lawful maritime blockade of Hamas-controlled Gaza’s coastline. When Israeli naval commandos boarded the ship to interdict it, passengers on deck attacked them – in breach of international maritime law.

The Wine, Women
and Song Foundation
American Thinker, by Clarice Feldman    Original Article
Posted By: Judy W.- 3/24/2013 8:32:31 AM     Post Reply
I have watched over the years how publicly unaccountable foundations have amassed billions of dollars, tax free, and spend it on dangerous, leftwing, often anti-American and anti-Israeli outfits, conferences and promoters. Taxpaying citizens opposed to abortion without restrictions, open borders, balkanization of the country, erosion of their constitutional rights, dumbed down education of their children and environmental extremism are fighting opposition very generously funded by these groups. The irony of this development is that capitalists -- like Ford, Rockefeller, Carnegie, Pew -- who owed their fortunes to American free market policies, started most of these foundations.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



We Are Living in
a Dying Country

92 replie(s)
Rushlimbaugh.com, by Rush Limbaugh    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/5/2013 4:53:10 PM     Post Reply
RUSH: Folks, I don´t know how else to categorize this. We are living in a dying country. I don´t know how else to categorize what´s happening -- 88,000 new jobs. The unemployment rate, because of a terrible statistic, is down to 7.6%. The number of people in this country who are not working is shameful. Ninety million Americans are no longer in the workforce. Ninety million. People not in the labor force grew by 663,000, and now 90 million. That´s the labor force participation rate. This is 1979 levels.

Why Obama´s ´Best-Looking Attorney
General´ Comment Was a Gaffe

62 replie(s)
The Atlantic, by Garance Franke-Ruta    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 6:51:15 AM     Post Reply
President Obama´s biggest gaffe yesterday when speaking of California Attorney General Kamala Harris was not in flirtatiously complimenting her as "the best-looking attorney general," but in introducing an observation from the system of beauty into a forum that was about the system of power.What´s that, you say? Irin Carmon does a great job in Salon in laying out the bounds of propriety for when it´s appropriate to talk about a woman´s looks as a general matter. But I´ve long felt we lack a solid theoretical underpinning for easily discussing these issues, and why precisely it is that

´My bangs are getting
a little irritating´: Michelle
Obama admits she already regrets
her high-maintenance hairdo

46 replie(s)
Daily Mail (UK), by Margot Peppers    Original Article
Posted By: pineledger- 4/7/2013 7:43:42 AM     Post Reply
Michelle Obama has admitted that she is already tired of the bangs she first sported in January. The First Lady said in an interview with Entertainment Tonight: ´Bangs are a day-by-day proposition. They´re starting to grow out, get a little irritating.´ Still, she hasn´t let her hairdo woes get her down. ´It´s okay,´ she said after her initial complaint. ´We´ll be good.´ The first indication that her hairstyle was becoming a burden came about last weekend, when Malia, 14, was spotted adjusting her mother´s hair during the White House Easter Egg Roll.

We are living in a dying country (Thread 2)
43 replie(s)
Rushlimbaugh.com, by Rush Limbaugh    Original Article
Posted By: LComStaff- 4/7/2013 6:49:54 AM     Post Reply
This is the second thread of an article posted yesterday which can be found here:http://lucianne.com/thread/?artnum=730032

Hillary Clinton Would Not
´Clear the Field´ for 2016

41 replie(s)
New Republic, by Tod Lindberg    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/6/2013 5:22:36 AM     Post Reply
No one is more preoccupied these days with Hillary Clinton´s 2016 plans than the Beltway political class—not even the former presidential candidate herself. To hear some tell it, her decision will be dispositive for all other Democrats thinking of entering the race. And pundits and reporters aren´t the only ones positing the "The Hillary Factor": No less than the House Democratic whip, Steny Hoyer, told BuzzFeed, “I don´t know that anybody would run against Hillary…. If she runs, she clears the field.” It´s an understandable conclusion, given Clinton´s stature in the Democratic Party and her 70 percent

Obama critic apologizes for
his ´poorly chosen words´
on gay marriage

41 replie(s)
The Hill [Washington DC], by Alexandra Jaffe    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/6/2013 12:18:19 PM     Post Reply
Neurosurgeon Ben Carson, considered by some to be a potential Republican contender for president, apologized to Johns Hopkins University for the "poorly chosen words" he used in expressing his opposition to gay marriage last month.“I am sorry for any embarrassment this has caused,” Carson said in the letter, reported in New York Magazine.(Snip) "Although I do believe marriage is between a man and a woman, there are much less offensive ways to make that point. I hope all will look at a lifetime of service over some poorly chosen words.” Carson will remain as commencement speaker at Johns Hopkins,

Hillary Clinton: The clock is turning
back for women in America

38 replie(s)
Washington Examiner, by Charlie Spiering    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/5/2013 3:25:20 PM     Post Reply
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton explained to the Women in the World summit in New York today that the clock is turning back for women in America. Clinton praised her own mother for helping empower her to success and marveled at the opportunities that her own daughter Chelsea has pursued. But Clinton warned that there is still so much to do to promote women´s rights in America. "As I look at all these young women that I am privileged to work with, or know through Chelsea, and its hard to imagine turning the clock on them," Clinton said.

White House Blames Jobs
Numbers on Sequester

36 replie(s)
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Wynton Hall    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/5/2013 8:02:58 PM     Post Reply
The Obama White House is scrambling to blame Friday’s abysmal March jobs numbers on the sequester’s trimming of the rate of growth in federal budgets that have yet to fully commence. After the Labor Department announced that a mass exodus of 663,000 workers left the U.S. workforce last month and that job creation fell 112,000 jobs short of projections, Obama’s top economic adviser Alan B. Krueger, took to the White House blog to blame the sequester: It is important to bear in mind that the March household and payroll surveys are the first monthly surveys to look

Mother Of Slain Benghazi
Officer To Sean Hannity:
‘They Want Me To Shut Up’

34 replie(s)
Mediaite, by A.J. Delgado    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 5:00:16 AM     Post Reply
On Friday, Sean Hannity brought Pat Smith, mother of the late Sean Smith, on his radio program. The 34-year-old information management officer was one of four Americans murdered in the Benghazi embassy attack on September 11, 2012. In the chilling interview, a distraught Ms. Smith, in tears, pleaded for answers and spoke of the efforts to silence her. Ms. Smith first relayed how her son, prior to the attack, requested additional security in advance and warned the State Department: He did tell them, ahead of time, he typed it into his little typewriter over there,

Trayvon Martin´s parents
settle wrongful death claim

32 replie(s)
Orlando Sentinel, by Rene Stutzman    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/5/2013 3:15:25 PM     Post Reply
SANFORD - Trayvon Martin´s parents have settled a wrongful death claim for an amount believed to be more than $1 million against the homeowners association of the Sanford subdivision where their teenage son was killed. Their attorney, Benjamin Crump, filed that paperwork at the Seminole County Courthouse, a portion of which was made public today. In the five pages of the settlement that were available for public review, the settlement amount had been marked out. Lower in the agreement, the parties specified that they would keep that amount confidential. When asked during an earlier interview whether the amount was

Beyonce, Jay-Z celebrate 5th
anniversary in Havana, Cuba

32 replie(s)
Los Angeles Times, by Nardine Saad    Original Article
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 4/6/2013 8:20:04 AM     Post Reply
Beyonce and Jay-Z celebrated their fifth wedding anniversary in Cuba this week. The couple, who married on April 4, 2008, took in the sights of Old Havana, visited a school, dined on a rooftop terrace and strolled the fan-filled streets in their island best.(snip).The power couple declined to answer journalists´ questions about their visit to the island nation, but some outlets are reporting that the moguls are there as tourists, though that would be illegal because of the half-century embargo the U.S. has on the Communist country. However, the Miami Herald said Washington has issued special licenses for

Obama Budget to Cap Retirement
Accounts at $3 Million

30 replie(s)
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Tony Lee    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/5/2013 9:40:39 PM     Post Reply
The budget President Barack Obama will submit on April 10 will contain a proposal that would prohibit individuals from accumulating more than $3 million in Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs) and tax-preferred retirement accounts. According to a White House statement, the Obama administration believes the current rules allow some wealthy individuals "to accumulate many millions of dollars in these accounts, substantially more than is needed to fund reasonable levels of retirement saving." "The budget would limit an individual’s total balance across tax-preferred accounts to an amount sufficient to finance an annuity of not more than $205,000 per


Post Reply   Close thread 720286





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password

© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

FS