A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy

































   
 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


White House now requires ‘We the
People’ petitions to have 100,000
signatures for official response

Daily Caller, by Neil Munro

Original Article

Posted By:philsner, 1/16/2013 9:35:32 AM

President Barack Obama’s deputies have quadrupled the number of signatures that petitioners on the administration’s “We the People” website must collect to get an official response from the White House, following a series of popular, provocative and disrespectful signature drives by his critics. Some of the petitions sought approval for states to secede after Obama’s re-election, while others called on the White House to disavow executive orders that restrict gun rights, or to deport CNN’s British-born, progressive host Piers Morgan.

Comments:
How long before this is gone completely?

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Keekng, 1/16/2013 9:39:47 AM     (No. 9119612)

It is so unpleasant when the peasants become boisterous and expect the leaders to lead.


Reply 2 - Posted by: mitzi, 1/16/2013 9:40:45 AM     (No. 9119617)

If Snow White, Mickey Mouse and Elmer Fudd can register as Democrats and vote, they should certainly be qualified to sign "We the People" petitions. No? /s


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: LudicrousSextus, 1/16/2013 9:42:42 AM     (No. 9119624)

Wonder how many signatures it takes to start impeachment proceedings?


Reply 4 - Posted by: Attercliffe, 1/16/2013 9:46:49 AM     (No. 9119634)

Okay. Let´s raise ´em 25k. Don´t take 5,000 to a 100,000 fight.


Reply 5 - Posted by: TOOTALL, 1/16/2013 9:54:23 AM     (No. 9119657)

Up to this point I´ve been just watching these petitions with interest. Looks like I´m going to have to start signing some of them since they´ve upped the ante!


Reply 6 - Posted by: MrYules, 1/16/2013 9:59:08 AM     (No. 9119671)

This "administration" doesn´t listen to the American People anyway. The website is for show, and to monitor the frustration of the People.



Reply 7 - Posted by: RightShoe, 1/16/2013 10:06:42 AM     (No. 9119695)

Considering the value of an "official response" this change is meaningless.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: yuban, 1/16/2013 10:14:40 AM     (No. 9119718)

Nothin´ from nothin´ leaves nothin´


Reply 9 - Posted by: ocjim, 1/16/2013 10:21:22 AM     (No. 9119742)

´´We the People´´ website always was just more disingenuous Obama blather. We don´t need no stinkin´ petitions. The Obama regime does not address problems, anyway... They handle them, and would would appreciate it if we would all just shut up and sit down.


Reply 10 - Posted by: MisterDickens, 1/16/2013 10:24:28 AM     (No. 9119747)

#7 got to the point very nicely.


Reply 11 - Posted by: snowoutlaw, 1/16/2013 10:25:04 AM     (No. 9119751)

The number has nothing to do with it. Has to be from the correct color or cult. Also has to be anti-Americian.


Reply 12 - Posted by: ramona, 1/16/2013 10:25:31 AM     (No. 9119754)

I won´t send email to any DNC/White House site as I don´t want to be on their lists.
Ramona (the Pest)


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: Safari Man, 1/16/2013 10:35:17 AM     (No. 9119784)

#6 is correct and this whole thing is purely symbolic. The WH wants free speech when it benefits them, but they will put up barriers if they don´t like what they are hearing.

Nonetheless, the existence of this thing did allow the secession story to get quite a bit of media coverage. The left-wing media couched it in terms of right wing wackos, but many people on our side were awakened to the notion of how beneficial it would be to get a divorce from the 50% of the country that is destroying 100% of the country.


Reply 14 - Posted by: tangerinedream, 1/16/2013 10:36:47 AM     (No. 9119792)

#8 got to the point very nicely as well.


Reply 15 - Posted by: mickturn, 1/16/2013 10:37:46 AM     (No. 9119799)

Go read some of them...

We the people is a sham just like everything else this administration sets up.


Reply 16 - Posted by: nimby, 1/16/2013 11:15:44 AM     (No. 9119907)

Moving the goal post, eh?


Reply 17 - Posted by: pineledger, 1/16/2013 11:16:36 AM     (No. 9119912)

I do not recognize this country.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: zephyrgirl, 1/16/2013 11:21:39 AM     (No. 9119926)

I´m guessing the one proposing to make the White House a gun-free zone tipped them over the edge. The last time I checked, it was fast approaching 25,000 signatures.


Reply 19 - Posted by: nonsense, 1/16/2013 2:34:37 PM     (No. 9120439)

You mean to tell me that not one person among the 101 people that Mr. o hires daily can handle the traffic of the "We the People" petition web site?

Not a very efficient manager is he?


Reply 20 - Posted by: judy, 1/16/2013 3:13:18 PM     (No. 9120532)

Maybe someone will hire acorn...they good with names...fake names...



Post Reply   Close thread 719227




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "philsner"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "philsner"



White House now requires ‘We the
People’ petitions to have 100,000
signatures for official response
Daily Caller, by Neil Munro    Original Article
Posted By: philsner- 1/16/2013 9:35:32 AM     Post Reply
President Barack Obama’s deputies have quadrupled the number of signatures that petitioners on the administration’s “We the People” website must collect to get an official response from the White House, following a series of popular, provocative and disrespectful signature drives by his critics. Some of the petitions sought approval for states to secede after Obama’s re-election, while others called on the White House to disavow executive orders that restrict gun rights, or to deport CNN’s British-born, progressive host Piers Morgan.

   

 



 


Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



We are living in a dying country (Thread 2)
72 replie(s)
Rushlimbaugh.com, by Rush Limbaugh    Original Article
Posted By: LComStaff- 4/7/2013 6:49:54 AM     Post Reply
This is the second thread of an article posted yesterday which can be found here:http://lucianne.com/thread/?artnum=730032

´My bangs are getting
a little irritating´: Michelle
Obama admits she already regrets
her high-maintenance hairdo

65 replie(s)
Daily Mail (UK), by Margot Peppers    Original Article
Posted By: pineledger- 4/7/2013 7:43:42 AM     Post Reply
Michelle Obama has admitted that she is already tired of the bangs she first sported in January. The First Lady said in an interview with Entertainment Tonight: ´Bangs are a day-by-day proposition. They´re starting to grow out, get a little irritating.´ Still, she hasn´t let her hairdo woes get her down. ´It´s okay,´ she said after her initial complaint. ´We´ll be good.´ The first indication that her hairstyle was becoming a burden came about last weekend, when Malia, 14, was spotted adjusting her mother´s hair during the White House Easter Egg Roll.

McCain: ´I don´t understand´
GOP filibuster on guns

65 replie(s)
Politico, by Jennifer Epstein    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/7/2013 12:18:14 PM     Post Reply
Sen. John McCain says he doesn´t understand the threats from some of his Republican colleagues to filibuster a bill on background checks to buy guns. "I don´t understand it," the Arizona Republican said on Sunday of the threat coming from Sen. Rand Paul,Sen. Ted Cruz, Sen. Mike Lee and nine other Republicans. "The purpose of the United States Senate is to debate and to vote and to let the people know where we stand.” "What are we afraid of? ... If this issue is as important as we all think it is, why not take ... it up and debate?"

Why Obama´s ´Best-Looking Attorney
General´ Comment Was a Gaffe

62 replie(s)
The Atlantic, by Garance Franke-Ruta    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 6:51:15 AM     Post Reply
President Obama´s biggest gaffe yesterday when speaking of California Attorney General Kamala Harris was not in flirtatiously complimenting her as "the best-looking attorney general," but in introducing an observation from the system of beauty into a forum that was about the system of power.What´s that, you say? Irin Carmon does a great job in Salon in laying out the bounds of propriety for when it´s appropriate to talk about a woman´s looks as a general matter. But I´ve long felt we lack a solid theoretical underpinning for easily discussing these issues, and why precisely it is that

Christians, here´s why we´re
losing our religion

47 replie(s)
Fox News, by Craig Groeschel    Original Article
Posted By: STLstudent- 4/7/2013 5:13:55 PM     Post Reply
Recent research indicates that the number of people who do not consider themselves a part of an organized religion is steadily on the rise. Interestingly enough, though the number of those religiously unaffiliated is increasing, there is little to no trend in the number of those who express atheist or agnostic beliefs. People aren’t saying they don’t believe in God. They’re saying they don’t believe in religion. They are not rejecting Christ. They are rejecting the church. This begs the question, “Why are we losing our religion?”

Broadcasters worry
about ´Zero TV´ homes

45 replie(s)
Associated Press, by Ryan Nakashima    Original Article
Posted By: Ribicon- 4/7/2013 2:43:40 PM     Post Reply
Los Angeles — Some people have had it with TV. They´ve had enough of the 100-plus channel universe. They don´t like timing their lives around network show schedules. They´re tired of $100-plus monthly bills. A growing number of them have stopped paying for cable and satellite TV service, and don´t even use an antenna to get free signals over the air. (Snip) Last month, the Nielsen Co. started labeling people in this group "Zero TV" households, because they fall outside the traditional definition of a TV home. There are 5 million of these residences in the U.S., up from

Mother Of Slain Benghazi
Officer To Sean Hannity:
‘They Want Me To Shut Up’

44 replie(s)
Mediaite, by A.J. Delgado    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/7/2013 5:00:16 AM     Post Reply
On Friday, Sean Hannity brought Pat Smith, mother of the late Sean Smith, on his radio program. The 34-year-old information management officer was one of four Americans murdered in the Benghazi embassy attack on September 11, 2012. In the chilling interview, a distraught Ms. Smith, in tears, pleaded for answers and spoke of the efforts to silence her. Ms. Smith first relayed how her son, prior to the attack, requested additional security in advance and warned the State Department: He did tell them, ahead of time, he typed it into his little typewriter over there,

Vanishing workforce
weighs on growth

42 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Jim Tankersley    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/6/2013 11:28:59 PM     Post Reply
Put out an all-points bulletin: Millions of Americans have gone missing from the workforce. Every month that those would-be workers are gone raises the odds that they might never come back, dimming the prospects for future economic growth. The vanishing trend is more than a decade old, but it accelerated during the Great Recession. Throughout 2012, economists held out hope that it had stopped. But then came Friday’s jobs report, and hopes were dashed. The Labor Department reported that the U.S. labor force — everyone who has a job or is looking for one — shrank

Hillary Clinton Would Not
´Clear the Field´ for 2016

41 replie(s)
New Republic, by Tod Lindberg    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/6/2013 5:22:36 AM     Post Reply
No one is more preoccupied these days with Hillary Clinton´s 2016 plans than the Beltway political class—not even the former presidential candidate herself. To hear some tell it, her decision will be dispositive for all other Democrats thinking of entering the race. And pundits and reporters aren´t the only ones positing the "The Hillary Factor": No less than the House Democratic whip, Steny Hoyer, told BuzzFeed, “I don´t know that anybody would run against Hillary…. If she runs, she clears the field.” It´s an understandable conclusion, given Clinton´s stature in the Democratic Party and her 70 percent

Obama critic apologizes for
his ´poorly chosen words´
on gay marriage

41 replie(s)
The Hill [Washington DC], by Alexandra Jaffe    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/6/2013 12:18:19 PM     Post Reply
Neurosurgeon Ben Carson, considered by some to be a potential Republican contender for president, apologized to Johns Hopkins University for the "poorly chosen words" he used in expressing his opposition to gay marriage last month.“I am sorry for any embarrassment this has caused,” Carson said in the letter, reported in New York Magazine.(Snip) "Although I do believe marriage is between a man and a woman, there are much less offensive ways to make that point. I hope all will look at a lifetime of service over some poorly chosen words.” Carson will remain as commencement speaker at Johns Hopkins,

The Secrets of Princeton
40 replie(s)
New York Times, by Ross Douthat    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/7/2013 8:08:09 AM     Post Reply
Susan Patton, the Princeton alumna who became famous for her letter urging Ivy League women to use their college years to find a mate, has been denounced as a traitor to feminism, to coeducation, to the university ideal. But really she’s something much more interesting: a traitor to her class. Her betrayal consists of being gauche enough to acknowledge publicly a truth that everyone who’s come up through Ivy League culture knows intuitively —

Beyonce, Jay-Z celebrate 5th
anniversary in Havana, Cuba

32 replie(s)
Los Angeles Times, by Nardine Saad    Original Article
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 4/6/2013 8:20:04 AM     Post Reply
Beyonce and Jay-Z celebrated their fifth wedding anniversary in Cuba this week. The couple, who married on April 4, 2008, took in the sights of Old Havana, visited a school, dined on a rooftop terrace and strolled the fan-filled streets in their island best.(snip).The power couple declined to answer journalists´ questions about their visit to the island nation, but some outlets are reporting that the moguls are there as tourists, though that would be illegal because of the half-century embargo the U.S. has on the Communist country. However, the Miami Herald said Washington has issued special licenses for

   

Post Reply   Close thread 719227





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password

© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

FS